You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: Then I guess you have no reason to be here [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Then I guess you have no reason to be here
Since you have nothing else to contribute to back up your own statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Newsweek Hides Global Warming Denier's Ties To Big Oil RestoreGore  Apr-15-07 09:48 AM   #0 
  - I love Harpers! k&r  Joanne98   Apr-15-07 09:57 AM   #1 
  - My letter to Bucknell University  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 10:05 AM   #2 
  - He is a "Contributing Expert" to George C. Marshall Institute  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 10:34 AM   #14 
  - OK, I guess the question is  Turbineguy   Apr-15-07 10:07 AM   #3 
  - Excellent post in all its points.  Buzz Clik   Apr-15-07 10:09 AM   #5 
  - The Denial leads me to believe it is the latter  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 10:18 AM   #7 
     - Here is the exact quote from Newsweek:  Buzz Clik   Apr-15-07 10:27 AM   #10 
        - Then I guess you have no reason to be here  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 10:31 AM   #13 
        - I am not a climate scientist  nam78_two   Apr-15-07 02:32 PM   #21 
           - I agree. His position is quite curious given the evidence.  Buzz Clik   Apr-15-07 02:40 PM   #23 
           - Exactly right  Reterr   Apr-15-07 02:42 PM   #24 
              - Now, you're starting to make some solid progress.  Buzz Clik   Apr-15-07 03:34 PM   #28 
                 - It appears his "science" is based on his associations  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 03:40 PM   #30 
                    - I already proved my point. And you? Nothing but contempt.  Buzz Clik   Apr-15-07 03:57 PM   #33 
                       - I can DAMN WELL question HIS CREDENTIALS  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 04:24 PM   #45 
  - Ok. So he received some money from oil companies.  Buzz Clik   Apr-15-07 10:08 AM   #4 
  - Look up Leipzig Declaration  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 10:17 AM   #6 
  - I am very aware of all these things.  Buzz Clik   Apr-15-07 10:23 AM   #8 
     - That wasn't a tangent.  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 10:25 AM   #9 
        - Do you dispute his science? Can you prove that his science is flawed?  Buzz Clik   Apr-15-07 10:28 AM   #11 
           - You made the accusation  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 10:30 AM   #12 
              - Prove it is what? This is the silliest argument I've ever seen, here or anywhere else.  Buzz Clik   Apr-15-07 02:20 PM   #17 
                 - I obviously hit a nerve with you with this thread  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 03:38 PM   #29 
                    - You've demonstrated nothing. All you do is repeat the same accusations endlessly.  Buzz Clik   Apr-15-07 03:58 PM   #34 
                       - His "science" is questionable based on his associations  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 04:02 PM   # 
                       - I acknowledge his associations. I don't acknowledge any bias in his science.  Buzz Clik   Apr-15-07 04:05 PM   #40 
                       - His "science" is questionable based on his associations  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 04:02 PM   #38 
                       - His "science" is questionable based on his associations  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 04:02 PM   #39 
  - Isn't That Really The Point of the OP?  Crisco   Apr-15-07 10:39 AM   #15 
  - Thanks, At least someone gets it  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 10:47 AM   #16 
  - We all get it.  Buzz Clik   Apr-15-07 02:35 PM   #22 
     - He is LYING about his credentials  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 03:23 PM   #25 
        - No, Newsweek printed it.  Buzz Clik   Apr-15-07 03:31 PM   #27 
           - And what is your real motivation for harrassing me in this thread?  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 03:42 PM   #32 
              - I make it a point to correct flaws, biases, and ignorance.  Buzz Clik   Apr-15-07 03:59 PM   #35 
                 - You've done nothing but waste bandwidth here n/t  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 04:01 PM   #37 
                    - On the contrary, I've made my point. And that is very important.  Buzz Clik   Apr-15-07 04:06 PM   #41 
                    - And I'll be back for your next episode of bullshit.  Buzz Clik   Apr-15-07 04:18 PM   #43 
  - Newsweek made an accurate but misleading statement.  Buzz Clik   Apr-15-07 02:22 PM   #18 
     - You strongly disagree?  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 03:28 PM   #26 
  - He has a pattern of being a pundit for Energy Interests  leftchick   Apr-15-07 04:43 PM   #48 
  - Here's something for you Private Sector 101  autorank   Apr-15-07 11:14 PM   #53 
  - K&R.nt  nam78_two   Apr-15-07 02:22 PM   #19 
  - Thanks for the thread RestoreGore  Uncle Joe   Apr-15-07 02:27 PM   #20 
  - BAD newsweek! Just when I thought they  zidzi   Apr-15-07 03:41 PM   #31 
  - Lindzen, Fred S. Singer, and Sun Myung Moon?  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 04:00 PM   #36 
  - That is an interesting factoid about Moon  nam78_two   Apr-15-07 04:09 PM   #42 
  - yes, tobacco-global warming link  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 04:26 PM   #47 
  - Thats a great link  Reterr   Apr-15-07 04:46 PM   #50 
     - Thanks, I just might do that. n/t  RestoreGore   Apr-16-07 01:50 PM   #55 
  - Richard Lindzen Agreed With Glenn Beck  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 04:22 PM   #44 
  - There is big money to be made in denying global warming and evolution  ComerPerro   Apr-15-07 04:24 PM   #46 
  - All you need to know about Lindzen's flawed science  RestoreGore   Apr-15-07 04:46 PM   #49 
  - Jeff Jacoby, a Repug tool, wrote a column in today's Boston Globe about Lindzen.  PinkyisBlue   Apr-15-07 05:02 PM   #51 
  - Kick and Rec n/t  Jcrowley   Apr-15-07 10:49 PM   #52 
  - ...  nam78_two   Apr-16-07 01:06 PM   #54 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC