hfojvt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-30-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
| 31. well us little people don't count. We're not celebrities on TV. |
|
and Sean Penn and Tim Robbins don't count either. They're just B-listers.
|
| -Vidal now believes, Clinton would be the better president. |
leave iraq |
Sep-30-09 11:14 AM |
#0 |
 -
Gore Vidal is, without a doubt, a genius. However, he also has "issues." eom |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-30-09 11:15 AM |
#1 |
  -
It always hurts more when one of our own says stuff like this about Obama. |
timeforpeace |
Sep-30-09 02:49 PM |
#44 |
| -
That's because Vidal is a fucking idiot who loves the masturbating in a spotlight |
Beer on a stick |
Sep-30-09 11:17 AM |
#2 |
| -
that's not necessary. It's monday Morning Quarterbacking and it speaks for itself. nt |
LaydeeBug |
Sep-30-09 12:42 PM |
#33 |
| -
Norman Mailer, is that you? |
EFerrari |
Sep-30-09 04:17 PM |
#52 |
| -
*snarf* |
charlie |
Sep-30-09 04:22 PM |
#55 |
| -
No, it's Pierre Salinger. LOOK!!!! UFOS!!!! |
Beer on a stick |
Sep-30-09 06:37 PM |
#62 |
| -
Nearly a life-time Vidal fan here. |
saltpoint |
Oct-01-09 12:01 AM |
#72 |
| -
When was the last time this guy was relevant? |
VMI Dem |
Sep-30-09 11:18 AM |
#3 |
| -
When he was the lone voice in the wilderness who dared criticize |
Cleita |
Sep-30-09 11:21 AM |
#5 |
| -
Thank you! |
meegbear |
Sep-30-09 11:23 AM |
#8 |
| -
he was never the lone voice criticizing the bushies. not even close. |
cali |
Sep-30-09 11:24 AM |
#16 |
| -
well us little people don't count. We're not celebrities on TV. |
hfojvt |
Sep-30-09 12:15 PM |
#31 |
| -
He was the only one on a media that was a big cheerleader for the Bushes, |
Cleita |
Sep-30-09 12:54 PM |
#39 |
| -
Oh effing puh-leez! That's the image he tries to maintain, what he wants you to think. |
Beer on a stick |
Sep-30-09 11:32 AM |
#18 |
| -
I'm almost seventy years old and have read much of what Vidal has written |
Cleita |
Sep-30-09 12:52 PM |
#38 |
| -
That's right. And DU celebrated him then. |
Matariki |
Sep-30-09 11:36 AM |
#21 |
| -
Yeah, but what has he done for me lately? |
QC |
Sep-30-09 06:49 PM |
#65 |
| -
I think he has some great insight at times, and then he's got some opinions with |
gateley |
Sep-30-09 11:23 AM |
#9 |
| -
Until the moment you read the article nt |
Dreamer Tatum |
Sep-30-09 11:24 AM |
#10 |
| -
What is the date on the interview? |
EFerrari |
Sep-30-09 04:18 PM |
#53 |
| -
Thanks for playing, but Vidal *always* believed that. |
BlooInBloo |
Sep-30-09 11:19 AM |
#4 |
| -
No kidding. Next he'll announce that he now feels the sun is hot. |
Forkboy |
Sep-30-09 11:23 AM |
#7 |
| -
Disagree w/the statement: "He’s acting as if Afghanistan is the |
gateley |
Sep-30-09 11:22 AM |
#6 |
| -
So? |
gkhouston |
Sep-30-09 11:24 AM |
#11 |
| -
Vidal also believed John Kennedy was a terrible president. It is just his opinion |
still_one |
Sep-30-09 11:24 AM |
#12 |
| -
It may be true that some Dems are slightly to the left of |
pokercat999 |
Sep-30-09 11:35 AM |
#20 |
| -
Perhaps, but read the republican platform verses the Democratic one |
still_one |
Sep-30-09 03:37 PM |
#47 |
| -
Yeah that'll do it.........when has either party stuck to their |
pokercat999 |
Oct-01-09 06:34 AM |
#73 |
| -
I take great comfort... |
damonm |
Sep-30-09 11:24 AM |
#13 |
| -
Yes. I supported Clinton in the primary, but I think Obama's doing a better job than she would have. |
FormerDittoHead |
Sep-30-09 03:21 PM |
#46 |
| -
So, he's angry his trust fund isn't as much as it once was. |
Ikonoklast |
Sep-30-09 11:24 AM |
#14 |
| -
He may be right, but we'll not be finding out now, will we? |
Maru Kitteh |
Sep-30-09 11:24 AM |
#15 |
| -
The die hard Obama worshipers around here are going to run out of liberal Icons pretty soon. |
leeroysphitz |
Sep-30-09 11:26 AM |
#17 |
| -
Your statement should be declared a fire hazard, it's so full of straw. |
Hello_Kitty |
Sep-30-09 11:45 AM |
#25 |
| -
Hmmm |
leftynyc |
Sep-30-09 01:14 PM |
#42 |
| -
If the cult of personality fits, wear it... |
leeroysphitz |
Sep-30-09 05:49 PM |
#61 |
| -
Hillary and Obama are the same |
blue_onyx |
Sep-30-09 11:33 AM |
#19 |
| -
I'm 100% with you. +1 |
Hassin Bin Sober |
Sep-30-09 11:48 AM |
#27 |
| -
One more thing |
DireStrike |
Sep-30-09 01:16 PM |
#43 |
| -
"The Republicans will win the next election"? |
HughBeaumont |
Sep-30-09 11:37 AM |
#22 |
| -
I really hope Vidal is wrong on this one |
aint_no_life_nowhere |
Sep-30-09 02:58 PM |
#45 |
| -
Bewsh made it on his name. |
HughBeaumont |
Sep-30-09 04:14 PM |
#50 |
| -
huge |
H2O Man |
Sep-30-09 11:39 AM |
#23 |
| -
Yeah, "huge" as in |
Cha |
Sep-30-09 12:52 PM |
#37 |
| -
Hell, if Vidal bumps Roman off the radar........ |
JohnnyLib2 |
Sep-30-09 11:44 AM |
#24 |
| -
isn't Hillary more of a hawk? |
G_j |
Sep-30-09 11:48 AM |
#26 |
| -
Yep. But she'd magically transform into a dove in office, this chucklehead believes. |
TwilightGardener |
Sep-30-09 12:43 PM |
#34 |
| -
Yup. (nt) |
redqueen |
Sep-30-09 04:16 PM |
#51 |
| -
Now you've gone and done it... |
Greyhound |
Sep-30-09 11:50 AM |
#28 |
| -
Pointless flamebait |
CakeGrrl |
Sep-30-09 11:53 AM |
#29 |
| -
He's right -- If ONLY a woman of Hillary Clinton's intellect, political savvy, foreign experience |
Blue_Tires |
Sep-30-09 11:59 AM |
#30 |
| -
Uh, sorry -- the primaries were decided in 2008. |
damntexdem |
Sep-30-09 12:38 PM |
#32 |
| -
Headline: Gore Vidal searches for relevancy in an ever evolving world! n/t |
rvablue |
Sep-30-09 12:43 PM |
#35 |
| -
Boo. Hoo. |
Rude Dog |
Sep-30-09 12:47 PM |
#36 |
| -
FWIW Vidal also believes McVeigh was a patriot, so he's all over the place in that interview |
Blue_Tires |
Sep-30-09 12:57 PM |
#40 |
| -
His views are too complicated for the requisite smash n grab soundbites. |
EFerrari |
Sep-30-09 04:22 PM |
#57 |
| -
thank you for that. it's embarrassing how smash n grab soundbitey DU has become... |
NuttyFluffers |
Sep-30-09 08:10 PM |
#68 |
| -
Wow. I've never read about the connection to McVeigh. Thanks for posting this. nt |
EmilyAnne |
Sep-30-09 04:23 PM |
#58 |
| -
Just as Palin would have |
Hutzpa |
Sep-30-09 12:57 PM |
#41 |
| -
Good for him... Oh, would he be saying, if she were President now, that Obama would be better? |
Deja Q |
Sep-30-09 03:39 PM |
#48 |
| -
Because she's a woman? |
rucky |
Sep-30-09 03:42 PM |
#49 |
| -
Those Democratic intelligence gals... |
AntiFascist |
Sep-30-09 04:24 PM |
#59 |
| -
WTF? nt |
Liquorice |
Sep-30-09 06:51 PM |
#66 |
| -
With Clinton, we'd be at war with Iran right now as well nt |
ecstatic |
Sep-30-09 04:19 PM |
#54 |
| -
Because she's a woman. Riiiiiiight. |
Orsino |
Sep-30-09 04:22 PM |
#56 |
| -
I have tremendous respect |
Libertas1776 |
Sep-30-09 04:28 PM |
#60 |
| -
I'm a little confused. Clinton would be more likely to escalate without |
mmonk |
Sep-30-09 06:41 PM |
#63 |
| -
Doesn't Hillary want Obama to send MORE troops |
pot luck |
Sep-30-09 06:47 PM |
#64 |
| -
Right or wrong, what a miserably unwise old man. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
Sep-30-09 07:19 PM |
#67 |
| -
kick |
xchrom |
Sep-30-09 11:35 PM |
#69 |
| -
She would have been almost exactly the same. |
Forkboy |
Sep-30-09 11:46 PM |
#70 |
| -
Hillary has far more contempt for the average voter |
jgraz |
Oct-01-09 12:01 AM |
#71 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread