You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: I'm with you [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Lucy Goosey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm with you
I'm still grossed out by the fact that he essentially let Glenn Beck fire Van Jones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -If Kevin Jennings goes, I'm going with him. Robb  Oct-01-09 07:15 PM   #0 
  - Don't tell us, tell them. And your newspapers.  aquart   Oct-01-09 07:18 PM   #1 
  - Count on it. nt  Robb   Oct-01-09 07:20 PM   #2 
  - +1  JuniperLea   Oct-01-09 07:21 PM   #3 
  - I'm sure Robb can do all three and more. /m  lib_wit_it   Oct-01-09 08:47 PM   #38 
  - Well, bye.  bbinacan   Oct-01-09 07:22 PM   #4 
  - I would advise you check your facts.  Robb   Oct-01-09 07:24 PM   #6 
  - He didn't tell anyone to fuck anyone  ruggerson   Oct-01-09 07:25 PM   #7 
  - "Your spin is the repetition of rightwing mendacity."  Howardx   Oct-01-09 07:42 PM   #16 
  - do you ever check your facts?  La Lioness Priyanka   Oct-01-09 07:26 PM   #8 
  - ....  bbinacan   Oct-01-09 07:42 PM   #15 
     - You equate "I hope you knew to use a condom"  Robb   Oct-01-09 07:49 PM   #19 
     - I stand corrected  bbinacan   Oct-01-09 07:53 PM   #21 
        - I'm astounded still.  Robb   Oct-01-09 07:55 PM   #22 
        - You're astounded?  bbinacan   Oct-01-09 07:57 PM   #24 
        - Read below carefully, I honestly want an answer:  Robb   Oct-01-09 08:02 PM   #27 
        - This is the problem I have  bbinacan   Oct-01-09 08:39 PM   #37 
           - That's not at ALL what you said. You are lying.  Robb   Oct-02-09 07:47 AM   #39 
              - The real problem I have  bbinacan   Oct-02-09 06:10 PM   #40 
                 - Just say it. It's because he's gay, isn't it.  Robb   Oct-02-09 07:16 PM   #43 
                    - You assume too much.  bbinacan   Oct-02-09 07:22 PM   #45 
                       - You haven't offered another reason. I'm running out of options here. nt  Robb   Oct-02-09 07:23 PM   #46 
                       - Kicking because I don't want to let this go.  Robb   Oct-03-09 08:03 AM   #47 
                       - Still waiting.  Robb   Oct-04-09 08:23 PM   #51 
                       - Kicking again, and still waiting.  Robb   Oct-05-09 07:53 AM   #52 
                       - Still waiting. nt  Robb   Oct-06-09 07:31 AM   #53 
                       - Kick. nt  Robb   Oct-07-09 11:01 AM   #55 
                       - Still waiting. nt  Robb   Oct-09-09 07:46 AM   #56 
                       - A patient kick. nt  Robb   Oct-11-09 03:35 PM   #58 
        - There is no statutory rape since the kid was 16 and that is the legal age in Mass  ruggerson   Oct-01-09 08:03 PM   #28 
           - The poster does not care about the facts clearly  FreeState   Oct-02-09 06:32 PM   #41 
        - apparantly we dont give kids sexual health advice if we dont agree with their sexual decisions.  La Lioness Priyanka   Oct-01-09 07:58 PM   #25 
        - not raped since it was consensual. i think you know nothing of the deep pain gay boys  La Lioness Priyanka   Oct-01-09 07:57 PM   #23 
        - By definition  bbinacan   Oct-01-09 08:04 PM   #29 
           - the kid was of legal age in Mass at the time  ruggerson   Oct-01-09 08:07 PM   #30 
           - he was 16. which is consensual age. what should the teacher done without outing the kid?  La Lioness Priyanka   Oct-01-09 08:07 PM   #31 
        - you're effed up, because the fact clearly are not on your side, and you won't admit it.  dionysus   Oct-03-09 09:31 AM   #48 
     - i read it. he didnt want the child to get aids. how horrible of him  La Lioness Priyanka   Oct-01-09 07:51 PM   #20 
  - he didn't. you pulled that story right out of..... well, we know where you pulled it from  cali   Oct-01-09 07:29 PM   #10 
  - ...  bbinacan   Oct-01-09 07:45 PM   #17 
     - The kid in question was 16 at the time and DID NOT HAVE SEX  FreeState   Oct-02-09 06:34 PM   #42 
  - It's not worth arguing with you about this  Malikshah   Oct-01-09 07:33 PM   #11 
  - The sign of a weak argument  bbinacan   Oct-01-09 08:09 PM   #32 
     - Not a weak argument at all. The truth does hurt. If one doesn't like the pain  Malikshah   Oct-01-09 08:18 PM   #34 
  - The law in the state is that 16 is considered legal for consensual  MadMaddie   Oct-01-09 07:34 PM   #13 
  - Last I read the kid was  bbinacan   Oct-01-09 07:36 PM   # 
     - Reporters don't do their homework  ruggerson   Oct-01-09 08:01 PM   #26 
        - From ABC  bbinacan   Oct-01-09 08:21 PM   #35 
           - Mediamatters has his drivers licence  dsc   Oct-09-09 08:00 AM   #57 
  - So you're saying gay people should have unprotected sex?  HiFructosePronSyrup   Oct-02-09 07:19 PM   #44 
  - I'm with you  Lucy Goosey   Oct-01-09 07:22 PM   #5 
  - everyone has to make up their own mind about this. What I know is that  cali   Oct-01-09 07:28 PM   #9 
  - it can't become a distraction  ruggerson   Oct-01-09 07:34 PM   #12 
     - while I certainly think they should strongly defend him and he certainly  cali   Oct-01-09 07:36 PM   #14 
        - They will *always* come up with another distraction....  BlooInBloo   Oct-01-09 07:46 PM   #18 
           - I could not agree with you more..how many will be viewed as a distraction and given the boot because  AuntPatsy   Oct-01-09 08:25 PM   #36 
  - Ensign First!  Gold Metal Flake   Oct-01-09 08:16 PM   #33 
  - thank you. nt  xchrom   Oct-03-09 09:37 AM   #49 
  - Who are you, and what have you done with the dingbat?  11 Bravo   Oct-03-09 09:39 AM   #50 
  - Well. it's going to get a lot nastier.  Are_grits_groceries   Oct-06-09 07:37 AM   #54 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC