You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #21: It's sort of like voter fraud reform. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. It's sort of like voter fraud reform.
In both cases the real issue is corporate supremacy over the American People but voter fraud is a manufactured issue used to dis-empower the American People from having affect in obtaining sincere/good quality executive and/or legislative representation, tort reform is the other head of the same Hydra; used to disenfranchise the people from the Judiciary and justice against corporate malfeasance.

If you can estrange or weaken the American Peoples' power too, hold or influence on all three branches, what's left? If your answer is the "fourth estate" free press, corporate media, I won't be able to stop laughing or crying until tomorrow morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Can anyone exolain "tort reform to me? I believe if someone is napi21  Aug-25-09 05:03 PM   #0 
  - my issue is when the injured guy gets a small percentage and the lawyer walks with millions  vadawg   Aug-25-09 05:05 PM   #1 
  - It's a standard third. If he asks for more, get another lawyer.  aquart   Aug-25-09 05:07 PM   #3 
  - What aquart said. Seriously, a good lawyer earns it and if s/he asks for more than that, run, don't  blondeatlast   Aug-25-09 05:10 PM   #7 
  - It varies.  Laelth   Aug-25-09 06:35 PM   #27 
  - Actually, the lawyer generally gets a third or so of the haul  Warpy   Aug-25-09 05:10 PM   #6 
  - Yeah, That Situation is Common in Stockholder Suits  On the Road   Aug-25-09 05:33 PM   #19 
  - Hiccup  Warpy   Aug-25-09 05:10 PM   #8 
  - Then you don't have an issue.  The Stranger   Aug-25-09 05:11 PM   #9 
  - A soution to that would be for the Federal government to actually enforce the laws  depakid   Aug-25-09 08:25 PM   #34 
  - yea, but repukes like to complain about "liberal lawyers" to ignorant folks  NightWatcher   Aug-25-09 05:05 PM   #2 
  - Ugh. I call that narrator "marble mouth guy" - you know you're in for a crock of shit when you hear  Maru Kitteh   Aug-25-09 05:19 PM   #13 
  - Most of the outrageous awards are remedied (usually reduc on appeal; note that I didn't say "many,"  blondeatlast   Aug-25-09 05:08 PM   #4 
  - You're watching spin by large corporate interests  taterguy   Aug-25-09 05:09 PM   #5 
  - Here is one example that blows my mind.  napi21   Aug-25-09 05:36 PM   #20 
     - How much money has the plaintiff collected?  taterguy   Aug-25-09 06:25 PM   #26 
        - I read that aetickle and the 3rd court said $28MM  napi21   Aug-25-09 07:58 PM   #30 
  - Ideally, the plaintiff should still be compensated for the monies lost for  no_hypocrisy   Aug-25-09 05:12 PM   #10 
  - I see two problems with how punitive damages are allocated  ParkieDem   Aug-25-09 05:56 PM   #22 
  - Nebraska and Texas have the most restrictive medical tort law in the country and it has NOT brought  Maru Kitteh   Aug-25-09 05:14 PM   #11 
  - The McDonald's coffee case is a perfect example of how the media spins  WCGreen   Aug-25-09 05:18 PM   #12 
  - And as I mention upthread, the case was appealed and the award reduced--which is quite typical. nt  blondeatlast   Aug-25-09 05:21 PM   #14 
  - But the fact that Mickey D's paid off so many others in order to  WCGreen   Aug-25-09 05:33 PM   #18 
     - Oh, hell yes. She still won almost $500k and was entitled to every penny, lawyers' fees, and then  blondeatlast   Aug-25-09 06:52 PM   #28 
  - Yes. I had personal knowledge of the facts in this case, but in  marybourg   Aug-25-09 05:56 PM   #23 
  - Would people have understood better if it was a man whose penis and scrotum needed skin grafts?  SharonAnn   Aug-25-09 06:25 PM   #25 
  - I have never known a person to receive a large sum of money.  theoldman   Aug-25-09 05:23 PM   #15 
  - Tort law works on this principle: someone will pay for every injury.  Laelth   Aug-25-09 05:28 PM   #16 
  - It's a rich vs. poor issue.  Eric J in MN   Aug-25-09 05:31 PM   #17 
  - It's sort of like voter fraud reform.  Uncle Joe   Aug-25-09 05:46 PM   #21 
  - It's something people who get sued alot advocate. n/t  rucky   Aug-25-09 05:57 PM   #24 
  - "Tort Reform" is a GOP propaganda scam.  TexasObserver   Aug-25-09 06:57 PM   #29 
  - Tort reform surely is propaganda  laughingliberal   Aug-25-09 08:09 PM   #32 
     - If they really want tort reform, eliminate the biggest item of monetary damages: health care costs.  TexasObserver   Aug-26-09 12:45 AM   #35 
  - "but I've heard of insane compensations in some cases too."  Warren Stupidity   Aug-25-09 08:07 PM   #31 
  - So called "tort reform" means no recourse against abusive corporations  depakid   Aug-25-09 08:15 PM   #33 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC