You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #21: I think he meant the intended purpose of it failed. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-18-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. I think he meant the intended purpose of it failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Cho (VT gunmans) gun purchase was ILLEGAL. the background check FAILED. davepc  Apr-18-07 03:28 PM   #0 
  - Ouch...  beevul   Apr-18-07 03:33 PM   #1 
  - If he was flagged by the NICS (National Instant Criminal Background Check System)  davepc   Apr-18-07 03:35 PM   #4 
     - Cho was probably never checked at all.  Breeze54   Apr-18-07 04:03 PM   #33 
     - If he wasn't in the NICS database,  formercia   Apr-18-07 04:32 PM   #41 
  - I'd definitely call that an abject failure of the background check system.  kestrel91316   Apr-18-07 03:33 PM   #2 
  - Reagan started this crap  Juniperx   Apr-18-07 03:34 PM   #3 
  - The NICS was part of the 1993 Brady Bill  davepc   Apr-18-07 03:39 PM   #7 
  - Mental health disqualification predates Brady. It has been in force since the 60s  Solo_in_MD   Apr-18-07 03:53 PM   #20 
  - I'm talking about mental health... not guns... n/t  Juniperx   Apr-18-07 04:05 PM   #35 
     - another Republican failure. They've underfunded and destroyed the mental health system for years  davepc   Apr-18-07 04:26 PM   #38 
        - Yep  Juniperx   Apr-18-07 04:29 PM   #40 
  - I don't want family members having that kind of power over each other  kgfnally   Apr-18-07 03:50 PM   #17 
     - There's a huge gap in that reasoning...  Juniperx   Apr-18-07 04:09 PM   #37 
  - So, the "gun control" advocates were wrong. No surprise.  Alexander   Apr-18-07 03:36 PM   #5 
  - There you go, using logic...  Juniperx   Apr-18-07 03:38 PM   #6 
  - Seconded.  TheFriendlyAnarchist   Apr-18-07 03:41 PM   #11 
  - The gun control advocates put that law on the books  jpgray   Apr-18-07 03:40 PM   #8 
     - The problem here was enforcement, and the Brady bill had nothing to do with it.  Alexander   Apr-18-07 03:52 PM   # 
        - The NICS was part of the brady campaign, no? Don't spew propaganda--think.  jpgray   Apr-18-07 03:55 PM   #23 
           - He's right.  davepc   Apr-18-07 03:57 PM   #25 
              - So clearly, the brady campaign had something to do with it.  jpgray   Apr-18-07 03:58 PM   #26 
                 - I thought it was a reply to another post. I support the '93 Brady Bill  davepc   Apr-18-07 04:00 PM   #28 
                    - The AWB was essentially a graceless attempt to ban weapons of military design  jpgray   Apr-18-07 04:04 PM   #34 
  - K & R  karlrschneider   Apr-18-07 03:40 PM   #9 
  - Or could it be?  loyalsister   Apr-18-07 03:47 PM   #13 
  - OK - other then the question on the 4473, how does "mental history"  jmg257   Apr-18-07 03:40 PM   #10 
  - Don't forget HIPPA....  virginia mountainman   Apr-18-07 03:47 PM   #15 
  - It was legal  shadowrider   Apr-18-07 03:47 PM   #12 
  - I've heard there's a distinction between voluntary and involuntary committal to a mental hospital  piedmont   Apr-18-07 03:47 PM   #14 
  - How do you know the background check failed?  Eric J in MN   Apr-18-07 03:48 PM   #16 
  - I think he meant the intended purpose of it failed.  karlrschneider   Apr-18-07 03:54 PM   #21 
  - He was only sent for observation  shadowrider   Apr-18-07 03:54 PM   #22 
  - Who needs a background check in Virginia?  George Oilwellian   Apr-18-07 03:52 PM   #18 
  - Not just gun shows. Classified ads and other private party sales.  piedmont   Apr-18-07 03:59 PM   #27 
  - or you can lie on the form you fill out when you buy a gun from a dealer and the computer does not  davepc   Apr-18-07 04:01 PM   #31 
  - Except he didn't buy it at a gun show N/T  beevul   Apr-18-07 04:02 PM   #32 
  - my take on this..where was homeland security?? there should have  madmom   Apr-18-07 03:53 PM   #19 
  - They're too busy feeling up grandmas at the airport.  karlrschneider   Apr-18-07 03:55 PM   #24 
     - BWHAHAHAHAHA!!!  Karenina   Apr-18-07 06:33 PM   #44 
  - He voluntarily checked himself in - and thanks to our super gun laws, that's ok.  AZBlue   Apr-18-07 04:01 PM   #29 
  - You're Dead Wrong On Both Counts. It Was Legal And It Did Not Fail.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Apr-18-07 04:01 PM   #30 
  - You're correct  shadowrider   Apr-18-07 04:07 PM   #36 
  - If the dealer did a NICS check of Cho  formercia   Apr-18-07 04:29 PM   #39 
  - VT shootings = another success for the NRA  MethuenProgressive   Apr-18-07 06:00 PM   #42 
  - Mental defective  Thothmes   Apr-18-07 06:12 PM   #43 
  - Keep'll eventually find a way to justify your gun lust  jgraz   Apr-18-07 07:15 PM   #45 
  - (AP) Rules Should Have Barred Cho's Weapons Purchase  davepc   Apr-19-07 10:15 PM   #46 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC