HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-11-07 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #38 |
| 41. Yes, O.J. went to trial. |
|
And he was found not guilty.
That he went to trial is not mean that he was more likely to have done compared to the lacrosse players.
The people who still claim that O.J. did it aren't any different than people who still maintain that the lacrosse players did it.
Being found not guilty, or having the charges dropped, is not proof that O.J. didn't kill Nicole, or proof that the lacrosse players didn't rape that woman. It just shows there's insufficient evidence to prove their guilt.
|
| -ok, I will admit it looks like I was completely wrong re: Duke Lacrosse players |
Lerkfish |
Apr-11-07 01:29 PM |
#0 |
-
Thank you for having the grace and maturity to fess up - K&R |
slackmaster |
Apr-11-07 01:31 PM |
#1 |
-
Good for you. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Apr-11-07 01:31 PM |
#2 |
-
I think they got away with it. |
soothsayer |
Apr-11-07 01:31 PM |
#3 |
 -
Not one single shred of forensic evidence. NOT ONE. |
dbaker41 |
Apr-11-07 01:35 PM |
#6 |
-
There's a difference... |
Bornaginhooligan |
Apr-11-07 01:36 PM |
#7 |
-
Nope. And in America, I don't have to. |
dbaker41 |
Apr-11-07 01:40 PM |
#12 |
 -
Isn't it written somewhere, Innocent until proven guilty? |
William769 |
Apr-11-07 02:17 PM |
#39 |
  -
not anymore. not since the patriot act. Check it out. |
antifaschits |
Apr-12-07 09:50 AM |
#71 |
 -
well said |
Scriptor Ignotus |
Apr-12-07 09:44 AM |
#69 |
-
Wow, what will it take to make you believe that the system worked-- |
wienerdoggie |
Apr-11-07 01:42 PM |
#13 |
 -
I believe the system did work. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Apr-11-07 01:43 PM |
#15 |
  -
Then why cast doubt on their innocence? How are they supposed to go on with their |
wienerdoggie |
Apr-11-07 01:46 PM |
#17 |
   -
I'm presuming they're innocent. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Apr-11-07 01:48 PM |
#19 |
  -
Hair Splitting Nonsense, Hooligan! |
ProfessorGAC |
Apr-11-07 01:53 PM |
#24 |
  -
You're misreading. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Apr-11-07 01:59 PM |
#28 |
  -
They weren't found "not guilty". The charges were DROPPED. |
dbaker41 |
Apr-11-07 02:05 PM |
#32 |
   -
Yes, same thing. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Apr-11-07 02:06 PM |
#34 |
    -
I don't care how often you repeat it, BAH, it's NOT the same. |
dbaker41 |
Apr-11-07 02:18 PM |
#40 |
    -
And the testimony was fabricated. |
TX-RAT |
Apr-12-07 09:29 AM |
#64 |
   -
They were in fact proclaimed innocent |
marshall |
Apr-12-07 09:00 AM |
#59 |
  -
In this case, the Prosecutor |
ObamaNationYes |
Apr-11-07 02:07 PM |
#35 |
   -
Yes, but for misconduct. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Apr-11-07 02:09 PM |
#36 |
  -
Look Who's Misreading |
ProfessorGAC |
Apr-11-07 02:12 PM |
#38 |
  -
Yes, O.J. went to trial. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Apr-11-07 02:20 PM |
#41 |
  -
You Stick With That |
ProfessorGAC |
Apr-11-07 02:21 PM |
#42 |
  -
You think O.J. did it, don't you? |
Bornaginhooligan |
Apr-11-07 02:22 PM |
#43 |
  -
Where was the evidence the NYT talked about last year? |
marshall |
Apr-12-07 09:07 AM |
#61 |
 -
You misunderstand me, so let me make myself perfectly clear |
dbaker41 |
Apr-11-07 01:49 PM |
#21 |
-
Um, I think we're on the same side of this issue :) |
wienerdoggie |
Apr-11-07 01:56 PM |
#25 |
-
My bad, I thought you were replying to me ... |
dbaker41 |
Apr-11-07 02:02 PM |
#30 |
-
S'okay! |
wienerdoggie |
Apr-11-07 02:04 PM |
#31 |
-
The Attorney General of North Carolina says they are innocent |
slackmaster |
Apr-11-07 02:10 PM |
#37 |
 -
Exactly. I am not sure what other "proof" can there possibly be. |
lizzy |
Apr-11-07 06:39 PM |
#54 |
-
Their dismissal orders say the charges are dropped because |
lizzy |
Apr-11-07 06:38 PM |
#53 |
-
They were declared INNOCENT. You're right - there is a big difference. NT |
mondo joe |
Apr-12-07 09:09 AM |
#62 |
-
Yep, they were guilty before being proven innocent, it sounds like. |
wienerdoggie |
Apr-11-07 01:32 PM |
#4 |
 -
You mean they're just supposed to GET OVER IT? |
dbaker41 |
Apr-11-07 01:37 PM |
#8 |
  -
No, I feel bad for these young men. I said what I meant--I hope they |
wienerdoggie |
Apr-11-07 01:39 PM |
#10 |
 -
Frankly, I don't see how they CAN get over it, or go forward, or whatever, |
dbaker41 |
Apr-11-07 01:42 PM |
#14 |
 -
There are certain crimes where that seems to be the norm.... |
SacredCow |
Apr-12-07 10:34 AM |
#80 |
-
I guess I was too |
LisaM |
Apr-11-07 01:35 PM |
#5 |
-
I will apologise and say I was wrong as well. |
xultar |
Apr-11-07 01:38 PM |
#9 |
-
I am wondering what were the reasons that y'all determined |
jhrobbins |
Apr-11-07 01:39 PM |
#11 |
 -
Here's a clue. . . |
Journeyman |
Apr-11-07 01:46 PM |
#18 |
 -
simply based on the situation. |
Lerkfish |
Apr-11-07 01:56 PM |
#26 |
-
That's what a lot of us thought at first |
yardwork |
Apr-11-07 03:40 PM |
#49 |
-
If the DA had been correct, or truthful |
Lerkfish |
Apr-11-07 03:43 PM |
#50 |
-
So what went on in that bathroom? |
cat_girl25 |
Apr-11-07 01:44 PM |
#16 |
 -
I'm sure the lacrosse players... |
Bornaginhooligan |
Apr-11-07 01:48 PM |
#20 |
  -
Isn't there an Imus thread for you to troll around in? |
dbaker41 |
Apr-11-07 01:52 PM |
#23 |
 -
There is no evidence that any physical assault occurred at all |
yardwork |
Apr-11-07 01:51 PM |
#22 |
-
How did all this go that far? |
cat_girl25 |
Apr-11-07 01:59 PM |
#27 |
-
Prosecutor Out Of Control |
ProfessorGAC |
Apr-11-07 02:25 PM |
#44 |
-
I agree that this was entirely the prosecutor's fault |
yardwork |
Apr-11-07 03:33 PM |
#46 |
-
Nifong needed to be reelected. |
Zynx |
Apr-11-07 03:36 PM |
#48 |
-
The reason she's not being prosecuted is sealed. n/t |
femmedem |
Apr-12-07 09:34 AM |
#66 |
-
Well said. n/t |
lumberjack_jeff |
Apr-12-07 10:09 AM |
#77 |
-
Btw, has anyone heard from their prior coach? |
cat_girl25 |
Apr-11-07 02:01 PM |
#29 |
 -
He didn't high-tail it out; HE GOT FIRED. |
dbaker41 |
Apr-11-07 02:06 PM |
#33 |
-
He did? I thought he quit. |
cat_girl25 |
Apr-11-07 02:28 PM |
#45 |
-
He was fired. |
yardwork |
Apr-11-07 03:35 PM |
#47 |
-
Another Victory for the Male System Against a Woman Victim |
Hidden Stillness |
Apr-11-07 03:44 PM |
#51 |
 -
I would not view that as a victory. |
Lerkfish |
Apr-11-07 03:56 PM |
#52 |
 -
None of this "evidence" exists |
yardwork |
Apr-11-07 10:05 PM |
#55 |
 -
Jesus H. Keeeerist! What part of the FACTS don't you get???? |
dbaker41 |
Apr-11-07 10:09 PM |
#56 |
 -
Your post is full of bullshit. |
Kingshakabobo |
Apr-12-07 01:19 AM |
#57 |
  -
methinks that men start out guilty, and we have to prove our innocence |
antifaschits |
Apr-12-07 09:52 AM |
#73 |
 -
Thanks for the little bit of irony there, "Hidden Stiffness" |
slackmaster |
Apr-12-07 09:21 AM |
#63 |
-
That "story" seemed like a no-brainer from day one |
SoCalDem |
Apr-12-07 01:27 AM |
#58 |
-
Your apology is not PC. Please rewrite. |
Neshanic |
Apr-12-07 09:07 AM |
#60 |
 -
er...??? |
Lerkfish |
Apr-12-07 09:32 AM |
#65 |
-
Youmentioned a group, and a perception of that group in your apology. |
Neshanic |
Apr-12-07 09:40 AM |
#68 |
-
so I did. |
Lerkfish |
Apr-12-07 09:48 AM |
#70 |
-
Well, without getting technical, that still gives you no rights to generalize... |
Neshanic |
Apr-12-07 09:50 AM |
#72 |
-
ahhh..so the 'reverse racism" crowd is trying to exact revenge for Imus? |
Lerkfish |
Apr-12-07 09:52 AM |
#74 |
-
You are the one making a generalization about a group. Mirror? |
Neshanic |
Apr-12-07 09:54 AM |
#75 |
-
I was wrong too, and I also apologize. |
femmedem |
Apr-12-07 09:38 AM |
#67 |
-
Interesting article |
lumberjack_jeff |
Apr-12-07 10:07 AM |
#76 |
 -
"Jesse Jackson-supplied college degree"???? |
Lerkfish |
Apr-12-07 10:23 AM |
#78 |
 -
Her name has been cited in the media |
yardwork |
Apr-12-07 10:26 AM |
#79 |
-
Rationalize much? |
lumberjack_jeff |
Apr-12-07 02:46 PM |
#81 |
-
Whatever. If you can't see the difference between a District Attorney |
yardwork |
Apr-12-07 04:42 PM |
#83 |
-
good on ya |
cwydro |
Apr-12-07 02:59 PM |
#82 |
-
I was, too, and I don't apologize for it. |
yardwork |
Apr-12-07 04:54 PM |
#84 |
-
Yes, best point |
cwydro |
Apr-12-07 04:57 PM |
#85 |