You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #49: Excactly. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
49. Excactly.
Medicare for all.!!! These "bills" are shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Yes, there are some great provisions in the health care bill, BUT... Lydia Leftcoast  Nov-18-09 01:21 PM   #0 
  - There are a lot of pains in that but.  damntexdem   Nov-18-09 01:23 PM   #1 
  - I personally thought a lot of those things could have been broken into  Cleita   Nov-18-09 01:29 PM   #2 
  - How do you ban "pre-existing conditions" with out a mandate?  MNDemNY   Nov-18-09 01:30 PM   #4 
     - Why kind of mandate are you talking about?  Cleita   Nov-18-09 01:33 PM   #6 
     - A personal mandate to carry insurance. You know the kind that is in any bill under consideration?  MNDemNY   Nov-18-09 01:39 PM   #9 
        - Which is corporate welfare unless  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-18-09 02:06 PM   #13 
        - All the new provisions of this legislation are corporate welfare IMHO. n/t  Cleita   Nov-18-09 02:08 PM   #16 
        - Excactly.  MNDemNY   Nov-18-09 04:32 PM   #49 
        - Mandate is the worst thing in this bill. It criminalizes the poor who still  Cleita   Nov-18-09 02:07 PM   #14 
           - Yup, medicare for all!  MNDemNY   Nov-18-09 04:32 PM   #50 
           - It does not "criminalize the poor."  subterranean   Nov-18-09 05:22 PM   #65 
              - Oh, that's all  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-18-09 06:45 PM   #68 
     - Easily: You just do it  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-18-09 01:35 PM   #7 
     - Why buy it until you need it?  MNDemNY   Nov-18-09 01:38 PM   #8 
        - Then that's just the insurance companies' tough luck  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-18-09 02:01 PM   #11 
           - No mandates and no pre-existing conditions means either really high  geek tragedy   Nov-18-09 02:34 PM   #20 
           - Or the executives have to not get such high bonuses, the buildings  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-18-09 03:03 PM   #31 
              - That would be the first to go, but not the last.  geek tragedy   Nov-18-09 03:14 PM   #36 
                 - Because smart people know that anyone can get sick at any time  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-18-09 03:20 PM   #38 
                    - Well, once you get sick, then you buy insurance and  geek tragedy   Nov-18-09 03:24 PM   #41 
                       - What makes you think that only sick people would buy insurance?  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-18-09 03:38 PM   #44 
                          - How many people buy wheelchairs who do not need them?  MNDemNY   Nov-18-09 04:34 PM   #52 
                          - Oh boy, another person who argues like a Republican (or a DLCer) making false analogies  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-18-09 04:53 PM   #59 
                             - You REALLY got me wrong.  MNDemNY   Nov-18-09 05:08 PM   #62 
                          - The reason you buy insurance now at considerable expense  subterranean   Nov-18-09 05:36 PM   #66 
                             - No, because it would be a hassle to apply for it if I were in the midst of a heart attack  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-18-09 06:44 PM   #67 
           - Which is way you will not see it!  MNDemNY   Nov-18-09 04:33 PM   #51 
     - with single payer, medicare-for-all universal health care, that's how....  mike_c   Nov-18-09 02:07 PM   #15 
        - Would your proposed Single Payer bill pay for abortions?  geek tragedy   Nov-18-09 02:35 PM   #21 
        - Either a hamster in a wheel  sandnsea   Nov-18-09 02:48 PM   #25 
        - The sure sign that someone doesn't know anything  geek tragedy   Nov-18-09 02:56 PM   #28 
        - it covers "all medically necessary services..."  mike_c   Nov-18-09 02:52 PM   #26 
           - Medicare doesn't pay for abortion, mainly becase virtually no one  geek tragedy   Nov-18-09 02:55 PM   #27 
           - here is a list of the 93 co-sponsors of HR 676-- the folks you characterize as...  mike_c   Nov-18-09 03:24 PM   #42 
              - 91/92 living members on that list voted FOR the House Bill.  geek tragedy   Nov-18-09 03:33 PM   #43 
                 - that suggests to me that HR 676 would likely have at least as much support...  mike_c   Nov-18-09 09:02 PM   #69 
                    - There's no logical reason to suggest that HR 676 would have  geek tragedy   Nov-19-09 07:11 AM   #71 
           - A strawman?? You must not be paying attention  sandnsea   Nov-18-09 03:01 PM   #30 
        - Yes! I could not agree more.  MNDemNY   Nov-18-09 04:31 PM   #48 
  - Because this way, we get nothing without a rollback of womens rights.  MNDemNY   Nov-18-09 01:29 PM   #3 
  - Imagine what Stupak would do with a Single Payer bill.  geek tragedy   Nov-18-09 02:33 PM   #19 
     - So women need to make it clear that anyone who votes for a Stupak amendment  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-18-09 03:06 PM   #32 
     - Again, the question is whether there would be 218 votes to for taxpayer  geek tragedy   Nov-18-09 03:15 PM   # 
        - Keep voting the retrograde pols out until there are  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-18-09 03:20 PM   #39 
           - That could be a very, very long wait. nt  geek tragedy   Nov-18-09 03:22 PM   #40 
              - Since the EXISTING bill has an anti-abortion provision in it  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-18-09 03:57 PM   #45 
                 - Should we pass the excisting bill in pieces with stupak?  MNDemNY   Nov-18-09 04:41 PM   #55 
                    - If the bill is in pieces, then Stupak is one of the pieces that can be  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-18-09 04:48 PM   #57 
                       - Oh to be a dreamer!  MNDemNY   Nov-18-09 05:04 PM   #60 
                          - The "practicality" of conservative Dems is killing us  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-18-09 05:08 PM   #63 
                             - I'm sorry I forgot the sarcasm tag.  MNDemNY   Nov-18-09 05:12 PM   #64 
     - As opposed to it's effect in the house bill?  MNDemNY   Nov-18-09 04:37 PM   #53 
  - i think you're right.  Hannah Bell   Nov-18-09 01:31 PM   #5 
  - That wouldn't help anyone pay for health care  sandnsea   Nov-18-09 01:42 PM   #10 
  - The bill under consideration  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-18-09 02:06 PM   #12 
     - Help for the insured and the poor, no one else  sandnsea   Nov-18-09 02:45 PM   #22 
  - Newt Gingrich actually suggested a series of bills too. Whatever works. nt  thereismore   Nov-18-09 02:15 PM   #17 
  - In Newt's case, he probably thinks it would be easier to shoot some of  Cleita   Nov-18-09 02:18 PM   #18 
     - And it would  sandnsea   Nov-18-09 02:46 PM   #23 
        - But that still doesn't explain why most provisions don't go into effect for FOUR years  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-18-09 03:00 PM   #29 
           - This is more complicated than Medicare  sandnsea   Nov-18-09 03:15 PM   #37 
              - But still...FOUR YEARS?  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-18-09 03:58 PM   #46 
              - And some will start sooner  sandnsea   Nov-18-09 04:10 PM   #47 
              - The real reason is to collect the "new " taxes for some time before the expenditures begin.  MNDemNY   Nov-18-09 04:43 PM   #56 
  - Let's start at the very beginning. In 2004 a young man running for the Senate said that  truedelphi   Nov-18-09 02:47 PM   #24 
  - ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##  DU GrovelBot   Nov-18-09 03:06 PM   #33 
  - Double spaced with large margins....  jberryhill   Nov-18-09 03:07 PM   #34 
     - Double-spaced with large margins means it's an 800- 1000-page bill  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-18-09 03:11 PM   #35 
        - How about we just pass Stupak?  MNDemNY   Nov-18-09 04:39 PM   #54 
        - Now you're just being silly  Lydia Leftcoast   Nov-18-09 04:48 PM   #58 
           - My point is much the same as yours.  MNDemNY   Nov-18-09 05:07 PM   #61 
        - Pay Me A Senator's Salary And Give Me A Staff  jberryhill   Nov-18-09 10:52 PM   #70 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC