EOTE
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-03-09 04:14 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. K&R from a proud Luddite with 16 years IT experience. |
|
I come from a proud tradition of Luddites. Only my folks still haven't figured out how to stop their VCR from flashing 12:00.
|
| -"What's a Luddite?" |
Orwellian_Ghost |
Nov-03-09 04:03 PM |
#0 |
-
Why the cowardly U after it is barely posted? (nt) |
question everything |
Nov-03-09 04:06 PM |
#1 |
 -
Probably didn't |
Orwellian_Ghost |
Nov-03-09 04:09 PM |
#2 |
 -
It's not the content, |
Autumn |
Nov-03-09 04:10 PM |
#4 |
  -
I rec for the name. |
SammyWinstonJack |
Nov-04-09 12:43 AM |
#37 |
 -
Same here |
Autumn |
Nov-04-09 07:03 AM |
#41 |
 -
I just gave an unrec because you're complaining about unrecs. |
Blue-Jay |
Nov-03-09 04:12 PM |
#8 |
  -
Yeah, within a couple of minutes after a thread is posted, somebody has to complain about UnRecs. |
elocs |
Nov-03-09 05:07 PM |
#15 |
   -
can we unrec a post? damn. |
sui generis |
Nov-04-09 01:08 PM |
#53 |
  -
Well, that'll show 'em... |
Greyhound |
Nov-03-09 05:08 PM |
#16 |
 -
Attention, and you gave it to them. They thank you. n/t |
elocs |
Nov-03-09 05:03 PM |
#13 |
 -
You're fair and balanced. You will counter with a Recommend, right? |
TexasObserver |
Nov-03-09 05:18 PM |
#20 |
-
Oh, thank you, thank you, oh great master |
question everything |
Nov-03-09 11:42 PM |
#34 |
-
Question, TexasObserver, where does one SEE a negative vote? I don't have any visible |
bertman |
Nov-04-09 08:06 AM |
#44 |
-
I'll try to explain. |
TexasObserver |
Nov-04-09 01:07 PM |
#52 |
-
+1 for a good history lesson here |
noamnety |
Nov-03-09 04:10 PM |
#3 |
-
They were the folks who said the family & family values would be destroyed |
SpiralHawk |
Nov-03-09 04:10 PM |
#5 |
-
sure. but they destroyed new technology. assigning that as the cause |
PretzelWarrior |
Nov-03-09 04:11 PM |
#6 |
 -
I believe the point of the OP was that what YOU are saying is the |
RaleighNCDUer |
Nov-04-09 10:36 AM |
#45 |
 -
It is not the technology, per se |
blindpig |
Nov-04-09 11:30 AM |
#47 |
 -
from ludlow. |
pansypoo53219 |
Nov-04-09 12:15 PM |
#50 |
-
Techno-utopians? I think the Pet Shop Boys fall into that group. |
GodlessBiker |
Nov-03-09 04:11 PM |
#7 |
 -
What have the Pet Shop Boys got to do with this? |
Puzzler |
Nov-03-09 04:17 PM |
#11 |
-
It was a joke. |
FatDave |
Nov-04-09 12:25 AM |
#36 |
-
knr but shouldn't there be a link? |
hfojvt |
Nov-03-09 04:12 PM |
#9 |
 -
From a Thomas Pynchon essay, I think. Link: |
sl8 |
Nov-07-09 05:21 PM |
#59 |
-
K&R from a proud Luddite with 16 years IT experience. |
EOTE |
Nov-03-09 04:14 PM |
#10 |
-
So What? The Sophists weren't the charletans they were bashed for being, either... |
Odin2005 |
Nov-03-09 05:01 PM |
#12 |
 -
+1 (nt) |
Posteritatis |
Nov-03-09 05:16 PM |
#19 |
 -
OMGWTFLOGIC! |
redqueen |
Nov-03-09 05:31 PM |
#23 |
 -
Here's what |
Orwellian_Ghost |
Nov-03-09 07:18 PM |
#24 |
  -
Lingustic change has no memory. |
Odin2005 |
Nov-03-09 08:25 PM |
#27 |
   -
There's a ton of words that have absolutely nothing to do with their origin. |
JoeyT |
Nov-03-09 09:50 PM |
#29 |
  -
Two sided coin |
DonCoquixote |
Nov-03-09 10:08 PM |
#30 |
 -
Hello, fellow Aspie! |
Odin2005 |
Nov-03-09 11:04 PM |
#31 |
 -
I know I'm late to the party |
JackintheGreen |
Nov-04-09 11:19 AM |
#46 |
-
Weaving was a highly skilled profession and the weavers owned their looms. |
Ozymanithrax |
Nov-03-09 05:05 PM |
#14 |
-
You're familiar with Edward Thompson ... |
RoyGBiv |
Nov-03-09 05:10 PM |
#17 |
-
See, if someone has a really stupid idea, and you don't like it, you're a Luddite! |
TexasObserver |
Nov-03-09 05:14 PM |
#18 |
 -
no. I don't look for "IT" words. when I read the self-checkout thread I thought |
PretzelWarrior |
Nov-03-09 05:19 PM |
#21 |
-
CALVINIST! |
TexasObserver |
Nov-03-09 05:29 PM |
#22 |
-
Thanks!! K&R nt |
maryf |
Nov-03-09 07:43 PM |
#25 |
-
Proud Luddite here...sorta. |
badgerpup |
Nov-03-09 08:11 PM |
#26 |
 -
My wife & I saw a perfect example of what you're talking about. |
Altoid_Cyclist |
Nov-04-09 05:28 AM |
#40 |
-
Pro-Nukers call me a Luddite for opposing nuclear power, BUT... |
Liberation Angel |
Nov-03-09 08:28 PM |
#28 |
-
I'm a proud believer of Ned Ludd's reasoning. |
westerebus |
Nov-03-09 11:19 PM |
#32 |
-
Was discussing this with someone just the other day -- |
eppur_se_muova |
Nov-03-09 11:39 PM |
#33 |
-
I'm a proud luddite. |
HiFructosePronSyrup |
Nov-03-09 11:45 PM |
#35 |
-
K&R |
leftstreet |
Nov-04-09 01:14 AM |
#38 |
-
The Marxist distinction between a tool and a machine is relevant here |
eridani |
Nov-04-09 01:46 AM |
#39 |
-
Basic Meaning |
soarsboard2 |
Nov-04-09 07:09 AM |
#42 |
-
Ned Ludd did it. |
Soylent Brice |
Nov-04-09 07:16 AM |
#43 |
-
neoluddism |
Gedankenaustausch |
Nov-04-09 11:36 AM |
#48 |
-
Good post, but it fails to mention that Luddites recognize the damage machinery can do. |
Grinchie |
Nov-04-09 11:54 AM |
#49 |
 -
+1 |
IrateCitizen |
Nov-04-09 12:55 PM |
#51 |
-
K & R hmmm I like the name...luddite can be a good thing... |
winyanstaz |
Nov-04-09 02:22 PM |
#54 |
-
to be devil's advocate, the unabomber was a luddite |
Lerkfish |
Nov-04-09 02:24 PM |
#55 |
 -
The unabomber was also... |
LanternWaste |
Nov-04-09 02:50 PM |
#56 |
 -
Not really |
Orwellian_Ghost |
Nov-05-09 08:22 AM |
#58 |
-
can you redefine plagiarism, too? |
chimpyisstillsatan |
Nov-05-09 08:13 AM |
#57 |
-
I would like to point out that the definition of terms change over time. |
johnaries |
Nov-07-09 05:38 PM |
#60 |
-
I already said that, and got an angry lecture. |
Odin2005 |
Nov-07-09 06:12 PM |
#61 |