You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #142: Why am I not surprised at all at this? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-16-09 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
142. Why am I not surprised at all at this?
If this abysmal bit didn't show up on the front page, I would have missed it, which would have been terrible.

Speaking only for myself, I couldn't care less what a bunch of nutcases think and do about each other.

They're, um, nutcases, irrelevant nutcases.

The only people who give a rat's ass about this matter are themselves pretty clearly only weakly connected with reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -WSWS (World Socialist Web Site) termed "sick and reactionary" by Marxists for anti-union disruption HamdenRice  Sep-16-09 07:41 AM   #0 
  - Unrecs -- but no engagement with the facts? typical! nt  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 07:58 AM   #1 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-16-09 08:25 AM   #4 
     - 1) Looks at name of web site...  sudopod   Sep-16-09 08:28 AM   #6 
     - I believe we are allowed to offer constructive disagreement  Kid Dynamite   Sep-16-09 09:03 AM   #20 
        - people don't generally want factual information,  GreenArrow   Sep-16-09 05:38 PM   #227 
     - He's not the only one ...  RoyGBiv   Sep-16-09 08:30 AM   #7 
     - Thanks  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 08:39 AM   #11 
     - Quite filthy, but you're right ...  RoyGBiv   Sep-16-09 09:17 AM   #29 
     - I hate to "ignore" anyone,  TicketyBoo   Sep-16-09 09:01 AM   #18 
     - I avoided it for a long time ...  RoyGBiv   Sep-16-09 09:09 AM   #23 
     - Then your complaint is that the DU admins and moderators  Kid Dynamite   Sep-16-09 09:20 AM   #30 
        - No, it is not ...  RoyGBiv   Sep-16-09 09:25 AM   #35 
        - So you admit that your complaint and the OP are merely subjective rantings  Kid Dynamite   Sep-16-09 09:30 AM   #37 
           - Silly boy ...  RoyGBiv   Sep-16-09 09:33 AM   #40 
              - So then my reading of the situation stands  Kid Dynamite   Sep-16-09 09:37 AM   #43 
        - That makes no sense  PVnRT   Sep-16-09 11:49 AM   #100 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-16-09 08:36 AM   #10 
  - WSWS is to the left,  safeinOhio   Sep-16-09 08:06 AM   #2 
  - They're actually much worse than Beck  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 08:32 AM   #8 
     - It does seem to me that most of the stuff that gets posted here from WSWS  redqueen   Sep-16-09 09:39 AM   #45 
     - It is important to be self-critical as well  Kid Dynamite   Sep-16-09 09:41 AM   #47 
     - LOL... aw, aren't you precious!  redqueen   Sep-16-09 09:51 AM   #52 
        - You want RoyGBiv  Kid Dynamite   Sep-16-09 10:28 AM   #68 
        - They're always so cute when they are naive, aren't they? Especially the darlings that just  blondeatlast   Sep-16-09 04:46 PM   #209 
           - *roffle*  redqueen   Sep-16-09 05:23 PM   #221 
     - Turns out the anti-union Trotskyite owner of WSWS is a millionaire! See below nt  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 09:47 AM   #50 
        - Yeah... I was just reading that.  redqueen   Sep-16-09 09:50 AM   #51 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-16-09 10:13 PM   #245 
  - What?  tama   Sep-16-09 08:15 AM   #3 
  - Sure. I did that to an inordinate degree in South Africa in 1980s  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 08:46 AM   #12 
     - I have my biases too  tama   Sep-16-09 11:29 AM   #93 
  - Trotskyites suck.  Odin2005   Sep-16-09 08:27 AM   #5 
  - A World News Trust Editor Has Been Running WSWS Content...  Tace   Sep-16-09 08:35 AM   #9 
  - WSWS is an excellent resource.  Octafish   Sep-16-09 08:47 AM   #13 
  - A broken clock can be right twice a day  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 08:56 AM   #15 
  - Your definition of "factual scrutiny"  Kid Dynamite   Sep-16-09 09:12 AM   #24 
  - How about that Wall Street Bailout?!!  Octafish   Sep-16-09 09:17 AM   #28 
  - Not to mention so poorly written one wonders why a person would link to it.  imdjh   Sep-16-09 09:38 AM   #44 
  - Wha...wha...what?! You mean POLITICO didn't cover that? lol  Echo In Light   Sep-16-09 09:02 AM   #19 
     - Hey! Both sides jumped on the puke Weldon!  Octafish   Sep-16-09 09:21 AM   #32 
  - The people that post from the WSWS have an anti-organized labor  Ikonoklast   Sep-16-09 08:51 AM   #14 
  - Not just anti-labor, but anti-Democrat, anti-Green, anti British Labour, ...  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 08:57 AM   #16 
  - Are you able to detail who you are accusing of being anti-labor  Kid Dynamite   Sep-16-09 09:08 AM   #22 
  - I will not call out members by name.  Ikonoklast   Sep-16-09 09:12 AM   #25 
  - The honus is on you then  Kid Dynamite   Sep-16-09 09:15 AM   #26 
     - No, I am following the rules of the owners of this site.  Ikonoklast   Sep-16-09 09:22 AM   #33 
     - Unnamed others, unknowns  Kid Dynamite   Sep-16-09 09:26 AM   #36 
        - You amuse me with your faux outrage.  Ikonoklast   Sep-16-09 09:32 AM   #39 
           - The phony outrage is all yours  Kid Dynamite   Sep-16-09 09:33 AM   #41 
     - What does a long dead baseball player have to do with this?  PVnRT   Sep-16-09 11:52 AM   #102 
        - Whats funny is that was exactly who I was thinking of  Kid Dynamite   Sep-16-09 02:26 PM   #132 
  - What nonsense. Try the British "Independent": They hate unions, Labour, other Marxists  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 09:16 AM   #27 
     - For someone who dislikes sectarianism  Kid Dynamite   Sep-16-09 09:23 AM   #34 
     - re: your comment about accomplishments...  redqueen   Sep-16-09 09:57 AM   #56 
        - Also, when you've got $25 mil to play with, accomplishments for workers ...  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 10:00 AM   #58 
  - There are unions and then there are unions.  blindpig   Sep-16-09 10:47 AM   #75 
     - Exactly... not all unions are corrupt.  redqueen   Sep-16-09 10:56 AM   #76 
        - I have yet to see evidence of that.  blindpig   Sep-16-09 11:16 AM   #83 
           - I don't hate it because of the class analysis... I dislike it  redqueen   Sep-16-09 11:34 AM   #97 
              - Who is 'the Left' ?  blindpig   Sep-16-09 04:33 PM   #199 
                 - Well there's a bit of context involved there... but in the context I'm thinking of...  redqueen   Sep-16-09 04:41 PM   #204 
  - If I read a post with a link to that site I stop reading and move on..  Mudoria   Sep-16-09 08:59 AM   #17 
  - Hey! A flamebait post from HamdenRice! That's unexpected!  Romulox   Sep-16-09 09:05 AM   #21 
  - yeah, uh.. not so much...  dionysus   Sep-16-09 01:12 PM   #126 
     - In journalism, there is a test known as the "so what" test...  Romulox   Sep-16-09 03:22 PM   #148 
  - I actually like their film reviews  Astrad   Sep-16-09 09:20 AM   #31 
  - ROFL! New find: WSWS became anti-union when it's owner became a millionaire corporate owner!  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 09:31 AM   #38 
  - No union protection for those employees.  Ikonoklast   Sep-16-09 09:47 AM   #49 
  - Red Bait much? WSWS is obviously not sanctioned by the DLC.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Sep-16-09 09:37 AM   #42 
  - From Hamden?! Never!  Kid Dynamite   Sep-16-09 09:39 AM   #46 
  - Are you reading any of this stuff?  redqueen   Sep-16-09 09:53 AM   #53 
  - I condider it an example of the in-fighting between Trots and Stalinists.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Sep-16-09 10:04 AM   #61 
     - No, it isn't. The owner of WSWS is a $26 million fraud.  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 10:06 AM   #62 
     - So? How many of our politicians are millionaires and in the corps pockets?  Tierra_y_Libertad   Sep-16-09 10:09 AM   #63 
     - Pointing out that a so called Trotskyite Revolutionary has $25 million in revenue isn't red baiting  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 10:20 AM   #65 
        - For a second I thought  ipfilter   Sep-16-09 03:44 PM   #159 
     - Almost every member of the Senate and Obama are all millionaires, no?  Kid Dynamite   Sep-16-09 10:27 AM   #67 
        - Do they claim to be Trotskyite Revolutionaries?  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 10:30 AM   #69 
           - What we think of them is not based on what they think of themselves  Kid Dynamite   Sep-16-09 10:32 AM   #70 
           - Most Senators are PRO -CAPITALIST  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 10:36 AM   #72 
           - You're big on coherency  Kid Dynamite   Sep-16-09 10:40 AM   #73 
           - they also claim to be pro-democracy. while taking pay-offs & lying to the people.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 02:27 PM   #134 
           - Ummmmm  PVnRT   Sep-16-09 11:48 AM   #99 
           - Do they go around trying to divide the left,  redqueen   Sep-16-09 10:35 AM   #71 
              - divide "the left"? lol. afl-cio *is* sold out, long ago, & you have only  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 04:56 PM   #213 
                 - Are supporters of the WSWS going to vote in our elections?  redqueen   Sep-16-09 05:07 PM   #215 
                    - "turning people off the left" is what happens when "the left" doesn't deliver for the people,  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 05:10 PM   #216 
                       - Different things turn off different voters.  redqueen   Sep-16-09 05:17 PM   #217 
                          - "a tiny percentage who would be drawn in by that... " Universal health care funded like  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 05:25 PM   #223 
                             - Please... WSWS isn't just about stuff like healthcare...  redqueen   Sep-16-09 05:26 PM   #224 
                                - i didn't say it was. how disingenuous of you to suggest i did.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 06:06 PM   #236 
                                   - You whipped it out as an example, when you should know well that's not what I mean.  redqueen   Sep-16-09 06:07 PM   #237 
                                      - "you should know well that's not what I mean." i should?  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 06:21 PM   #239 
     - Are they using lies in this in-fighting?  redqueen   Sep-16-09 10:13 AM   #64 
        - The "purists" are the ones demanding party loyalty in the face of sell-outs.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Sep-16-09 12:11 PM   #108 
           - Party Loyalty? Screw that... I care about results.  redqueen   Sep-16-09 12:18 PM   #109 
              - India is no longer a British colony, for one improvement.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Sep-16-09 12:31 PM   #113 
                 - Anything else?  redqueen   Sep-16-09 12:38 PM   #116 
                 - The American Labor Movement owes a lot to Anarchists.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Sep-16-09 12:46 PM   #121 
                 - But concessions on recognition, actual wages, working conditions, civil rights, etc...  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 12:48 PM   #122 
                    - They were won by communists & workers, not by afl-cio.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 02:34 PM   #135 
                       - Reading comprehension is your friend  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 02:56 PM   #139 
                          - "unions associated with afl-cio" were purged of their reds in the 50s.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 03:14 PM   #146 
                 - Does 'Haymarket' ring a bell?  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 05:17 PM   #218 
                    - But history's hard!  QC   Sep-16-09 05:18 PM   #219 
                    - That makes two.  redqueen   Sep-16-09 05:25 PM   #222 
                       - um, those i term sell-outs accomplished nothing.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 05:35 PM   #225 
                          - So there's been absolutely no progress since the early 20th century?  redqueen   Sep-16-09 05:37 PM   #226 
                          - those i term sell-outs = afl-cio, formed in 1955 at the peak of unionization.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 05:43 PM   #230 
                             - AFL CIO is not the be-all end-all... you call most of the Dem party sell outs, don't you?  redqueen   Sep-16-09 05:45 PM   #231 
                                - obama won by the biggest majority since reagan's second term, i believe.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 06:04 PM   #234 
                                   - Do another anarchist strike thing, and see how far that goes.  redqueen   Sep-16-09 06:05 PM   #235 
                                      - yes, let's.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 06:07 PM   #238 
                          - spanish civil war:  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 05:38 PM   #228 
                             - Just going to ignore my question re: progress since the early 20th century?  redqueen   Sep-16-09 05:41 PM   #229 
                                - you might read my post before you use the rolly icon (like it strengthens your non-existent point).  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 06:02 PM   #232 
                                   - My point is that they accomplish less, far less, and I stand by that.  redqueen   Sep-16-09 06:04 PM   #233 
                                      - examples of afl-cio gains since 1955? you're bowing out before putting up the evidence?  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 06:28 PM   #241 
                                         - Of course it's not surprising. Why would any reasonable person want to discuss anything with you?  redqueen   Sep-17-09 09:16 AM   #246 
                                            - "Why would any reasonable person want to discuss anything with you?"  Forkboy   Sep-17-09 09:23 AM   #248 
                 - He was hardly an anarchist as that would be understood today  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 12:41 PM   #118 
                    - Yes, and he attacked the congress party when it made a hash of it.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Sep-16-09 12:49 PM   #123 
  - What? How is this red-baiting? The Marxists are the ones calling the WSWS out.  anonymous171   Sep-16-09 03:05 PM   #144 
  - Curiouser and curiouser: WSWS "owner" had $25 million in revenue from slave labor of party cult  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 09:45 AM   #48 
  - A blogger asks: With $25 million, and 50 years, why haven't you opened even 1 party office???  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 09:53 AM   #54 
  - A blogger asks: If WSWS owner and wife Heather live comfortably on $25 mil, why beg from comrades?  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 09:58 AM   #57 
     - speaking of distorting the facts. the 26 mill = total revenues. out of that, they pay wages  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 02:38 PM   #136 
        - But I thought all accounting was "right wing"!!!!  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 02:41 PM   #137 
           - i've never said anything like that. as you also know. as for north, i don't explain it away at all.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 03:00 PM   #141 
              - You wrote: "i'm honest, whatever else i may be"  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 03:03 PM   #143 
                 - I didn't claim "unions are a criminal conspiracy against the working class." That's your spin.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 03:08 PM   #145 
                    - You're like Austin Powers in the first movie! "I'm tellin ya baby, that's not mine!"  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 03:18 PM   #147 
                       - Since you refuse to acknowledge my post, I'll keep posting it.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 03:25 PM   #149 
                          - I just posted the link to your thread citing a WSWS article calling unions criminal conspiracies  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 03:30 PM   #151 
                             - where? i've gone though your responses to me, & i don't find it.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 03:39 PM   #155 
                                - cause there was no such post, that's why.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 04:03 PM   #170 
  - Indymedia blog: WSWS "turn" against unions due to owners non-union shop. WSWS/SEP a cult and "crock"  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 10:47 AM   #74 
  - There is no actual proof that these two men are in anyway the same person, as far as I see.  Starry Messenger   Sep-16-09 10:58 AM   #77 
     - Cognitive dissonance at its finest! nt  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 11:01 AM   #78 
     - Excuse me?  Starry Messenger   Sep-16-09 11:03 AM   #79 
        - Several different people-former party members- confirm the story, with additional details-->  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 11:09 AM   #81 
           - Oh man... that last one is bad.  redqueen   Sep-16-09 11:13 AM   #82 
           - When DU's Trots were screaming, socialize the costs, privatize the gains, I thought it was critique!  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 11:19 AM   #86 
           - Several?  Starry Messenger   Sep-16-09 11:18 AM   #84 
              - They link to the story and say, I can confirm that North is Green  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 11:20 AM   #87 
              - I'm not a big fan of WSWS.  Starry Messenger   Sep-16-09 11:23 AM   #91 
              - If you're right and it's all lies that'd be great...  redqueen   Sep-16-09 11:23 AM   #90 
     - Bitter infighting among Trot splinter factions?  blindpig   Sep-16-09 11:20 AM   #88 
        - Uh, no. It's former cult members busting their leader for living the lavish life  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 11:24 AM   #92 
        - I dunno about that  blindpig   Sep-16-09 01:52 PM   #131 
           - Line>Editorial Policy>Reporting  curt_b   Sep-16-09 02:26 PM   #133 
           - "And that is what you really object to." yep. it's pretty obvious.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 03:54 PM   #164 
        - I don't know blindpig.  Starry Messenger   Sep-16-09 11:33 AM   #96 
        - Oh. My.  Starry Messenger   Sep-16-09 12:03 PM   #105 
  - Wow, this is a keeper!  Spazito   Sep-16-09 11:49 AM   #101 
  - well that explains how they finance their trolls  grantcart   Sep-16-09 04:04 PM   #172 
     - I didn't get what you meant down thread. From what I've read about them it's entirely possible nt  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 04:25 PM   #192 
     - I think most everybody gets it now, The only question is do they get paid  grantcart   Sep-16-09 06:24 PM   #240 
     - if a regional millionaire can fund trolls, multinational corps & the dems & pugs must have boatloads  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 04:48 PM   #211 
  - When the unions stop being in bed with the exploiter class, maybe this 'critique" would make sense  alcibiades_mystery   Sep-16-09 09:53 AM   #55 
  - It's the hope for Galbraith's "New Industrial State"  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 10:03 AM   #59 
  - I love pissing matches between various communist groups..  naaman fletcher   Sep-16-09 10:04 AM   #60 
  - The only people we hate more than the Romans are the fucking Judean People's Front.  subcomhd   Sep-16-09 09:40 PM   #244 
  - A lot of their stuff is extreme OpEd and little more  ProgressiveProfessor   Sep-16-09 10:27 AM   #66 
  - 'Bout time you got to the point instead of ankle-biting  Lilith Velkor   Sep-16-09 11:07 AM   #80 
  - Apologist  Orwellian_Ghost   Sep-16-09 11:19 AM   #85 
  - You live in a WSWS fantasy.  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 11:23 AM   #89 
  - +10000000000000000000000000  leftstreet   Sep-16-09 12:30 PM   #112 
  - nothing you post supports the comparison to Rense, PrisonPlanet and LaRouche  Enrique   Sep-16-09 11:31 AM   #94 
  - Do a search  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 11:32 AM   #95 
  - So you start this OP  Kid Dynamite   Sep-16-09 12:11 PM   #107 
  - That really wasn't the point of the OP. It's a combination of "Look at me!" and an enemies list.  Romulox   Sep-16-09 11:36 AM   #98 
  - Trotskyism has always been a scam for bourgeois intellectuals  anonymous171   Sep-16-09 11:57 AM   #103 
  - How so?  otherlander   Sep-16-09 12:27 PM   #110 
  - Here's one take from my experience in South Africa  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 12:37 PM   #115 
  - There really isn't any such thing as Trotskyism.  subcomhd   Sep-17-09 12:32 PM   #251 
  - So does this also apply to the DSP or the SPofA?  and-justice-for-all   Sep-16-09 12:01 PM   #104 
  - It doesn't apply to any mainstream democratic socialists  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 12:05 PM   #106 
     - I am sure there are some Communist Socialist Parties around..  and-justice-for-all   Sep-16-09 12:30 PM   #111 
  - unkick and unrec  leftstreet   Sep-16-09 12:32 PM   #114 
  - The truth hurts doesn't it? nt  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 12:39 PM   #117 
     - Post some truth and I'll let you know n/t  leftstreet   Sep-16-09 12:44 PM   #119 
        - What is not true in the OP, or the scoop about WSWS being a front for a millionaire? nt  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 12:46 PM   #120 
           - Oh for goodness sake.  Starry Messenger   Sep-16-09 12:59 PM   #124 
           - Oh get over it  leftstreet   Sep-16-09 01:05 PM   #125 
              - So Lyndon LaRouche links would be acceptable as long as it's "thought provoking"?  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 01:36 PM   #128 
              - You're on a roll  leftstreet   Sep-16-09 01:45 PM   #130 
              - !!  Soylent Brice   Sep-16-09 03:34 PM   #153 
  - The truth must hurt! Afternoon unrec'ers are out in force to protect their millionaire cult leader  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 01:15 PM   #127 
  - I have no problem with you "outing" David North. As I've said repeatedly,  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 01:40 PM   #129 
  - and why am i not surprised you completely ignore this post?  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 03:33 PM   #152 
     - The proof will be in the pudding when WSWS vomits up some new word salad of lies  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 03:37 PM   #154 
        - the proof is in the post you keep ignoring. cause it doesn't match your spin.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 03:42 PM   #156 
           - So will you continue posting lies from a $26 million corporate anti-union cult?  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 03:44 PM   #158 
              - I don't consider them lies. And if information from "anti-union cults"  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 03:49 PM   #161 
  - You Make An Excellent point, Mr. Rice  The Magistrate   Sep-16-09 02:45 PM   #138 
  - Thank you! They sound like a nasty piece of work from all angles. nt  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 02:56 PM   #140 
  - Why am I not surprised at all at this?  NNadir   Sep-16-09 03:01 PM   #142 
  - A split in the Flat Earth Society? nt  subcomhd   Sep-16-09 03:28 PM   #150 
  - Most entertaining thread ever!  Bluenorthwest   Sep-16-09 03:43 PM   #157 
  - Aha... I think I have finally sorted the truth from the echoes...  LooseWilly   Sep-16-09 03:47 PM   #160 
  - i *knew* there was something spooky about hampton.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 03:50 PM   #162 
  - I know Hannah, I'm sorry for you. Life just won't be the same for you knowing your main  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 03:56 PM   #166 
     - Do you know if the SocialistWorker pays trolls?  grantcart   Sep-16-09 04:17 PM   #187 
        - No, but I think they are another branch of the same "House of Crazy" nt  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 04:23 PM   #191 
  - No, the Scott person posted the first expose  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 03:52 PM   #163 
     - Those were posts by scott in that first post.  Starry Messenger   Sep-16-09 04:06 PM   #175 
     - No, the only other "person" who said that they could id from the "photo"  LooseWilly   Sep-16-09 04:25 PM   #193 
        - spooky.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 04:32 PM   #198 
           - Heh... I don't see it as spooky, so much as funny.  LooseWilly   Sep-16-09 04:55 PM   #212 
              - spooky has several meanings.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 05:04 PM   #214 
                 - If you say so...  LooseWilly   Sep-16-09 05:22 PM   #220 
  - It is difficult to understand why people who do not support the Democratic Party  grantcart   Sep-16-09 03:55 PM   #165 
  - i support the party of roosevelt, not rahm.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 03:57 PM   #167 
  - That's the $60,000 question, isn't it? And when it turns out their info sources are a cult of liars  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 03:58 PM   #168 
  - yes well their 'ideological purity' allows them to carry out any deception  grantcart   Sep-16-09 04:01 PM   #169 
  - and for you:  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 04:06 PM   #174 
  - once more:  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 04:05 PM   #173 
     - So you thought WSWS was psy-ops and you posted a half dozen of their articles per day?  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 04:09 PM   #179 
        - this must have escaped you:  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 04:11 PM   #181 
        - Uh, no. Shows who you are  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 04:12 PM   #183 
           - um, since the posts i cite pre-date today by several months, i could hardly be making them up.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 04:15 PM   #184 
              - So you thought it was psy-ops and you POSTED ARTICLES FROM IT EVERY DAY ANYWAY???  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 04:20 PM   #189 
                 - NYT/WAPO: also psy-ops. & to tweak YOU, sweetie.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 04:27 PM   #195 
        - boy you sure attracted a lot of "ignore" to this thread  grantcart   Sep-16-09 04:11 PM   #182 
  - It is difficult, indeed.  redqueen   Sep-16-09 04:03 PM   #171 
  - and for you, too:  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 04:08 PM   #177 
  - This isn't DLCUnderground  leftstreet   Sep-16-09 04:07 PM   #176 
     - oh, but it is.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 04:08 PM   #178 
     - If you post articles from sites that call Democrats "criminal conspiracy" are you a Democrat? nt  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 04:10 PM   #180 
     - link, hampton. then we'll discuss it.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 04:17 PM   #186 
     - You got your 6 pity recs, let this thread die  leftstreet   Sep-16-09 04:18 PM   #188 
        - Poor thing. You're going to have to find another "crazy house" website ...  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 04:22 PM   #190 
           - dupe  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 04:30 PM   #196 
           - david north = "millionaire" (runs a successful local business), so wsws reportage = "crazy".  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 04:30 PM   #197 
              - I'm glad you've flipped your views and now think rich people are "successful"  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 04:33 PM   #200 
              - david north does not equal david green.  Starry Messenger   Sep-16-09 04:38 PM   #202 
                 - You're a one note record. No one buys it. Even party members acknowledge it  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 04:40 PM   #203 
                    - LOL.  Starry Messenger   Sep-16-09 04:44 PM   #207 
                       - "I will never take you seriously ever again."  Forkboy   Sep-17-09 09:26 AM   #250 
     - The site referred to is a house organ for another political party that did no support  grantcart   Sep-16-09 04:16 PM   #185 
        - you have a problem with rich people financing politics?  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 04:26 PM   #194 
           - Apparently, you now don't. It's the new "Hannah Bull" view nt  HamdenRice   Sep-16-09 04:35 PM   #201 
              - lol  redqueen   Sep-16-09 04:43 PM   #205 
              - you know how.  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 04:45 PM   #208 
              - No, I honestly don't...  redqueen   Sep-16-09 04:47 PM   #210 
              - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-17-09 09:21 AM   #247 
                 - I'm thanking him for "tweaking" (as Hannah puts it) the people who post anti Dem stuff CONSTANTLY.  redqueen   Sep-17-09 09:24 AM   #249 
              - oh, i do. i'm just not so disingenuous to suggest that a regional millionaire is more suspect  Hannah Bell   Sep-16-09 04:44 PM   #206 
  - Thank You HamdenRice. Kicked and Recomended. nt  subcomhd   Sep-16-09 06:39 PM   #242 
  - I love WSWS and I'm not bothered in the least that Marxists reject it.  Prometheus Bound   Sep-16-09 06:43 PM   #243 
     - And yet,  tama   Sep-17-09 12:42 PM   #252 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC