Blackhatjack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-06-09 08:57 PM
Response to Original message |
| 67. When the Blue Dogs Return Every Stinking Dollar They Get From the Healthcare Insurance Industry... |
|
... I will begin to listen to their ideas. Until then, they will be treated as mere extensions of the Healthcare Insurance Industry and the millions of dollars they are spending lobbying for changes that will implode any efforts to bring about real reform.
|
| -Blue Dogs Demand Tight Constraints on Any Public Health Plan Option |
babylonsister |
Jun-05-09 11:16 AM |
#0 |
 -
Blue Dogs are worse than Republicans.... |
FLAprogressive |
Jun-05-09 11:24 AM |
#1 |
  -
"Blue Dogs" sounds like something they did. nt |
Snotcicles |
Jun-06-09 08:41 AM |
#52 |
| -
What in hell is wrong with them? |
wryter2000 |
Jun-05-09 11:26 AM |
#2 |
| -
They have their Cadillac quality health plan that our tax dollars pay for, so the |
Cleita |
Jun-05-09 11:34 AM |
#11 |
| -
All the campaign money they get is suffocating them, starving their brains of precious oxygen. n/t |
DRoseDARs |
Jun-06-09 02:50 AM |
#50 |
| -
If they can't stop it at least they can cripple it. |
kenny blankenship |
Jun-05-09 11:26 AM |
#3 |
| -
Actually, I'm okay with negotiated prices, the trigger is a no-go |
sandnsea |
Jun-05-09 11:30 AM |
#4 |
| -
*That's* where the outrage should be directed. (nt) |
redqueen |
Jun-05-09 11:30 AM |
#5 |
| -
May they rot in the Hell of their own making. |
Cleita |
Jun-05-09 11:30 AM |
#6 |
| -
Not To Put Too Fine A Point On It, Ma'am, This Is Utter Bullshit |
The Magistrate |
Jun-05-09 11:31 AM |
#7 |
| -
8 friggin' years and $6 trillion dollars debt... |
kentuck |
Jun-05-09 11:32 AM |
#8 |
| -
they want to make sure the public option sucks n/t |
Enrique |
Jun-05-09 11:32 AM |
#9 |
| -
Call these assholes out. I want them quaking. |
dorkulon |
Jun-05-09 11:33 AM |
#10 |
| -
Shouldn't we start calling them "Red Dogs" |
sutz12 |
Jun-05-09 11:35 AM |
#12 |
| -
Is "Conservative Democrats" an oxymoron? |
omega minimo |
Jun-06-09 01:23 PM |
#63 |
| -
Looks like the blue dogs are going to stab a second Democratic president in the back |
WeDidIt |
Jun-05-09 11:37 AM |
#13 |
| -
With "Democrats" like this, WHO needs Republicans? |
Triana |
Jun-05-09 11:37 AM |
#14 |
| -
Exactly. |
kenny blankenship |
Jun-05-09 11:42 AM |
#20 |
| -
This is why the REAL Democratic Position should be Single Payer |
Sebastian Doyle |
Jun-05-09 11:38 AM |
#15 |
| -
I think this negotiation tactic would result in a non-starter |
Cant trust em |
Jun-05-09 11:57 AM |
#24 |
| -
And if this ends up being RomneyCare or any sort of corporate controlled "public" option |
Sebastian Doyle |
Jun-06-09 02:30 AM |
#48 |
| -
+1 |
Dappleganger |
Jun-06-09 08:47 AM |
#54 |
| -
Amen....n/t |
Hepburn |
Jun-06-09 09:25 AM |
#57 |
| -
And some people wonder why full single-payer isn't being seriously considered |
Cant trust em |
Jun-05-09 11:39 AM |
#16 |
| -
Exactly. |
redqueen |
Jun-05-09 11:49 AM |
#21 |
| -
There's a poster here who has boldly inserted a painting of a blue dog in his sig line. |
Occulus |
Jun-05-09 11:39 AM |
#17 |
| -
Not sure about him |
kctim |
Jun-05-09 12:27 PM |
#28 |
| -
And the Democratic Party can't win without us. We've seen the results |
Greyhound |
Jun-05-09 12:44 PM |
#33 |
| -
Very true |
kctim |
Jun-05-09 12:53 PM |
#35 |
| -
That was my point. And don't leave out that you guys crippled Jimmy Carter, |
Greyhound |
Jun-05-09 01:19 PM |
#36 |
| -
You would rather we vote for somebody who does not represent us? |
kctim |
Jun-05-09 01:56 PM |
#37 |
| -
You wanna explain to us why you think the public option should be limited? |
tkmorris |
Jun-05-09 02:09 PM |
#38 |
| -
Yes, I am happy with their stance on this |
kctim |
Jun-05-09 02:36 PM |
#39 |
| -
"Be fair to private insurers"? |
tkmorris |
Jun-05-09 04:38 PM |
#41 |
| -
Yes, be fair |
kctim |
Jun-05-09 04:50 PM |
#42 |
| -
Fair enough |
tkmorris |
Jun-05-09 05:15 PM |
#46 |
| -
Belated Welcome to DU! |
Strong Atheist |
Jun-08-09 08:14 PM |
#74 |
| -
He gets a thrill out of killing sick people n/t |
eridani |
Jun-06-09 02:32 AM |
#49 |
| -
We have a national liberal party, it's called the Democratic Party. |
Greyhound |
Jun-05-09 02:37 PM |
#40 |
| -
I am only speaking for myself and those I know who believe as I do |
kctim |
Jun-08-09 11:26 AM |
#70 |
| -
Well considering you seem more aligned with the Republican party |
Raineyb |
Jun-08-09 01:17 PM |
#72 |
| -
More aligned with the Republican Party? |
kctim |
Jun-08-09 02:12 PM |
#73 |
| -
That same poster had a pic captioned "Al Gore debates Ross Perot over NAFTA..." |
Romulox |
Jun-05-09 12:42 PM |
#32 |
| -
Blue Dogger lied? I'm shocked! |
Kingofalldems |
Jun-05-09 12:49 PM |
#34 |
| -
We need to target the blue dogs especially |
supernova |
Jun-05-09 11:40 AM |
#18 |
| -
Blue Dogs are the reason not to get too excited about 60 Dems in the Senate. |
elocs |
Jun-05-09 11:41 AM |
#19 |
| -
Yep. People talk a lot of smack about the DLC... |
redqueen |
Jun-05-09 11:50 AM |
#22 |
| -
Blue Dog in the House; DLC is in the Senate |
Zodiak |
Jun-05-09 12:16 PM |
#26 |
| -
There are Blue Dogs in the Senate. |
redqueen |
Jun-05-09 12:34 PM |
#29 |
| -
They're for the most part one in the same....save for social issues. |
FLAprogressive |
Jun-06-09 12:44 PM |
#60 |
| -
The Blue Dogs have a website. The members are ... |
Bozita |
Jun-05-09 11:52 AM |
#23 |
| -
Blue Dogs and ConservaDems: 'Public option for health care? FU, little people.' |
seafan |
Jun-05-09 12:12 PM |
#25 |
| -
The Blue Dogs "set strict conditions"?!?!?!?!?! |
ljm2002 |
Jun-05-09 12:27 PM |
#27 |
| -
Their support provides the vote's margin of victory. |
tritsofme |
Jun-05-09 04:54 PM |
#44 |
| -
Gosh, you don't say... |
ljm2002 |
Jun-05-09 05:38 PM |
#47 |
| -
K & R - guess it's time to send my Blue Dog rep an ultimatum. |
Raksha |
Jun-05-09 12:39 PM |
#30 |
| -
Blue Dogs continue to be at the beck and call of their corporate masters |
neverforget |
Jun-05-09 12:41 PM |
#31 |
| -
These guys are trying to KILL YOU. |
Karenina |
Jun-05-09 04:52 PM |
#43 |
| -
Blue dog = corrupt ideologue. Nothing more, nothing less |
depakid |
Jun-05-09 04:58 PM |
#45 |
| -
It seems to me our greatest enemy sometimes is within. |
mmonk |
Jun-06-09 08:10 AM |
#51 |
| -
"how a public option is allowed to compete"...that's backwards...totally bassackwards. |
Triana |
Jun-06-09 08:43 AM |
#53 |
| -
Not Idiots, Just Purchased - They only sound idiotic because their "views" are indefensible n/t |
Dragonfli |
Jun-06-09 09:08 AM |
#56 |
| -
You're absolutely right, of course. Insufferable either way. GRRR! n/t |
Triana |
Jun-06-09 09:27 AM |
#58 |
| -
Grrr! is Right! Peddling influence should be against the law! - Oh wait - GRRRRRRRRR!!! |
Dragonfli |
Jun-06-09 09:52 AM |
#59 |
| -
Any so-called "reform" that is suitable to these people will be WORSE than passing nothing. |
Faryn Balyncd |
Jun-06-09 09:05 AM |
#55 |
| -
How about tight nooses for blue dogs? |
Vidar |
Jun-06-09 01:21 PM |
#61 |
| -
Red Dogs... nt |
tsuki |
Jun-06-09 01:23 PM |
#62 |
| -
We need to FIRE them. |
Joanne98 |
Jun-06-09 01:25 PM |
#64 |
| -
Good idea. Pink slip the Blue dawgs. |
glinda |
Jun-06-09 08:50 PM |
#65 |
| -
The Blue Dogs are getting to be a pain worse than Neocons! |
lib2DaBone |
Jun-06-09 08:57 PM |
#66 |
| -
When the Blue Dogs Return Every Stinking Dollar They Get From the Healthcare Insurance Industry... |
Blackhatjack |
Jun-06-09 08:57 PM |
#67 |
| -
We need 50 Senate votes for a public option. Forget bi-partisanship |
Better Believe It |
Jun-07-09 09:17 PM |
#68 |
| -
Blue Dogs need to be put down......(figuratively, of course) |
marmar |
Jun-07-09 09:19 PM |
#69 |
| -
Blue dogshit. That's what we're headed for. Better nothing than a bad plan. |
chaska |
Jun-08-09 12:13 PM |
#71 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread