Mabus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-09-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
| 43. No but following me from posting to posting is |
| -If Clark or Gore were going to run for Prez, they would've declared by now. |
Lex |
Apr-09-07 10:38 AM |
#0 |
-
You can raise a crapload of money early on and still lose big. See Howard Dean. |
Selatius |
Apr-09-07 10:40 AM |
#1 |
 -
Also see John Conally. |
Benhurst |
Apr-09-07 11:56 AM |
#36 |
-
it would be smarter to sit back and watch Obama and Hillary cancel |
Donnachaidh |
Apr-09-07 10:40 AM |
#2 |
 -
I don't think Gore will run, unfortunately. |
alyce douglas |
Apr-09-07 10:42 AM |
#3 |
-
I think he will |
madokie |
Apr-09-07 10:43 AM |
#4 |
-
what makes you think so?? |
alyce douglas |
Apr-09-07 10:59 AM |
#15 |
 -
His next book is NOT about Global Warming issues. |
NYCGirl |
Apr-09-07 11:09 AM |
#19 |
 -
not to be argumentative did I say that. I think he knows it is going to take a herculean |
madokie |
Apr-09-07 11:11 AM |
#21 |
-
I think he will, too! So there! |
Blue State Native |
Apr-09-07 11:25 AM |
#31 |
-
;-0 |
madokie |
Apr-09-07 11:31 AM |
#33 |
-
Is it just me, but the fundraising part of the race is NOT what I'm interested in? |
The Count |
Apr-09-07 10:44 AM |
#5 |
 -
Amen and pass the potatoes. |
Clark2008 |
Apr-09-07 11:08 AM |
#18 |
-
Running now just makes you look desparate |
maxsolomon |
Apr-09-07 10:45 AM |
#6 |
-
they are smart to WAIT |
Roland99 |
Apr-09-07 10:45 AM |
#7 |
 -
Clark waited last go 'round and couldn't catch up |
Lex |
Apr-09-07 10:52 AM |
#9 |
-
Clark didn't have general appeal (no pun intended). Name recognition carries a lot of weight. |
Roland99 |
Apr-09-07 10:53 AM |
#10 |
 -
Hmmm... really? |
Clark2008 |
Apr-09-07 11:09 AM |
#20 |
-
Doesn't change the fact he doesn't have a widespread appeal. |
Roland99 |
Apr-09-07 11:46 AM |
#35 |
-
that was Clark -- big difference if Gore stepped up late |
Donnachaidh |
Apr-09-07 11:20 AM |
#27 |
-
Gore gets plenty of free media right now |
Mabus |
Apr-09-07 10:51 AM |
#8 |
 -
True, but mostly for his great work on global warming, |
Lex |
Apr-09-07 10:54 AM |
#11 |
  -
That's why I mentioned his upcoming book |
Mabus |
Apr-09-07 11:16 AM |
#26 |
  -
That's why I'm grateful for the internet |
Mabus |
Apr-09-07 01:52 PM |
#40 |
  -
I agree... |
RestoreGore |
Apr-10-07 03:54 PM |
#55 |
 -
You mean , the CLIMATE CRISIS gets media attention. Right? |
RestoreGore |
Apr-09-07 10:58 AM |
#14 |
-
Will you quit harassing me? |
Mabus |
Apr-09-07 01:24 PM |
#39 |
-
One response is not harrassing |
RestoreGore |
Apr-09-07 03:36 PM |
#42 |
-
No but following me from posting to posting is |
Mabus |
Apr-09-07 04:16 PM |
#43 |
-
I don't follow you |
RestoreGore |
Apr-09-07 04:23 PM |
#44 |
-
So... |
Kurovski |
Apr-09-07 10:37 PM |
#45 |
-
I'll tell you what, tell me what you did with the money you raised for your Gore/Michael Moore film |
Mabus |
Apr-10-07 08:54 AM |
#50 |
-
What are you talking about? |
RestoreGore |
Apr-10-07 12:06 PM |
#52 |
-
Which are you confused about? The incandescent lights you were hawking |
Mabus |
Apr-10-07 02:24 PM |
#53 |
-
Oh, and you are now also on ignore for making up lies about me |
RestoreGore |
Apr-10-07 02:57 PM |
#54 |
-
I think those who were early to enter the race run the risk of suffering |
smoogatz |
Apr-09-07 10:54 AM |
#12 |
-
I'm convinced Clark will take a powder. Not so sure about Gore. |
SteppingRazor |
Apr-09-07 10:54 AM |
#13 |
 -
So you're saying we're stuck with losers and panderers? |
Clark2008 |
Apr-09-07 11:12 AM |
#24 |
-
Depending on how you see it, yes. |
SteppingRazor |
Apr-09-07 11:24 AM |
#30 |
-
Considering I don't think any of the current crop can win, I |
Clark2008 |
Apr-09-07 11:05 AM |
#16 |
-
Unfortunatey, I Tend to Agree with You |
ribofunk |
Apr-09-07 11:07 AM |
#17 |
-
I wouldn't say it was wrong, just speculation. |
Jim4Wes |
Apr-09-07 11:11 AM |
#22 |
-
Agreed, neither one is going to run IMO... |
Virginia Dare |
Apr-09-07 11:12 AM |
#23 |
-
Al Gore is running on the issues, |
Uncle Joe |
Apr-09-07 11:12 AM |
#25 |
-
I hope they both run, but I'm doubting they will (I also doubt Gingrich, Fred Thompson, or Hagel |
Czolgosz |
Apr-09-07 11:22 AM |
#28 |
-
Says you. |
BlooInBloo |
Apr-09-07 11:23 AM |
#29 |
-
most analysts say that Gore is the one person who can wait. |
WI_DEM |
Apr-09-07 11:25 AM |
#32 |
-
"Some say" that and "some say" they don't need the money or early coverage. nt |
valerief |
Apr-09-07 11:42 AM |
#34 |
 -
Too much Fox Noise. |
Lex |
Apr-09-07 11:57 AM |
#37 |
-
Yeah, we all say "Ugh" when it comes to their Propatainment. nt |
valerief |
Apr-09-07 12:51 PM |
#38 |
-
But uless you have boots on the grounf and money you dio not win Iowa |
Perky |
Apr-09-07 01:57 PM |
#41 |
 -
But Iowa ain't the kingmaker anymore. Other Dems' votes get to count this time |
The Count |
Apr-10-07 12:25 AM |
#47 |
-
The calendar gets condensed but i'm not ure anyone survives not meeting expectations in Iowa |
Perky |
Apr-10-07 04:45 AM |
#48 |
-
Disagree 100%. |
mb7588a |
Apr-09-07 10:59 PM |
#46 |
-
Clark yes but Gore can afford to wait. |
bklyncowgirl |
Apr-10-07 05:41 AM |
#49 |
-
IMHO we have already passed the critical point for either to jump in the race... |
Blackhatjack |
Apr-10-07 09:06 AM |
#51 |