HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-05-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
| 23. I'm pretty sure it's not SOP for the SWAT to serve evictions. |
| -Elderly man resisting eviction shot by Detroit police |
Hannah Bell |
Aug-05-09 12:38 PM |
#0 |
-
This rises way above stupidly... this over the top use of violence needs to stop. |
ShamelessHussy |
Aug-05-09 12:47 PM |
#1 |
 -
Were it not blasphemous, I would scream out :J***s f*****g C****t |
indepat |
Aug-05-09 04:27 PM |
#60 |
-
it takes a real hero to shoot an unarmed senile a dozen times |
Sen. Walter Sobchak |
Aug-05-09 12:47 PM |
#2 |
-
Ownership society |
havocmom |
Aug-05-09 12:50 PM |
#3 |
-
Another way to get low income people off the waterfront, ala Katrina! |
FreeJG |
Aug-05-09 12:51 PM |
#4 |
-
This is why the police and the Government exist. |
anonymous171 |
Aug-05-09 12:52 PM |
#5 |
-
Christ, just wait him out |
NickB79 |
Aug-05-09 12:54 PM |
#6 |
 -
In a decent society there would not even be a consideration |
sabrina 1 |
Aug-05-09 01:36 PM |
#33 |
-
Good post n/t |
malaise |
Aug-05-09 03:18 PM |
#58 |
-
You speak the truth. -nt |
crickets |
Aug-05-09 06:15 PM |
#62 |
-
Thank you. That's really the issue, why is a 78-year-old getting evicted anyway? |
Hannah Bell |
Aug-06-09 03:53 AM |
#64 |
-
wsws is not a credible source. |
HiFructosePronSyrup |
Aug-05-09 12:54 PM |
#7 |
 -
I find it more credible than the New York Times |
noamnety |
Aug-05-09 01:35 PM |
#32 |
-
May be true or not true. If it's reported in WSWS, there's no way to tell b/c it's not credible |
HamdenRice |
Aug-05-09 12:56 PM |
#8 |
 -
Ah, turns out it's technically true. |
HiFructosePronSyrup |
Aug-05-09 01:01 PM |
#10 |
  -
you're the one with poor reporting skills. the wsws article doesn't say he was unarmed. in fact: |
Hannah Bell |
Aug-05-09 01:08 PM |
#14 |
 -
"It takes a real hero to shoot an unarmed senile a dozen times." |
HiFructosePronSyrup |
Aug-05-09 01:09 PM |
#15 |
 -
I didn't make the statement, so not sure what your point is. Maybe to disguise your own misreporting |
Hannah Bell |
Aug-05-09 01:11 PM |
#16 |
  -
Yet you take issue with my reply, but not with the guy who actually got it wrong. |
HiFructosePronSyrup |
Aug-05-09 01:12 PM |
#17 |
 -
The article didn't get it wrong. Your comment was made in response to hampton's obligatory |
Hannah Bell |
Aug-05-09 01:16 PM |
#20 |
 -
1. I never claimed the article got it wrong. |
HiFructosePronSyrup |
Aug-05-09 01:18 PM |
#22 |
 -
If you had read the article, you'd see they made a note of the police mentioning he was armed. |
EOTE |
Aug-05-09 02:42 PM |
#51 |
 -
Do you have any examples of their 'complete fabrications'? |
Cal Carpenter |
Aug-05-09 01:02 PM |
#12 |
-
Just stick around. Hannah posts a WSWS complete fabrication every other day or so... |
HamdenRice |
Aug-05-09 01:33 PM |
#29 |
-
yep, just to bug *you,* hampton, & elicit your jerked knee. |
Hannah Bell |
Aug-05-09 01:35 PM |
#31 |
 -
It'd be more effective if you didn't stick your foot in your mouth in the process. |
HiFructosePronSyrup |
Aug-05-09 01:36 PM |
#34 |
-
look who's talking; miss cordiality. just sayin' |
Hannah Bell |
Aug-05-09 01:46 PM |
#35 |
-
Oh, I never claimed to be cordial. |
HiFructosePronSyrup |
Aug-05-09 01:47 PM |
#36 |
-
I've read a lot of wsws stuff about Detroit |
Cal Carpenter |
Aug-05-09 02:11 PM |
#43 |
-
As I mentioned upthread, they said the UAW were criminals. |
HamdenRice |
Aug-05-09 02:40 PM |
#50 |
-
No, upthread you said the USW |
Cal Carpenter |
Aug-05-09 02:59 PM |
#54 |
-
Sorry, it was the Steel Workers. No I don't have a link. Do a search, it was about 2 weeks ago. nt |
HamdenRice |
Aug-05-09 03:07 PM |
#55 |
-
it's you who's fabricating. which is why you have no link. |
Hannah Bell |
Aug-06-09 03:46 AM |
#63 |
-
This appears to be |
H2O Man |
Aug-05-09 12:57 PM |
#9 |
 -
Obama's health plan is to kill old people... |
HiFructosePronSyrup |
Aug-05-09 01:02 PM |
#11 |
-
im not seeing if he was armed or not, if so then it casts a totally different complexion |
vadawg |
Aug-05-09 01:07 PM |
#13 |
 -
The police say he was. Easy to know once he's in custody, but no |
Hannah Bell |
Aug-05-09 01:14 PM |
#18 |
-
However, do you really believe 100 police & helicopters are required for an eviction? |
HiFructosePronSyrup |
Aug-05-09 01:15 PM |
#19 |
-
which came first? & other than the police, who else claims the man was |
Hannah Bell |
Aug-05-09 01:18 PM |
#21 |
-
I'm pretty sure it's not SOP for the SWAT to serve evictions. |
HiFructosePronSyrup |
Aug-05-09 01:19 PM |
#23 |
-
they weren't serving an eviction. they were evicting, i.e. removing the man. |
Hannah Bell |
Aug-05-09 01:28 PM |
#25 |
-
Since when are evictions a criminal matter? |
wininboy |
Aug-05-09 02:34 PM |
#49 |
-
the sheriffs dept who do the evictions are the police and in many places have more power and authori |
vadawg |
Aug-05-09 02:45 PM |
#52 |
-
The Sherriffs' Office and the Police Dept are different organization AFAIK |
wininboy |
Aug-05-09 03:10 PM |
#56 |
-
oops you miscontrued what i meant, the sheriffs dept is law enforcement |
vadawg |
Aug-05-09 03:13 PM |
#57 |
-
OK |
wininboy |
Aug-05-09 04:18 PM |
#59 |
-
yup ive done a few evictions were people start brandishing and very quickly it turns into the alamo |
vadawg |
Aug-05-09 04:30 PM |
#61 |
-
That's my childhood neighborhood |
MrScorpio |
Aug-05-09 01:19 PM |
#24 |
 -
Very very sad |
omega minimo |
Aug-05-09 01:50 PM |
#37 |
-
Strangely some people think expanding cop arsenals to include automatic weapons is a good idea. n/t |
Statistical |
Aug-05-09 01:29 PM |
#26 |
 -
well seeing as the bad guys have automatic weapons, i see allowing the popo to have them |
vadawg |
Aug-05-09 01:32 PM |
#27 |
  -
"bad guys" virtually never have automatic weapons except in the movies. n/t |
Statistical |
Aug-05-09 01:59 PM |
#38 |
 -
yeah okay, try working the road and coming across said bad guys |
vadawg |
Aug-05-09 02:01 PM |
#40 |
 -
No problem with cops having rifles or shotguns or scopes or tazers. |
Statistical |
Aug-05-09 02:04 PM |
#41 |
 -
They did that because the cops were being out gunned by |
Fire1 |
Aug-05-09 02:18 PM |
#46 |
-
I wonder how much the Detroit authorities spent on this "operation" |
Mosby |
Aug-05-09 01:32 PM |
#28 |
 -
Well, it did say they tried tear gas first, that's non-lethal. |
HiFructosePronSyrup |
Aug-05-09 01:34 PM |
#30 |
-
that's true, they did try tear gas |
Mosby |
Aug-05-09 02:00 PM |
#39 |
-
This is another casualty of the drug war (really).. |
naaman fletcher |
Aug-05-09 02:05 PM |
#42 |
-
Hooray for our law enforcement officials! |
FiveGoodMen |
Aug-05-09 02:13 PM |
#44 |
 -
thank you...... oh you were being sarcastic |
vadawg |
Aug-05-09 02:17 PM |
#45 |
-
When they refer to 'tear gas cannisters', would 'flash bangs' |
Pharlo |
Aug-05-09 02:27 PM |
#47 |
 -
Tear gas is meant to draw out. Flash bang is meant to distract while the officers enter. |
armyowalgreens |
Aug-06-09 04:00 AM |
#65 |
-
K&R for bringing out the "authoritarian brigade". |
Greyhound |
Aug-05-09 02:27 PM |
#48 |
-
I don't think most are saying the police were justified, just that there's no way of telling |
HamdenRice |
Aug-05-09 02:53 PM |
#53 |