Reply #39: "I SEE NO REASON WHY THERE SHOULD NOT BE A PRIVATE OPTION ALONGSIDE A PUBLIC OPTION"

[Oregone]

Why should there be one in the first place?


One reason that there should be no private providers is that it is incredibly difficult to level the playing field without broad (and susceptible) legislation to restrict and regulate their activity. Any mistakes can result in a worse system than the status quo and a bankrupt public system. If you were willing to take such measures, why not attempt the simpler, more clear solution of single-payer?

Another reason is that with a single-payer, it aids health care facilities administrate their own costs. They have a single billable rate, and they know all claims will be honored. Collecting fees is incredible simple. A large part of the billing/processing/collection component of the actual providers is removed, lowering the cost of healthcare.