| 28. They don't "need a legal background" . . . it's not an official requirement for the nominee --!! |
| -How about a NON-LAWYER, NON-JUDGE for the Supreme Court? |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 03:31 PM |
#0 |
 -
yeah, let's not make a Federal case |
WannaJumpMyScooter |
May-01-09 03:32 PM |
#1 |
 -
Take the poll at APJ |
johnfunk |
May-01-09 04:35 PM |
#63 |
 -
LOL n/t |
whopis01 |
May-04-09 04:29 AM |
#230 |
| -
if rodney dangerfield were alive, i would nominate him |
datasuspect |
May-01-09 03:32 PM |
#2 |
| -
Howard Dean? |
TheBigotBasher |
May-01-09 03:33 PM |
#3 |
| -
Um, no. |
Deep13 |
May-01-09 03:33 PM |
#4 |
| -
How about a "non judge." I think being a lawyer is helpful. |
MADem |
May-01-09 03:33 PM |
#5 |
| -
Lawyers are not only educated in law they are molded with rigid thinking . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 03:48 PM |
#27 |
| -
Utter nonsense. The opposite is true. |
TexasObserver |
May-01-09 04:03 PM |
#40 |
| -
Doctors aren't "molded with rigid thinking", they are trained in analytical |
kestrel91316 |
May-01-09 04:07 PM |
#45 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-01-09 04:47 PM |
#74 |
| -
Oh, ok. I'll carry on. |
kestrel91316 |
May-01-09 05:49 PM |
#98 |
| -
wow Odin2005 you managed to fling venom all over the place with that one. |
omega minimo |
May-02-09 03:36 AM |
#152 |
| -
I'm afraid I haven't quite "got it"--I don't believe that because Bush hired a bunch of asshole |
MADem |
May-01-09 04:08 PM |
#47 |
| -
The doctors at my clinic |
wolfgangmo |
May-04-09 07:49 AM |
#231 |
| -
Gary Busey or Denis Leary for SCOTUS!!! |
flvegan |
May-01-09 03:33 PM |
#6 |
| -
Dennis Leary would be awesome. |
merh |
May-01-09 04:06 PM |
#44 |
| -
Denis Leary is awesome, the bastid. |
omega minimo |
May-02-09 03:17 AM |
#147 |
| -
Not Denis Leary! It would be really weird for me to have a raging passion for a SCOTUS! |
OmmmSweetOmmm |
May-04-09 08:52 PM |
#237 |
| -
Good 'ol American anti-intellectualism. "America: Stupid and LOVIN it!!!" |
BlooInBloo |
May-01-09 03:34 PM |
#7 |
| -
Kissinger was an intellectual. |
anonymous171 |
May-01-09 04:10 PM |
#49 |
| -
Support for teh stupid lobby noted. |
BlooInBloo |
May-01-09 04:12 PM |
#51 |
| -
no kidding. Next up - wrestler *The Undertaker* for POTUS, because he's |
Donnachaidh |
May-01-09 04:58 PM |
#83 |
| -
Hah! I wasn't the only one reminded of Idiocracy by the OP |
Matariki |
May-03-09 10:27 PM |
#223 |
| -
If that is your art... |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-03-09 10:47 PM |
#227 |
| -
Thank you. |
Matariki |
May-04-09 08:51 PM |
#236 |
| -
Yeah! |
realisticphish |
May-01-09 03:35 PM |
#8 |
| -
Mel Gibson!! |
Fuzz |
May-01-09 03:35 PM |
#9 |
| -
Yes!! |
sammythecat |
May-01-09 03:47 PM |
#25 |
| -
Lewis Black? |
guitar man |
May-01-09 03:36 PM |
#10 |
| -
Brilliant and the only non lawyer I would endorse |
grantcart |
May-01-09 03:40 PM |
#16 |
| -
the only other one |
guitar man |
May-01-09 03:46 PM |
#24 |
| -
Lewis Black --------- and George Carlin .... let the CLONING begin -- !!! |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 03:55 PM |
#36 |
| -
Or Larry David---Curb Your BS. Imagine him doing that looking into your eyes thing on Antonin Scalia |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 04:19 PM |
#57 |
| -
Sorry, stupid idea |
Warpy |
May-01-09 03:36 PM |
#11 |
| -
Thomas was a lawyer and a judge. |
dorkulon |
May-01-09 04:36 PM |
#64 |
| -
Thomas actually spews the least BS of any Justice from the actual bench (or chair or whatever it is) |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 04:39 PM |
#67 |
| -
Evidently, he also parrots Scalia . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 09:19 PM |
#106 |
| -
But NOT versed in constitutional law |
Warpy |
May-01-09 07:54 PM |
#103 |
| -
Thomas was also in a Catholic seminary at one point . . . later a |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 09:16 PM |
#105 |
| -
And how about some non-civil engineers to fix up the I-35 bridge? n/t |
eridani |
May-01-09 03:36 PM |
#12 |
| -
We have our WINNUR! |
havocmom |
May-01-09 05:32 PM |
#94 |
| -
good idea - lets put those legalities aside as we rule on the law of the land . . . |
DrDan |
May-01-09 03:38 PM |
#13 |
| -
uhh, no. I'm stunned that anyone would even suggest this, |
Donnachaidh |
May-01-09 03:38 PM |
#14 |
| -
Why . . . there's no requirement that the nominee be a lawyer . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 03:43 PM |
#18 |
| -
because they at least need to be familiar with case law. |
Donnachaidh |
May-01-09 04:46 PM |
#72 |
| -
And how difficult do you think that is? How many clerks do they have, as well? |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 09:27 PM |
#107 |
| -
You've Crossed The Line From Naivete To Dangerous Thinking. |
Paladin |
May-03-09 10:03 AM |
#218 |
| -
I Believe There's A Law Against Such Dangerous Thinking. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-03-09 10:12 AM |
#219 |
| -
I wouldn't hire Justice Souter to do surgery on me either. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 04:31 PM |
#62 |
| -
... |
Donnachaidh |
May-01-09 04:46 PM |
#73 |
| -
--- |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 04:50 PM |
#75 |
| -
Because the supreme court sometimes handles cases that require |
anonymous171 |
May-01-09 03:39 PM |
#15 |
| -
Nonsense . . . any intelligent person can understand the cases --- |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 03:44 PM |
#20 |
| -
Being able to understand a case is not the same as being able to rule on it. |
Raskolnik |
May-01-09 04:20 PM |
#58 |
| -
If our law is so complicated that an ordinary intelligent person can't understand it . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 09:30 PM |
#108 |
| -
it's not JUST understanding the cases. |
Donnachaidh |
May-01-09 04:50 PM |
#77 |
| -
I've never seen American Idol . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 09:40 PM |
#112 |
| -
Legalese is complex and convoluted for a reason, to remove ambiguity. |
Odin2005 |
May-01-09 04:56 PM |
#81 |
| -
This is one of the silliest ideas I've ever heard |
COLGATE4 |
May-02-09 03:22 PM |
#193 |
| -
It's the fallacy of the expert. |
wolfgangmo |
May-04-09 08:07 AM |
#232 |
| -
It's like a POT OF FROGS. If you put a bunch of frogs into a pot |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 03:44 PM |
#21 |
| -
Fine -e elect that person as your representative |
anigbrowl |
May-01-09 05:29 PM |
#92 |
| -
Elect a frog? Let's not jump to conclusions. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 05:32 PM |
#93 |
| -
Although to be fair. |
wolfgangmo |
May-04-09 08:12 AM |
#233 |
| -
Creating TV programs and advertising with the lowest common denominator |
prayin4rain |
May-01-09 09:34 PM |
#110 |
| -
Are you saying ordinary citizens are inferior to lawyers . . . ??? |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 09:42 PM |
#113 |
| -
At legal reasoning... definitely. |
prayin4rain |
May-01-09 09:48 PM |
#117 |
| -
Lincoln was never in law school -- |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 10:42 PM |
#131 |
| -
Training/schooling to be a lawyer was quite different 150 years ago |
prayin4rain |
May-01-09 11:05 PM |
#133 |
| -
Again, this is exactly what democracy is all about --- |
defendandprotect |
May-02-09 10:14 AM |
#168 |
| -
Democracy is not about average people in top in positions. |
prayin4rain |
May-02-09 12:08 PM |
#180 |
| -
Actually, it is --- |
defendandprotect |
May-02-09 10:57 PM |
#210 |
| -
Actually Justice Robert H. Jackson never went to |
whistler162 |
May-02-09 07:01 PM |
#205 |
| -
Yes, even only 100 years ago training to be a lawyer was very different. |
prayin4rain |
May-02-09 09:43 PM |
#207 |
| -
The basis of your thinking should be that the people have to understand what is going on . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-02-09 10:59 PM |
#211 |
| -
The average person can go to law school if they want to be on the SC. |
prayin4rain |
May-02-09 11:40 PM |
#212 |
| -
Again -- it is NOT a requirement that a SC nominee be a lawyer . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-03-09 12:03 AM |
#213 |
| -
I never said it was a requirement and I am not panicking. n/t |
prayin4rain |
May-03-09 12:23 AM |
#214 |
| -
Right . . . good idea . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 03:41 PM |
#17 |
| -
No, they need a legal background. |
tekisui |
May-01-09 03:43 PM |
#19 |
| -
They don't "need a legal background" . . . it's not an official requirement for the nominee --!! |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 03:50 PM |
#28 |
| -
There's never been a non-lawyer on the US Supreme court (for good reason) |
depakid |
May-01-09 03:53 PM |
#30 |
| -
There was never a SC that put a president in the Oval Office . . . for good reason . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 09:44 PM |
#114 |
| -
No, it's not an official requirement. But remember, if a Dem POTUS does it |
rvablue |
May-01-09 03:54 PM |
#33 |
| -
Do you think Americans would accept a Limbaugh nomination? |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 09:46 PM |
#115 |
| -
No, it's not required, but it would be stupid to put someone |
tekisui |
May-01-09 05:44 PM |
#96 |
| -
Why . . . . ? |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 09:48 PM |
#116 |
| -
I would only let a doctor operate on me. |
tekisui |
May-01-09 10:10 PM |
#124 |
| -
A surgeon isn't part of government . . . the basis of democracy is that |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 10:33 PM |
#129 |
| -
Are you saying everyone understands the Commerce Clause, |
tekisui |
May-02-09 07:04 AM |
#162 |
| -
We don't understand corporate interests . . . is that what you mean? |
defendandprotect |
May-02-09 10:27 AM |
#170 |
| -
You ever hear the old adage |
northzax |
May-03-09 01:16 AM |
#215 |
| -
I agree that a legal background is needed, but judge experience isn't. |
Xithras |
May-01-09 04:13 PM |
#52 |
| -
Clarence Thomas makes a "terrible" SC justice . . . he was rated very low by ABA . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 09:49 PM |
#118 |
| -
why compare a non-lawyer, non-judge to a "relative idiot"? |
hfojvt |
May-01-09 03:45 PM |
#22 |
| -
Certainly Noam Chomsky or Howard Zinn would make fine SC Justices . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 09:51 PM |
#119 |
| -
Phil Donahue? Bill Moyers? |
lpbk2713 |
May-01-09 03:46 PM |
#23 |
| -
Robert Redford ... |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 03:53 PM |
#31 |
| -
wow, you certainly travel in narrow circles--how about gloria steinem? gloria allred? |
niyad |
May-01-09 05:06 PM |
#86 |
| -
I'm a strong feminist but not a Steinem fan -- tho she would have been better than Thomas--!!! |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 09:53 PM |
#120 |
| -
How about a non-college, non-medical person to do my next surgery? |
Maru Kitteh |
May-01-09 03:47 PM |
#26 |
| -
Sure, I can handle that little problem for ya--hand me that ginsu knife! |
MADem |
May-01-09 04:11 PM |
#50 |
| -
At it turns out, I'm getting ready to do that very thing right now. |
Maru Kitteh |
May-01-09 04:37 PM |
#65 |
| -
Sure--bring the thread along with your anesthesia!!!! |
MADem |
May-01-09 05:41 PM |
#95 |
| -
better yet, don't replace souter... let's just use a cnn internet poll as the ninth "judge"... |
1 |
May-01-09 03:51 PM |
#29 |
| -
See, now, I can tell you're not a lawyer---coming up with such a simple brilliant proletariat idea! |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 03:55 PM |
#34 |
| -
I see you live in CA. |
namahage |
May-01-09 10:54 PM |
#132 |
| -
I think you may have tooken 1's post a little more seriously than I did. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 11:20 PM |
#137 |
| -
"Tooken?" |
Codeine |
May-03-09 10:38 PM |
#225 |
| -
So I left off the "ed". |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-03-09 10:42 PM |
#226 |
| -
Ok. You got me. |
Codeine |
May-03-09 10:48 PM |
#228 |
| -
Gottened. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-03-09 10:52 PM |
#229 |
| -
If we could CLONE someone . . . it would be Barbara Jordan . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 03:54 PM |
#32 |
| -
Yes, Barbara Jordan was a lawyer ... an excellent one. A professor of law. |
TahitiNut |
May-01-09 04:16 PM |
#55 |
| -
Non-Judge-maybe, non-lawyer-probably unwise |
TheKentuckian |
May-01-09 03:55 PM |
#35 |
| -
No horses! |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 03:57 PM |
#37 |
| -
So . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 09:59 PM |
#121 |
| -
I gots uncommunicated eyeballs ..... pick me. |
Stinky The Clown |
May-01-09 03:58 PM |
#38 |
| -
Thanks, Joe the Plumber, for that sage advice. |
TexasObserver |
May-01-09 04:00 PM |
#39 |
| -
I expect my Supreme Court justices to have more than a passing |
kestrel91316 |
May-01-09 04:03 PM |
#41 |
| -
Well . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 10:00 PM |
#122 |
| -
Sure, I'll take the job. |
Hugabear |
May-01-09 04:04 PM |
#42 |
| -
Those powdered wigs were good enough for George Washington--a NON-LAWYER. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 04:07 PM |
#46 |
| -
Washington was far better educated than Americans today. |
Donnachaidh |
May-01-09 04:53 PM |
#80 |
| -
I thought you said you didn't want people like George Washington on the Supreme Court. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 04:56 PM |
#82 |
| -
nice dodge on the question |
Donnachaidh |
May-01-09 04:59 PM |
#84 |
| -
Probably neither of us is as dumb as we seem to think the other is. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 05:04 PM |
#85 |
| -
George never sat on the Supremes, though! Wig or no wig! nt |
MADem |
May-01-09 05:44 PM |
#97 |
| -
You probably need a lawyer, but not a judge. |
TimesSquareCowboy |
May-01-09 04:06 PM |
#43 |
| -
Willie Nelson |
blindpig |
May-01-09 04:09 PM |
#48 |
| -
Please tell me this is satire. |
Raskolnik |
May-01-09 04:14 PM |
#53 |
| -
As soon as Heart Surgeons start operating without going to medical school, let me know... |
Blackhatjack |
May-01-09 04:14 PM |
#54 |
| -
Is this the beginning of a "Jon Stewart for Supreme Court" campaign??? |
TahitiNut |
May-01-09 04:18 PM |
#56 |
| -
I'd take Jon Stewart --- humor and humanist -- ???? |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 10:03 PM |
#123 |
| -
Love it!!! |
Bunny |
May-01-09 04:21 PM |
#59 |
| -
All it takes is one frog in the pot of frogs who asks "Is this water getting really fucking hot?" |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 04:26 PM |
#61 |
| -
Sorry - we tried it your way - teh stupid way - for 8 years. No more. |
BlooInBloo |
May-01-09 04:22 PM |
#60 |
| -
I don't agree with him either, but that is not called for |
tkmorris |
May-01-09 05:19 PM |
#89 |
| -
Thank you. Plus, there is different varieties of stpuid. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 05:24 PM |
#90 |
| -
How about a NATIVE AMERICAN? |
Karenina |
May-01-09 04:38 PM |
#66 |
| -
ward churchill |
niyad |
May-01-09 05:13 PM |
#88 |
| -
Should college professors be just random guys pulled off the street? |
anonymous171 |
May-01-09 04:40 PM |
#68 |
| -
I've had profs I think somebody pulled off on the street randomly as it is. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 04:45 PM |
#71 |
| -
And the Secretary of Education can be illiterate! nt |
Codeine |
May-01-09 04:41 PM |
#69 |
| -
That's going two far. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 04:51 PM |
#78 |
| -
If they go non-judge, Michael Moore, John Conyers or Dennis Kucinich would be my picks. |
harun |
May-01-09 04:44 PM |
#70 |
| -
No. I want someone who understands the law. |
Odin2005 |
May-01-09 04:50 PM |
#76 |
| -
What I want, what I need, and what I get is two different things. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 04:53 PM |
#79 |
| -
I'd rather have someone who has studied the appropriate... |
LanternWaste |
May-01-09 05:07 PM |
#87 |
| -
Patton Oswald. |
Starry Messenger |
May-01-09 05:25 PM |
#91 |
| -
If you need surgery, as many here apparently do, you don't need a lawyer OR a so-called doctor. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 05:55 PM |
#99 |
| -
Let me perform exploratory brain surgery on you then. |
Political Heretic |
May-02-09 03:42 PM |
#195 |
| -
Okay. I'm curious what's in there. I doubt a little amateur exploratory brain surgery now & then |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-02-09 03:50 PM |
#197 |
| -
OMG WTF BBQ JOE TEH PLUMBER FOR SUPREME COURT!! |
Danger Mouse |
May-01-09 05:56 PM |
#100 |
| -
Don't feed |
DireStrike |
May-01-09 06:00 PM |
#101 |
| -
Physician, heal |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 06:07 PM |
#102 |
| -
Completely AWFUL idea |
JerseygirlCT |
May-01-09 08:00 PM |
#104 |
| -
Let me assure you that they all understand the Constitution . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 10:15 PM |
#125 |
| -
Um..... how about my plumber performs your brain surgery? |
Political Heretic |
May-01-09 09:31 PM |
#109 |
| -
Evidently you're saying that you can't begin to understand any of the cases |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 10:17 PM |
#126 |
| -
And any technical matters, just go to lawguru.com. It isn't brain surgery, although |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 10:26 PM |
#128 |
| -
You might recall that law was a matter of -- |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 10:36 PM |
#130 |
| -
The law is infintely more complicated now than it was then. |
Political Heretic |
May-01-09 11:10 PM |
#136 |
| -
Too complicated . . . ? You're saying you didn't understand Bush vs Gore--? |
defendandprotect |
May-02-09 10:20 AM |
#169 |
| -
You're suggesting an either/or where none exists. |
Political Heretic |
May-02-09 03:40 PM |
#194 |
| -
What "either/or" . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-02-09 10:50 PM |
#209 |
| -
That's exactly what I'm saying. Not well enough to be nominated to the Supreme Court. |
Political Heretic |
May-01-09 11:07 PM |
#134 |
| -
The stupid. It hurts me. |
varkam |
May-02-09 03:12 AM |
#145 |
| -
Isn't this the same concept that the Republicans just used for the VP position? |
prayin4rain |
May-01-09 09:37 PM |
#111 |
| -
We got Bush/Cheney because the corrupt Supreme Court put him in the Oval Office -- |
defendandprotect |
May-01-09 10:18 PM |
#127 |
| -
They did not put him in office, they remanded, and there was a ferocious dissent. |
prayin4rain |
May-01-09 11:08 PM |
#135 |
| -
The Supreme Court did not put Bush into the Oval Office . . . ???? |
defendandprotect |
May-02-09 10:30 AM |
#171 |
| -
How did such potato-droppings get 2 recs? |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 11:51 PM |
#138 |
| -
How about a NON-MED-SCHOOL, NON-DOCTOR surgeon next time you're injured? nt |
Occam Bandage |
May-01-09 11:53 PM |
#139 |
| -
There are plenty of do-it-yourself surgery sites on the internets. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-01-09 11:58 PM |
#140 |
| -
"Brain surgery is not rocket science." |
Occam Bandage |
May-01-09 11:59 PM |
#141 |
| -
It almost sounds like something from ... Alice. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-02-09 12:20 AM |
#142 |
| -
I have actually done some autosurgery... |
anigbrowl |
May-02-09 02:16 AM |
#143 |
| -
Presumably, they forgot to make being a lawyer a requirement to be on SC??? |
defendandprotect |
May-02-09 10:34 AM |
#173 |
| -
You have to have a license to practice medicine . . . you don't have to be a lawyer to be on SC . .! |
defendandprotect |
May-02-09 10:32 AM |
#172 |
| -
Really really bad idea |
donheld |
May-02-09 02:18 AM |
#144 |
| -
Think about democracy . . . |
defendandprotect |
May-02-09 10:36 AM |
#174 |
| -
Too bad George Carlin died. |
omega minimo |
May-02-09 03:16 AM |
#146 |
| -
Amen. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-02-09 03:34 AM |
#151 |
| -
I'm #3 |
omega minimo |
May-02-09 03:38 AM |
#153 |
| -
I suspected as much. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-02-09 03:43 AM |
#155 |
| -
Well |
omega minimo |
May-02-09 03:45 AM |
#157 |
| -
I had to look that up. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-02-09 04:11 AM |
#160 |
| -
. |
omega minimo |
May-02-09 04:25 AM |
#161 |
| -
grumpy + sad = whinge ? |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-02-09 02:40 PM |
#187 |
| -
# |
omega minimo |
May-02-09 03:18 PM |
#192 |
| -
& |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-02-09 05:25 PM |
#199 |
| -
+ |
omega minimo |
May-02-09 05:34 PM |
#203 |
| -
I'm going to guess this is sarcasm. |
varkam |
May-02-09 03:20 AM |
#148 |
| -
Great idea! Maybe a judge from American Idol? |
Matariki |
May-02-09 03:29 AM |
#149 |
| -
Susan Boyle!!! |
omega minimo |
May-02-09 03:39 AM |
#154 |
| -
Jello Biafra |
omega minimo |
May-02-09 03:32 AM |
#150 |
| -
I think it's time for Justice Clinton on the Supreme Court. |
Warren DeMontague |
May-02-09 03:44 AM |
#156 |
| -
Supreme Funkourt. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-02-09 03:46 AM |
#158 |
| -
Ya no see it? |
unapatriciated |
May-02-09 08:23 AM |
#167 |
| -
A DLC-corporate candidate . . . ? Don't think we need more of that -- !!! |
defendandprotect |
May-02-09 10:38 AM |
#175 |
| -
Whoosh!! (eom) |
TacoD |
May-02-09 11:14 AM |
#177 |
| -
George Parliament Funkadelic Clinton is a DLC-corporate candidate?! |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-02-09 12:51 PM |
#182 |
| -
... |
Warren DeMontague |
May-02-09 03:07 PM |
#190 |
| -
Very well: Louis CK |
bridgit |
May-02-09 03:47 AM |
#159 |
| -
Mr. Ed would be an improvment over long dong Thomas |
Hubert Flottz |
May-02-09 07:08 AM |
#163 |
| -
Yeah, and Justice Ed will never speak, unless he has something to say! (nt) |
KansDem |
May-02-09 11:18 AM |
#178 |
| -
I think we need a reality TV show to decide it |
muriel_volestrangler |
May-02-09 07:46 AM |
#164 |
| -
Excellent ideas! There's no reason the Supreme Court has to be so haughty & elitistical. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-02-09 01:44 PM |
#186 |
| -
How about me performing your next surgery in my garage? |
olegramps |
May-02-09 07:52 AM |
#165 |
| -
I believe that Manson is available with lots of experience with the law. |
olegramps |
May-02-09 08:16 AM |
#166 |
| -
The person IMO has to have a law degree and be a member of some... |
Hepburn |
May-02-09 10:42 AM |
#176 |
| -
How about |
no name no slogan |
May-02-09 11:34 AM |
#179 |
| -
Let's have a Native American. |
cherokeeprogressive |
May-02-09 12:11 PM |
#181 |
| -
I think an attentive lifelong TV watcher picks up enough knowledge from law shows |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-02-09 01:09 PM |
#183 |
| -
Now I've confirmed what I've thought - that you're just having a go at us. |
Political Heretic |
May-02-09 03:47 PM |
#196 |
| -
Does that mean you're not going to perform the exploratory brain surgery on me? |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-02-09 03:55 PM |
#198 |
| -
Actually I think that's a horrible idea |
Taverner |
May-02-09 01:11 PM |
#184 |
| -
Yeah, a NON-ACTOR Governing California is working out so well |
DS1 |
May-02-09 01:12 PM |
#185 |
| -
No thank you |
tammywammy |
May-02-09 02:52 PM |
#188 |
| -
Thank you for being so courteous in disagreeing |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-02-09 08:22 PM |
#206 |
| -
Clone Barack Obama |
DFW |
May-02-09 02:57 PM |
#189 |
| -
Brilliant idea - they could use it for the presidency too |
muriel_volestrangler |
May-02-09 03:12 PM |
#191 |
| -
Why? |
defendandprotect |
May-02-09 10:44 PM |
#208 |
| -
Okay. I pick Clint Eastwood. |
Buns_of_Fire |
May-02-09 05:28 PM |
#200 |
| -
Heh. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-02-09 05:30 PM |
#201 |
| -
Better yet, how about a |
varelse |
May-02-09 05:30 PM |
#202 |
| -
I asked him. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-02-09 06:10 PM |
#204 |
| -
No. Barack Obama's got this one. |
backscatter712 |
May-03-09 01:45 AM |
#216 |
| -
I know somebody who knows somebody, |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-03-09 09:52 AM |
#217 |
| -
Spiderman! nt |
ZombieHorde |
May-03-09 06:11 PM |
#220 |
| -
Don't be silly. |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-03-09 06:27 PM |
#221 |
| -
Bailiff... thwack his pee-pee. |
dweller |
May-03-09 09:28 PM |
#222 |
| -
Who doesn't |
A-Schwarzenegger |
May-04-09 04:37 PM |
#235 |
| -
Diana Ross. She already has Supremes experience |
Canuckistanian |
May-03-09 10:35 PM |
#224 |
| -
I think 'judging' is complicated job and I want someone with experience |
aikoaiko |
May-04-09 09:32 AM |
#234 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore