You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #103: I linked you to that post in her blog earlier. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
GirlinContempt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #99
103. I linked you to that post in her blog earlier.
Edited on Tue Oct-20-09 02:06 PM by GirlinContempt
Go back through my posts, it's there.

She said that she & her family are dealing with the TSA on this issue. Why would you deal with an agency that apparently edited video footage of them kidnapping your child?! I say it smells like total bullshit. And I just don't believe that the TSA has some video editing genius hanging around waiting for them to abduct children so they can tamper with videos and insert babies in to frames where they were not actually present. If I'm wrong, I'll eat my words and issue a full apology without condition.

A few other things she said were true, too. She was at the airport. She was pulled aside for screening. That doesn't mean the TSA stole her child. They released additional footage because people were complaining it wasn't enough. If this REALLY happened as she said it did, she should be taking them to court and having the full tapes presented and witnesses subpoenaed, as I've said all along. Personally, I doubt that'll happen, because I think it's a lie. I tried to suspend judgment, but I just can't. The whole thing seems to me to be a total attention seeking drama fest from someone self-admittedly unstable. None of her actions or statements seem to me like the reactions of a justified person, a person who has been traumatized and had her child traumatized. A person who wants this to never happen to anyone else. I'd be taking them to fucking court before I'd be looking for a publisher, that's for sure.

My grandmother, who has osteoporosis and is handicapped had a horrific ordeal when she and I were traveling together, and due to the negligence of the airline she ended up with a fractured hip. My LAST thought was posting about it online, or finding a publisher to spread it around (or cash in). My FIRST thought was of course taking care of my grandmother, obviously, but after that I was dealing with the airline, I contacted a lawyer in case I found we needed to take it further, and other appropriate agencies. I was so incredibly outraged, upset and shocked that this had happened. The negligence and incompetence surrounding the situation was shocking, it went against the airlines own policies. I was fortunate enough to be able to deal with them and not have to take it further. But, I probably could have written an expose piece about it and got some cash. That was the LAST thing on my mind. If they had taken footage of the instance and doctored it, I would have been screaming my head off, filing a lawsuit, and doing everything in my power immediately to rectify the situation and expose them. And I would not be trying to settle with them, as they would have proved themselves despicable and untrustworthy. Nothing about this womans situation is ringing true to me. We're two different people, this woman and I, but that's how I feel.

And I also think it's complete bullshit that the kind lady 'had to be a mom', but that's another story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Not everything you read on the internet is true: hedgehog  Oct-17-09 09:15 AM   #0 
  - Saw this posted here yesterday by somebody.  lamp_shade   Oct-17-09 09:18 AM   #1 
  - It was a hot and heavy post. I thought that more people would see it today if  hedgehog   Oct-17-09 09:24 AM   #4 
     - I didn't post it... and I had no comment because I suspected it was weak.  lamp_shade   Oct-17-09 09:33 AM   #5 
        - I didn't mean to imply that I was taking umbrage with you.  hedgehog   Oct-17-09 09:52 AM   #12 
  - For Real?  zorahopkins   Oct-17-09 09:20 AM   #2 
  - I'm sorry but I don't believe that...  Curtland1015   Oct-17-09 09:21 AM   #3 
  - WOW - Immediate credible transparency  FreakinDJ   Oct-17-09 09:34 AM   #6 
  - It's probably just a hobby with them....  old mark   Oct-17-09 09:39 AM   #8 
  - Just glad its not a Fetish with them  FreakinDJ   Oct-17-09 10:03 AM   #15 
  - LOL  iamjoy   Oct-17-09 10:06 AM   #17 
     - I don't know what the protocols are today, but on one trip the  hedgehog   Oct-17-09 10:13 AM   #19 
        - LOL!  tammywammy   Oct-17-09 10:15 AM   #20 
        - I'm a little disappointed that Americans are so readily conformist  old mark   Oct-17-09 10:52 AM   #25 
           - I think Americans follow rules and regulations because  hedgehog   Oct-17-09 11:49 AM   #36 
           - I've recently gone through security in Heathrow and Frankfort.. I couldn't see a difference  Orangepeel   Oct-17-09 12:33 PM   #44 
              - god knows what he would have done with that.......nt  old mark   Oct-17-09 04:08 PM   #64 
  - Not being a flyer  ipaint   Oct-17-09 09:34 AM   #7 
  - If by the "TSA took my baby away" (a long lost Ramones song?)  myrna minx   Oct-17-09 09:39 AM   #9 
  - I liked the part about sneakily getting her cell phone in order to make two calls  tammywammy   Oct-17-09 09:57 AM   #13 
     - I'm going to play the race card. How much of her anger was due  hedgehog   Oct-17-09 10:18 AM   #21 
        - Ohhh, nice angle!  rd_kent   Oct-17-09 10:33 AM   #23 
        - OH, excellent angle  tammywammy   Oct-17-09 10:59 AM   #28 
           - She says she has xanex - it appears she does have issues  merh   Oct-17-09 11:48 AM   #35 
              - The video was blurred as a courtesy. According to the woman's  hedgehog   Oct-17-09 11:50 AM   #37 
              - And that required the entire "wanding" to be blurred?  merh   Oct-17-09 12:37 PM   #46 
              - I agree, if it was just the metal clip she should have been able to remove it  tammywammy   Oct-17-09 12:35 PM   #45 
                 - You mean to tell me the fact that the TSA released a video  merh   Oct-17-09 12:39 PM   #47 
                    - No, it doesn't  tammywammy   Oct-17-09 12:42 PM   #48 
                       - I see. So in your opinioin, it is okay that they required she unzip her pants?  merh   Oct-17-09 12:51 PM   #50 
                          - I suggest you write to the blogger and have her request the TSA release the video unblurred n/t  tammywammy   Oct-17-09 01:00 PM   #53 
                          - That's not the point.  merh   Oct-17-09 01:03 PM   #54 
                             - There are people on here who apparently think it's perfectly ok for  LibDemAlways   Oct-17-09 01:39 PM   #56 
                                - Christ, there were men all around and the area is open to the public  merh   Oct-17-09 02:13 PM   #57 
                                - I noticed the missing seconds, too. Suspect TSA is only showing what it wants  LibDemAlways   Oct-17-09 03:07 PM   #59 
                                - I hope the blogger gets an attorney.  merh   Oct-17-09 03:12 PM   #60 
                                   - There was definitely more going on there than TSA was  LibDemAlways   Oct-17-09 03:20 PM   #61 
                                      - I agree.  merh   Oct-17-09 03:38 PM   #62 
                                - It seems to me  GirlinContempt   Oct-17-09 05:26 PM   #66 
                                   - Wrong - there was no camera change - there were two cameras  merh   Oct-17-09 08:05 PM   #79 
                                      - Generally, they are in synch  GirlinContempt   Oct-17-09 10:07 PM   #81 
                                         - No, they didn't go to a different camera.  merh   Oct-17-09 10:36 PM   #85 
                                            - Sorry, that's what I meant by 'go to a different camera'  GirlinContempt   Oct-17-09 10:43 PM   #88 
                                               - It is just an assumption that all the cameras have the same time  merh   Oct-17-09 11:06 PM   #89 
                                               - Hey, I said I have no way of knowing if they have the same time  GirlinContempt   Oct-17-09 11:51 PM   #90 
                                               - self delete  merh   Oct-18-09 12:12 AM   # 
                                               - I think some of it's lunacy on the other side too  GirlinContempt   Oct-18-09 12:14 AM   #92 
                                               - I'd have contacted a lawyer by now  merh   Oct-18-09 12:12 AM   #91 
                                               - Instead of contacting a lawyer, she's contacting publishers  GirlinContempt   Oct-19-09 03:17 PM   #94 
                                               - Where did you read about her contacting publishers?  merh   Oct-19-09 04:10 PM   #95 
                                               - She said it herself re: publishers  GirlinContempt   Oct-20-09 09:01 AM   #97 
                                               - Oh, so you post me someone's blog that interprets her blog and  merh   Oct-20-09 11:19 AM   #100 
                                               - I linked you to the screen shots  GirlinContempt   Oct-20-09 01:42 PM   #101 
                                               - They do.  merh   Oct-20-09 01:47 PM   #102 
                                               - "eh i can put it up on my blog,  GirlinContempt   Oct-20-09 02:11 PM   #104 
                                               - She did post a response  merh   Oct-20-09 01:51 AM   #96 
                                               - I read that, I posted that to you.  GirlinContempt   Oct-20-09 09:13 AM   #98 
                                               - You didn't post that link to me. I asked you for something  merh   Oct-20-09 11:02 AM   #99 
                                               - I linked you to that post in her blog earlier.  GirlinContempt   Oct-20-09 02:04 PM   #103 
                                               - I've already detailed the problems with the video and the  merh   Oct-20-09 02:41 PM   #105 
                                               - And I've told you that I don't believe  GirlinContempt   Oct-20-09 02:59 PM   #106 
                                               - You read her blog with skeptism though you are not skepitcal  merh   Oct-20-09 03:57 PM   #107 
                                               - Sorry, I should have said  GirlinContempt   Oct-20-09 04:20 PM   #108 
                                               - Of course we can part amicably  merh   Oct-20-09 04:32 PM   #109 
                                               - Good good  GirlinContempt   Oct-20-09 05:37 PM   #110 
                                               - I've noticed a lot of that silliness.  merh   Oct-20-09 09:49 PM   #111 
                                               - Sent  GirlinContempt   Oct-20-09 10:03 PM   #112 
                                               - reply sent.  merh   Oct-20-09 10:44 PM   #113 
                                - My mistake - the blog says she had to unbutton her jeans.  hedgehog   Oct-17-09 02:58 PM   #58 
                                   - Then why did the TSA blur the image if the image was just that  merh   Oct-17-09 03:41 PM   #63 
                                      - Well, I think I'll ask them why on their blog  GirlinContempt   Oct-17-09 05:53 PM   #67 
                                         - If you get an answer please let me know.  merh   Oct-17-09 06:12 PM   #68 
                                            - I counted one for the majority  GirlinContempt   Oct-17-09 06:24 PM   #69 
                                               - You can't tell, it is blurred.  merh   Oct-17-09 06:59 PM   #72 
                                                  - You can tell, actually, that it was only one.  GirlinContempt   Oct-17-09 07:22 PM   #75 
                                                  - I don't think it was a total fabrication  merh   Oct-17-09 07:59 PM   #78 
                                                  - You're right, it's edited.  GirlinContempt   Oct-17-09 09:51 PM   #80 
                                                  - I'm not defending her  merh   Oct-17-09 10:29 PM   #84 
                                                  - Ok, then I don't disagree with you.  GirlinContempt   Oct-17-09 10:37 PM   #86 
                          - She never said she had to pull them down  GirlinContempt   Oct-17-09 05:22 PM   #65 
  - Funny, I went into the court house a few weeks ago with a knife in my pocket  old mark   Oct-17-09 09:42 AM   #10 
  - I'm not sure what you are saying; your experience sounds very  hedgehog   Oct-17-09 10:05 AM   #16 
     - Sorry I wasn't clear - It went smoothly and was no problem for anyone -  old mark   Oct-17-09 10:48 AM   #24 
  - She lost me when she said she was in a hurry...  rucky   Oct-17-09 09:43 AM   #11 
  - I'm The Opposite  iamjoy   Oct-17-09 10:08 AM   #18 
  - Well, if it happened  TicketyBoo   Oct-17-09 11:34 AM   #33 
     - She was in there for less than sixty seconds before she started to get agitated.  GirlinContempt   Oct-17-09 12:55 PM   #52 
  - The TSA and the DHS are fascist organizations  ixion   Oct-17-09 09:58 AM   #14 
  - Agreed.  LibDemAlways   Oct-17-09 11:19 AM   #31 
  - Will any of the DUers that berated anyone who DARED to question this story apologise?  rd_kent   Oct-17-09 10:32 AM   #22 
  - That funny.  ipaint   Oct-17-09 10:56 AM   #27 
     - Dont even try it!  rd_kent   Oct-17-09 10:59 AM   #29 
  - The mother lied.  TexasObserver   Oct-17-09 10:53 AM   #26 
  - Where is the proof that the woman in the video and the woman on the  LibDemAlways   Oct-17-09 11:15 AM   #30 
  - Because if it wasn't the same woman, their disinfo could be blown away in seconds  Bucky   Oct-17-09 11:54 AM   #40 
  - All I see is that an anonymous blogger posted a TSA horror story.  LibDemAlways   Oct-17-09 12:16 PM   #42 
  - She admits it's her.  GirlinContempt   Oct-17-09 10:38 PM   #87 
  - I never take TSA horror stories at face value.  MineralMan   Oct-17-09 11:20 AM   #32 
  - Regarding: Edit  TicketyBoo   Oct-17-09 11:39 AM   #34 
  - The blurring was done for insideous reasons  Bucky   Oct-17-09 11:51 AM   #38 
  - I just counted from when she was pulled aside at 11:02.  hedgehog   Oct-17-09 11:51 AM   #39 
  - Public body searches are routine, and people have been conditioned to  LibDemAlways   Oct-17-09 12:08 PM   #41 
     - But if they're "routine"  TicketyBoo   Oct-17-09 12:49 PM   #49 
        - It's obscured probably because they are feeling around her bra or made her  LibDemAlways   Oct-17-09 01:32 PM   #55 
  - One time when my sister and I were very young  GirlinContempt   Oct-17-09 12:28 PM   #43 
  - SHE PUT HER SON IN THE STROLLER HERSELF AND HE SAT THERE THE WHOLE TIME!  GirlinContempt   Oct-17-09 12:52 PM   #51 
  - Well, To Be Fair To Her  iamjoy   Oct-17-09 06:24 PM   #70 
     - Yeah, a minute can seem like a lot longer  GirlinContempt   Oct-17-09 06:55 PM   #71 
        - +1! Noticed that, too. She is FOS. n/t  rvablue   Oct-17-09 07:11 PM   #73 
        - That's True  iamjoy   Oct-17-09 07:34 PM   #76 
           - I think in most cases  GirlinContempt   Oct-17-09 07:41 PM   #77 
  - And this is why all law enforcement should have cameras  nadinbrzezinski   Oct-17-09 07:18 PM   #74 
  - In Canada they let you remove whatever it is that is setting the alarm off  ipaint   Oct-17-09 10:16 PM   #82 
     - I've always had them scan me in public  GirlinContempt   Oct-17-09 10:26 PM   #83 
     - The plexiglass booth is more than a holding pen. There are air jets  hedgehog   Oct-18-09 12:45 PM   #93 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC