You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #25: XD too funny for words! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. XD too funny for words!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Certain posters I can't stand have disappeared from the greatest page Truth2Tell  Jul-12-09 05:09 PM   #0 
  - Their posts have not been censored  Cronus Protagonist   Jul-12-09 05:11 PM   #1 
  - Censorship doesn't require "removal."  Truth2Tell   Jul-12-09 05:13 PM   #3 
  - If somethjing's not great, it's not being buried, it's just not great  Cronus Protagonist   Jul-12-09 06:13 PM   #30 
     - There is a chiling effect in seeing how meanspirited the response to having the Reckless button was  omega minimo   Jul-12-09 07:13 PM   #46 
  - It's that basic dishonesty that keeps coming through - they keep pretending like the unrec func  apocalypsehow   Jul-12-09 05:14 PM   #4 
     - That's the only way their persecution complex can be expressed without laughing.  BlooInBloo   Jul-12-09 06:13 PM   #29 
     - It's stupid and dishonest to claim that anyone is "pretending" that.  omega minimo   Jul-12-09 07:14 PM   #48 
        - Calling an irrefutable fact's author "stupid and dishonest" does not make the irrefutable fact any  apocalypsehow   Jul-12-09 07:26 PM   #49 
           - It isn't. I didn't. And it still isn't. It IS REFUTED.  omega minimo   Jul-12-09 07:34 PM   #52 
              - Repeating a falsehood over and over does not mitigate it's essential dishonesty.  apocalypsehow   Jul-12-09 07:41 PM   #53 
                 - Your mom called. Dinner's ready.  omega minimo   Jul-12-09 07:50 PM   #54 
                    - Then that resurrection stuff I've heard about all my life must have been real, after all.  apocalypsehow   Jul-12-09 07:53 PM   #55 
  - How have their posts been censored?  LostInAnomie   Jul-12-09 05:13 PM   #2 
  - Censorship? How about having to actually have a consensus of opinion that something is, in fact,  MADem   Jul-12-09 05:14 PM   #5 
  - It seems to me that if DU is split 40/60  Truth2Tell   Jul-12-09 05:17 PM   #10 
     - That is the shortest, most cogent , best summary I have seen. Thanks. nt.  Phoebe Loosinhouse   Jul-12-09 05:33 PM   #20 
     - If DU is split 94 to six on an issue, with only six people thinking that a dumbass post is "great"  MADem   Jul-12-09 06:37 PM   #40 
        - Exactly. It's goofy to let 6 people elevate dreck to caviar status.  Tan Gent   Jul-12-09 07:30 PM   #50 
  - Look for them in GD or GD:P if you miss being annoyed.  NC_Nurse   Jul-12-09 05:14 PM   #6 
  - It was group imposed censorship then too  sandnsea   Jul-12-09 05:14 PM   #7 
  - Why do you assume that getting on the GP, before the un-rec change, was a manifestation of merit,  patrice   Jul-12-09 05:15 PM   #8 
  - It was a manifestation of some base of support  Truth2Tell   Jul-12-09 05:19 PM   #12 
     - Not a rationally valid manifestation since it filtered its opposition.  patrice   Jul-12-09 05:28 PM   #16 
     - It could have been a manifestation of one person and five sockpuppets. NT  MADem   Jul-12-09 06:40 PM   #41 
  - wow. more melodrama. color me shocked.  cali   Jul-12-09 05:16 PM   #9 
  - Yes, I can't understand why Free Republic poster can't....  rfranklin   Jul-12-09 05:18 PM   #11 
  - I didn't say that. What a stupid straw man.  Truth2Tell   Jul-12-09 05:21 PM   #14 
     - It is actually possible for that minority view to adapt itself, where possible, and, thus, win those  patrice   Jul-12-09 05:31 PM   #18 
  - Aren't you noble  anigbrowl   Jul-12-09 05:20 PM   #13 
  - It's beginning to look alot like the DU I joined! n/t  Fire1   Jul-12-09 05:26 PM   #15 
  - What in the world makes you believe that DU is in any way a "free speech zone"?  Vinnie From Indy   Jul-12-09 05:30 PM   #17 
  - It's not censorship.  cwydro   Jul-12-09 05:31 PM   #19 
  - I find it laughable..  sendero   Jul-12-09 05:40 PM   #21 
  - I wish I could recommend a reply  Shrek   Jul-12-09 05:53 PM   #24 
  - +1  TorchTheWitch   Jul-12-09 06:48 PM   #42 
  - +1. I feel the same way...  SidDithers   Jul-12-09 06:49 PM   #43 
  - How is it censorship? The threads are still there.  johnaries   Jul-12-09 05:43 PM   #22 
  - See my post #10 for what I think was more fair.  Truth2Tell   Jul-12-09 05:48 PM   #23 
     - XD too funny for words!  anigbrowl   Jul-12-09 05:58 PM   #25 
     - But if it WERE "well-written" it would get more votes.  johnaries   Jul-12-09 06:01 PM   #26 
     - I think more DUers rec and unrec posts  Truth2Tell   Jul-12-09 06:05 PM   #27 
        - LOL! "Melodrama" is right!  johnaries   Jul-12-09 06:11 PM   #28 
           - I've always found it kinda fun  Truth2Tell   Jul-12-09 06:14 PM   #32 
              - Me, too! And to be honest, sometimes I'll open a  johnaries   Jul-12-09 06:26 PM   #38 
     - You have a grievance and that's fair--but please, let's not redefine an issue as serious  blondeatlast   Jul-12-09 06:26 PM   #37 
  - No one is being censored.  SeattleGirl   Jul-12-09 06:14 PM   #31 
  - Of course it's censorship.  Truth2Tell   Jul-12-09 06:16 PM   #33 
  - Of course they aren't! And it's absurd for anyone to suggest otherwise.  TexasObserver   Jul-12-09 09:48 PM   #60 
  - Wouldn't it sound silly to say the GOP has been censored by voters?  TexasObserver   Jul-12-09 06:16 PM   #34 
  - Having been found out by other posters, they'll probably adopt new usernames. Or  Joe Chi Minh   Jul-12-09 06:19 PM   #35 
  - Yep. And to wonder about others who won't try posting as often.  EFerrari   Jul-12-09 06:20 PM   #36 
  - Unrecommend is a modification of the former "let it sink"  cornermouse   Jul-12-09 06:27 PM   #39 
  - An ignore function existed to rid yourself of the posters you can't stand.  Baikonour   Jul-12-09 06:56 PM   #44 
  - what?  fizzgig   Jul-12-09 07:05 PM   #45 
  - There is no truth to the statement that anyone has been silenced by Unrecommend.  TexasObserver   Jul-12-09 09:45 PM   #59 
  - so...+1 has weight...but -1 should have no voice...  islandmkl   Jul-12-09 07:13 PM   #47 
     - Yes, that's precisely what they call "democratic" - only 'yes' votes allowed.  BlooInBloo   Jul-12-09 07:31 PM   #51 
     - -1 is for those who refuse to USE THE VOICE THEY HAVE in the posts, to contribute to a thread  omega minimo   Jul-12-09 07:56 PM   #56 
     - John McCain got almost 60 million votes!  trotsky   Jul-12-09 08:00 PM   #57 
        -  islandmkl   Jul-12-09 09:42 PM   #58 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC