You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #202: Better yet, how about a [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
202. Better yet, how about a
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -How about a NON-LAWYER, NON-JUDGE for the Supreme Court? A-Schwarzenegger  May-01-09 03:31 PM   #0 
  - yeah, let's not make a Federal case  WannaJumpMyScooter   May-01-09 03:32 PM   #1 
  - Take the poll at APJ  johnfunk   May-01-09 04:35 PM   #63 
  - LOL n/t  whopis01   May-04-09 04:29 AM   #230 
  - if rodney dangerfield were alive, i would nominate him  datasuspect   May-01-09 03:32 PM   #2 
  - Howard Dean?  TheBigotBasher   May-01-09 03:33 PM   #3 
  - Um, no.  Deep13   May-01-09 03:33 PM   #4 
  - How about a "non judge." I think being a lawyer is helpful.  MADem   May-01-09 03:33 PM   #5 
  - Lawyers are not only educated in law they are molded with rigid thinking . . .  defendandprotect   May-01-09 03:48 PM   #27 
     - Utter nonsense. The opposite is true.  TexasObserver   May-01-09 04:03 PM   #40 
     - Doctors aren't "molded with rigid thinking", they are trained in analytical  kestrel91316   May-01-09 04:07 PM   #45 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   May-01-09 04:47 PM   #74 
        - Oh, ok. I'll carry on.  kestrel91316   May-01-09 05:49 PM   #98 
        - wow Odin2005 you managed to fling venom all over the place with that one.  omega minimo   May-02-09 03:36 AM   #152 
     - I'm afraid I haven't quite "got it"--I don't believe that because Bush hired a bunch of asshole  MADem   May-01-09 04:08 PM   #47 
     - The doctors at my clinic  wolfgangmo   May-04-09 07:49 AM   #231 
  - Gary Busey or Denis Leary for SCOTUS!!!  flvegan   May-01-09 03:33 PM   #6 
  - Dennis Leary would be awesome.  merh   May-01-09 04:06 PM   #44 
  - Denis Leary is awesome, the bastid.  omega minimo   May-02-09 03:17 AM   #147 
  - Not Denis Leary! It would be really weird for me to have a raging passion for a SCOTUS!  OmmmSweetOmmm   May-04-09 08:52 PM   #237 
  - Good 'ol American anti-intellectualism. "America: Stupid and LOVIN it!!!"  BlooInBloo   May-01-09 03:34 PM   #7 
  - Kissinger was an intellectual.  anonymous171   May-01-09 04:10 PM   #49 
  - Support for teh stupid lobby noted.  BlooInBloo   May-01-09 04:12 PM   #51 
  - no kidding. Next up - wrestler *The Undertaker* for POTUS, because he's  Donnachaidh   May-01-09 04:58 PM   #83 
     - Hah! I wasn't the only one reminded of Idiocracy by the OP  Matariki   May-03-09 10:27 PM   #223 
        - If that is your art...  A-Schwarzenegger   May-03-09 10:47 PM   #227 
           - Thank you.  Matariki   May-04-09 08:51 PM   #236 
  - Yeah!  realisticphish   May-01-09 03:35 PM   #8 
  - Mel Gibson!!  Fuzz   May-01-09 03:35 PM   #9 
  - Yes!!  sammythecat   May-01-09 03:47 PM   #25 
  - Lewis Black?  guitar man   May-01-09 03:36 PM   #10 
  - Brilliant and the only non lawyer I would endorse  grantcart   May-01-09 03:40 PM   #16 
     - the only other one  guitar man   May-01-09 03:46 PM   #24 
        - Lewis Black --------- and George Carlin .... let the CLONING begin -- !!!  defendandprotect   May-01-09 03:55 PM   #36 
           - Or Larry David---Curb Your BS. Imagine him doing that looking into your eyes thing on Antonin Scalia  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 04:19 PM   #57 
  - Sorry, stupid idea  Warpy   May-01-09 03:36 PM   #11 
  - Thomas was a lawyer and a judge.  dorkulon   May-01-09 04:36 PM   #64 
     - Thomas actually spews the least BS of any Justice from the actual bench (or chair or whatever it is)  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 04:39 PM   #67 
     - Evidently, he also parrots Scalia . . .  defendandprotect   May-01-09 09:19 PM   #106 
     - But NOT versed in constitutional law  Warpy   May-01-09 07:54 PM   #103 
     - Thomas was also in a Catholic seminary at one point . . . later a  defendandprotect   May-01-09 09:16 PM   #105 
  - And how about some non-civil engineers to fix up the I-35 bridge? n/t  eridani   May-01-09 03:36 PM   #12 
  - We have our WINNUR!  havocmom   May-01-09 05:32 PM   #94 
  - good idea - lets put those legalities aside as we rule on the law of the land . . .  DrDan   May-01-09 03:38 PM   #13 
  - uhh, no. I'm stunned that anyone would even suggest this,  Donnachaidh   May-01-09 03:38 PM   #14 
  - Why . . . there's no requirement that the nominee be a lawyer . . .  defendandprotect   May-01-09 03:43 PM   #18 
  - because they at least need to be familiar with case law.  Donnachaidh   May-01-09 04:46 PM   #72 
     - And how difficult do you think that is? How many clerks do they have, as well?  defendandprotect   May-01-09 09:27 PM   #107 
        - You've Crossed The Line From Naivete To Dangerous Thinking.  Paladin   May-03-09 10:03 AM   #218 
           - I Believe There's A Law Against Such Dangerous Thinking.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-03-09 10:12 AM   #219 
  - I wouldn't hire Justice Souter to do surgery on me either.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 04:31 PM   #62 
     - ...  Donnachaidh   May-01-09 04:46 PM   #73 
        - ---  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 04:50 PM   #75 
  - Because the supreme court sometimes handles cases that require  anonymous171   May-01-09 03:39 PM   #15 
  - Nonsense . . . any intelligent person can understand the cases ---  defendandprotect   May-01-09 03:44 PM   #20 
  - Being able to understand a case is not the same as being able to rule on it.  Raskolnik   May-01-09 04:20 PM   #58 
  - If our law is so complicated that an ordinary intelligent person can't understand it . . .  defendandprotect   May-01-09 09:30 PM   #108 
  - it's not JUST understanding the cases.  Donnachaidh   May-01-09 04:50 PM   #77 
  - I've never seen American Idol . . .  defendandprotect   May-01-09 09:40 PM   #112 
  - Legalese is complex and convoluted for a reason, to remove ambiguity.  Odin2005   May-01-09 04:56 PM   #81 
  - This is one of the silliest ideas I've ever heard  COLGATE4   May-02-09 03:22 PM   #193 
     - It's the fallacy of the expert.  wolfgangmo   May-04-09 08:07 AM   #232 
  - It's like a POT OF FROGS. If you put a bunch of frogs into a pot  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 03:44 PM   #21 
  - Fine -e elect that person as your representative  anigbrowl   May-01-09 05:29 PM   #92 
     - Elect a frog? Let's not jump to conclusions.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 05:32 PM   #93 
     - Although to be fair.  wolfgangmo   May-04-09 08:12 AM   #233 
  - Creating TV programs and advertising with the lowest common denominator  prayin4rain   May-01-09 09:34 PM   #110 
     - Are you saying ordinary citizens are inferior to lawyers . . . ???  defendandprotect   May-01-09 09:42 PM   #113 
        - At legal reasoning... definitely.  prayin4rain   May-01-09 09:48 PM   #117 
           - Lincoln was never in law school --  defendandprotect   May-01-09 10:42 PM   #131 
              - Training/schooling to be a lawyer was quite different 150 years ago  prayin4rain   May-01-09 11:05 PM   #133 
                 - Again, this is exactly what democracy is all about ---  defendandprotect   May-02-09 10:14 AM   #168 
                 - Democracy is not about average people in top in positions.  prayin4rain   May-02-09 12:08 PM   #180 
                    - Actually, it is ---  defendandprotect   May-02-09 10:57 PM   #210 
                 - Actually Justice Robert H. Jackson never went to  whistler162   May-02-09 07:01 PM   #205 
                    - Yes, even only 100 years ago training to be a lawyer was very different.  prayin4rain   May-02-09 09:43 PM   #207 
                       - The basis of your thinking should be that the people have to understand what is going on . . .  defendandprotect   May-02-09 10:59 PM   #211 
                          - The average person can go to law school if they want to be on the SC.  prayin4rain   May-02-09 11:40 PM   #212 
                             - Again -- it is NOT a requirement that a SC nominee be a lawyer . . .  defendandprotect   May-03-09 12:03 AM   #213 
                                - I never said it was a requirement and I am not panicking. n/t  prayin4rain   May-03-09 12:23 AM   #214 
  - Right . . . good idea . . .  defendandprotect   May-01-09 03:41 PM   #17 
  - No, they need a legal background.  tekisui   May-01-09 03:43 PM   #19 
  - They don't "need a legal background" . . . it's not an official requirement for the nominee --!!  defendandprotect   May-01-09 03:50 PM   #28 
  - There's never been a non-lawyer on the US Supreme court (for good reason)  depakid   May-01-09 03:53 PM   #30 
  - There was never a SC that put a president in the Oval Office . . . for good reason . . .  defendandprotect   May-01-09 09:44 PM   #114 
  - No, it's not an official requirement. But remember, if a Dem POTUS does it  rvablue   May-01-09 03:54 PM   #33 
  - Do you think Americans would accept a Limbaugh nomination?  defendandprotect   May-01-09 09:46 PM   #115 
  - No, it's not required, but it would be stupid to put someone  tekisui   May-01-09 05:44 PM   #96 
     - Why . . . . ?  defendandprotect   May-01-09 09:48 PM   #116 
        - I would only let a doctor operate on me.  tekisui   May-01-09 10:10 PM   #124 
           - A surgeon isn't part of government . . . the basis of democracy is that  defendandprotect   May-01-09 10:33 PM   #129 
              - Are you saying everyone understands the Commerce Clause,  tekisui   May-02-09 07:04 AM   #162 
              - We don't understand corporate interests . . . is that what you mean?  defendandprotect   May-02-09 10:27 AM   #170 
              - You ever hear the old adage  northzax   May-03-09 01:16 AM   #215 
  - I agree that a legal background is needed, but judge experience isn't.  Xithras   May-01-09 04:13 PM   #52 
     - Clarence Thomas makes a "terrible" SC justice . . . he was rated very low by ABA . . .  defendandprotect   May-01-09 09:49 PM   #118 
  - why compare a non-lawyer, non-judge to a "relative idiot"?  hfojvt   May-01-09 03:45 PM   #22 
  - Certainly Noam Chomsky or Howard Zinn would make fine SC Justices . . .  defendandprotect   May-01-09 09:51 PM   #119 
  - Phil Donahue? Bill Moyers?  lpbk2713   May-01-09 03:46 PM   #23 
  - Robert Redford ...  defendandprotect   May-01-09 03:53 PM   #31 
     - wow, you certainly travel in narrow circles--how about gloria steinem? gloria allred?  niyad   May-01-09 05:06 PM   #86 
        - I'm a strong feminist but not a Steinem fan -- tho she would have been better than Thomas--!!!  defendandprotect   May-01-09 09:53 PM   #120 
  - How about a non-college, non-medical person to do my next surgery?  Maru Kitteh   May-01-09 03:47 PM   #26 
  - Sure, I can handle that little problem for ya--hand me that ginsu knife!  MADem   May-01-09 04:11 PM   #50 
     - At it turns out, I'm getting ready to do that very thing right now.  Maru Kitteh   May-01-09 04:37 PM   #65 
        - Sure--bring the thread along with your anesthesia!!!!  MADem   May-01-09 05:41 PM   #95 
  - better yet, don't replace souter... let's just use a cnn internet poll as the ninth "judge"...  1   May-01-09 03:51 PM   #29 
  - See, now, I can tell you're not a lawyer---coming up with such a simple brilliant proletariat idea!  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 03:55 PM   #34 
     - I see you live in CA.  namahage   May-01-09 10:54 PM   #132 
        - I think you may have tooken 1's post a little more seriously than I did.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 11:20 PM   #137 
           - "Tooken?"  Codeine   May-03-09 10:38 PM   #225 
              - So I left off the "ed".  A-Schwarzenegger   May-03-09 10:42 PM   #226 
                 - Ok. You got me.  Codeine   May-03-09 10:48 PM   #228 
                    - Gottened.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-03-09 10:52 PM   #229 
  - If we could CLONE someone . . . it would be Barbara Jordan . . .  defendandprotect   May-01-09 03:54 PM   #32 
  - Yes, Barbara Jordan was a lawyer ... an excellent one. A professor of law.  TahitiNut   May-01-09 04:16 PM   #55 
  - Non-Judge-maybe, non-lawyer-probably unwise  TheKentuckian   May-01-09 03:55 PM   #35 
  - No horses!  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 03:57 PM   #37 
  - So . . .  defendandprotect   May-01-09 09:59 PM   #121 
  - I gots uncommunicated eyeballs ..... pick me.  Stinky The Clown   May-01-09 03:58 PM   #38 
  - Thanks, Joe the Plumber, for that sage advice.  TexasObserver   May-01-09 04:00 PM   #39 
  - I expect my Supreme Court justices to have more than a passing  kestrel91316   May-01-09 04:03 PM   #41 
  - Well . . .  defendandprotect   May-01-09 10:00 PM   #122 
  - Sure, I'll take the job.  Hugabear   May-01-09 04:04 PM   #42 
  - Those powdered wigs were good enough for George Washington--a NON-LAWYER.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 04:07 PM   #46 
     - Washington was far better educated than Americans today.  Donnachaidh   May-01-09 04:53 PM   #80 
     - I thought you said you didn't want people like George Washington on the Supreme Court.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 04:56 PM   #82 
        - nice dodge on the question  Donnachaidh   May-01-09 04:59 PM   #84 
           - Probably neither of us is as dumb as we seem to think the other is.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 05:04 PM   #85 
     - George never sat on the Supremes, though! Wig or no wig! nt  MADem   May-01-09 05:44 PM   #97 
  - You probably need a lawyer, but not a judge.  TimesSquareCowboy   May-01-09 04:06 PM   #43 
  - Willie Nelson  blindpig   May-01-09 04:09 PM   #48 
  - Please tell me this is satire.  Raskolnik   May-01-09 04:14 PM   #53 
  - As soon as Heart Surgeons start operating without going to medical school, let me know...  Blackhatjack   May-01-09 04:14 PM   #54 
  - Is this the beginning of a "Jon Stewart for Supreme Court" campaign???  TahitiNut   May-01-09 04:18 PM   #56 
  - I'd take Jon Stewart --- humor and humanist -- ????  defendandprotect   May-01-09 10:03 PM   #123 
  - Love it!!!  Bunny   May-01-09 04:21 PM   #59 
  - All it takes is one frog in the pot of frogs who asks "Is this water getting really fucking hot?"  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 04:26 PM   #61 
  - Sorry - we tried it your way - teh stupid way - for 8 years. No more.  BlooInBloo   May-01-09 04:22 PM   #60 
  - I don't agree with him either, but that is not called for  tkmorris   May-01-09 05:19 PM   #89 
     - Thank you. Plus, there is different varieties of stpuid.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 05:24 PM   #90 
  - How about a NATIVE AMERICAN?  Karenina   May-01-09 04:38 PM   #66 
  - ward churchill  niyad   May-01-09 05:13 PM   #88 
  - Should college professors be just random guys pulled off the street?  anonymous171   May-01-09 04:40 PM   #68 
  - I've had profs I think somebody pulled off on the street randomly as it is.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 04:45 PM   #71 
  - And the Secretary of Education can be illiterate! nt  Codeine   May-01-09 04:41 PM   #69 
  - That's going two far.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 04:51 PM   #78 
  - If they go non-judge, Michael Moore, John Conyers or Dennis Kucinich would be my picks.  harun   May-01-09 04:44 PM   #70 
  - No. I want someone who understands the law.  Odin2005   May-01-09 04:50 PM   #76 
  - What I want, what I need, and what I get is two different things.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 04:53 PM   #79 
  - I'd rather have someone who has studied the appropriate...  LanternWaste   May-01-09 05:07 PM   #87 
  - Patton Oswald.  Starry Messenger   May-01-09 05:25 PM   #91 
  - If you need surgery, as many here apparently do, you don't need a lawyer OR a so-called doctor.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 05:55 PM   #99 
  - Let me perform exploratory brain surgery on you then.  Political Heretic   May-02-09 03:42 PM   #195 
     - Okay. I'm curious what's in there. I doubt a little amateur exploratory brain surgery now & then  A-Schwarzenegger   May-02-09 03:50 PM   #197 
  - OMG WTF BBQ JOE TEH PLUMBER FOR SUPREME COURT!!  Danger Mouse   May-01-09 05:56 PM   #100 
  - Don't feed  DireStrike   May-01-09 06:00 PM   #101 
  - Physician, heal  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 06:07 PM   #102 
  - Completely AWFUL idea  JerseygirlCT   May-01-09 08:00 PM   #104 
  - Let me assure you that they all understand the Constitution . . .  defendandprotect   May-01-09 10:15 PM   #125 
  - Um..... how about my plumber performs your brain surgery?  Political Heretic   May-01-09 09:31 PM   #109 
  - Evidently you're saying that you can't begin to understand any of the cases  defendandprotect   May-01-09 10:17 PM   #126 
     - And any technical matters, just go to lawguru.com. It isn't brain surgery, although  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 10:26 PM   #128 
     - You might recall that law was a matter of --  defendandprotect   May-01-09 10:36 PM   #130 
        - The law is infintely more complicated now than it was then.  Political Heretic   May-01-09 11:10 PM   #136 
           - Too complicated . . . ? You're saying you didn't understand Bush vs Gore--?  defendandprotect   May-02-09 10:20 AM   #169 
              - You're suggesting an either/or where none exists.  Political Heretic   May-02-09 03:40 PM   #194 
                 - What "either/or" . . .  defendandprotect   May-02-09 10:50 PM   #209 
     - That's exactly what I'm saying. Not well enough to be nominated to the Supreme Court.  Political Heretic   May-01-09 11:07 PM   #134 
     - The stupid. It hurts me.  varkam   May-02-09 03:12 AM   #145 
  - Isn't this the same concept that the Republicans just used for the VP position?  prayin4rain   May-01-09 09:37 PM   #111 
  - We got Bush/Cheney because the corrupt Supreme Court put him in the Oval Office --  defendandprotect   May-01-09 10:18 PM   #127 
     - They did not put him in office, they remanded, and there was a ferocious dissent.  prayin4rain   May-01-09 11:08 PM   #135 
        - The Supreme Court did not put Bush into the Oval Office . . . ????  defendandprotect   May-02-09 10:30 AM   #171 
  - How did such potato-droppings get 2 recs?  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 11:51 PM   #138 
  - How about a NON-MED-SCHOOL, NON-DOCTOR surgeon next time you're injured? nt  Occam Bandage   May-01-09 11:53 PM   #139 
  - There are plenty of do-it-yourself surgery sites on the internets.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-01-09 11:58 PM   #140 
  - "Brain surgery is not rocket science."  Occam Bandage   May-01-09 11:59 PM   #141 
  - It almost sounds like something from ... Alice.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-02-09 12:20 AM   #142 
  - I have actually done some autosurgery...  anigbrowl   May-02-09 02:16 AM   #143 
  - Presumably, they forgot to make being a lawyer a requirement to be on SC???  defendandprotect   May-02-09 10:34 AM   #173 
  - You have to have a license to practice medicine . . . you don't have to be a lawyer to be on SC . .!  defendandprotect   May-02-09 10:32 AM   #172 
  - Really really bad idea  donheld   May-02-09 02:18 AM   #144 
  - Think about democracy . . .  defendandprotect   May-02-09 10:36 AM   #174 
  - Too bad George Carlin died.  omega minimo   May-02-09 03:16 AM   #146 
  - Amen.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-02-09 03:34 AM   #151 
     - I'm #3  omega minimo   May-02-09 03:38 AM   #153 
        - I suspected as much.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-02-09 03:43 AM   #155 
           - Well  omega minimo   May-02-09 03:45 AM   #157 
              - I had to look that up.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-02-09 04:11 AM   #160 
                 - .  omega minimo   May-02-09 04:25 AM   #161 
                    - grumpy + sad = whinge ?  A-Schwarzenegger   May-02-09 02:40 PM   #187 
                       - #  omega minimo   May-02-09 03:18 PM   #192 
                          - &  A-Schwarzenegger   May-02-09 05:25 PM   #199 
                             - +  omega minimo   May-02-09 05:34 PM   #203 
  - I'm going to guess this is sarcasm.  varkam   May-02-09 03:20 AM   #148 
  - Great idea! Maybe a judge from American Idol?  Matariki   May-02-09 03:29 AM   #149 
  - Susan Boyle!!!  omega minimo   May-02-09 03:39 AM   #154 
  - Jello Biafra  omega minimo   May-02-09 03:32 AM   #150 
  - I think it's time for Justice Clinton on the Supreme Court.  Warren DeMontague   May-02-09 03:44 AM   #156 
  - Supreme Funkourt.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-02-09 03:46 AM   #158 
  - Ya no see it?  unapatriciated   May-02-09 08:23 AM   #167 
  - A DLC-corporate candidate . . . ? Don't think we need more of that -- !!!  defendandprotect   May-02-09 10:38 AM   #175 
     - Whoosh!! (eom)  TacoD   May-02-09 11:14 AM   #177 
     - George Parliament Funkadelic Clinton is a DLC-corporate candidate?!  A-Schwarzenegger   May-02-09 12:51 PM   #182 
     - ...  Warren DeMontague   May-02-09 03:07 PM   #190 
  - Very well: Louis CK  bridgit   May-02-09 03:47 AM   #159 
  - Mr. Ed would be an improvment over long dong Thomas  Hubert Flottz   May-02-09 07:08 AM   #163 
  - Yeah, and Justice Ed will never speak, unless he has something to say! (nt)  KansDem   May-02-09 11:18 AM   #178 
  - I think we need a reality TV show to decide it  muriel_volestrangler   May-02-09 07:46 AM   #164 
  - Excellent ideas! There's no reason the Supreme Court has to be so haughty & elitistical.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-02-09 01:44 PM   #186 
  - How about me performing your next surgery in my garage?  olegramps   May-02-09 07:52 AM   #165 
  - I believe that Manson is available with lots of experience with the law.  olegramps   May-02-09 08:16 AM   #166 
  - The person IMO has to have a law degree and be a member of some...  Hepburn   May-02-09 10:42 AM   #176 
  - How about  no name no slogan   May-02-09 11:34 AM   #179 
  - Let's have a Native American.  cherokeeprogressive   May-02-09 12:11 PM   #181 
  - I think an attentive lifelong TV watcher picks up enough knowledge from law shows  A-Schwarzenegger   May-02-09 01:09 PM   #183 
  - Now I've confirmed what I've thought - that you're just having a go at us.  Political Heretic   May-02-09 03:47 PM   #196 
     - Does that mean you're not going to perform the exploratory brain surgery on me?  A-Schwarzenegger   May-02-09 03:55 PM   #198 
  - Actually I think that's a horrible idea  Taverner   May-02-09 01:11 PM   #184 
  - Yeah, a NON-ACTOR Governing California is working out so well  DS1   May-02-09 01:12 PM   #185 
  - No thank you  tammywammy   May-02-09 02:52 PM   #188 
  - Thank you for being so courteous in disagreeing  A-Schwarzenegger   May-02-09 08:22 PM   #206 
  - Clone Barack Obama  DFW   May-02-09 02:57 PM   #189 
  - Brilliant idea - they could use it for the presidency too  muriel_volestrangler   May-02-09 03:12 PM   #191 
  - Why?  defendandprotect   May-02-09 10:44 PM   #208 
  - Okay. I pick Clint Eastwood.  Buns_of_Fire   May-02-09 05:28 PM   #200 
  - Heh.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-02-09 05:30 PM   #201 
  - Better yet, how about a  varelse   May-02-09 05:30 PM   #202 
  - I asked him.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-02-09 06:10 PM   #204 
  - No. Barack Obama's got this one.  backscatter712   May-03-09 01:45 AM   #216 
  - I know somebody who knows somebody,  A-Schwarzenegger   May-03-09 09:52 AM   #217 
  - Spiderman! nt  ZombieHorde   May-03-09 06:11 PM   #220 
  - Don't be silly.  A-Schwarzenegger   May-03-09 06:27 PM   #221 
  - Bailiff... thwack his pee-pee.  dweller   May-03-09 09:28 PM   #222 
  - Who doesn't  A-Schwarzenegger   May-04-09 04:37 PM   #235 
  - Diana Ross. She already has Supremes experience  Canuckistanian   May-03-09 10:35 PM   #224 
  - I think 'judging' is complicated job and I want someone with experience  aikoaiko   May-04-09 09:32 AM   #234 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC