You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #18: No one outsiide the US needed to attack us [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. No one outsiide the US needed to attack us
after 9/11 - which was a pretty big event, as I recall. And it happened when Chimpy Fucknuts was squatting in the Oval Office.

Why should they waste their time/energy/resources when Chimpy and his thugs were doing such a first-rate job of trashing our country? They lay waste to our economic status, to our military, to our infrastructure, to our standing in the world, to our civil rights, to our sense of security, to our pride in being American.

They invaded Iraq based on lies and subversions.

Chimpy and his cohorts subverted the Constitution when they weren't busy trying to make sure Roe v. Wade was being undercut in every possible way. They robbed stem cell research, and millions of sick people in this world, of eight years during which so much might have been achieved. They managed to appoint some unqualified and corrupt people to the bench, at all levels, and they tried to legalize torture.

Those are just the quickies, when I think of it.

Why on earth would anyone have wanted to interrupt the destruction of the United States of America when the people in charge were doing such a first-rate job?

Just consider this - as of today, more than 1,300 more people have died in our occupation of Iraq than died on 9/11.

Al Qaeda should send Chimpy Fucknuts a 'thank you" note .............

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -"No terrorist attack while Bush was president..." Bigmack  May-25-09 10:32 PM   #0 
  - Bush was prez. on 9/11/2001.  muntrv   May-25-09 10:34 PM   #1 
  - But hey, that was only the largest terrorist attack ever on US soil......  marmar   May-25-09 10:35 PM   #2 
  - Largest AND most successful. nt  bemildred   May-26-09 11:58 AM   #29 
  - I'm always amazed that...  Puzzler   May-25-09 10:54 PM   #7 
  - Don't let them rewrite history like this. The man was in office on 9/11/01 !  RagAss   May-25-09 10:36 PM   #3 
  - "Bewsh kept us safe" is a logical fallacy.  HughBeaumont   May-25-09 10:44 PM   #4 
  - **cough** anthrax attacks **cough**  krispos42   May-25-09 10:45 PM   #5 
  - good catch - most people had forgotten about that. n/t  votingupstart   May-25-09 10:57 PM   #9 
  - That pie graphic  Tangerine LaBamba   May-25-09 11:14 PM   #13 
     - Fabulous!  krispos42   May-25-09 11:18 PM   #16 
        - Honey, T LaB DEFINES fabulous .................  Tangerine LaBamba   May-25-09 11:30 PM   #21 
  - Katrina.  EFerrari   May-25-09 10:47 PM   #6 
  - katrina - terrorist attack???? uh ..please explain......  votingupstart   May-25-09 10:56 PM   #8 
     - Why are you shouting when you admit to not understanding my post?  EFerrari   May-25-09 10:58 PM   #10 
     - so you are saying katrina WAS or WAS NOT a terrorist attack  votingupstart   May-25-09 11:10 PM   #11 
        - OK, I already asked  Tangerine LaBamba   May-25-09 11:18 PM   #15 
        - are you refering to me or eferrari?  votingupstart   May-26-09 11:43 AM   #25 
           - I think you  QueenOfCalifornia   May-26-09 01:06 PM   #38 
        - We? You've been here five minutes. Enjoy your stay at DU.  EFerrari   May-25-09 11:18 PM   #17 
        - nice logic - new information is always to be discarded  votingupstart   May-26-09 11:37 AM   #23 
           - Attacking other posters before you understand what they're saying  EFerrari   May-26-09 11:52 AM   #27 
           - you are probably correct -  votingupstart   May-26-09 12:06 PM   #33 
              - My point was that George Bush not only didn't keep us safe from terrorists,  EFerrari   May-26-09 12:20 PM   #35 
                 - so i jumped to conclusions about eferrari  votingupstart   May-26-09 01:15 PM   #39 
                    - Oh, no problem. My response could have been less cryptic.  EFerrari   May-26-09 01:56 PM   #41 
           - Logic doesn't make people act like assholes  Zodiak   May-26-09 12:06 PM   #32 
        - "then we get yahoos and idiots who like to just post random crap and derail the discussion"  Vickers   May-25-09 11:27 PM   #20 
        - you are correct - i am new , does that change the facts  votingupstart   May-26-09 11:51 AM   #26 
           - It does not change the facts  Zodiak   May-26-09 12:10 PM   #34 
        - You are new here, so let me give you some advice  Zodiak   May-26-09 12:04 PM   #31 
     - You're kidding, right?  Tangerine LaBamba   May-25-09 11:16 PM   #14 
        - could be - i am new  votingupstart   May-26-09 11:34 AM   #22 
           - The response to Katrina was, in my  Tangerine LaBamba   May-26-09 12:55 PM   #37 
  - I suggest that the biggest terrorists during the Bush admin.  PDJane   May-25-09 11:14 PM   #12 
  - No one outsiide the US needed to attack us  Tangerine LaBamba   May-25-09 11:24 PM   #18 
  - Them terrorists are our unseen enemies...these GOP dudes are in plain sight  opihimoimoi   May-25-09 11:26 PM   #19 
  - Iraq  Terran   May-26-09 11:43 AM   #24 
  - No crashes for much of the Hindernburg's flight.  Marr   May-26-09 11:57 AM   #28 
  - But they are wrong  nadinbrzezinski   May-26-09 11:59 AM   #30 
  - Um,,,,,9/11???? Hello, rightwingers??? Scary stupid n/t  adigal   May-26-09 12:24 PM   #36 
  - Yeah, just some 61,000 dead and wounded Americans  Posteritatis   May-26-09 01:52 PM   #40 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC