You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #27: Move on (eom). [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Brooklyns_Finest Donating Member (747 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-23-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
27. Move on (eom).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Is Obama on the verge of committing impeachable offenses by not prosecuting the tyranny of Bushco? Union Yes  Aug-23-09 12:10 PM   #0 
  - I voted No. First of all, I was never deluded into thinking  JeanGrey   Aug-23-09 12:14 PM   #1 
  - Not investigating torture is a crime. The only question really  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 12:23 PM   #6 
  - Good luck prosecuting Obama for this "crime".  JeanGrey   Aug-23-09 12:25 PM   #8 
     - The torture convention has a mandate and a time sensitive one.  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 12:38 PM   #23 
        - Look, Obama is still doing what Bush did. There are still  JeanGrey   Aug-23-09 09:29 PM   #104 
           - Right. And that's different than dismissing out of hand  EFerrari   Aug-24-09 03:35 AM   #112 
  - Purposely failing to prosecute high crimes is a violation of Presidential Oath of Office.  Union Yes   Aug-23-09 12:24 PM   #7 
  - Well then are you prepared to launch a movement to  JeanGrey   Aug-23-09 12:26 PM   #10 
  - "failing to prosecute high crimes" Here is the only mention of "high crimes" in the Constitution:  cherokeeprogressive   Aug-23-09 02:07 PM   #50 
  - I agree with you. It was never going to happen, not with any of our Dems, even DK.  Maru Kitteh   Aug-23-09 04:05 PM   #63 
  - Exactly. I was quite frankly, surprised at those that  JeanGrey   Aug-23-09 09:30 PM   #105 
  - Why do we have laws, then?  sabrina 1   Aug-24-09 02:02 PM   #133 
  - You forgot one: No one actually in authority gives a crap.  Ladyhawk   Aug-23-09 12:14 PM   #2 
  - No, but he better be mindful of war crimes charges for the Pakistan incursion and bombings.  timeforpeace   Aug-23-09 04:01 PM   #62 
  - Who would do this?  DrZeeLit   Aug-23-09 12:20 PM   #3 
  - Very, very well put. My sentiments, exactly.  JeanGrey   Aug-23-09 12:26 PM   #11 
  - As much as we'd all love to see Bush in jail, it's never ever going to happen.  Curtland1015   Aug-23-09 12:22 PM   #4 
  - Do you want him impeached? Then why start this poll?  NoSheep   Aug-23-09 12:23 PM   #5 
  - At some point if he doesn't prosecute, YES.  Union Yes   Aug-23-09 12:26 PM   #9 
     - It isn't going to happen.  JeanGrey   Aug-23-09 12:28 PM   #13 
     - Presidents don't prosecute.  NoSheep   Aug-23-09 12:30 PM   #16 
     - Don't you know? Everything bad that happens in this country is Obama's fault.  Curtland1015   Aug-23-09 12:32 PM   #17 
     - Best of luck to us, huh?  NoSheep   Aug-23-09 12:32 PM   #19 
     - He is obligated to investigate torture, yes.  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 12:49 PM   #26 
     - Then prepare to be banned from this site.  geek tragedy   Aug-23-09 04:27 PM   #70 
     - And here is the key difference between Republicans and Democrats folks...  SidneyCarton   Aug-24-09 01:40 PM   #131 
  - Other  Ohio Joe   Aug-23-09 12:26 PM   #12 
  - Oath of Office.  Union Yes   Aug-23-09 12:29 PM   #14 
  - None of that says perform prosecutions  Ohio Joe   Aug-23-09 12:38 PM   #21 
  - Yes, under the Geneva torture convention. n/t  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 12:40 PM   #24 
     - Where?  Ohio Joe   Aug-23-09 12:45 PM   #25 
        - Not impeachment but the convention is written so as to criminalize  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 12:56 PM   #29 
           - And I agree completely with that...  Ohio Joe   Aug-23-09 01:23 PM   #38 
           - Impeachment aside, I believe that under Geneva, the president  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 01:34 PM   #41 
              - Perhaps...  Ohio Joe   Aug-23-09 02:07 PM   #51 
              - Oh, I agree that the right wing would have a field day.  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 04:57 PM   #78 
              - The War Crimes Act of 1996  G_j   Aug-23-09 10:35 PM   #110 
           - Nadler is a good Congressman, but he's just legally wrong  HamdenRice   Aug-23-09 02:06 PM   #49 
              - The mandate is to investigate and no, I"m not misunderstanding anything. n/t  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 03:29 PM   #58 
  - and what if the next Prez doesnt prosecute Obama for not prosecuting Bush?  NightWatcher   Aug-23-09 12:29 PM   #15 
  - Then she wil be in violation of her Oath of Office as well.  Union Yes   Aug-23-09 12:36 PM   #20 
  - God do we have to sit through MORE ignorance about impeachment?  Richardo   Aug-23-09 12:32 PM   #18 
  - Explain your accusation of ignorance, I'm quite well informed.  Union Yes   Aug-23-09 12:38 PM   #22 
  - You can start with what the impeachable crime is... and the evidence for that crime  Richardo   Aug-23-09 01:06 PM   #35 
     - The rule of law, a little leftist fantasy.  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 01:14 PM   #36 
        - "The Rule of Law" The last vestige of those with no real criminal evidence  Richardo   Aug-23-09 01:28 PM   #39 
        - More than one person has already pointed out that Obama is in violation.  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 01:37 PM   #43 
           - You don't seem to know what the law is. That's the problem.  HamdenRice   Aug-23-09 02:15 PM   #53 
              - I think I side with Turley, Nadler and Nowak and not you. n/t  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 03:35 PM   #59 
        - Cute.  SidneyCarton   Aug-24-09 01:43 PM   #132 
  - The impeachnuts are out for blood and they don't care shose  geek tragedy   Aug-23-09 04:21 PM   #66 
  - Move on (eom).  Brooklyns_Finest   Aug-23-09 12:54 PM   #27 
  - Are you serious?  Political Heretic   Aug-23-09 08:11 PM   #98 
  - When do you?  thisisenuff   Aug-23-09 12:54 PM   #28 
  - I have  Libertas1776   Aug-23-09 12:57 PM   #30 
  - Disappointing? Yes. Impeachable? Why take down a Dem President.  Jennicut   Aug-23-09 12:59 PM   #31 
  - It's the law. Forgetting impeachment, it's not only disappointing  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 01:02 PM   #32 
     - It is NOT the law, contrary to what impeachnuts say.  geek tragedy   Aug-23-09 04:24 PM   #69 
        - Read the thread. It's one thing to oppose impeachment.  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 04:47 PM   #75 
  - ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##  DU GrovelBot   Aug-23-09 01:02 PM   #33 
  - With the time and the resources, we can either clean up the Bush mess or prosecute.  Kerrytravelers   Aug-23-09 01:02 PM   #34 
  - It is an impeachable offense, but one I doubt the GOPers would use  MasonJar   Aug-23-09 01:16 PM   #37 
  - Other. I agree with Rep. Nadler on this issue  IndianaGreen   Aug-23-09 01:30 PM   #40 
  - Aw Jeez, not this ignorant rubbish again  HamdenRice   Aug-23-09 01:36 PM   #42 
  - The president is obligated to order the Attorney General to investigate.  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 01:40 PM   #44 
  - No he isn't. You are just plain wrong on the law. Period.  HamdenRice   Aug-23-09 01:43 PM   #46 
     - Investigate, not prosecute, and the UN Special Rapporteur disagrees with you.  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 01:50 PM   #48 
        - Wrong. Please name the provision of the UN Convention against Torture that requires investigation  HamdenRice   Aug-23-09 02:12 PM   #52 
           - Third Geneva Convention deals with torture, and presumably, these articles:  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 03:20 PM   #55 
              - Cut the Gordian Knot. The AG does not deal with impeachments. nt.  Hosnon   Aug-23-09 05:01 PM   #81 
              - I wasn't addressing impeachment but the mandate to investigate.  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 05:04 PM   #83 
                 - I thought the point was taking Obama to task? The OP asked about impeachment, not  Hosnon   Aug-23-09 05:08 PM   #84 
                    - The underlying question is, is Obama mandated to investigate.  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 05:20 PM   #87 
                       - Oh I see. I thought you meant the AG was required to investigate.  Hosnon   Aug-23-09 05:22 PM   #88 
                       - Or for not being able to bowl a 100.  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 05:26 PM   #90 
                          - Zactly. nt.  Hosnon   Aug-23-09 05:27 PM   #91 
                       - Bullshit. See multiple posts proving you wrong. nt  HamdenRice   Aug-24-09 07:38 AM   #127 
              - I notice HR hasn't be back after you dumped actual facts on him.  Political Heretic   Aug-23-09 08:14 PM   #99 
              - Maybe he's walking his pony.  EFerrari   Aug-24-09 03:31 AM   #111 
              - Actually, you misread it so badly, it's hard to know where to begin  HamdenRice   Aug-24-09 05:40 AM   #113 
                 - LOL  EFerrari   Aug-24-09 05:53 AM   #117 
                    - Can't answer?  HamdenRice   Aug-24-09 06:19 AM   #120 
  - A voice of reason.  SeattleGirl   Aug-23-09 01:40 PM   #45 
  - Obama must pursue known torturers  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 03:46 PM   #61 
     - What utter bullshit. Please provide an example of a prosecution for failure to prosecute  HamdenRice   Aug-24-09 05:47 AM   #114 
        - The letter was written by a prosecutor of war crimes in Rwanda.  EFerrari   Aug-24-09 05:52 AM   #116 
           - Did you even read the letter you are citing? Can you understand it? Let's look at the text:  HamdenRice   Aug-24-09 06:25 AM   #121 
              - LOL  EFerrari   Aug-24-09 07:32 AM   #125 
                 - LOL is your "answer" when you are proved absolutely wrong. DemocracyNow reports issue is moot  HamdenRice   Aug-24-09 07:37 AM   #126 
  - Impeached or prosecuted?  Hosnon   Aug-23-09 05:00 PM   #80 
  - 3 arms of the government???  CitizenPatriot   Aug-23-09 01:46 PM   #47 
  - I'm waiting for someone to post the specific passage from whatever law, convention, or treaty under  cherokeeprogressive   Aug-23-09 02:26 PM   #54 
  - See #55. The thing is, there is more than one way to get to the same place.  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 03:22 PM   #56 
  - A "high crime" or "misdemeanor" is whatever the House says it is.  Hosnon   Aug-23-09 04:07 PM   #64 
  - That's because it doesn't exist. nt  HamdenRice   Aug-24-09 06:33 AM   #123 
  - That's the "Catch 22"!  DailyGrind51   Aug-23-09 03:25 PM   #57 
  - KATRINA should be on that list n/t  lies and propaganda   Aug-23-09 03:38 PM   #60 
  - Not an impeachable offense, not a crime.  geek tragedy   Aug-23-09 04:19 PM   #65 
  - Not an impeachable offense? Calling others ignorant of the law in that context  Hosnon   Aug-23-09 04:22 PM   #67 
  - 100% true. Lots of nutjobs who preach about the  geek tragedy   Aug-23-09 04:29 PM   #71 
     - I was referring to your comment as unwise. What is a "high crime" or "misdemeanor"  Hosnon   Aug-23-09 04:33 PM   #72 
     - By your definition, Bush committed no impeachable offenses. nt  geek tragedy   Aug-23-09 04:42 PM   #74 
        - No. Just as any criminal still committed the crime beyond the statute of limitations.  Hosnon   Aug-23-09 04:57 PM   #77 
     - Right. Nutjobs like John Dean.  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 05:02 PM   #82 
        - Dean's main qualification when discussing criminal law is the fact  geek tragedy   Aug-23-09 08:04 PM   #96 
           - You must be kidding. He's the reason Nixon was forced to resign.  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 09:42 PM   #106 
  - Here you go:  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 04:23 PM   #68 
     - 0.  geek tragedy   Aug-23-09 04:40 PM   #73 
        - I think I'll still go with international experts like this prosecutor,  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 04:51 PM   #76 
           - You need to go no further than Article 2, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution. nt.  Hosnon   Aug-23-09 04:58 PM   #79 
              - This is Scot Horton on why Holder may appoint a special prosecutor:  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 05:17 PM   #85 
                 - I think the United Nations Convention against Torture would run up against the Constitution and  Hosnon   Aug-23-09 05:18 PM   #86 
                 - There is also the War Crimes Act to consider.  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 05:25 PM   #89 
                    - He's probably obligated to investigate under international law but, psh, what is that?  Hosnon   Aug-23-09 05:29 PM   #92 
                 - You are misreading the UN Convention completely  HamdenRice   Aug-24-09 06:00 AM   #118 
  - Some things to think about... WHO are the torturers in all of these legal scenarios?  Curtland1015   Aug-23-09 05:40 PM   #93 
  - There's all kinds of evidence from video tape to memos to witnesses  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 05:44 PM   #94 
  - The President doesn't issue indictments. The Justice Department does that  Freddie Stubbs   Aug-23-09 06:03 PM   #95 
  - It doesn't matter, the moment you use the word "impeachment" - dialog here shuts down.  Political Heretic   Aug-23-09 08:10 PM   #97 
  - No.  H2O Man   Aug-23-09 08:15 PM   #100 
  - No. And who would do this impeaching of Obama for  subcomhd   Aug-23-09 08:29 PM   #101 
  - We're going to impeach Obama over Bush/Cheney's crimes?  Stephanie   Aug-23-09 08:32 PM   #102 
  - I really don't think the OP meant to attack Obama  EFerrari   Aug-23-09 09:53 PM   #108 
  - In a perfect world, the obvious answer is yes. But this isn't a perfect world.  armyowalgreens   Aug-23-09 08:33 PM   #103 
  - Forget the Constitution, everybody else has.  mmonk   Aug-23-09 09:45 PM   #107 
  - wow, the poll results certainly aren't consistent with the rec-unrec status on the OP  flakban   Aug-23-09 09:54 PM   #109 
  - The OPer split the No vote 3 ways. More people voted No than Yes  HamdenRice   Aug-24-09 06:31 AM   #122 
     - Here's how I see it...  flakban   Aug-24-09 01:35 PM   #128 
  - Errr... Huffington Post is reporting that the Justice department *WILL* probably pursue  Liberal_Stalwart71   Aug-24-09 05:49 AM   #115 
  - ... only a few "bad apples," like with the Abu Graib farce.  Senator   Aug-24-09 06:08 AM   #119 
  - Nice splitting of the no votes  WeDidIt   Aug-24-09 06:42 AM   #124 
  - Other.  SidneyCarton   Aug-24-09 01:36 PM   #129 
  - So we are going to impeach Obama for not investigating  walldude   Aug-24-09 01:40 PM   #130 
  - ROFLMAO!! OK So what's the Official Obama-haters, PUMA, Trotskyite Mob, Day 1 Impeachers excuse now?  HamdenRice   Aug-24-09 02:12 PM   #134 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC