Reply #220: OK, let's go through your post:

[stopbush]

"Those that believe in a larger scenario regarding the Kennedy assassination can produce just as
many sources, facts, and first-hand experiences as Bugliosi's assembly."

I asked you to provide facts to back up this assertion. You haven't.

"Doesn't the secrecy and obvious fraud, the bullet for example, just make it more likely that the controversy will continue."

I provided pictorial evidence that the bullet (CE399) was not "a fraud," including demonstrating the correct seating position of the men in the limo, ballistics results and the bullet fragment results from Connally.

"We're headed into exactly the same place with the 9/11 attacks."

That's an opinion, not a fact.

"Why all the seemingly pointless evasions if what appears to have happened is the truth?"

Who is evading? I've provided evidence.

The remainder of your post is pure opinion and speculation on your part:

"We live in a much darker world than most Americans want to believe, this I know for a fact from first-hand experience, and that knowledge makes many of the theories you so casually dismiss that much more plausible." (please, enlighten us.)

"I know that I don't know The Truth, but I do know of many instances where the official story is a flat-out lie, which makes me think that many so-called "conspiracy theories" likely have at least some element of truth in them." (could be, but that's not the case as it pertains to the JFK assassination where there is no doubt as to what happened on that tragic day in 1963).