Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-06-09 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
| -Blue Dogs Demand Tight Constraints on Any Public Health Plan Option |
babylonsister |
Jun-05-09 11:16 AM |
#0 |
 -
Blue Dogs are worse than Republicans.... |
FLAprogressive |
Jun-05-09 11:24 AM |
#1 |
  -
"Blue Dogs" sounds like something they did. nt |
Snotcicles |
Jun-06-09 08:41 AM |
#52 |
| -
What in hell is wrong with them? |
wryter2000 |
Jun-05-09 11:26 AM |
#2 |
| -
They have their Cadillac quality health plan that our tax dollars pay for, so the |
Cleita |
Jun-05-09 11:34 AM |
#11 |
| -
All the campaign money they get is suffocating them, starving their brains of precious oxygen. n/t |
DRoseDARs |
Jun-06-09 02:50 AM |
#50 |
| -
If they can't stop it at least they can cripple it. |
kenny blankenship |
Jun-05-09 11:26 AM |
#3 |
| -
Actually, I'm okay with negotiated prices, the trigger is a no-go |
sandnsea |
Jun-05-09 11:30 AM |
#4 |
| -
*That's* where the outrage should be directed. (nt) |
redqueen |
Jun-05-09 11:30 AM |
#5 |
| -
May they rot in the Hell of their own making. |
Cleita |
Jun-05-09 11:30 AM |
#6 |
| -
Not To Put Too Fine A Point On It, Ma'am, This Is Utter Bullshit |
The Magistrate |
Jun-05-09 11:31 AM |
#7 |
| -
8 friggin' years and $6 trillion dollars debt... |
kentuck |
Jun-05-09 11:32 AM |
#8 |
| -
they want to make sure the public option sucks n/t |
Enrique |
Jun-05-09 11:32 AM |
#9 |
| -
Call these assholes out. I want them quaking. |
dorkulon |
Jun-05-09 11:33 AM |
#10 |
| -
Shouldn't we start calling them "Red Dogs" |
sutz12 |
Jun-05-09 11:35 AM |
#12 |
| -
Is "Conservative Democrats" an oxymoron? |
omega minimo |
Jun-06-09 01:23 PM |
#63 |
| -
Looks like the blue dogs are going to stab a second Democratic president in the back |
WeDidIt |
Jun-05-09 11:37 AM |
#13 |
| -
With "Democrats" like this, WHO needs Republicans? |
Triana |
Jun-05-09 11:37 AM |
#14 |
| -
Exactly. |
kenny blankenship |
Jun-05-09 11:42 AM |
#20 |
| -
This is why the REAL Democratic Position should be Single Payer |
Sebastian Doyle |
Jun-05-09 11:38 AM |
#15 |
| -
I think this negotiation tactic would result in a non-starter |
Cant trust em |
Jun-05-09 11:57 AM |
#24 |
| -
And if this ends up being RomneyCare or any sort of corporate controlled "public" option |
Sebastian Doyle |
Jun-06-09 02:30 AM |
#48 |
| -
+1 |
Dappleganger |
Jun-06-09 08:47 AM |
#54 |
| -
Amen....n/t |
Hepburn |
Jun-06-09 09:25 AM |
#57 |
| -
And some people wonder why full single-payer isn't being seriously considered |
Cant trust em |
Jun-05-09 11:39 AM |
#16 |
| -
Exactly. |
redqueen |
Jun-05-09 11:49 AM |
#21 |
| -
There's a poster here who has boldly inserted a painting of a blue dog in his sig line. |
Occulus |
Jun-05-09 11:39 AM |
#17 |
| -
Not sure about him |
kctim |
Jun-05-09 12:27 PM |
#28 |
| -
And the Democratic Party can't win without us. We've seen the results |
Greyhound |
Jun-05-09 12:44 PM |
#33 |
| -
Very true |
kctim |
Jun-05-09 12:53 PM |
#35 |
| -
That was my point. And don't leave out that you guys crippled Jimmy Carter, |
Greyhound |
Jun-05-09 01:19 PM |
#36 |
| -
You would rather we vote for somebody who does not represent us? |
kctim |
Jun-05-09 01:56 PM |
#37 |
| -
You wanna explain to us why you think the public option should be limited? |
tkmorris |
Jun-05-09 02:09 PM |
#38 |
| -
Yes, I am happy with their stance on this |
kctim |
Jun-05-09 02:36 PM |
#39 |
| -
"Be fair to private insurers"? |
tkmorris |
Jun-05-09 04:38 PM |
#41 |
| -
Yes, be fair |
kctim |
Jun-05-09 04:50 PM |
#42 |
| -
Fair enough |
tkmorris |
Jun-05-09 05:15 PM |
#46 |
| -
Belated Welcome to DU! |
Strong Atheist |
Jun-08-09 08:14 PM |
#74 |
| -
He gets a thrill out of killing sick people n/t |
eridani |
Jun-06-09 02:32 AM |
#49 |
| -
We have a national liberal party, it's called the Democratic Party. |
Greyhound |
Jun-05-09 02:37 PM |
#40 |
| -
I am only speaking for myself and those I know who believe as I do |
kctim |
Jun-08-09 11:26 AM |
#70 |
| -
Well considering you seem more aligned with the Republican party |
Raineyb |
Jun-08-09 01:17 PM |
#72 |
| -
More aligned with the Republican Party? |
kctim |
Jun-08-09 02:12 PM |
#73 |
| -
That same poster had a pic captioned "Al Gore debates Ross Perot over NAFTA..." |
Romulox |
Jun-05-09 12:42 PM |
#32 |
| -
Blue Dogger lied? I'm shocked! |
Kingofalldems |
Jun-05-09 12:49 PM |
#34 |
| -
We need to target the blue dogs especially |
supernova |
Jun-05-09 11:40 AM |
#18 |
| -
Blue Dogs are the reason not to get too excited about 60 Dems in the Senate. |
elocs |
Jun-05-09 11:41 AM |
#19 |
| -
Yep. People talk a lot of smack about the DLC... |
redqueen |
Jun-05-09 11:50 AM |
#22 |
| -
Blue Dog in the House; DLC is in the Senate |
Zodiak |
Jun-05-09 12:16 PM |
#26 |
| -
There are Blue Dogs in the Senate. |
redqueen |
Jun-05-09 12:34 PM |
#29 |
| -
They're for the most part one in the same....save for social issues. |
FLAprogressive |
Jun-06-09 12:44 PM |
#60 |
| -
The Blue Dogs have a website. The members are ... |
Bozita |
Jun-05-09 11:52 AM |
#23 |
| -
Blue Dogs and ConservaDems: 'Public option for health care? FU, little people.' |
seafan |
Jun-05-09 12:12 PM |
#25 |
| -
The Blue Dogs "set strict conditions"?!?!?!?!?! |
ljm2002 |
Jun-05-09 12:27 PM |
#27 |
| -
Their support provides the vote's margin of victory. |
tritsofme |
Jun-05-09 04:54 PM |
#44 |
| -
Gosh, you don't say... |
ljm2002 |
Jun-05-09 05:38 PM |
#47 |
| -
K & R - guess it's time to send my Blue Dog rep an ultimatum. |
Raksha |
Jun-05-09 12:39 PM |
#30 |
| -
Blue Dogs continue to be at the beck and call of their corporate masters |
neverforget |
Jun-05-09 12:41 PM |
#31 |
| -
These guys are trying to KILL YOU. |
Karenina |
Jun-05-09 04:52 PM |
#43 |
| -
Blue dog = corrupt ideologue. Nothing more, nothing less |
depakid |
Jun-05-09 04:58 PM |
#45 |
| -
It seems to me our greatest enemy sometimes is within. |
mmonk |
Jun-06-09 08:10 AM |
#51 |
| -
"how a public option is allowed to compete"...that's backwards...totally bassackwards. |
Triana |
Jun-06-09 08:43 AM |
#53 |
| -
Not Idiots, Just Purchased - They only sound idiotic because their "views" are indefensible n/t |
Dragonfli |
Jun-06-09 09:08 AM |
#56 |
| -
You're absolutely right, of course. Insufferable either way. GRRR! n/t |
Triana |
Jun-06-09 09:27 AM |
#58 |
| -
Grrr! is Right! Peddling influence should be against the law! - Oh wait - GRRRRRRRRR!!! |
Dragonfli |
Jun-06-09 09:52 AM |
#59 |
| -
Any so-called "reform" that is suitable to these people will be WORSE than passing nothing. |
Faryn Balyncd |
Jun-06-09 09:05 AM |
#55 |
| -
How about tight nooses for blue dogs? |
Vidar |
Jun-06-09 01:21 PM |
#61 |
| -
Red Dogs... nt |
tsuki |
Jun-06-09 01:23 PM |
#62 |
| -
We need to FIRE them. |
Joanne98 |
Jun-06-09 01:25 PM |
#64 |
| -
Good idea. Pink slip the Blue dawgs. |
glinda |
Jun-06-09 08:50 PM |
#65 |
| -
The Blue Dogs are getting to be a pain worse than Neocons! |
lib2DaBone |
Jun-06-09 08:57 PM |
#66 |
| -
When the Blue Dogs Return Every Stinking Dollar They Get From the Healthcare Insurance Industry... |
Blackhatjack |
Jun-06-09 08:57 PM |
#67 |
| -
We need 50 Senate votes for a public option. Forget bi-partisanship |
Better Believe It |
Jun-07-09 09:17 PM |
#68 |
| -
Blue Dogs need to be put down......(figuratively, of course) |
marmar |
Jun-07-09 09:19 PM |
#69 |
| -
Blue dogshit. That's what we're headed for. Better nothing than a bad plan. |
chaska |
Jun-08-09 12:13 PM |
#71 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread