You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #18: Right. That's what I was getting at [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Right. That's what I was getting at
A person with an arrow to turn left should be free to turn into whichever lane is needed. When a business is located right on the corner of the intersection, one does not have the time to turn and then switch lanes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Man took traffic ticket case to GA Supreme Court; Court throws out Georgias left-turn law ecstatic  Jun-08-09 11:43 AM   #0 
  - They may need to fix the language of the law, but the spirit of it makes sense  aikoaiko   Jun-08-09 11:48 AM   #1 
  - A left turn from the left lane should be made into the left lane of a multi lane road.  Renew Deal   Jun-08-09 11:49 AM   #2 
  - What if you have to make an immediate right upon completing the turn?  ecstatic   Jun-08-09 11:50 AM   #3 
  - Change lanes  zipplewrath   Jun-08-09 11:52 AM   #6 
     - That is correct.  Renew Deal   Jun-08-09 11:56 AM   #9 
     - Exactly  jmowreader   Jun-08-09 11:57 AM   #10 
        - I almost got taken out by someone making this mistake.  Renew Deal   Jun-08-09 11:58 AM   #14 
  - If you have an arrow you should not have to. If both the left turn and right turn are on green  Captain Hilts   Jun-08-09 11:51 AM   #5 
     - If who has an arrow?  Renew Deal   Jun-08-09 11:57 AM   #11 
        - If you have a left turn arrow, then the oncoming side is not supposed to turn. nt  Captain Hilts   Jun-08-09 11:58 AM   #12 
           - Right. That's what I was getting at  ecstatic   Jun-08-09 12:02 PM   #18 
              - Exactly  tammywammy   Jun-08-09 12:12 PM   #19 
              - I agree. nt  Captain Hilts   Jun-08-09 12:12 PM   #20 
  - Just the wording  zipplewrath   Jun-08-09 11:51 AM   #4 
  - I can understand "too vague", but "unconstitutional"???  MercutioATC   Jun-08-09 11:53 AM   #7 
  - The idea is that it's against the constitution for the government to...  Eric J in MN   Jun-08-09 11:59 AM   #15 
     - Gotcha.  MercutioATC   Jun-08-09 12:01 PM   #17 
  - I believe it is a very stupid thing for anyone to do no matter what the Law  Winterblues   Jun-08-09 11:54 AM   #8 
  - That bastard lives a charmed life!!!  MADem   Jun-08-09 11:58 AM   #13 
     - LOL. I wonder if he's rich  ecstatic   Jun-08-09 12:01 PM   #16 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC