Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Reply #116: 2007: Truthout Special Report: Democratic House Officials Recruited Wealthy Conservatives [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Nov-05-09 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
116. 2007: Truthout Special Report: Democratic House Officials Recruited Wealthy Conservatives
Edited on Thu Nov-05-09 09:47 AM by seafan
Special Report: Democratic House Officials Recruited Wealthy Conservatives

By Matt Renner
September 6, 2007


.....

In May 2004, a former candidate for the New York State Legislature named Cynthia Pooler founded November Victories and Democrat Unity, online forums for new candidates who were running for Congress as Democrats.

"Before you knew it, candidates started talking about the difficulties they were having with the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the Democratic leadership," Pooler said.

According to Democratic candidates who ran for House of Representative seats in 2006, Rahm Emanuel, then head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, took sides during the Democratic primary elections, favoring conservative candidates, including former Republicans, and sidelining candidates who were running in favor of withdrawal from Iraq.

Appointed as head of the DCCC by then-House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, Emanuel spearheaded the Democratic Party effort to regain control of the House of Representatives during the 2006 election cycle. Emanuel claimed credit for the Democratic takeover and was promoted to chairman of the Democratic Caucus, the fourth-highest ranking position in the House. But his election tactics have been criticized by progressive activists and former Congressional candidates.

According to his critics, Emanuel played kingmaker by financially supporting his favored candidates during primary contests with other Democrats. His critics say that this interference was in direct contradiction of a DCCC policy to "remain neutral" in party primaries.

According to Doug Thornell, spokesperson for the DCCC, "The policy of the DCCC is not to get involved in primaries, unless there is an unusual circumstance that demands it. I cannot speculate on what those circumstances might be. The majority of these cases <2008 primaries> will be left up to the voters on the ground. Meddling hasn't taken place this cycle, and for the most part last cycle. That isn't an accurate way to describe what happened. We are cognizant of having local support for our candidates."

Howard Dean, chairman of the Democratic National Committee, would not comment on the DCCC's alleged interference.

However, a source close to the DNC indicated that there was disagreement between Dean and Emanuel over election tactics. In his recent book, "The Thumpin'," Naftali Bendavid, a journalist who spent months inside the DCCC operation and at Emanuel's side, reported a heated conversation between Dean, Emanuel and Senator Charles Schumer (D-New York) regarding election strategies of the DCCC and the DNC. At the time, Dean was focusing on helping local organizations across the country to mobilize their communities to support Democrats. Emanuel wanted to focus the resources of the national party on specific races that were the most likely to be competitive for Democrats. According to Bendavid, Emanuel said to Dean, "You're nowhere, Howard. Your field plan is not a field plan. That's fucking bullshit ... I know your field plan - it doesn't exist. I've gone around the country with these races. I've seen your people. There is no plan, Howard."

How Emanuel came to his decisions about which candidates to support against Democratic opponents is known only to Emanuel and his staff. Emanuel declined direct comment on this story. But an examination of individual races reveals a pattern of financial and political support for wealthy conservative candidates and an assault on their grassroots-supported opponents who were running on platforms that included a full withdrawal of US forces from Iraq.

.....

Illinois's 6th District: Christine Cegelis vs. Tammy Duckworth

.....

"To tell you I didn't take it personally is wrong," Cegelis said, adding, "this was the wrong way to choose a representative. It is wrong of parties to exclude people from the primary elections. The primary is the time for the people to choose who is on the ballot; those decisions should not be made in back rooms."

Bendavid goes on to quote Emanuel saying of Cegelis, "If she would only work as hard as she would goddamn whine.... She's the only one who says, 'What can you do for me?" adding, " could absolutely win. She's just not doing it."

Emanuel's assertion about Cegelis's work ethic was hotly contested by members of her campaign.

.....


Florida's 13th District: Jan Schneider vs. Christine Jennings

.....


California's 11th District: Jerry McNerney vs. Steve Filson

.....


Florida's 16th District: David Lutrin vs. Tim Mahoney


.....


While Emanuel is given credit for turning power over to the Democratic Party in the House of Representatives, the majority is fractured.

Many of the candidates that Emanuel helped elect have joined with a group of self-styled conservative Blue Dog Democrats and have cast key votes with Republicans and stymied Democratic efforts to end the occupation of Iraq and the Bush administration's warrantless wiretapping program.

Thirteen of the Democratic members of the House elected in 2006 joined The Blue Dog Coalition; a group that, according to its spokesperson, has no official stance on withdrawal from Iraq or the president's warrantless wiretapping program. However, 30 out of 47 of the Blue Dog members broke with the majority of Democrats and cast votes in favor of the recent Protect America Act, a bill that greatly expanded the power of the executive branch to spy on Americans. The caucus also broke with the majority of Democrats when 40 of the Blue Dog members voted to continue funding the occupation of Iraq without a timetable for withdrawal.

In an interview shortly after his election, freshman Blue Dog member Tim Mahoney told the Charlotte Sun, a local paper from his district, that he attended a meeting with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and told her "The president should be free to maintain troops in Iraq, if the purpose is to thwart terrorism."




Postcript to the fate of Tim Mahoney (who was a Republican until 2005; shortly thereafter, appearing on Rahm's radar screen):


Mahoney's Florida District Has Sex-Scandal Déjà Vu, October 16, 2008


Sex Scandal Fells Florida Democrat in Former Mark Foley District, November 4, 2008



Mahoney lost re-election in 2008. The result? Another Republican sitting in Mark Foley's disgraced seat.


Thanks, Rahm.



The Chief of Staff appointment is the second largest mistake Obama has made since his election.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  Hamsher: Lessons Learned in VA, CA and NJ: Is Rahm Emanuel Orchestrating 2010 Democratic Massacre? seafan  Nov-04-09 12:30 PM   #0 
   K&R -- Fuck you Rahm, you corporate pig.  FLAprogressive   Nov-04-09 12:32 PM   #1 
   +1 K&R -- Fuck you Rahm, you corporate pig. Tell Obama kick him to the curb  Vincardog   Nov-04-09 12:35 PM   #4 
   Obama won't because he's corporate just like Rahm.  FLAprogressive   Nov-04-09 12:36 PM   #6 
   Maybe we can make him do the right thing  Vincardog   Nov-04-09 12:37 PM   #7 
      I've pretty much given up on that thought. The majority on the "left" are still in love with their  FLAprogressive   Nov-04-09 12:38 PM   #8 
         The majority of his support seems to come from 'the Center is the way' crowd. It is hard to see how  Vincardog   Nov-04-09 01:05 PM   #22 
         Many of the people I know who are enmoured with the image of Obama are not of the left persuassion  liberation   Nov-04-09 07:50 PM   #71 
         No, the majority on the left (progressives) do NOT love him.  Le Taz Hot   Nov-04-09 11:58 PM   #97 
            When will these Democratic politicians learn that the more liberal they are  fasttense   Nov-05-09 04:53 AM   #112 
   Why would Obama do that. Obama likes the way Rahm thinks.  joeycola   Nov-04-09 02:10 PM   #35 
   How about because he wants to be re-elected?  JDPriestly   Nov-04-09 08:01 PM   #76 
   How about because he wants to be re-elected?  pmorlan1   Nov-04-09 08:29 PM   #80 
   My whole life (and I'm not young anymore)  Golden Raisin   Nov-05-09 04:03 AM   #109 
   Sorry  pmorlan1   Nov-04-09 08:39 PM   #82 
   People are starting to refer to the Rahm Emanuel Obama presidency. He forgets  bjobotts   Nov-05-09 01:26 AM   #103 
      Obama forgets...no one voted for Rahm for president or even advisor.  bjobotts   Nov-05-09 01:28 AM   #104 
         There's a good reason few people like him.He stands for nothing but campaign donations  bjobotts   Nov-05-09 01:29 AM   #105 
   What ... are you two getting the same talking points....  Techn0Girl   Nov-05-09 03:50 AM   #107 
   WHY WHY WHY  Bitwit1234   Nov-04-09 02:05 PM   #33 
   That scum was never "Change"  Jax   Nov-04-09 03:52 PM   #45 
   The President disagrees  leftynyc   Nov-04-09 04:02 PM   # 
      are you trying to bait her into getting in trouble?  jonnyblitz   Nov-04-09 04:43 PM   #61 
         I'm sick of everyone  leftynyc   Nov-05-09 11:04 AM   #120 
   Its not fair to ALL PIGS being associated with Rahm. Obama needs to question and address the advice  Segami   Nov-05-09 11:23 AM   #122 
   Rahm is about ensuring a corporate Democratic party, even at the expense of winning elections  yurbud   Nov-04-09 12:34 PM   #2 
   You hit it out of the park with that assessment  TornadoTN   Nov-04-09 12:41 PM   #11 
   agreed. nt  tomp   Nov-05-09 01:07 AM   #102 
   Jane, I agree completely!  Enthusiast   Nov-04-09 12:35 PM   #3 
   The above list leaves out one important fact - Rahm is a DLC member  Individualist   Nov-04-09 12:36 PM   #5 
   "Obama isn't DLC, he just put Rahm in there because he gets things done! Go team!!!"  FLAprogressive   Nov-04-09 12:40 PM   #9 
   You seem to have misinterpreted my post  Individualist   Nov-04-09 12:47 PM   #17 
   oh no, I was just pretending to be one of those apologists. No worries, I knew what you were saying.  FLAprogressive   Nov-04-09 12:50 PM   #20 
   O was a DLC'r before he wasn't nt  ooglymoogly   Nov-04-09 06:15 PM   #68 
   Obama is responsible who he chooses to be on his team period /nt  still_one   Nov-04-09 04:08 PM   #49 
   Except when he isn't... such is the magic of his 3D chess skills  liberation   Nov-04-09 07:54 PM   #72 
   Yeah you are right...Its the things he is getting done  ooglymoogly   Nov-04-09 06:13 PM   #67 
   What has Obama done that is not DLC?  JDPriestly   Nov-04-09 08:03 PM   #77 
   I'm still hoping Obama placed Rahm to diffuse his power, just like he did w Hillary.  mod mom   Nov-04-09 01:20 PM   #28 
      See post #17  Individualist   Nov-04-09 01:21 PM   #29 
      How does adding to his power defuse his power?  JackRiddler   Nov-04-09 07:55 PM   #73 
   Jane Hamsher is Spot On. Rahm is a poison pill, way back to Clinton days.  Justitia   Nov-04-09 12:40 PM   #10 
   Obama is not naive. He didn't just pick Rahm innocently. He picked Rahm for a reason.  FLAprogressive   Nov-04-09 12:42 PM   #12 
      I don't think he is "naive", I think it has more to do w/their Chicago ties. And it's a blind spot.  Justitia   Nov-04-09 12:44 PM   #15 
      i think it has more to do with the big (chicago & elsewhere) money that  Hannah Bell   Nov-04-09 02:22 PM   #38 
      Someone needs to ask Obama point blank about his University of Chicago days.  rudy23   Nov-04-09 12:45 PM   #16 
         he yammers about how bad "protectionism" is....  FLAprogressive   Nov-04-09 12:47 PM   #18 
         UofC Law School makes Friedman  placton   Nov-04-09 05:27 PM   #64 
   Rahm tried to take credit for Dean's work in 2006...  joeybee12   Nov-04-09 12:43 PM   #13 
   the media did give him credit for Dean's work  yurbud   Nov-04-09 01:06 PM   #23 
   That still pisses me off  JCMach1   Nov-05-09 08:44 AM   #114 
      Rahm and media ho for the same pimp, what would you expect?  yurbud   Nov-05-09 02:30 PM   #126 
   he's not incompetent, he's corporate compliant first and foremost even when it means losing  yurbud   Nov-04-09 01:07 PM   #24 
   kick  debbierlus   Nov-04-09 12:44 PM   #14 
   silly stuff. And sorry, Janie but beltway wisdom was overwhelmingly  cali   Nov-04-09 12:48 PM   #19 
   He was, but if he had come out against a public  sabrina 1   Nov-04-09 04:00 PM   #46 
   LINK: send that Rahm resume to the White House  yurbud   Nov-04-09 12:56 PM   #21 
   yurbud  Torn_Scorned_Ignored   Nov-04-09 02:28 PM   #39 
   Excellent letter. It should be in the NYT as they probably  sabrina 1   Nov-04-09 08:11 PM   #78 
   great letter!!  inna   Nov-04-09 09:59 PM   #85 
   Here's one swing state voter that will refuse to vote for corporate candidates even w D's after  mod mom   Nov-04-09 01:17 PM   #25 
   Hear!!! Hear!!! Ms. Firedoglake is my HERO. Rec.  bertman   Nov-04-09 01:17 PM   #26 
   if the democrats don't give the people who elected them what they want, rahm won't matter  spanone   Nov-04-09 01:18 PM   #27 
   So now Rahm is the real reason we lost in 1994?  geek tragedy   Nov-04-09 01:22 PM   #30 
   One of many contributing factors with a common theme  depakid   Nov-04-09 04:10 PM   #50 
      Democrats learned the wrong lessons in the 80, 84, & 88 elections  yurbud   Nov-04-09 04:25 PM   #56 
         "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results"  Ignis   Nov-04-09 10:33 PM   #88 
         You can also include 2000 under :  bvar22   Nov-04-09 11:53 PM   #96 
            that was one thing they captured perfectly in HBO's RECOUNT  yurbud   Nov-05-09 02:29 PM   #125 
   The fact that Obama really wanted Rahm worries me  Nikki Stone1   Nov-04-09 01:25 PM   #31 
   Most of those links are illegitimate  Cheney Killed Bambi   Nov-04-09 02:04 PM   #32 
   facepalm  inna   Nov-04-09 10:07 PM   #86 
   Yep, Rahm is the new Rove  Generator   Nov-04-09 02:07 PM   #34 
   Rahm was NOT the architect of NAFTA  Winterblues   Nov-04-09 02:13 PM   #36 
   Read this-he certainly had his grimey hand in it:  mod mom   Nov-04-09 02:19 PM   #37 
   That just repeats the charge without providing any actual evidence.  anigbrowl   Nov-04-09 04:18 PM   #53 
      Here's a PBS interview w rahm from June, 2000:  mod mom   Nov-04-09 04:25 PM   #57 
   Completely untrue  harkadog   Nov-04-09 04:40 PM   #60 
   Yep. Another Jane Hamsher truth moment.  mmonk   Nov-04-09 02:30 PM   #40 
   Like Hamsher, I am disappointed by Rahm Emanuel's leadership so far.  philly_bob   Nov-04-09 02:45 PM   #41 
   I think it has less to do with issues than it does with  cadmium   Nov-04-09 03:11 PM   #42 
   Maybe someone should tell the president to neuter Rahm or maybe show Rahm the door  sasquatch   Nov-04-09 03:15 PM   #43 
   Excellent assessment!  sabrina 1   Nov-04-09 03:47 PM   #44 
   Sounds like Jane found her Emmanuel Goldstein.  tritsofme   Nov-04-09 04:02 PM   #47 
   I don't think it's tough for him to sleep at all as he doesn't see  sabrina 1   Nov-04-09 04:19 PM   #54 
   We didn't lose Va and NJ because Rahm, but if you need your scape goat go for it  still_one   Nov-04-09 04:06 PM   #48 
   Well, I agree with your last sentence.  sabrina 1   Nov-04-09 04:13 PM   #51 
      Dist 23, in my view was very significant. The palin/becks/teabaggers are not  still_one   Nov-04-09 04:15 PM   #52 
         Yes, very significant.  sabrina 1   Nov-04-09 04:25 PM   #59 
   And we wonder why Obama's promises are shit........  DainBramaged   Nov-04-09 04:21 PM   #55 
   K & R  Liberal_Dog   Nov-04-09 04:25 PM   #58 
   Rahm Emanuel did no favors for Alaska  Blue_In_AK   Nov-04-09 05:05 PM   #62 
   K&R! Thank you, Jane! n/t  Kermitt Gribble   Nov-04-09 05:10 PM   #63 
   Rahm will turn Obama into a one-term Carter  dpbrown   Nov-04-09 05:57 PM   #65 
   But he'll keep the Democratic Party corporate--which is more important in the long term .  rudy23   Nov-04-09 06:02 PM   #66 
   A lot of people dismiss Carter's legacy as just being an one term bomb  liberation   Nov-04-09 08:00 PM   #74 
      thank you. who, after all, started a lot of the deregulation--Carter  bbgrunt   Nov-05-09 12:35 AM   #100 
      Count me as agreeing with you and I will add to it  rpannier   Nov-06-09 12:07 AM   #130 
   Rahm puts his own self-agrandizement ahead of what is best for the ocutnry.  BrklynLiberal   Nov-04-09 07:04 PM   #69 
   !... K&R  bvar22   Nov-04-09 07:24 PM   #70 
   The Blue Dogs buy into the meme that independents decide elections.  JDPriestly   Nov-04-09 08:00 PM   #75 
   The numbers in the VA Gov race support what you say.  leveymg   Nov-05-09 12:51 PM   #124 
      Please post your message separately. It should be read by more DUers.  JDPriestly   Nov-05-09 03:05 PM   #127 
   K&R  pleah   Nov-04-09 08:19 PM   #79 
   fuck you rahm and sadly fuck you obama  natrat   Nov-04-09 08:34 PM   #81 
   I keep wondering ....  Techn0Girl   Nov-05-09 03:53 AM   #108 
   The Obama's got a dog. This is the "change" we're supposed to be fighting for  EVDebs   Nov-04-09 08:46 PM   #83 
   Wow, Rahm is the "anti-Howard Dean"  Canuckistanian   Nov-04-09 09:48 PM   #84 
   Does Jane Hamsher post here at DU?  Major Hogwash   Nov-04-09 10:08 PM   #87 
   Dear Jane, it certainly looks like the all powerful Rahm  ProSense   Nov-04-09 10:35 PM   #89 
   Tell me again why he's Obama's Chief of Staff . . .  janet118   Nov-04-09 10:50 PM   #90 
   If Dems organized a protest against Rahm I would be there - I would march. With a sign. And I  peacetalksforall   Nov-04-09 11:18 PM   #91 
   It seems that we can look back and almost create the meeting that must have been held  peacetalksforall   Nov-04-09 11:22 PM   #92 
   Rahm's not DCCC head anymore, so no. I don't think he is.  Arkana   Nov-04-09 11:23 PM   #93 
   Who needs Karl Rove when you have Rahm Emmanuel?  Vidar   Nov-04-09 11:23 PM   #94 
   K&R  invictus   Nov-04-09 11:24 PM   #95 
   He is such a slimeball  Horse with no Name   Nov-05-09 12:09 AM   #98 
   Rahm is a Republican mole  The Wizard   Nov-05-09 12:33 AM   #99 
   Time to END the Rahm-per-room in the White House!  cascadiance   Nov-05-09 12:39 AM   #101 
   LOL The stupid it hurts!  Egnever   Nov-05-09 01:31 AM   #106 
   The same people try to defend him or derail the thread every time  Greyhound   Nov-05-09 04:06 AM   #110 
   K & R The Goldman Sachs admin has been exposed lets see if they change their wicked ways!  democracy1st   Nov-05-09 04:12 AM   #111 
   Rahm's the chief of staff. Congressional Dems and the DNC will determine 2010.  RBInMaine   Nov-05-09 07:06 AM   #113 
   Liberals? To back of bus. This admin is for rich conservatives . -nt  scentopine   Nov-05-09 08:45 AM   #115 
   2007: Truthout Special Report: Democratic House Officials Recruited Wealthy Conservatives  seafan   Nov-05-09 09:43 AM   #116 
   Oh please. Rahm is just an easy scapegoat.  Jennicut   Nov-05-09 09:54 AM   #117 
   The bullet about Garamendi/Tauscher is just wrong.  Gormy Cuss   Nov-05-09 10:28 AM   #118 
   K&R. //nt  Overseas   Nov-05-09 10:50 AM   #119 
   Creigh Deeds & Bill Owens were both lukewarm about a public option,  Eric J in MN   Nov-05-09 11:16 AM   #121 
   Which makes me ask again: WTF is he doing in this administration??? Get him OUT!!!!  DesertDiamond   Nov-05-09 12:26 PM   #123 
   Some perspective here on CA  rpannier   Nov-05-09 11:58 PM   #128 
   Real Democrats will win in 2010. DLC phonies will not.  Sebastian Doyle   Nov-06-09 12:00 AM   #129 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC