You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #58: To early to attribute this one to "antigenic shift" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Jim Pivonka Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
58. To early to attribute this one to "antigenic shift"
This is in no way similar to changes in flu viruses that result from "antigenic shift" as that has been described in the literature I've seen.

This is a straightup recombinant virus. Whether any of the four components of the recombinant will show antigenic shift is not known - I am sure that will be studied carefully.

But the key idea here is that this is recombinant. Recombinant viruses are not that unusual; the difficulty with the "it happened naturally" idea here is that we have 4 (FOUR) recombinant components, not two. And none of the components has been seen, so far as is so far known, been seen in combination with any of the other components.

So we have at a minimum three novel recombinations if viruses, one avian, one human, and two swine, suddenly appearing in a new virus, and suddenly spreading very rapidly. No precursors. No animal infections known. None of the four ever seen in combination with any of he other three before.

Sorry - we cannot say that this "looks" natural, or that it reflects "antigenic shift". It just aint so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC