Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Reply #9: A modest change of tactics [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov-04-09 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. A modest change of tacticsUpdated at 8:34 AM
There are not as many mean old people as you think -- but they get stoked up on rage, and go out and vote. So WE have to get the vote out. Liberals stayed home everywhere except in the NY-23 race.

And we have to "take it to" the culture warriors. Combative angry ranting won't work; Limbaugh's and Beck's and Hoffman's and Palin's rant-populism show us that a "new paradigm" is called for. I am sure that there are hundreds of things we could do that are overlooking. Sure, we're all disappointed and angry, but we only have 51 weeks to get ready for the NEXT election.

It ain't over yet.

--d!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  We just can't win gay marriage elections bluestateguy  Nov-04-09 12:54 AM   #0 
   honestly i think its just the word marraige, if you took that word out  vadawg   Nov-04-09 12:55 AM   #1 
   Yes, it's a referendum on the word and whether it's only for religious people to define it.  GreenPartyVoter   Nov-04-09 12:56 AM   #3 
   whether you like it or not, society as a whole defines it the same as the religious folk  vadawg   Nov-04-09 12:59 AM   #5 
   It is not just a word.  Ms. Toad   Nov-04-09 01:07 AM   #11 
   the point being that it will take decades anyway to get the votes  vadawg   Nov-04-09 01:12 AM   #14 
   They aren't that stupid. They will fight that, even though they imply that they won't.  imdjh   Nov-04-09 01:16 AM   #21 
   and they are the minority of the people who vote no on the ballots  vadawg   Nov-04-09 01:20 AM   #23 
   Well, I know it's not much consolation  sabrina 1   Nov-04-09 01:26 AM   #25 
   Yep, the anti-choice crowd does the same thing  theHandpuppet   Nov-04-09 07:09 AM   #44 
   Exactly. Virginia being a prime example.  theHandpuppet   Nov-04-09 07:13 AM   #45 
   Segregation is unacceptable. eom  laconicsax   Nov-04-09 02:07 AM   #32 
   Even if they passed tomorrow  Ms. Toad   Nov-04-09 08:30 AM   #49 
   I'm wondering why America makes such a big deal about the separation of church and state  tavalon   Nov-04-09 02:50 AM   #35 
   thats why we should seperate them, have the civil side do a contract  vadawg   Nov-04-09 02:51 AM   #36 
   I completely agree with you, btw  tavalon   Nov-04-09 02:53 AM   #38 
   That is already what happens.  ieoeja   Nov-04-09 10:12 AM   #58 
   It's not quite as much a mixture as it seems.  Ms. Toad   Nov-04-09 08:48 AM   #51 
   Thank you, Ms. Toad  theHandpuppet   Nov-04-09 06:51 AM   #40 
   What is in a "word"?  tsuki   Nov-04-09 07:22 AM   #46 
   I am speaking of the word in connection with legal status.  Ms. Toad   Nov-04-09 08:12 AM   #47 
      Your suspicion is incorrect. My Mother believed that if I did not  tsuki   Nov-04-09 10:58 AM   #69 
   "'Domestic Partners' shall have all the rights, privileges, and responsibilities under the law...  Romulox   Nov-04-09 10:42 AM   #64 
      That only works reasonably well within the state which sponsored it.  Ms. Toad   Nov-04-09 11:39 AM   #74 
         The issue you're speaking on turns on Full Faith and Credit, not the characterization of the union  Romulox   Nov-04-09 12:01 PM   #76 
            And the problems you are suggesting  Ms. Toad   Nov-04-09 12:21 PM   #78 
               "reciprocity in other states..." is what "Full Faith and Credit" means...  Romulox   Nov-04-09 12:36 PM   #79 
                  Yes and no.  Ms. Toad   Nov-04-09 02:51 PM   #81 
   The same assholes  NMMNG   Nov-04-09 01:26 AM   #28 
   No.  laconicsax   Nov-04-09 01:53 AM   #30 
   Well...  regnaD kciN   Nov-04-09 02:18 AM   #34 
   It's not a "word." It's a question: are we REALLY equal or just sorta-kinda?  Unvanguard   Nov-04-09 09:06 AM   #52 
   "let's just call it an interracial civil union."  gatorboy   Nov-04-09 09:48 AM   #57 
   Our own President is against it.  VMI Dem   Nov-04-09 12:56 AM   #2 
   Yes where now?  SammyWinstonJack   Nov-04-09 01:15 AM   #20 
   My parents and their friends are all against it. My friends are all for it.  Jennicut   Nov-04-09 12:57 AM   #4 
   What's sad is the Maine proposal wasn't forcing anyone/any group to marry people....  ProudToBeBlueInRhody   Nov-04-09 01:01 AM   #6 
   harder in midterms  DaveinMD   Nov-04-09 01:01 AM   #7 
   We lost California with Obama on the ticket.  imdjh   Nov-04-09 01:11 AM   #12 
   Note that both tax-reduction referenda...  Davis_X_Machina   Nov-04-09 01:04 AM   #8 
   A modest change of tactics  Dogmudgeon   Nov-04-09 01:05 AM   #9 
   I'm thinking baseball bats at the moment. Too extreme?  imdjh   Nov-04-09 01:13 AM   #15 
      We still haven't tried agitprop  Dogmudgeon   Nov-04-09 01:26 AM   #27 
   My mom is a perfect example of this barrier.  Cessna Invesco Palin   Nov-04-09 01:06 AM   #10 
   Tell your mom for me ...  Hepburn   Nov-04-09 10:23 AM   #60 
   Time is on our side.  d_b   Nov-04-09 01:12 AM   #13 
   In about 20 years this country is going to be a VERY different place...  LostInAnomie   Nov-04-09 01:13 AM   #16 
   Yea I give it 20 years too  d_b   Nov-04-09 01:13 AM   #17 
   Take your pick of predictions, but yours assumes a great deal of assimilation of immigrants.  imdjh   Nov-04-09 01:26 AM   #26 
   Good point.  Beregond2   Nov-04-09 01:52 AM   #29 
   I assume you are kidding.  imdjh   Nov-04-09 11:28 AM   #73 
   Even with immigration, the age divide on same-sex marriage is still immense.  Unvanguard   Nov-04-09 09:27 AM   #55 
      I have little doubt about the inevitability of it, though I wonder if I'll live to see it.  imdjh   Nov-04-09 11:19 AM   #71 
   Yep. Until then, things will suck. We are living in Fundie-land.  krabigirl   Nov-04-09 03:10 PM   #83 
   Closer than ever before. I have to have hope.  NoSheep   Nov-04-09 01:14 AM   #18 
   civil rights was won through court battles and legislature, the same will be true of gay marriage  JI7   Nov-04-09 01:15 AM   #19 
   Gay marriage legal in 5 states, up from 2 at the beginning of this year  liberalpragmatist   Nov-04-09 01:19 AM   #22 
   Yes,  Beregond2   Nov-04-09 01:56 AM   #31 
   Yeats summed up being a liberal thusly:  XemaSab   Nov-04-09 01:22 AM   #24 
   The main thrust of the Yes on 1 campaign was-  Old and In the Way   Nov-04-09 02:08 AM   #33 
   Look at the way the ballots are always worded  SoCalDem   Nov-04-09 02:53 AM   #37 
   Maine had a 'people's veto' referendum...  Davis_X_Machina   Nov-04-09 06:25 AM   #39 
   I am all for same gender marriages  quaker bill   Nov-04-09 07:02 AM   #41 
   Why not try another tact?  Ganja Ninja   Nov-04-09 07:07 AM   #42 
   Sometimes I wonder  Stevenmarc   Nov-04-09 08:23 AM   #48 
   A marriage ceremony and a wedding are the same thing.  Ganja Ninja   Nov-04-09 09:26 AM   #54 
   There is no such thing as a marriage ceremony.  ieoeja   Nov-04-09 10:26 AM   #61 
   I'm not talking prohibiting anybody from doing anything.  Ganja Ninja   Nov-04-09 10:46 AM   #65 
   What you are suggesting is legal nonsense.  Ms. Toad   Nov-04-09 11:57 AM   #75 
   Question about your post -- seriously  justiceischeap   Nov-04-09 10:28 AM   #62 
      You didn't ask it of me, but you are (virtually) correct.  ieoeja   Nov-04-09 10:34 AM   #63 
      Marriage isn't really a contract, inasmuch as it binds a third party  Romulox   Nov-04-09 10:53 AM   #66 
      I'm saying when you go to the county for a license it will say ...  Ganja Ninja   Nov-04-09 11:02 AM   #70 
         For legal reasons, it needs to say marriage.  Ms. Toad   Nov-04-09 12:05 PM   #77 
            Well that shoots that down then. n/t  Ganja Ninja   Nov-04-09 01:01 PM   #80 
   Marriage was a legal partnership in Europefor millenia before the Church took responsibility for it.  ieoeja   Nov-04-09 10:20 AM   #59 
   They've been using this for cycles to GOTV and fire up their base  TheKentuckian   Nov-04-09 07:08 AM   #43 
   But it can't be settled at the Federal level because:  Tesha   Nov-04-09 08:40 AM   #50 
   Yes, we can. We almost won in California. We almost won in Maine.  Unvanguard   Nov-04-09 09:07 AM   #53 
   The bigots are good at scaring people.  Odin2005   Nov-04-09 09:39 AM   #56 
   And the nice, young people  tonysam   Nov-04-09 10:55 AM   #67 
   Nope. People under 50 pretty much are not as insane about the whole gay thing, period.  krabigirl   Nov-04-09 03:11 PM   #84 
   People are too stupid to do the right thing  Taverner   Nov-04-09 10:57 AM   #68 
   Gay marriage will win when enough peoples' hearts and minds have been won over  slackmaster   Nov-04-09 11:20 AM   #72 
   You're right. We can't. Right now, America is still a backwards, bigoted, religious nation.  krabigirl   Nov-04-09 03:09 PM   #82 
   Crap. I accidentally recommended this thread. Oops.  BlueIris   Nov-04-09 03:12 PM   #85 
   Not giving up. Not even waiting for the bigots to die. Will just keep fighting  Malikshah   Nov-04-09 03:13 PM   #86 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC