You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: You can blame that on the Hill. It's their headline. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. You can blame that on the Hill. It's their headline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Kucinich: House Dems bill not better than status quo ProSense  Nov-09-09 09:44 PM   #0 
  - Kucinich is the king of hyperbole  Egnever   Nov-09-09 09:46 PM   #1 
  - Facts don't count.  ProSense   Nov-09-09 09:50 PM   #2 
  - It's not a quote. Kucinich never said "status quo"  Luminous Animal   Nov-09-09 10:11 PM   #21 
     - So if he believes it's better than the status quo, why did he vote against it? n/t  ProSense   Nov-09-09 10:34 PM   #41 
     - .  Luminous Animal   Nov-09-09 10:43 PM   #50 
        - "the health insurance companies are getting quite a deal. "  ProSense   Nov-09-09 10:47 PM   #55 
           - They are and, in fact, they've openly stated that the mandate is the cat's pajamas.  Luminous Animal   Nov-09-09 11:17 PM   #70 
              - Nonsense.  ProSense   Nov-09-09 11:20 PM   #72 
                 - They give some to get 36 million customers.  Luminous Animal   Nov-09-09 11:39 PM   #82 
                 - They get them, including those with pre-existing conditions. n/t  ProSense   Nov-09-09 11:53 PM   #86 
                 - they'll find a way around it  lame54   Nov-11-09 09:44 AM   #121 
     - Prosense does not engage in hyperbole. He engages in falsehoods and crusades  Go2Peace   Nov-10-09 12:07 AM   #88 
        - I'm really getting under your skin, aren't I? n/t  ProSense   Nov-10-09 12:20 AM   #91 
        - No, Not really.  Go2Peace   Nov-10-09 12:30 AM   #93 
        - fail  dionysus   Nov-10-09 01:43 PM   #104 
        - ASK PROSENSE IF SHE WILL SUPPORT THIS BILL WITH THE STUPAK AMENDMENT INTACT.  MNDemNY   Nov-11-09 04:31 PM   #122 
  - Kucinich lost me on this BS. Maybe for good.  w4rma   Nov-09-09 09:51 PM   #3 
  - The test is always honesty. In this case, he's flat out lying  ecstatic   Nov-09-09 09:55 PM   #6 
  - You're correct, ecstatic. And unfortunately for all the good issues he's pushed it harms his long  w4rma   Nov-09-09 09:57 PM   #7 
  - +1  redqueen   Nov-10-09 04:28 PM   #114 
  - So even though the title of the OP is not a quote  Luminous Animal   Nov-09-09 10:13 PM   #23 
     - So making inaccurate statements is OK with you?  ProSense   Nov-09-09 10:24 PM   #33 
        - Co-pays will still be in effect for everything but prentive care.  Luminous Animal   Nov-09-09 10:36 PM   #42 
           - Now, you're just making excuses. n/t  ProSense   Nov-09-09 10:37 PM   #44 
              - No. I am thoughtfully reading Kucinich's statement and logically  Luminous Animal   Nov-09-09 10:40 PM   #46 
                 - No, you're making excuses. If the bill is better than the status quo, why vote against it? n/t  ProSense   Nov-09-09 10:49 PM   #57 
                    - Again..  Luminous Animal   Nov-09-09 11:09 PM   #64 
                       - "the health insurance companies are getting quite a deal. " Repeat:  ProSense   Nov-09-09 11:10 PM   #65 
                          - And I will repeat. They are.  Luminous Animal   Nov-09-09 11:19 PM   #71 
                             - Losing it, huh? The facts in the OP prove Kucinich's claims are bogus  ProSense   Nov-09-09 11:26 PM   #73 
                                - No they don't. See now isn't this fun?  Luminous Animal   Nov-09-09 11:38 PM   #80 
                                   - "No they don't. See now isn't this fun?" Never tried denial so I wouldn't know. n/t  ProSense   Nov-09-09 11:39 PM   #81 
  - Kucinich ignores history  neuvocat   Nov-09-09 10:49 PM   #56 
  - He's picking up the Nader mantle.  MilesColtrane   Nov-10-09 01:22 PM   #102 
  - lol @ ProSense's anti-Kucinich tirade that has lasted for days now. Won't somebody listen to him? nt  t0dd   Nov-09-09 09:52 PM   #4 
  - Praising Kucinich is more important than the facts, right? n/t  ProSense   Nov-09-09 09:53 PM   #5 
  - Facts? That is an inaccurate quote attributed to DK, as far as I can tell.  tekisui   Nov-09-09 09:58 PM   #8 
     - Title of the article. Everything statement in that article is a complete distortion  ProSense   Nov-09-09 10:01 PM   #11 
     - Yes. It is the title of the article but not a quote.  Luminous Animal   Nov-09-09 10:10 PM   #20 
     - You can blame that on the Hill. It's their headline.  SemiCharmedQuark   Nov-09-09 10:01 PM   #13 
     - So you're suggesting he recognizes it would be an improvement, yet voted against anyway? n/t  lumberjack_jeff   Nov-09-09 10:04 PM   #15 
        - If you honestly want to know his reasons...  Luminous Animal   Nov-09-09 10:17 PM   #28 
  - Dennis tells the truth and keeps his word. He makes ProSense look bad  John Q. Citizen   Nov-09-09 10:00 PM   #9 
  - Who doesn't?  Forkboy   Nov-09-09 10:01 PM   #12 
     - Matter of fact, some folks don't need ANY help in that dept.  flvegan   Nov-09-09 10:08 PM   #19 
     - Yeah, isn't it sad? Some people think Kucinich's distortions are more relevant than truth  ProSense   Nov-09-09 10:12 PM   #22 
        - Your argument is based on a fallacy.  Luminous Animal   Nov-09-09 10:24 PM   #32 
           - Nonsense.  ProSense   Nov-09-09 10:31 PM   #39 
              - If you are going to present the headline as a basis for your argument,  Luminous Animal   Nov-09-09 10:38 PM   #45 
                 - The article was presented as the basis. Kucinich's distortions. n/t  ProSense   Nov-09-09 10:41 PM   #49 
                    - I think you lost a few words on the way from your brain to your fingers.  Luminous Animal   Nov-09-09 10:44 PM   #51 
                       - No, says it all: Kucinich's distortions. n/t  ProSense   Nov-09-09 10:46 PM   #53 
                          - Prosense has 10 nipples. There I said it so it must be true.  Luminous Animal   Nov-09-09 11:11 PM   #66 
                             - No you said, and it's beyond silly. Doesn't change the fact that Kucinich's claims are distortions.  ProSense   Nov-09-09 11:14 PM   #68 
  - Oh, facts are anti-kucinich? Well, that's  Cha   Nov-09-09 10:14 PM   #26 
  - As for the facts, please see Luminous Animal's #32.  Greyhound   Nov-09-09 10:36 PM   #43 
     - I know what the facts are and dennis  Cha   Nov-09-09 10:47 PM   #54 
  - Ah yes, and so many recs he gets. He'll now sing to the choir, the rest will have him on ignore  Go2Peace   Nov-10-09 12:05 AM   #87 
     - See, you do care. LOL! n/t  ProSense   Nov-10-09 12:08 AM   #89 
  - Everybody look! Bullet points!  flvegan   Nov-09-09 10:00 PM   #10 
  - Everyone look! Denial.  ProSense   Nov-09-09 10:05 PM   #16 
     - *snicker*  flvegan   Nov-09-09 10:08 PM   #18 
     - " Pelosi? Whatever"? So it's about the person not the facts? n/t  ProSense   Nov-09-09 10:13 PM   #24 
        - It's not fact.  flvegan   Nov-09-09 10:19 PM   #29 
           - So nothing that's in the bill is a fact?  ProSense   Nov-09-09 10:21 PM   #30 
              - You got your Conculsions Mat out, didn't you?  flvegan   Nov-09-09 10:28 PM   #38 
                 - You didn't read the bill if you're questioning her statement about co-pays. n/t  ProSense   Nov-09-09 11:00 PM   #60 
                    - You're calling premonition fact.  flvegan   Nov-09-09 11:05 PM   #62 
                       - "This bill is nothing more than a discussion right now." He voted against a discussion?  ProSense   Nov-09-09 11:06 PM   #63 
                          - Pathetic.  flvegan   Nov-09-09 11:13 PM   #67 
                          - You claimed a bill that was actually voted on is a "discussion" and you say I have no argument.  ProSense   Nov-09-09 11:16 PM   #69 
                             - You don't.  flvegan   Nov-09-09 11:28 PM   #76 
                                - "And now you're boring, and no longer worth my time." You haven't presented one  ProSense   Nov-09-09 11:30 PM   #77 
                          - What do you think the Senate is going to do?  Luminous Animal   Nov-09-09 11:32 PM   #78 
                             - "So yes, the bill is still in the discussion stage." Kucinich isn't in the Senate  ProSense   Nov-09-09 11:34 PM   #79 
                                - The discussion about "discussion" had nothing to do with Kucinich  Luminous Animal   Nov-09-09 11:47 PM   #84 
                                   - The OP is about the House bill. The information is from the House bill  ProSense   Nov-09-09 11:50 PM   #85 
     - My insurance company regularly denies me treatment for breast cancer  Luminous Animal   Nov-09-09 11:26 PM   #74 
        - "There is nothing in the bill to stop that." Wrong. n/t  ProSense   Nov-09-09 11:28 PM   #75 
           - Show me where in the bill that insurance companies  Luminous Animal   Nov-10-09 12:23 AM   #92 
              - It will be against the law for insurers to deny care.  ProSense   Nov-10-09 12:34 AM   #94 
                 - So, you can't show me because it is not there.  Luminous Animal   Nov-10-09 01:18 AM   #96 
  - mandates poison the whole bill  optimator   Nov-09-09 10:02 PM   #14 
  - You're welcome to choose that for yourself.  lumberjack_jeff   Nov-09-09 10:06 PM   #17 
     - "Mandates are the whole point of a universal system"  Oregone   Nov-09-09 10:13 PM   #25 
     - So did you opt out of Canada-care?  lumberjack_jeff   Nov-10-09 09:18 AM   #98 
        - The *point* of Canada's UHC system is not to mandate people to enter into a commercial marketplace  Oregone   Nov-10-09 05:25 PM   #116 
           - Generally, when you visit a doctor in Canada, you are patronizing a private company. n/t  lumberjack_jeff   Nov-10-09 06:46 PM   #117 
              - No one in either place...  Oregone   Nov-10-09 07:58 PM   #118 
     - Mandates are the point of the system? I thought the point was  Bluenorthwest   Nov-10-09 04:06 PM   #112 
        - Universal = Mandatory.  lumberjack_jeff   Nov-11-09 09:32 AM   #120 
  - I'll now wait and see what Bernie Sanders has to say about what happens in the Senate  G_j   Nov-09-09 10:15 PM   #27 
  - I think you should probably move on....  AllentownJake   Nov-09-09 10:23 PM   #31 
  - "If you honestly give a shit about this bill" You're telling me to move on?  ProSense   Nov-09-09 10:25 PM   #35 
     - You are the oddest creature on this board  AllentownJake   Nov-09-09 10:27 PM   #37 
        - "You are the oddest creature on this board" After making that bizzare comment, you laugh? n/t  ProSense   Nov-09-09 10:32 PM   #40 
           - Here is what I think of your tirade the past few days  AllentownJake   Nov-09-09 10:40 PM   #48 
              - As long as you're constantly thinking about me  ProSense   Nov-09-09 10:44 PM   #52 
                 - .Good night Pro  AllentownJake   Nov-09-09 10:52 PM   #58 
  - In which paragraph does Kucinich compare the bill in question to the status quo?  SacramentoBlue   Nov-09-09 10:25 PM   #34 
  - ...And 45,000 more people die. n/t  Unvanguard   Nov-09-09 10:26 PM   #36 
  - Except for the millions it will help? Huh? nt  Bonobo   Nov-09-09 10:40 PM   #47 
  - It's like the Iraq war, Bonobo. It helped millions. The only down side it that it  John Q. Citizen   Nov-10-09 09:16 AM   #97 
  - Bernie Sanders said there's plenty of good stuff in it.  Lord Helmet   Nov-09-09 10:54 PM   #59 
  - Yes, he made perfect sense on Rachel Maddow's show tonight. n/t  ProSense   Nov-09-09 11:02 PM   #61 
  - where did he say that?  bigtree   Nov-09-09 11:40 PM   #83 
  - Here.  Bonobo   Nov-10-09 12:08 AM   #90 
     - You didn't quote Kucinich directly. You quoted the article  SacramentoBlue   Nov-10-09 12:52 AM   #95 
     - Again, if the bill is better than the status quo, why did Kucinich vote against it?  ProSense   Nov-10-09 12:05 PM   #99 
     - hmm  bigtree   Nov-10-09 12:15 PM   #100 
        - "Yes there are aspects of the House bill that are troubling."  ProSense   Nov-10-09 12:53 PM   #101 
           - You claim the alternative is no bill.  tekisui   Nov-10-09 01:41 PM   #103 
           - Nonsense.  ProSense   Nov-10-09 01:50 PM   #105 
           - Also, he did make the claim  ProSense   Nov-10-09 01:52 PM   #106 
           - his vote was inconsequential to passage and he and everyone else knew that going in.  bigtree   Nov-10-09 03:00 PM   #107 
              - "His vote serves to highlight his disagreement with some of the provisions. "  ProSense   Nov-10-09 03:38 PM   #108 
                 - tantrum?  bigtree   Nov-10-09 03:49 PM   #109 
                    - Yes, tantrum.  ProSense   Nov-10-09 03:52 PM   #110 
                       - neither did Kucinich  bigtree   Nov-10-09 03:53 PM   #111 
  - Well of course, Dennis did not say what the title claims.  Bluenorthwest   Nov-10-09 04:20 PM   #113 
  - tell that to all the folks with "pre-existing conditions", Dennis.  Odin2005   Nov-10-09 04:30 PM   #115 
  - Recommended.  saltpoint   Nov-10-09 08:03 PM   #119 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC