You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #21: "Why doesn't he just do the time for his admitted crime?" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
hokies Donating Member (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-30-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. "Why doesn't he just do the time for his admitted crime?"
Clearly I was responding to the OP, who was asking why doesn't he just suck it up, not fight the legal system, and voluntarily do his time since it is not a long jail sentence. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Polanski's sentence is only 90 days? rvablue  Sep-30-09 03:36 PM   #0 
  - His sentence was 90 days, then the prosecutor went back on the plea deal. nt  TheWraith   Sep-30-09 03:47 PM   #1 
  - There was no sentencing deal  TorchTheWitch   Sep-30-09 04:11 PM   #8 
  - He was not sentenced. He skipped before sentencing.  msanthrope   Sep-30-09 10:08 PM   #36 
  - it sounds to me like that 48 days of 90 he didnt serve is the deal breaker polanski fled  seabeyond   Sep-30-09 10:09 PM   #37 
  - Please review the history of his case  Warpy   Sep-30-09 04:02 PM   #2 
  - a draconian sentence would have been appropriate  27inCali   Sep-30-09 04:03 PM   #3 
  - What if he was truly mentally disturbed?  armyowalgreens   Sep-30-09 04:04 PM   #4 
     - Then that would further undermine the whole pretense  spoony   Sep-30-09 04:09 PM   #6 
     - Well we don't send the mentally ill to prison. At least we shouldn't.  armyowalgreens   Sep-30-09 04:13 PM   #9 
        - Nonsense.  LisaL   Sep-30-09 08:46 PM   #31 
     - Since it was pre Reagan, we still had good mental institutions that  Thickasabrick   Sep-30-09 10:10 PM   #38 
  - Hmm, you can't have it both ways.  spoony   Sep-30-09 04:07 PM   #5 
  - Yeah, but it's *legal* for middle-aged men to fuck 15-year-olds in Germany...  redqueen   Sep-30-09 04:10 PM   #7 
  - What part about intensive treatment didn't you understand?  Warpy   Sep-30-09 04:19 PM   #15 
     - Apparently it wasn't intensive enough. (nt)  redqueen   Sep-30-09 04:24 PM   #22 
  - OMG.  rvablue   Sep-30-09 04:17 PM   #11 
  - Shame on you  Warpy   Sep-30-09 04:18 PM   #13 
     - Are the wishes of the victim meaningful in statutory rape cases?  redqueen   Sep-30-09 04:23 PM   #19 
     - The question is not ARE they meaningful, but SHOULD they be meaningful.  armyowalgreens   Sep-30-09 04:27 PM   #23 
        - It depends on the case of course. (nt)  redqueen   Sep-30-09 04:31 PM   #26 
           - I think the victims wishes play a role in every case. But the level of importance varies.  armyowalgreens   Sep-30-09 04:33 PM   #27 
     - I've read about the wishes of the victim.  rvablue   Sep-30-09 04:23 PM   #20 
     - Have any of you using that awful argument ever considered  spoony   Sep-30-09 04:30 PM   #24 
     - Shame on you for calling him a concentration camp survivor when he is not. n/t  msanthrope   Sep-30-09 10:16 PM   #42 
  - I agree, especially that the mother should have been a codefendent.  mnhtnbb   Sep-30-09 04:19 PM   #14 
  - There are plenty of villains to go around in this one  Warpy   Sep-30-09 04:21 PM   #17 
  - Draconian sentence? Really?  LisaL   Sep-30-09 08:45 PM   #30 
  - impose a Draconian sentence....i keep hearing, but we dont see. he served 42 days of 90  seabeyond   Sep-30-09 10:11 PM   #39 
  - Polanski is not a survivor of a concentration camp.  msanthrope   Sep-30-09 10:15 PM   #41 
  - Why would he voluntarily do the time? They couldn't convict him now.  hokies   Sep-30-09 04:16 PM   #10 
  - You don't get disbarred for losing a case.  armyowalgreens   Sep-30-09 04:17 PM   #12 
  - Well, the lawyer would have to be a complete idiot  hokies   Sep-30-09 04:21 PM   #18 
     - Are you a lawyer?  armyowalgreens   Sep-30-09 04:31 PM   #25 
        - Never called "the lawyer an idiot for losing"  hokies   Sep-30-09 08:07 PM   #29 
  - he plead guilty - he was already convicted  TorchTheWitch   Sep-30-09 04:20 PM   #16 
  - "Why doesn't he just do the time for his admitted crime?"  hokies   Sep-30-09 04:24 PM   #21 
     - well, he didn't want to suck it up  TorchTheWitch   Sep-30-09 04:39 PM   #28 
  - He plead guilty. There is no need to convict him.  LisaL   Sep-30-09 08:48 PM   #32 
  - All of what you've posted is moot.  msanthrope   Sep-30-09 10:06 PM   #35 
  - I thought he fled before sentencing?  eShirl   Sep-30-09 09:06 PM   #33 
  - It seems so odd that he's a fugitive from a slap on the wrists.  JVS   Sep-30-09 09:17 PM   #34 
     - I've read conflicting news reports on this. I've read 90 day, 50 years,  Thickasabrick   Sep-30-09 10:14 PM   #40 
        - IF there was any kind of " impose a Draconian sentence" dont you think news would be all over it  seabeyond   Sep-30-09 10:19 PM   #43 
        - If he ran away for only 48 days, then he needs to be locked up extra  Thickasabrick   Sep-30-09 10:24 PM   #45 
           - it would be pure arrogance if this ends up to be the case. nt  seabeyond   Sep-30-09 10:30 PM   #47 
        - Lawyer in Polanski Documentary Now Says He Lied  Liquorice   Sep-30-09 10:22 PM   #44 
           - That is Huge!!! nt  Thickasabrick   Sep-30-09 10:25 PM   #46 
           - I knew something wasn't right about that documentary. Maybe Polanski paid that guy off? nt  Liquorice   Sep-30-09 10:37 PM   #49 
              - a documentary made by the very industry protecting polanski. why would it be right  seabeyond   Sep-30-09 10:47 PM   #50 
           - fucker. it just felt like it. be interesting how this story of arrogance continues. nt  seabeyond   Sep-30-09 10:31 PM   #48 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC