You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #47: And so? It's not up to her. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-29-09 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
47. And so? It's not up to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Samantha Geimer, Polanski's victim, doesn't back prison time for the director madmusic  Sep-28-09 11:13 PM   #0 
  - Too bad. He needs to go to jail, just like every other rapist. nt  anonymous171   Sep-28-09 11:15 PM   #1 
  - Write her a letter and straighten her out. nt  madmusic   Sep-28-09 11:18 PM   #2 
  - it is very simple and very common...  lala_rawraw   Sep-28-09 11:35 PM   #9 
  - Exactly. She has moved on and has reiterated that she doesn't want to bring it up again  Hawkeye-X   Sep-29-09 02:14 AM   #32 
  - And besides that, hasn't  Yupster   Sep-30-09 08:15 AM   #99 
  - Why? She has the right to her opinion. nt  EmilyAnne   Sep-29-09 02:13 AM   #31 
  - Some rapists are dead. Putting them in jail would be very unsanitary  Oregone   Sep-29-09 01:34 AM   #26 
  - Violation of the law is a crime against both a victim and society  brentspeak   Sep-28-09 11:26 PM   #3 
  - lots of abused wives don't want their husbands in jail either.  Teaser   Sep-28-09 11:27 PM   #4 
  - bingo. that is my experience and i've arrested SCOREs of domestic abusers  paulsby   Sep-29-09 02:37 AM   #34 
  - Doesn't matter.  proteus_lives   Sep-28-09 11:30 PM   #5 
  - kids raped, beaten by dad dont want him to have prison time. wives say no to prison. so? nt  seabeyond   Sep-28-09 11:32 PM   #6 
  - The vengeance obsessed don't care about her wishes  depakid   Sep-28-09 11:33 PM   #7 
  - again, i told you the position, yet ignore. how honest is that.... oh not. nt  seabeyond   Sep-28-09 11:35 PM   #8 
  - Scary isn't it? I just read that there are over 1,000 rape kits waiting  Thickasabrick   Sep-28-09 11:38 PM   #10 
  - It'll be an expensive case that in the end, benefits no one  depakid   Sep-28-09 11:44 PM   #11 
  - yet, here we have someone ready for sentencing and here it sets on shelf ready to be done. nt  seabeyond   Sep-29-09 07:44 AM   #44 
  - Deterrence is not vengeance.  Odin2005   Sep-28-09 11:45 PM   #12 
  - Punishment isn't deterrence.  Forkboy   Sep-29-09 12:12 AM   #17 
  - So Kissinger should not be tried as the war criminal he is because he is an old man?  Odin2005   Sep-29-09 12:16 AM   #19 
  - Why is that anytime someone starts a post with ,"So.." that whatever follows is never the case?  Forkboy   Sep-29-09 12:23 AM   #20 
     - that's a false argument  paulsby   Sep-29-09 02:41 AM   #35 
     - I follow Immanuel Kant's thinking about justice  Odin2005   Sep-29-09 07:40 AM   #42 
     - Kant was wrong.  armyowalgreens   Sep-29-09 03:46 PM   #69 
     - Not true at all..plenty of studies show harsher laws and sentencing  joeybee12   Sep-29-09 03:52 PM   #73 
     - Actually, arresting Kissinger would do incomparably more to deter war crimes...  JackRiddler   Sep-29-09 08:53 AM   #53 
     - +100! A voice of reason!  scarletwoman   Sep-29-09 09:16 PM   #93 
     - Because people don't understand the false dichotomy fallacy.  Ignis   Sep-29-09 02:56 PM   #63 
  - Agreed, good post. n/t  tammywammy   Sep-29-09 12:25 AM   #21 
  - .  MilesColtrane   Sep-29-09 12:53 PM   #56 
  - Something I remembered:  Odin2005   Sep-29-09 05:13 PM   #84 
  - There's no deterrent value in a 1977 case today  depakid   Sep-29-09 12:50 AM   #24 
     - Send a signal that if you are a great "artist" you can get away with child rape? BRILLIANT!!!  Odin2005   Sep-29-09 07:42 AM   #43 
     - How many great artists are convicted/ accused of child rape?  armyowalgreens   Sep-29-09 03:48 PM   #70 
        - A study posted on DU several times said that...  Odin2005   Sep-29-09 05:14 PM   #85 
     - There is the deterrent value in showing if you did the crime, admitted it and  bighart   Sep-29-09 04:23 PM   #74 
  - Same with the revenge obsessed folks who want to prosecute Bush  anonymous171   Sep-28-09 11:48 PM   #13 
  - And Cheney's old too  tammywammy   Sep-28-09 11:51 PM   #14 
  - That's not immediate case with tens of thousands of victims  depakid   Sep-29-09 02:59 AM   #37 
  - I actually disagree. We must stop the lack of accountability...  armyowalgreens   Sep-29-09 03:49 PM   #72 
  - Sad, but true. She has stated over and over again  sabrina 1   Sep-29-09 12:06 AM   #16 
  - +100.  Hannah Bell   Sep-29-09 02:44 AM   #36 
  - The law doesn't operate on the wishes of the victims. It operates on the law.  Forkboy   Sep-29-09 12:13 AM   #18 
  - Exactly. And that is a wonderful thing about our legal system. Everyone knows how often the victim  EmilyAnne   Sep-29-09 02:15 AM   #33 
  - What is perceived merely as vengeance by one person...  LanternWaste   Sep-29-09 04:25 PM   #75 
  - She is just pissed that the incident keeps appearing in the news and she has to relive it  Beaverhausen   Sep-29-09 12:00 AM   #15 
  - She sued him and got an "undisclosed settlement"  western mass   Sep-29-09 12:32 AM   #22 
  - Lousy rape apologists.  HiFructosePronSyrup   Sep-29-09 12:35 AM   #23 
  - This is one reason why rape shield laws are important.  moriah   Sep-29-09 01:00 AM   #25 
  - Should a priest who once raped a boy be allowed to walk free if the grown boy forgives him?  Azathoth   Sep-29-09 01:50 AM   #27 
  - All things taken into account., Polanski needs to face up to the original crime & fleeing punishment  aikoaiko   Sep-29-09 02:03 AM   #28 
  - if he had done this when he should have  Skittles   Sep-29-09 02:10 AM   #29 
  - He DID "face up to the crime" - he was sentenced to do time for  old mark   Sep-29-09 06:23 AM   #41 
     - Presumptuous much? I know all that. The court acted within its discretion -- did it not?  aikoaiko   Sep-29-09 08:49 AM   #52 
     - I am generally "presumptuous" when I hear the braying of jackasses.  old mark   Sep-29-09 01:52 PM   #59 
        - He's a fugitive and should be brought to court to finish this up?  aikoaiko   Sep-29-09 02:40 PM   #62 
     - the psych eval was not a formal sentence  TorchTheWitch   Sep-29-09 11:19 PM   #97 
  - Good for her. But, it doesn't matter. That's why its the State of California vs. Polanski.  EmilyAnne   Sep-29-09 02:13 AM   #30 
  - "We are a nation of laws."  GreenArrow   Sep-29-09 04:51 PM   #81 
  - Forget it, madmusic. It's Democratic Underground.  t0dd   Sep-29-09 03:05 AM   #38 
  - What town... is this?  madmusic   Sep-29-09 03:41 AM   #39 
  - Because she said she doesn't want to go through it anymore and she's sick  pnwmom   Sep-29-09 06:14 AM   #40 
  - It's not up to her.  LisaL   Sep-29-09 08:09 AM   #48 
     - I agree completely. All prosecutions are in the name of the state,  pnwmom   Sep-29-09 07:50 PM   #88 
  - Well, I'd assume she'd get a chance to speak during the sentencing.  Barack_America   Sep-29-09 07:46 AM   #45 
  - For many, life is black and white  DefenseLawyer   Sep-29-09 07:56 AM   #46 
  - +1  shireen   Sep-29-09 11:27 AM   #54 
  - And so? It's not up to her.  LisaL   Sep-29-09 08:00 AM   #47 
  - How much did he pay her in the out-of-court settlement?  Freddie Stubbs   Sep-29-09 08:10 AM   #49 
  - I have no clue. It would have been completely up to her  LisaL   Sep-29-09 08:13 AM   #50 
  - For those that are against bringing him back for the rape  justiceischeap   Sep-29-09 08:21 AM   #51 
  - POLANSKI!!!  Echo In Light   Sep-29-09 12:33 PM   #55 
  - Polansky  subcomhd   Sep-29-09 12:54 PM   #57 
  - She must not be denied her constitutional right to determine sentencing. n/t  Orsino   Sep-29-09 01:41 PM   #58 
  - So What. That Changes Nothing, In Regards to the Apologists  NashVegas   Sep-29-09 01:55 PM   #60 
  - Geimer is as much "the public" as you are, so why call her an apologist?  madmusic   Sep-29-09 03:06 PM   #64 
     - What Does This Change?  NashVegas   Sep-29-09 03:44 PM   #67 
        - So now you are accusing her of excusing him? I didn't get that from the declaration. nt  madmusic   Sep-29-09 05:32 PM   #87 
           - No, I'm Asking YOU How Geimer's Desire to Move On With Her Life Decreases the Seriousness  NashVegas   Sep-29-09 08:30 PM   #89 
              - I don't know. Are you saying you think she is minimizing the seriousness?  madmusic   Sep-29-09 09:23 PM   #95 
                 - "I Don't Know"  NashVegas   Sep-30-09 06:33 AM   #98 
  - then that should be the end of it.  blues90   Sep-29-09 01:55 PM   #61 
  - delete  NashVegas   Sep-29-09 03:43 PM   #66 
  - it's the state of california vs. polanski  noiretextatique   Sep-29-09 04:28 PM   #77 
  - The victim's wishes should be paramount.  TexasObserver   Sep-29-09 03:22 PM   #65 
  - Agreed. This isn't about justice, this is about ego of the prosecutors and publicity for their  BREMPRO   Sep-29-09 08:45 PM   #90 
     - Excellent post. Thank you. (nt)  scarletwoman   Sep-29-09 09:27 PM   #96 
  - Is statutory rape one of those crimes where they ask the victim if they want to press charges?  redqueen   Sep-29-09 03:45 PM   #68 
  - state of california vs. polanski  noiretextatique   Sep-29-09 04:31 PM   #78 
     - Sad how easily that simple fact seems to escape some people here.  redqueen   Sep-29-09 04:34 PM   #80 
     - Maybe Polanski will quickly plead guilty  Yupster   Sep-30-09 08:21 AM   #100 
  - Not Surprising  WeekendWarrior   Sep-29-09 03:49 PM   #71 
  - As of 2003 she still wanted to see him punished.  Nuclear Unicorn   Sep-29-09 04:25 PM   #76 
  - That is a lie. In 1997 she wrote a letter to the court asking for the  Thickasabrick   Sep-29-09 04:32 PM   #79 
     - OK,then just for sake of argument...  Nuclear Unicorn   Sep-29-09 05:10 PM   #82 
        - I don't understand the question. What lame excuse? nt  Thickasabrick   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #83 
           - The lame excuse that the victim's desire for obscurity exonerates the crime.  Nuclear Unicorn   Sep-29-09 05:31 PM   #86 
  - With apologies, here is the link  madmusic   Sep-29-09 09:06 PM   #91 
  - Unrecced and SO happy that the rape apologists of DU don't write policy.  Maru Kitteh   Sep-29-09 09:09 PM   #92 
  - As been pointed out before, it's state of Ca vs. Polanski.  LisaL   Sep-29-09 09:19 PM   #94 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC