Fumesucker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-08-09 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #74 |
| 77. It's called "compare and contrast".. |
|
The Edwards thing is a sideshow designed to distract and it seems to be working as intended.
I don't tell you or anyone else what and where to post, why do you feel the need to tell me what I may and may not post?
|
| -Fed investigation into Edwards mistress $ is for “honest services fraud” |
Adelante |
May-07-09 11:41 AM |
#0 |
 -
Yes, you are missing something. |
MADem |
May-07-09 11:49 AM |
#1 |
  -
I think it's subjective, though I agree on the quality |
Adelante |
May-07-09 11:55 AM |
#2 |
| -
Is it a "product delivered and paid for," or is it a "cover story" to provide a faux reason |
MADem |
May-07-09 12:28 PM |
#6 |
| -
Yeah, the dead guy money is a different thing |
Adelante |
May-07-09 12:36 PM |
#9 |
| -
Well, hell hath no fury....it looks like answers will be forthcoming...! |
MADem |
May-07-09 12:43 PM |
#11 |
| -
To a degree one can say it's subjective. But ultimately, was the final product she delivered |
KittyWampus |
May-07-09 12:40 PM |
#10 |
| -
The product was used on the campaign website |
Adelante |
May-07-09 01:11 PM |
#14 |
| -
Hah? Who thought they were the greatest thing since slice bread? |
LisaL |
May-08-09 08:03 AM |
#59 |
| -
I remember being lectured at the time on how I was an elitist |
Adelante |
May-08-09 08:30 AM |
#66 |
| -
So we're not going to investigate torture.... |
walldude |
May-07-09 11:59 AM |
#3 |
| -
To the fullest extent of the law! |
pocoloco |
May-07-09 12:10 PM |
#4 |
| -
This is an FBI investigation, not one emanating from DOJ. Apples/oranges. nt |
MADem |
May-07-09 12:30 PM |
#7 |
| -
Bullshit, the investigative arm of the DOJ is the FBI. |
merh |
May-07-09 01:42 PM |
#19 |
| -
OK, so Frank Perry is a big fat liar...or a bullshitter. What's his motive? |
MADem |
May-07-09 01:47 PM |
#21 |
| -
The DOJ is the one that the FBI goes to when trying to determine |
merh |
May-07-09 02:12 PM |
#25 |
| -
Yes, so? They're still investigating. When they've concluded their investigation, |
MADem |
May-07-09 03:18 PM |
#31 |
| -
My point is, the DOJ oversees the criminal investigations of the FBI |
merh |
May-07-09 03:31 PM |
#34 |
| -
Read the quote. It says what it says. This investigation is a ground-up, not a top-down, exercise. |
MADem |
May-07-09 03:35 PM |
#37 |
| -
$114,000 ... ... .. . .. $12,000,000,0000,000 |
Fumesucker |
May-08-09 04:59 AM |
#52 |
| -
Probably, eh? And of course, if one thing is "worse" than another, |
MADem |
May-08-09 05:14 AM |
#53 |
| -
Ever had the cops "investigate" a burglary or car theft? |
Fumesucker |
May-08-09 05:17 AM |
#54 |
| -
There you go again. Tell ya what, let's not bother doing ANYTHING at all. |
MADem |
May-08-09 07:59 AM |
#58 |
| -
Edwards is getting investigated |
Fumesucker |
May-08-09 10:55 AM |
#70 |
| -
The two aren't linked. At all. Why try to make them so? The point is not made. |
MADem |
May-08-09 11:10 AM |
#72 |
| -
But I predict that the government will not "walk and chew gum".. |
Fumesucker |
May-08-09 11:14 AM |
#73 |
| -
That is a separate discussion, though. I predict the government will not land a man on |
MADem |
May-08-09 11:31 AM |
#74 |
| -
It's called "compare and contrast".. |
Fumesucker |
May-08-09 01:17 PM |
#77 |
| -
No it isn't. It's called "Try, and fail, to shut down discussion on a small, progressive discussion |
MADem |
May-08-09 06:33 PM |
#78 |
| -
How am I trying to shut down discussion? |
Fumesucker |
May-09-09 06:05 AM |
#79 |
| -
By complaining about matters that have nothing to do with the topic. |
MADem |
May-09-09 11:59 AM |
#82 |
| -
Like I've said before.... |
Kansas Wyatt |
May-07-09 12:24 PM |
#5 |
| -
He wasn't a public official - he was a private citizen running for office |
merh |
May-07-09 12:35 PM |
#8 |
| -
He was a private citizen taking money from the public while running for public office |
KittyWampus |
May-07-09 12:43 PM |
#12 |
| -
I'm smart enough to read the OP and to reply to comments in same. |
merh |
May-07-09 01:36 PM |
#17 |
| -
Who supplied the HOUSE that was bought for her in California? What money paid for that? |
MADem |
May-07-09 01:49 PM |
#22 |
| -
He is a millionaire |
merh |
May-07-09 01:57 PM |
#24 |
| -
Sometimes rich people are awfully cheap. That's how they got to be rich. |
MADem |
May-07-09 02:48 PM |
#27 |
| -
You are so out of your league |
merh |
May-07-09 03:17 PM |
#30 |
| -
I think you're the one who needs to stop doing the insulting, and start doing the research. |
MADem |
May-07-09 03:23 PM |
#32 |
| -
It is you that has been confrontational. |
merh |
May-07-09 03:33 PM |
#36 |
| -
You haven't a clue, you're out of your league...and you call ME confrontational? |
MADem |
May-07-09 03:43 PM |
#38 |
| -
You have stated no law or fact to support your position. |
merh |
May-07-09 03:54 PM |
#42 |
| -
I've provided you with three links, at least. Why don't you read them? |
MADem |
May-07-09 04:11 PM |
#44 |
| -
I have read your links, they are tabloid press or news articles |
merh |
May-07-09 04:51 PM |
#47 |
| -
Now you don't like the links. What's next? |
MADem |
May-08-09 04:48 AM |
#50 |
| -
I challenge your absolutes and your understanding of the facts |
merh |
May-08-09 07:48 AM |
#56 |
| -
You aren't challenging anything. You're simply complaining that you don't "like" my cites. |
MADem |
May-08-09 08:04 AM |
#60 |
| -
LOL, you just don't get it. |
merh |
May-08-09 08:21 AM |
#61 |
| -
Oh, I get it. Your method of "debate" is to snark, whine and insult. |
MADem |
May-08-09 08:27 AM |
#64 |
| -
nice pwnage |
dionysus |
May-08-09 11:02 AM |
#71 |
| -
Thank You! nt |
MADem |
May-08-09 01:12 PM |
#76 |
| -
The Dem lawyer from Dallas who died recently |
rainbow4321 |
May-07-09 04:18 PM |
#45 |
| -
The dead guy worked on Edwards' campaign--he managed the money. |
MADem |
May-07-09 04:41 PM |
#46 |
| -
Without taking sides . . . |
TeeYiYi |
May-08-09 11:52 AM |
#75 |
| -
Hello? Campaign finance laws? |
MADem |
May-07-09 12:51 PM |
#13 |
| -
Hey, did you read the OP? I did |
merh |
May-07-09 01:18 PM |
#15 |
| -
What about the money for the fund for the poor that may have been diverted? |
MADem |
May-07-09 01:24 PM |
#16 |
| -
LOL, the government doesn't investigate torturers |
merh |
May-07-09 01:39 PM |
#18 |
| -
You're playing the apples and oranges game. The "if one, then not the other" routine. |
MADem |
May-07-09 01:45 PM |
#20 |
| -
Because, Edwards having an affair is not worthy of federal investigation |
merh |
May-07-09 01:56 PM |
#23 |
| -
Not "worthy?" How much campaign cash did Clinton spend on Monica--remind me, now? |
MADem |
May-07-09 02:59 PM |
#28 |
| -
LOL, campaign funds, how about taxpayer dollars |
merh |
May-07-09 03:14 PM |
#29 |
| -
There you go again. You're determined, because you don't like this subject, to |
MADem |
May-07-09 03:32 PM |
#35 |
| -
Wrong - one has to prove that the services he paid for were not |
merh |
May-07-09 03:44 PM |
#39 |
| -
No, that's not true. Get off the video tapes, too. Your fixation ignores the bigger issues. |
MADem |
May-07-09 04:01 PM |
#43 |
| -
Again, giving me the link from the biochemist proves what exactly? |
merh |
May-07-09 04:52 PM |
#48 |
| -
Complaining that you don't like the links without answering them substantively proves what, exactly? |
MADem |
May-08-09 04:49 AM |
#51 |
| -
Just pointing out that a biochemist is not an expert on the law and your source is weak. |
merh |
May-08-09 07:42 AM |
#55 |
| -
You're not either, and you've not provided anything save your own complaints. nt |
MADem |
May-08-09 07:57 AM |
#57 |
| -
Now who is showing that they don't read all the posts and links |
merh |
May-08-09 08:22 AM |
#62 |
| -
But I have read them. And you continue with the snark, because that's all you've got. |
MADem |
May-08-09 08:29 AM |
#65 |
| -
My guess is there is a DA who was cheated on once and wants blood |
Taverner |
May-07-09 02:16 PM |
#26 |
| -
Interesting - I had not read much about Rielle Hunter but her life has been |
csziggy |
May-07-09 03:28 PM |
#33 |
| -
No matter what Hunter's politics are, no matter who "hooked them up," Edwards |
NYCGirl |
May-07-09 03:47 PM |
#40 |
| -
Yes, I am not excusing Edwards any more than I do Clinton |
csziggy |
May-07-09 05:33 PM |
#49 |
| -
I see her as a product of her times |
Adelante |
May-07-09 03:50 PM |
#41 |
| -
Missing element of the crime, IMO |
Hepburn |
May-08-09 08:25 AM |
#63 |
| -
And... |
MonteLukast |
May-08-09 08:34 AM |
#67 |
| -
Elizabeth was lied to by her husband. |
MADem |
May-08-09 08:46 AM |
#69 |
| -
According to one of Hunter's friends |
chatnoir |
May-09-09 12:38 PM |
#84 |
| -
Uh oh. That makes the situation worse, still. |
MADem |
May-09-09 05:19 PM |
#85 |
| -
Only makes sense considering how amateurish the vids were |
chatnoir |
May-09-09 09:50 PM |
#86 |
| -
They got Jack Abramoff on this, too. |
MADem |
May-08-09 08:40 AM |
#68 |
| -
Don't forget, If Bush hadn't stolen the election in 2004, John Edwards would be Vice President |
Optical.Catalyst |
May-09-09 06:21 AM |
#80 |
| -
How does this apply to the OP? |
Adelante |
May-09-09 06:54 AM |
#81 |
| -
So the Feds are investigating sex again but not torture? |
Chisox08 |
May-09-09 12:07 PM |
#83 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread