You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #16: Oh I agree with the unrec idea. Wondered for years why we only [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Oh I agree with the unrec idea. Wondered for years why we only
had a rec function. Just ideas popping up in my head as I think about it now it is here. Once again, rec/unrec away people, I think it would actually fine tune what we see here. And ya a lot of people post shit here that deserves massive unrecs, just as a lot of posts need recs because of important topic information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -So why can we see how many ppl rec a post yet not how many unrec Rex  Jul-12-09 02:38 PM   #0 
  - If you think about it, you can't tell how many rec'd a pot either.  ret5hd   Jul-12-09 02:47 PM   #1 
  - 10 is x-x +10, isn't it?  EFerrari   Jul-12-09 02:54 PM   #7 
     - Pi R round  Lasher   Jul-12-09 03:08 PM   #15 
  - I think that's a good idea.  Lasher   Jul-12-09 02:47 PM   #2 
  - I might read a post that has -386 posts.  Rex   Jul-12-09 02:53 PM   #6 
     - Or it might be one of my OPs getting what it deserves.  Lasher   Jul-12-09 03:03 PM   #10 
        - Oh I agree with the unrec idea. Wondered for years why we only  Rex   Jul-12-09 03:08 PM   #16 
           - well - following that logic to its conclusion - do we have a "worst threads" feature  DrDan   Jul-12-09 03:57 PM   #24 
  - because people would throw an even bigger fit if they saw how many were unreccing their thread  Aramchek   Jul-12-09 02:48 PM   #3 
  - Well let them throw a fit, maybe they need a reality check.  Rex   Jul-12-09 03:12 PM   #19 
  - Welcome to DU!  cwydro   Jul-12-09 03:15 PM   #20 
  - Because Skinner said so...  BlooInBloo   Jul-12-09 02:48 PM   #4 
  - Wait....What? You mean Skinner makes the decisions on  MineralMan   Jul-12-09 02:50 PM   #5 
     - Yes! Don't piss him off either.....  Uben   Jul-12-09 03:03 PM   #11 
        - No way...the howwow!  MineralMan   Jul-12-09 03:08 PM   #17 
  - I can see pros and cons. If a post is too far in a ditch,  EFerrari   Jul-12-09 02:58 PM   #8 
  - True but sometimes a post with a lot of unrecs might be getting hits  Rex   Jul-12-09 03:01 PM   #9 
     - You're right. -387 recs would be something I'd probably want to see. n/t  EFerrari   Jul-12-09 03:03 PM   #12 
        - Well if they do like Rex suggests, just watch for my next OP  Lasher   Jul-12-09 03:06 PM   #14 
           - I haven't even seen you posting OPs in GD.  EFerrari   Jul-12-09 03:39 PM   #23 
              - You have to be quick.  Lasher   Jul-12-09 04:30 PM   #31 
  - ThiS was MasterMinded to get 1000s of DUers to Click on The GreatesT Page  leftstreet   Jul-12-09 03:05 PM   #13 
  - Holyshit, you know I didn't!  Rex   Jul-12-09 03:11 PM   #18 
  - I want pictures.  scarletwoman   Jul-12-09 03:17 PM   #21 
  - That is absolute  EarlG   Jul-12-09 03:34 PM   #22 
     - pervert  leftstreet   Jul-13-09 02:08 AM   #32 
  - Instead of "<0 votes"  frog92969   Jul-12-09 03:57 PM   #25 
  - You can't see how many people rec a post...nt  SidDithers   Jul-12-09 04:04 PM   #26 
     - You can deduce it, though.  EFerrari   Jul-12-09 04:05 PM   #27 
        - How can you deduce it?  cwydro   Jul-12-09 04:06 PM   #28 
        - No, you can only see the difference between recs and unrecs...  SidDithers   Jul-12-09 04:07 PM   #29 
           - That's right. I misunderstood you. n/t  EFerrari   Jul-12-09 04:15 PM   #30 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC