You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #19: no you aren't at all for exercising 1st amendment rights [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. no you aren't at all for exercising 1st amendment rights
if you are calling for his arrest for his obviously legal speech

he wasn't inciting jacksquat.

and you clearly haven't read the case law surrounding the 1st amendment.

start with schenck, move on to brandenberg (which superseded it and is currently law of the land) and you will see that what did is no different than what any # of people on the left and right have done legally for decades.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Politics or sedition? Rush Limbaugh calls for military coup L. Coyote  Nov-28-09 12:32 AM   #0 
  - I don't think wishing something would happen meets the level necessary for prosecution.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 12:36 AM   #1 
  - It really doesn't. But repeating it over and over normalizes the thought.  EFerrari   Nov-28-09 12:41 AM   #2 
  - True.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 12:46 AM   #3 
  - Yep. I don't know about the ethics of using public airwaves  EFerrari   Nov-28-09 01:07 AM   #9 
  - There you go again,  bleever   Nov-28-09 01:21 AM   #20 
  - Happy TG Day, bleever!  EFerrari   Nov-28-09 01:32 AM   #36 
     - And to you too.  bleever   Nov-28-09 01:46 AM   #52 
  - Of course, Rush is force fed to the troops via  tblue37   Nov-28-09 06:03 AM   #82 
     - Maybe "valorized" is a better word. Ug -- lee.  EFerrari   Nov-28-09 10:59 AM   #89 
     - Do thye force feed that fact that he is a chickenhawk?  jasi2006   Nov-29-09 01:08 AM   #208 
  - WHY ARE SOME DEFENDING THUGS  HowHasItComeToThis   Nov-28-09 01:27 AM   #27 
     - Why are some "who" defending thugs?  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 01:31 AM   #32 
     - Because "Ignored" is one of them?  Lorien   Nov-28-09 06:10 PM   #117 
        - People, people. YOU CAN'T ALERT ON IGNORED POSTS! How do you think RW trolls get to survive so long?  Commie Pinko Dirtbag   Nov-28-09 09:35 PM   #193 
  - ^^^exactally  WhaTHellsgoingonhere   Nov-28-09 12:49 PM   #100 
  - The term "wishing" refers to a silent mental activity --  iamtechus   Nov-28-09 01:04 AM   #8 
  - The article referred to it as expressed hope. It does stretch his words to say he is urging anyone.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 01:13 AM   #10 
  - two words:  paulsby   Nov-28-09 01:17 AM   #13 
     - "It held that government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless it is directed to  bleever   Nov-28-09 01:24 AM   #23 
        - there are three triggers  paulsby   Nov-28-09 01:36 AM   #40 
           - Brandenberg is not the relevant case law here.  mix   Nov-28-09 12:20 PM   #98 
              - So you believe a military coup is imminent specifically because of limbaugh's hope?  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 07:33 PM   #138 
                 - Limbaugh is trying to incite violence, trawling for assassins--military or otherwise--  mix   Nov-28-09 07:45 PM   #146 
                    - Let's see the quote in which he specifically calls for violence against our President?  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 07:47 PM   #148 
                       - To "detain" the President  mix   Nov-28-09 08:19 PM   #161 
                          - Except he didn't call for it he said he hoped it would happen. Protected by Brandenburg and Yates.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 08:23 PM   #162 
                             - I would call that "advocacy." See the original law. nt  mix   Nov-28-09 08:43 PM   #169 
                                - Even if you call it advocacy, SCOTUS ruled in Yates that such advocacy was specifically permitted.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 08:45 PM   #171 
                                   - show us nt  mix   Nov-28-09 08:56 PM   #175 
                                      - SCOTUS ruled that the Smith Act did not prohibit advocacy of forcible overthrow of the government"  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 09:01 PM   #178 
  - nice to see the anti-1st amendment brigade is kickin'  paulsby   Nov-28-09 01:16 AM   #12 
  - I am WISHING that one of Jabba the Rush's fans would watch "Talk Radio"  Cheap_Trick   Nov-28-09 11:27 PM   #204 
  - I am WISHING that god would "take him home". Maybe the sorry piece of shit will have  bertman   Nov-29-09 12:16 AM   #205 
  - Unless it is done against bush* or another republican?  me b zola   Nov-28-09 01:15 AM   #11 
  - Who was charged with sedition when bush was in office?  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 01:25 AM   #24 
     - i agree. it's frigging amazing  paulsby   Nov-28-09 01:54 AM   #63 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-28-09 03:04 AM   #78 
           - if defending the 1st amendment means i hate democratic values  paulsby   Nov-28-09 03:59 AM   #79 
  - Sure it does.  mix   Nov-28-09 11:10 AM   #90 
     - Sorry you are wrong, see Brandenburg v. Ohio.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 07:13 PM   #131 
        - wrong case law nt  mix   Nov-28-09 07:29 PM   #134 
           - In what way does it not apply?  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 07:31 PM   #136 
              - figure that one out on your own nt  mix   Nov-28-09 07:33 PM   #137 
                 - No need, Brandenburg V. Ohio is clearly the applicable case law. Thanks for your input though.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 07:40 PM   #142 
                 - Yates vs. United States even says Limbaugh is protected. Link included.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 07:51 PM   #149 
                 - you might want to read it more closely nt  mix   Nov-28-09 07:55 PM   #153 
                    - SCOTUS ruled that the Smith Act did not prohibit advocacy of forcible overthrow of the government"  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 07:58 PM   #156 
                 - I'm not a lawyer and just want the low-down  caraher   Nov-28-09 07:57 PM   #155 
                    - 1st Amendment Law is less relevant here than  mix   Nov-28-09 08:13 PM   #159 
                       - Yates specifically permits such advocacy. Although hoping something happens isn't advocating much.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 08:26 PM   #163 
                       - Thanks  caraher   Nov-28-09 08:31 PM   #166 
  - Time to get this treasonous bastard off the air and in prison.  Initech   Nov-28-09 12:50 AM   #4 
  - ah, the anti-1st amendment brigade  paulsby   Nov-28-09 01:17 AM   #14 
     - Hey I'm all for exercising 1st amendment rights.  Initech   Nov-28-09 01:19 AM   #17 
     - no you aren't at all for exercising 1st amendment rights  paulsby   Nov-28-09 01:21 AM   #19 
        - Legal free speech ends when you incite riots like yelling  Cleita   Nov-28-09 01:27 AM   #26 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-28-09 01:29 AM   #30 
        - Oh you are too much.  Cleita   Nov-28-09 01:39 AM   #41 
        - You think someone should go to jail for being anti-American?  fishwax   Nov-28-09 01:41 AM   #44 
        - I certainly would go if I tried to get somebody to overthrow the government.  Cleita   Nov-28-09 01:45 AM   #49 
           - no, you wouldn't go anywhere except  paulsby   Nov-28-09 01:49 AM   #58 
           - Are you his lawyer or something?  Cleita   Nov-28-09 01:53 AM   #62 
              - i'm just somebody that believes in civil rights  paulsby   Nov-28-09 01:55 AM   #64 
                 - How about my civil rights and my free speech?  Cleita   Nov-28-09 02:09 AM   #68 
                    - What name did he call you?  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 02:20 AM   #72 
                    - that's rubbish  paulsby   Nov-28-09 02:41 AM   #75 
                    - You have civil rights and free speech  metalbot   Nov-28-09 06:03 PM   #115 
           - well, that's not exactly equivalent  fishwax   Nov-28-09 01:52 AM   #61 
              - it's also not illegal to say what limbaugh said  paulsby   Nov-28-09 02:46 AM   #77 
        - lol, you sound like a fundamentalist trying to get prayer into school  paulsby   Nov-28-09 01:42 AM   # 
           - I would certainly be militant if Rush Limbaugh was played to children in  Cleita   Nov-28-09 01:46 AM   #50 
              - that wasn't the issue  paulsby   Nov-28-09 01:47 AM   #55 
        - To suggest that the military should "detain" the President is  mix   Nov-28-09 11:34 AM   #94 
        - Exactly. It's like yelling fire in a crowded auditorium.  Initech   Nov-28-09 02:11 AM   #69 
        - wrong both as to the first amendment and to the constitutional definition of treason  onenote   Nov-28-09 04:04 PM   #110 
        - Doesn't a riot have to happen before you could possibly be indicted for inciting one?  cherokeeprogressive   Nov-28-09 07:36 PM   #139 
        - Baloney  skepticscott   Nov-28-09 09:21 PM   #189 
        - What is treason?  JDPriestly   Nov-28-09 10:18 PM   #198 
        - You apparently aren't aware of the danger this exhibits.  Initech   Nov-28-09 02:16 AM   #71 
           - Are you resorting to a comic book reference? Really?  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 02:26 AM   #74 
     - Inciting the rabble who listens to him to commit treason has nothing  Cleita   Nov-28-09 01:22 AM   #21 
     - your use of the word incitement  paulsby   Nov-28-09 01:25 AM   #25 
     - BS. I know incitement when I hear it. Limbaugh always says something  Cleita   Nov-28-09 01:28 AM   #28 
        - you can call it incitement  paulsby   Nov-28-09 01:32 AM   #34 
     - I see we have a defender of a traitor here  fascisthunter   Nov-28-09 01:10 PM   #102 
        - defending the first amendment hardly makes one an apologist  onenote   Nov-28-09 04:08 PM   #111 
        - You need to read your Constitution  hack89   Nov-28-09 06:49 PM   #123 
     - Weigh the options.  mix   Nov-28-09 11:23 AM   #91 
        - so when I was marching in the streets against the vietnam war talking about revolution  onenote   Nov-28-09 04:18 PM   #113 
           - Read the law.  mix   Nov-28-09 06:51 PM   #124 
              - SCOTUS has ruled in both Yates and Brandenburg that you are incorrect.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 07:53 PM   #150 
  - Still snortin' that Hillbilly Heroin Rushbo?  Submariner   Nov-28-09 12:50 AM   #5 
  - He's not on drugs. Never met a fat junkie.  lysosome   Nov-28-09 01:41 AM   #43 
  - I think the Fort Hood shooting pretty much nixes that idea n/t  951-Riverside   Nov-28-09 12:52 AM   #6 
  - No military coup is a good thing, even if it had been done  Cleita   Nov-28-09 12:59 AM   #7 
  - another anti 1st amendment brigade post  paulsby   Nov-28-09 01:18 AM   #15 
     - The first amendment has nothing to do with suggesting that the military  Cleita   Nov-28-09 01:20 AM   #18 
        - brandenberg standard  paulsby   Nov-28-09 01:24 AM   #22 
        - You are using the First Amendment to justify overthrowing our government.  Cleita   Nov-28-09 01:31 AM   #31 
           - Suggestion. You have just admitted it wasn't incitement.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 01:32 AM   #35 
           - no, it's not  paulsby   Nov-28-09 01:34 AM   #39 
              - You can't even use proper punctuation and you are trying to impress  Cleita   Nov-28-09 01:40 AM   #42 
                 - trying to impress an authoritarian like you  paulsby   Nov-28-09 01:46 AM   #51 
                    - Why don't you and your ilk like use punctuation?  Cleita   Nov-28-09 01:52 AM   #60 
                       - my ilk is too busy opposing  paulsby   Nov-28-09 01:57 AM   #65 
                          - You have no understanding of the Constitution or federal law.  mix   Nov-28-09 03:52 PM   #109 
                             - how does the marine oath make what rush said illegal?  onenote   Nov-28-09 04:15 PM   #112 
                             - It doesn't.  mix   Nov-28-09 06:55 PM   #127 
                             - Both Limpballs' statements  billh58   Nov-28-09 08:12 PM   #158 
                                - His "hopes" are clearly protected, see Yates and Brandenburg.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 08:37 PM   #168 
                                   - Yep, but  billh58   Nov-28-09 09:02 PM   #179 
                                      - If a West Point grad ever tries to overthrow the Obama admin, Limbaugh may be in trouble.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 09:04 PM   #181 
                             - He didn't publicly call for anything of the sort. That's the problem.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 07:42 PM   #143 
        - Care to cite case law that supports your drivel?  Tejas   Nov-28-09 01:42 AM   #45 
           - Surely you are joking. I would put a bullet to my head if I had to listen  Cleita   Nov-28-09 01:57 AM   #66 
  - shouldn't he at the very least be booted off of armed forces radio...?  dysfunctional press   Nov-28-09 01:19 AM   #16 
  - THUGS ARE A DISEASE  HowHasItComeToThis   Nov-28-09 01:28 AM   #29 
  - Those "THUGS" have protections under the Constitution like everyone else.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 01:33 AM   #37 
     - False.  mix   Nov-28-09 11:43 AM   #95 
        - As has been stated here over and over limbaughs language doesn't meet cross the line.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 05:52 PM   #114 
        - it goes over the line nt  mix   Nov-28-09 06:52 PM   #126 
           - I advise you call the FBI and Secret Service and tell them your opinion.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 07:03 PM   #128 
        - The Supreme Court has ruled differently in Brandenburg v. Ohio.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 07:11 PM   #130 
           - wrong case law nt  mix   Nov-28-09 07:17 PM   #132 
              - SCOTUS has ruled in both Yates and Brandenburg that you are incorrect.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 07:53 PM   #151 
                 - prove it nt  mix   Nov-28-09 07:56 PM   #154 
                    - SCOTUS ruled that the Smith Act did not prohibit advocacy of forcible overthrow of the government"  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 08:00 PM   #157 
                    - The First Amendment  billh58   Nov-28-09 09:45 PM   #195 
                       - Advocating the overthrow of the government  mix   Nov-28-09 09:55 PM   #196 
                          - All you have said is  billh58   Nov-28-09 10:13 PM   #197 
  - at least!!!!! nt  Tumbulu   Nov-28-09 01:47 AM   #54 
  - He "hopes" Obama will be detained by the military.  bleever   Nov-28-09 01:31 AM   #33 
  - Nope.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 01:34 AM   #38 
  - What's missing? n/t  bleever   Nov-28-09 01:44 AM   #48 
     - Do you think it is likely to cause the military to try and stage a coup?  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 01:48 AM   #56 
        - Is it likely to incite it?  bleever   Nov-28-09 02:00 AM   #67 
           - Do you think that a military coup is imminent?  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 02:15 AM   #70 
           - SARCASM - so when do we haul him to the detention camps?  bikingaz   Nov-28-09 01:04 PM   #101 
  - It is, but his apologists say he isn't meeting the Brandenburg standard.  Cleita   Nov-28-09 01:43 AM   #47 
     - The law is the law. Your suggestion would be wise, don't pay attention to him.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 01:46 AM   #53 
  - Another instance of Negativity......Rush is Rash...wrong for so long means EVIL  opihimoimoi   Nov-28-09 01:42 AM   #46 
  - Fortunately, as much as he yacks, no one actually bothers to...  TreasonousBastard   Nov-28-09 01:48 AM   #57 
  - Limbaugh was for Gore in 2000 and Kerry in 2004?  Fumesucker   Nov-28-09 06:08 AM   #83 
  - limbaugh has been the most potent political force last 20 yrs  certainot   Nov-28-09 01:36 PM   #106 
     - If you support Limpballs  billh58   Nov-28-09 08:16 PM   #160 
        - talk radio's why we're in iraq, why the GOP is doomed, why we're not talking single payer  certainot   Nov-28-09 08:28 PM   #165 
           - Sorry for the  billh58   Nov-28-09 08:57 PM   #176 
              - exactly  certainot   Nov-29-09 02:51 AM   #210 
                 - I'm not sure what your  billh58   Nov-29-09 12:47 PM   #213 
                    - they have the biggest soapbox and they shout over you every day  certainot   Nov-29-09 02:17 PM   #214 
                       - Meh...  billh58   Nov-29-09 02:27 PM   #215 
                          - i never said a year- get your asses straight  certainot   Nov-29-09 04:11 PM   #217 
                             - Wow!  billh58   Nov-29-09 04:30 PM   #218 
                                - about time!  certainot   Nov-29-09 04:35 PM   #219 
                                - my point is  certainot   Nov-29-09 04:51 PM   #220 
  - He should be removed from public airwaves  Tumbulu   Nov-28-09 01:50 AM   #59 
  - It bears mention here that armed forces radio carries Limbaugh.  burning rain   Nov-28-09 02:24 AM   #73 
  - +1  JVS   Nov-28-09 04:00 AM   #80 
  - If you believe it to be a problem  Sherman A1   Nov-28-09 02:41 AM   #76 
  - Wow, after reading a lot of these posts I realize that authoritarianism is alive and well on DU.  proteus_lives   Nov-28-09 04:28 AM   #81 
  - And by what they get annoyed about shall ye know them. -nt  Commie Pinko Dirtbag   Nov-28-09 09:40 PM   #194 
  - I think where Rush fucked up, is when he got off of the pain killers  Hubert Flottz   Nov-28-09 06:15 AM   #84 
  - Limbaugh should  Enthusiast   Nov-28-09 06:27 AM   #85 
  - I'm sure AFRTN didn't put in a disclaimer...  BlueCollar   Nov-28-09 06:55 AM   #86 
  - As long as you are willing to put your fat ass in the front line, Rush!  DailyGrind51   Nov-28-09 06:57 AM   #87 
  - No, only leftists are ever prosecuted for sedition;  StarfarerBill   Nov-28-09 08:30 AM   #88 
  - Note to Rush:  FarLeftFist   Nov-28-09 11:25 AM   #92 
  - He should be taken off Armed Forces Radio at the very least  Kingofalldems   Nov-28-09 11:30 AM   #93 
  - YES  L. Coyote   Nov-28-09 11:56 AM   #97 
  - He should be kicked off Armed Services Radio at the very LEAST.  blm   Nov-28-09 11:46 AM   #96 
  - The Secret Service needs to have a little chat with OxyRush  Kievan Rus   Nov-28-09 12:45 PM   #99 
  - nazi boy wants his brand of nazism to take over the country?  fascisthunter   Nov-28-09 01:13 PM   #103 
  - When does a political joke become sedition? Oh, I dunno, when they put a noose around your neck...  bridgit   Nov-28-09 01:13 PM   #104 
  - Not free speech protected. Calling for a Military coup is a threat on the President.  berni_mccoy   Nov-28-09 01:15 PM   #105 
  - 'obama's head needs to roll' said limbaugh sept 10, 2008 second hour  certainot   Nov-28-09 01:39 PM   #107 
  - yes, Mike Malloy, Amy Goodman, Rachel and KO  newspeak   Nov-28-09 02:57 PM   #108 
  - Brandenburg standard's pretty damn vague.  BreweryYardRat   Nov-28-09 06:07 PM   #116 
  - Can you imagine what would have happened to any Democrat had they  Lorien   Nov-28-09 06:15 PM   #118 
  - Reminds me of a Famous Henry II Quote  malletgirl02   Nov-28-09 06:31 PM   #120 
  - All kinds of people said it and wrote it about Bush. How many of them were imprisoned?  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 07:04 PM   #129 
  - Man--you seem to be a big fan of Rush  Kingofalldems   Nov-28-09 07:19 PM   #133 
  - Your reading comprehension sucks. I'll defend the Constitution regardless, you don't have to.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 07:29 PM   #135 
     - Rush will not be arrested and you know it  Kingofalldems   Nov-28-09 07:36 PM   #140 
     - I love our nice big tent.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 07:39 PM   #141 
        - He called for a coup-- publicly  Kingofalldems   Nov-28-09 07:43 PM   #145 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-28-09 07:46 PM   #147 
           - I'll need to see that quote. His speech is protected. I have no idea who decides what's on AFR.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 10:32 PM   #200 
     - No. Not regardless. Only for right wingers. These are the only people you jump out on behalf of.  Commie Pinko Dirtbag   Nov-28-09 09:01 PM   #177 
        - Who was the last dem that openly hoped for the overthrow of a Repub admin?  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 09:03 PM   #180 
           - Well, since you replied with a non sequitur, it seems I'm not wrong.  Commie Pinko Dirtbag   Nov-28-09 09:06 PM   #182 
              - The case law here is specific to sedition type cases. Do you understand that?  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 09:09 PM   #183 
              - My point is about something else entirely. But you, of course, know that. -nt  Commie Pinko Dirtbag   Nov-28-09 09:17 PM   #186 
                 - Democrats, even during the Bush years, aren't known for making such inflammatory statements.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 09:21 PM   #188 
                    - No. Instead, they caught worse flak for speaking up in a much less inflammatory fashion.  Commie Pinko Dirtbag   Nov-28-09 09:27 PM   #191 
              - Nice strawman though. Especially trying to limit the Constitution to the 1st Amendment.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 09:11 PM   #184 
                 - OK, now I laughed. Involuntary comedy at its best! -nt  Commie Pinko Dirtbag   Nov-28-09 09:15 PM   #185 
                    - You weren't drinking milk were you?  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 09:18 PM   #187 
                       - Of course not. I was eating roasted blond Christian baby, like all evil Rush-censoring leftists.  Commie Pinko Dirtbag   Nov-28-09 09:23 PM   #190 
  - Burning Bush Guy?  Caretha   Nov-29-09 11:27 AM   #212 
  - See this full-page ad  billh58   Nov-29-09 12:33 AM   #207 
  - This is just like when he incited rabid RWers to kill that census taker in KY  JonQ   Nov-28-09 06:26 PM   #119 
  - Is he still being broadcast over Armed Forces Radio, in violation of the Hatch Act?  havocmom   Nov-28-09 06:32 PM   #121 
  - Nothing new  alp227   Nov-28-09 06:41 PM   #122 
  - This is scary shit!  Odin2005   Nov-28-09 06:51 PM   #125 
  - Air Force Radio should stop carrying him completely  martymar64   Nov-28-09 07:42 PM   #144 
  - Instead of looking for sedition case  Angry Dragon   Nov-28-09 08:27 PM   #164 
     - Limbaugh made no such threat. His speech is Constitutionally protected.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-28-09 08:44 PM   #170 
        - Actually, it is not  Politicub   Nov-29-09 12:27 AM   #206 
        - How does his opinion become unprotected by the fact it is being broadcast?  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-29-09 01:41 AM   #209 
        - It may (MAY) be, but his "right" to be on AFR is most assuredly NOT. -nt  Commie Pinko Dirtbag   Nov-29-09 07:45 AM   #211 
           - There is no Constitutional protection in regards to AFR.  Fire_Medic_Dave   Nov-29-09 03:51 PM   #216 
  - self delete nt  mix   Nov-28-09 07:54 PM   #152 
  - NOW do you think they will take him off the list of programs heard  jwirr   Nov-28-09 08:36 PM   #167 
  - Sounds like OxyRush wants civil war.  roamer65   Nov-28-09 08:45 PM   #172 
  - Gee, if rush is whining, why can't he do the fuckin' work of doing to coup himself?  Deja Q   Nov-28-09 08:46 PM   #173 
  - Did the military radio station broadcast this stuff to our troops?  JDPriestly   Nov-28-09 08:52 PM   #174 
  - May the fat f u c k e r rest in PIECES!!!!  pitchforksandtorches   Nov-28-09 09:30 PM   #192 
  - He should be marked as a terrorist/insurgent and put on the Terror Watch List/NO-Fly List  agentS   Nov-28-09 10:30 PM   #199 
  - That's it. Off with his head!  RedCloud   Nov-28-09 10:34 PM   #201 
  - kick and recommend!!! This needs to go viral!!!!  Douglas Carpenter   Nov-28-09 10:47 PM   #202 
  - Several people have said similar things  The Wizard   Nov-28-09 10:57 PM   #203 
  - Lets start a coup  Laura902   Nov-30-09 02:59 PM   #221 
  - I call it treason ....  gleaner   Nov-30-09 03:15 PM   #222 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC