You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #898: I should add that your accusations of lying ring untrue [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #895
898. I should add that your accusations of lying ring untrue
HamdenRice
Wed Apr-08-09 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #235
237. So would you agree that the phrase 'I support "Civil Broom Jumpin' for non-whites!"'is outrageously offensive?

dsc
Wed Apr-08-09 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #237
238. Yes I would and I sure as Hell didn't post anywhere near it nor did I see it. You are lying through your teeth when you say I did.

HamdenRice
Wed Apr-08-09 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #238
244. Thank you !!! nt

In other words, you seem to use the term, "You are lying through your teeth" for "I don't understand or know about what happened."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -A few people have expressed confusion about what is permitted here now that Obama is president. Skinner  Apr-24-09 08:34 AM   #0 
  - The petulance comes from both directions. nt  Captain Hilts   Apr-24-09 08:36 AM   #1 
  - Yes, it does.  Skinner   Apr-24-09 08:43 AM   #10 
     - Very much so. Thanks for your help and for DU.  Captain Hilts   Apr-24-09 09:07 AM   #32 
  - Well said  frogcycle   Apr-24-09 08:38 AM   #2 
  - I used to think that.  Skinner   Apr-24-09 08:39 AM   #3 
  - You can beat opinionated adults to a pulp.  graywarrior   Apr-24-09 08:42 AM   #7 
  - THat's correct, but  hootinholler   Apr-24-09 09:36 AM   #73 
  - To keep their diapers on  graywarrior   Apr-24-09 11:49 AM   #239 
     - Well the damned package said 25-35 pounds!  hootinholler   Apr-24-09 12:40 PM   #302 
        - Yabut, 5 lbs of what?  graywarrior   Apr-24-09 03:23 PM   #493 
  - Skinner, is there a DU policy regarding  shireen   Apr-24-09 11:36 PM   #670 
  - LOL!  JohnnyLib2   Apr-24-09 08:47 AM   #15 
  - Thank you Skinner. I just want to say that the last week or so  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 09:09 AM   #37 
  - I think you noticed and improvement because:  Marrah_G   Apr-24-09 09:40 AM   #84 
  - Mission accomplished.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 09:41 AM   #86 
  - I don't know about that. I just know that when I go to the Greatest page  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 09:59 AM   #105 
  - That's exactly correct. DU had become worse than Fox for a bit  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 10:09 AM   #112 
  - And the reverse also happened -- people being browbeaten  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 11:07 AM   # 
  - Sorry that's just not true  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 11:26 AM   #207 
  - I'll PM you a link from last night. n/t  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 11:29 AM   #210 
  - Check your mailbox. There certainly has been pressure here  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 11:47 AM   #233 
  - The post that people trashed was a blatant lie-attributing Bush policies to Obama  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 11:49 AM   #240 
     - The OP used THE TITLE OF THE ARTICLE.  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 11:54 AM   #245 
     - This is not name calling  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 12:00 PM   #256 
     - That is the TITLE of the article. And unless you have two broken arms  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 12:06 PM   #263 
     - Send me the link you are talking about.  Catherine Vincent   Apr-24-09 02:51 PM   #451 
     - It seems people are talking past each other.  redqueen   Apr-24-09 12:23 PM   #287 
     - The discussion didn't even mention Obama -- except for two posters  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 12:51 PM   #314 
     - What "thought crimes" and who is "our" in "our thought crimes"?  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 12:57 PM   #318 
     - I was referring to the posters who were having a discussion  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 01:00 PM   #320 
     - I wholeheartedly agree with that.  redqueen   Apr-24-09 01:13 PM   #341 
     - If nothing else, it slows down the reactions. And most people do better  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 01:15 PM   #345 
     - You were the first person in that thread to mention Obama  muriel_volestrangler   Apr-24-09 02:05 PM   #395 
        - Nope. Try again.  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 02:12 PM   #403 
           - You *were* the first to talk about Obama in the thread  muriel_volestrangler   Apr-24-09 02:54 PM   #458 
              - I was in no way critical of the *date* being brought up.  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 03:06 PM   # 
                 - You objected twice to the date being brought up  muriel_volestrangler   Apr-24-09 03:58 PM   #530 
                    - Nope. Wllful msreading. The discussion was focused elsewhere  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 04:53 PM   #570 
                       - "Willful misreading"  omega minimo   Apr-24-09 11:16 PM   #665 
                       - When forums attack!  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 11:23 PM   #667 
                       - Flying Spaghetti Squash Monster?  omega minimo   Apr-24-09 11:29 PM   #668 
     - I share your impression, though I don't know what specific story is being referenced either. nt  MADem   Apr-24-09 04:34 PM   #561 
     - "shouting down"  Two Americas   Apr-24-09 01:17 PM   #348 
        - I've been reading this person's stuff and all I can say is wow.  Political Heretic   Apr-25-09 12:51 AM   #678 
  - Yes, it is true. nt  Hissyspit   Apr-24-09 12:18 PM   #281 
  - you are leaving something important out  Two Americas   Apr-24-09 01:15 PM   #343 
  - Most people can tell the difference between rational discourse and slander  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 01:52 PM   #383 
     - Curious: why do you need to shout?  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 02:24 PM   #420 
     - You are misunderstanding the definition in the context of a political forum  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 02:28 PM   #427 
        - I don't think I'm misunderstanding at all.  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 02:44 PM   #444 
        - that is misleading  Two Americas   Apr-24-09 02:50 PM   #450 
        - ...and you never once specifically stated that it was you "shouting down" anybody  HughMoran   Apr-24-09 05:16 PM   #585 
           - wrong spot  Two Americas   Apr-25-09 04:38 PM   #799 
     - I'm the person who posted the story. I used the title of the story as given.  Hannah Bell   Apr-24-09 02:25 PM   #424 
     - And I'm glad you did because the ensuing discussion here  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 02:32 PM   #431 
     - that is right  Two Americas   Apr-24-09 03:03 PM   #476 
     - You seem to be generating fantasies at this point  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 03:42 PM   #518 
        - ok  Two Americas   Apr-24-09 04:03 PM   #534 
           - Why, so you can complain?  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 04:07 PM   #538 
              - I don't care  Two Americas   Apr-24-09 04:21 PM   #547 
                 - This is why I defend the right to distinguish rational vs. irrational discourse  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 04:47 PM   #566 
                    - as I said, I have to guess  Two Americas   Apr-24-09 06:25 PM   #619 
                    - Define "irrationality" without making it a tautology and define "general silliness"  Political Heretic   Apr-25-09 12:56 AM   #680 
                    - Falsehoods, Irrationality, or General Silliness As Defined By You?  NashVegas   Apr-25-09 06:41 AM   #712 
     - You've not posted any substantive examples of "slander" yet.  Political Heretic   Apr-25-09 12:53 AM   #679 
  - Agreed  SlingBlade   Apr-24-09 01:21 PM   #355 
  - Fine. Since you're agreeing that what I posted was untrue  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 01:33 PM   #366 
     - See post # 610 I thought it was obvious  SlingBlade   Apr-25-09 03:09 AM   #701 
        - Nope. Mr. Moran is wrong and it's not obvious in any way.  EFerrari   Apr-25-09 03:11 PM   #783 
           - Excuse me for interrupting your rant, But .....  SlingBlade   Apr-26-09 11:23 AM   #870 
              - It's "ma'am" thanks, and charging me with emotionalism isn't  EFerrari   Apr-26-09 06:53 PM   #934 
                 - Oh "ma'am," that explains the emotionalism..........just like sir explains  omega minimo   Apr-26-09 07:40 PM   #951 
  - We have 2 DU's. "General" and "Presidential" That should tell you there is a problem.  McCamy Taylor   Apr-24-09 05:13 PM   #582 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-24-09 05:23 PM   #590 
  - Agree completely  HughMoran   Apr-24-09 05:56 PM   #610 
  - You're absolutely correct.  pecwae   Apr-25-09 05:56 AM   #709 
  - provocative and inflammatory  Two Americas   Apr-24-09 01:04 PM   #329 
  - I was thinking of suggesting a GD:Social Justice/Human Rights forum.  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 01:12 PM   #339 
  - not bad  Two Americas   Apr-24-09 03:17 PM   #486 
     - This board is for supporters of the Democratic Party and Democrats.  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 03:32 PM   #504 
  - You sum up the problem very well.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 01:22 PM   #358 
  - What nonsense  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 01:31 PM   #365 
  - Insults like "What nonsense", a subject line which doesn't describe  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 01:35 PM   #367 
  - "provocative and inflammatory" does? nt  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 01:38 PM   #370 
  - I see you've declined to address the "critical analysis" in the body of the post.  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 02:01 PM   #389 
  - New rules for me: If the subject line is abusive, I don't read further.  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 02:22 PM   #416 
     - If you think 'nonsense' is abusive, you'll get very little discussion anywhere  muriel_volestrangler   Apr-24-09 03:02 PM   #475 
        - I think I know exactly how much civility to expect from you, HamdenRice. n/t  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 03:12 PM   #483 
        - You'd better read who posts are by, as well as the title (nt)  muriel_volestrangler   Apr-24-09 03:38 PM   #515 
           - You know, you're right. And Edit #2  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 03:41 PM   #517 
              - Go ahead. Plase do explain  muriel_volestrangler   Apr-24-09 04:01 PM   #531 
                 - Thank you for yet another illustration of incivility at DU. n/t  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 04:56 PM   #572 
                    - There's several subthreads here with Ignored being quite active  omega minimo   Apr-24-09 06:32 PM   #621 
        - It's Insulting  NashVegas   Apr-24-09 05:38 PM   #601 
           - NONSENSE refers to the argument, not the PERSON. It's not insulting.  MADem   Apr-24-09 06:54 PM   #628 
              - Yeah, The Funny Thing Is  NashVegas   Apr-25-09 06:52 AM   #713 
              - Well, there's levels of "nonsense" too. "True nonsense" is  MADem   Apr-25-09 09:41 AM   #744 
              - depends  Two Americas   Apr-25-09 04:13 PM   #797 
                 - That's still talking about "the posts," though--not the person.  MADem   Apr-25-09 08:13 PM   #814 
  - "Nonsense" is perfectly fine.  woo me with science   Apr-25-09 08:26 AM   #730 
  - Nor does "ridiculous".  urgk   Apr-26-09 06:29 AM   #841 
  - I stand by my post  Two Americas   Apr-24-09 03:09 PM   #481 
  - Will you address epistemology?  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 03:44 PM   # 
     - of course  Two Americas   Apr-24-09 04:46 PM   #565 
     - Your example #2 is an extreme corner case not representative if 99.9% of discussion here.  Political Heretic   Apr-25-09 01:04 AM   #681 
  - Red-Baiting  Vanje   Apr-24-09 03:29 PM   #503 
  - And a double "what nonsense" on you, Hamden.  LooseWilly   Apr-25-09 01:32 AM   #690 
  - excellent post.. n/t  habitual   Apr-25-09 05:11 AM   #704 
  - According to EarlG-->  HamdenRice   Apr-25-09 05:38 AM   #705 
     - argumentum ad verecundiam  Starry Messenger   Apr-25-09 11:04 AM   #747 
     - I'm not entirely sure that's quite the case.  MADem   Apr-25-09 07:53 PM   #810 
        - I was replying to Hamden.  Starry Messenger   Apr-25-09 08:13 PM   #813 
           - I realize that. I was noting that your argument --using the term, for which I provided  MADem   Apr-25-09 08:19 PM   #815 
              - Yes.  Starry Messenger   Apr-25-09 08:33 PM   #819 
                 - Certainly not absolute, but surely somewhat compelling?  MADem   Apr-25-09 08:45 PM   #822 
                    - Is this the world?  Starry Messenger   Apr-25-09 08:56 PM   #825 
                       - I think you're correct on all counts!  MADem   Apr-25-09 09:00 PM   #827 
     - Survey says...  LooseWilly   Apr-25-09 02:19 PM   #769 
  - There's nothing wrong with 'harsh'  pecwae   Apr-25-09 06:05 AM   #710 
     - Of course not....but when it "echoes the tone and substance of our opponent's arguments" then we've  MADem   Apr-25-09 08:06 PM   #811 
  - well said  Snazzy   Apr-24-09 02:39 PM   #440 
  - Yeah it's the far left that gets all the criticism here, right?  dmallind   Apr-25-09 08:11 AM   #726 
  - "There are places for them to post, like maybe some socialist workers pary website."  destes   Apr-24-09 04:26 PM   #552 
  - welcome to DU  Two Americas   Apr-24-09 04:50 PM   #569 
     - That's not a complicated question to answer, TA  Political Heretic   Apr-25-09 01:07 AM   #682 
     - Weird  Vanje   Apr-25-09 08:58 AM   #737 
  - Skinner seems to disagree with you . . .  defendandprotect   Apr-24-09 08:11 PM   #646 
  - NJMaverick- this reply is a perfect example of a violation of what skinner just posted.  bluedawg12   Apr-24-09 02:03 PM   #392 
     - Your whole point is predicated on the issue that there hasn't been anything wrong with DU  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 02:37 PM   #436 
     - Another violation of what Skinner just posted.  bluedawg12   Apr-24-09 02:51 PM   #452 
     - Was EarlG also violating the policy?  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 02:52 PM   #454 
        - "I was just as sick of looking at that crap."- NJM  bluedawg12   Apr-24-09 02:57 PM   #466 
           - Yet I made it clear that the crap is gone, that things have greatly improved  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 03:01 PM   #473 
              - What "crap" was here and what "crap" was gone and how is that civil dialogue?  bluedawg12   Apr-24-09 03:06 PM   #480 
                 - "crap" is the term EarlG used, I am quoting him  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 03:09 PM   #482 
                    - That's the term you used. Stand up for what you say, don't hide behind others.  bluedawg12   Apr-24-09 03:36 PM   #511 
                       - Yet you are willfully ignoring that I was referring to EarlG who talked about "crap"  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 04:05 PM   #535 
                          - "Willfully ignoring?" Those are your words NJmaverick.  bluedawg12   Apr-24-09 05:16 PM   #584 
                             - Using that logic, they are now your words  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 05:23 PM   # 
                                - That really wasn't an example of logic, it was fanciful. n/t  bluedawg12   Apr-24-09 05:55 PM   #609 
                                   - As is your suggestiong that EarlG's "crap" was my word  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 06:04 PM   #615 
                                   - Look up at your own post: "Yet I made it clear that the crap is gone"  bluedawg12   Apr-24-09 07:03 PM   #630 
     - And yours is predicated on the idea that "whats wrong with DU"  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 02:55 PM   #463 
     - in terms of civility and treating others with respect and avoiding labeling others  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 02:58 PM   #469 
        - That seems right to me for this reason.  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 03:16 PM   #485 
           - there was a post today that got locked down (thankfully)  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 03:26 PM   #498 
              - It sounds like your problem is being handled. Good. n/t  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 03:50 PM   #527 
                 - Yes it is, which is what I was saying in the first place  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 04:06 PM   #536 
     - Great quote! That's what I've been trying to say. No one wants DU to be Fox. Please give link! nt  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 04:23 PM   #550 
     - +1 infinity  waiting for hope   Apr-24-09 02:40 PM   #441 
     - Wow. +16  NashVegas   Apr-24-09 05:46 PM   #604 
     - Exactly bluedawg.  Starry Messenger   Apr-24-09 06:06 PM   #616 
     - excellent post  Two Americas   Apr-24-09 06:36 PM   #623 
     - Very well said. Thank you. n/t  lumberjack_jeff   Apr-24-09 07:20 PM   #635 
     - Well-written, timely, and dead-on accurate. Thank you for taking the time.  Political Heretic   Apr-25-09 01:10 AM   #683 
  - If they were offered a portable Italian meal on their way out, they'll be back  MADem   Apr-24-09 10:25 AM   #131 
  - No- only one did that I know of and she was here for 8 years.  Marrah_G   Apr-24-09 10:46 AM   #151 
  - The one that was banned earned it.  Renew Deal   Apr-24-09 11:05 AM   #181 
  - ?  uppityperson   Apr-24-09 11:46 AM   #232 
  - Which post are you referring to?  Midlodemocrat   Apr-24-09 11:54 AM   #247 
     - ...  DevonRex   Apr-24-09 12:27 PM   #293 
        - Oh, real nice..I wondered what the  Cha   Apr-24-09 12:43 PM   #308 
        - And neither do we.  DevonRex   Apr-24-09 12:49 PM   #312 
           - Precisely,  Cha   Apr-24-09 01:00 PM   #323 
        - Oh. My. God. That had to have been lifted from a far-right site. A well-earned pizza...  Hekate   Apr-24-09 03:25 PM   #497 
        - You KNOW that it was.  Number23   Apr-25-09 01:20 AM   #688 
        - Good gravy!!!!!  MADem   Apr-24-09 04:47 PM   #567 
        - you guys are kidding, right?  Two Americas   Apr-25-09 12:26 PM   #754 
           - You're kidding, right?  yowzayowzayowza   Apr-25-09 02:09 PM   #767 
              - didn't notice a link  Two Americas   Apr-25-09 02:33 PM   #771 
                 - You responded to a post with nothing but the link.  yowzayowzayowza   Apr-25-09 02:52 PM   #779 
                    - ignore it then  Two Americas   Apr-25-09 03:02 PM   #780 
                    - So you commented w/o even having looked at it and...  yowzayowzayowza   Apr-25-09 07:09 PM   #809 
                       - of course  Two Americas   Apr-26-09 12:23 PM   #878 
                          - No, your comment was about "something that we could not brush off and forgive"...  yowzayowzayowza   Apr-26-09 01:38 PM   #896 
                             - you know what?  Two Americas   Apr-26-09 02:27 PM   #905 
                                - Which is it?  yowzayowzayowza   Apr-26-09 04:28 PM   #917 
                    - ?  Two Americas   Apr-25-09 03:05 PM   #782 
                    - Nice  Vanje   Apr-25-09 05:04 PM   #803 
  - Why the ascribing of motive or attitude to me?  MADem   Apr-24-09 11:14 AM   #191 
     - because whether you mean it to or not that is how your post came across  Marrah_G   Apr-24-09 11:18 AM   #196 
        - "Your attitude has been made pretty clear on this thread?"  MADem   Apr-24-09 11:26 AM   #208 
           - No offense intended, but your attitude on this thread is crystal clear.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 01:42 PM   #373 
              - You are deliberately misrepresenting me for purposes that I can't fathom.  MADem   Apr-24-09 02:07 PM   #397 
              - i understood exactly the use of the capital ASS in the post  habitual   Apr-25-09 05:40 AM   #706 
  - these blanket attacks  Two Americas   Apr-24-09 01:22 PM   #357 
     - What blanket attacks? What are you talking about?  MADem   Apr-24-09 05:52 PM   #608 
        - pretty obvious  Two Americas   Apr-24-09 06:29 PM   #620 
           - Pretty obvious that you are "talking shit." Shame on you.  MADem   Apr-24-09 06:50 PM   #626 
              - lol  Two Americas   Apr-25-09 02:37 PM   #774 
  - Name names  Renew Deal   Apr-24-09 11:04 AM   #177 
  - No.  Marrah_G   Apr-24-09 11:19 AM   #198 
     - Then I don't buy it.  Renew Deal   Apr-24-09 11:30 AM   #212 
        - hundreds maybe  Two Americas   Apr-24-09 06:35 PM   #622 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-25-09 07:40 AM   #724 
        - I don't what you buy.  Marrah_G   Apr-25-09 12:44 PM   #756 
           - I think that is interesting  Two Americas   Apr-25-09 03:13 PM   #786 
              - In the Age of Social Networking, Intellectual Property and Info Wars  NashVegas   Apr-26-09 12:08 PM   #876 
  - Sorry to burst your bubble...but we lefties are still here.  earth mom   Apr-24-09 01:50 PM   #381 
  - Yup  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 02:23 PM   #418 
  - No we're not.  LooseWilly   Apr-25-09 02:00 AM   #693 
  - You misunderstood my post  Marrah_G   Apr-25-09 07:33 AM   #716 
  - And many more of us have taken to rarer visits  Creideiki   Apr-25-09 03:04 PM   #781 
  - Well that was rude. So you interrupt a potentially rational thread with red-baiting.  readmoreoften   Apr-24-09 02:13 PM   #405 
  - Like teh attacks against you almost whenever you post  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 02:24 PM   #419 
  - "red-baiting"? i think you misunderstand either the poster or the definition.  Hannah Bell   Apr-24-09 02:49 PM   #448 
  - I think that you misunderstood the poster. She was defending the lefties. She's one herself.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 02:50 PM   #449 
  - I think you completely misunderstood my post  Marrah_G   Apr-25-09 07:39 AM   #722 
     - ...and the savaging of many DUers "over there" is disgusting  HughMoran   Apr-25-09 08:09 AM   #725 
        - Fortunately no one is forcing you to go to those darn leftie sites.  Marrah_G   Apr-25-09 08:51 AM   #736 
           - That was not my point, nice evasion  HughMoran   Apr-25-09 09:03 AM   #739 
              - I would consider such a person a troll  TorchTheWitch   Apr-25-09 04:48 PM   #801 
  - Why is that a good thing?  caseycoon   Apr-24-09 04:20 PM   #546 
  - It's not a good thing.  Marrah_G   Apr-25-09 07:34 AM   #717 
  - How is that  Orwellian_Ghost   Apr-24-09 08:18 PM   #648 
  - It's not an improvement  Marrah_G   Apr-25-09 07:35 AM   #718 
  - What is a lefty?  NoSheep   Apr-25-09 01:45 AM   #691 
     - Wikiepedia is your friend.  Marrah_G   Apr-25-09 07:35 AM   #719 
        - Clearly, I should have asked: What is YOUR definition of a lefty. But I thought that would  NoSheep   Apr-25-09 12:25 PM   #753 
           - I do that way to often!  Marrah_G   Apr-25-09 12:31 PM   #755 
  - why re-open the wounds?  Two Americas   Apr-24-09 12:49 PM   #311 
  - How is noting an improvement of DU "opening old wounds" or "malicious"?  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 01:25 PM   #360 
     - What mind equates policy debate with de facto Dem bashing?  bluedawg12   Apr-24-09 02:17 PM   #409 
     - It wouldn't but I think you have to admit there has been both "policy debate"  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 04:08 PM   #539 
        - I think this post helps set the rules of conduct.  bluedawg12   Apr-24-09 05:04 PM   #578 
        - Are you sure that Obama hasn't just come around on a couple of topics?  LooseWilly   Apr-25-09 02:30 AM   #695 
     - here  Two Americas   Apr-24-09 06:42 PM   #625 
  - Yes, A very perceptual change and for the better  SlingBlade   Apr-24-09 01:18 PM   #350 
  - You're not kiddding...  Carni   Apr-24-09 09:16 AM   #42 
  - You haven't met the right opinionated adults  DFW   Apr-24-09 09:40 AM   #83 
  - Thanks, Skinner. Can we have threads about chicken in the Lounge again?  flvegan   Apr-24-09 11:16 AM   #194 
  - Hah. Wait until they're teenagers.  Midlodemocrat   Apr-24-09 11:23 AM   #204 
  - Just breast feed them in the Olive Garden..........oh wait, wrong room  BR_Parkway   Apr-24-09 03:04 PM   #477 
  - Is more like trying to herd cats...  niceypoo   Apr-24-09 09:18 PM   #654 
     - wow that's a long subthread Ignored started..............  omega minimo   Apr-24-09 09:51 PM   #656 
  - That's a very long subthread that began:  omega minimo   Apr-25-09 11:30 PM   #832 
  - Sounds good. Thanks for posting.  tekisui   Apr-24-09 08:40 AM   #4 
  - That's perfect. Thanks, Skinner.  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 08:41 AM   #5 
  - :thumbsup:  mainegreen   Apr-24-09 08:41 AM   #6 
  - kicked and recommended  ixion   Apr-24-09 08:42 AM   #8 
  - Thank you for the clarity  stillcool   Apr-24-09 08:43 AM   #9 
  - Thanks Skinner...  kentuck   Apr-24-09 08:44 AM   #11 
  - W is the worst ex President ever...nt  LeftHander   Apr-24-09 08:45 AM   #12 
  - He suffers even more when compared to Carter and Clinton  DFW   Apr-24-09 09:45 AM   #91 
  - Don't count on it...  Baby Snooks   Apr-24-09 11:54 AM   #246 
     - There seem to be hints that he's considering taking a moment to "smell the torture"... before  LooseWilly   Apr-25-09 03:04 AM   #700 
     - Don't hold your breath on his canonization  DFW   Apr-25-09 03:11 AM   #702 
  - not for the wealthy  Two Americas   Apr-25-09 03:15 PM   #787 
  - Thanks. The underlined "very important" sentence  JohnnyLib2   Apr-24-09 08:46 AM   #13 
  - My president, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right.  TacticalPeek   Apr-24-09 08:46 AM   #14 
  - Does this mean that DU will enforce violations of the name-calling rule?  yardwork   Apr-24-09 08:47 AM   #16 
  - Yup. See post 13.  JohnnyLib2   Apr-24-09 08:51 AM   #18 
  - That doesn't address Yardwork's answer  HarukaTheTrophyWife   Apr-24-09 08:58 AM   #24 
     - Mods -- this is Lostinva above, not Haruka  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 09:01 AM   #26 
  - Yes, we -- the moderators and administrators -- are going to do what we can.  Skinner   Apr-24-09 09:07 AM   #35 
  - Well, Skinner, I could post dozens of examples that show otherwise.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 09:14 AM   #40 
  - +1 -- you posted this as I was writing my response  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 09:18 AM   #44 
  - I am well aware that many respectful posts are greeted with rude an obnoxious responses.  Skinner   Apr-24-09 09:30 AM   #63 
  - Oh, no! No THAT!  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 09:34 AM   # 
  - Well Skinner, I think that I was known as a very polite and productive member of DU  yardwork   Apr-24-09 09:38 AM   #75 
  - Is the use of poutrage and pony against the rules?  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 09:38 AM   #76 
     - That would seem to fall in the same category as eyerolling smiley  uppityperson   Apr-24-09 11:48 AM   #236 
        - They are perceived very differently.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 12:30 PM   #295 
           - Reading the rest of this thread, I see that that has been an issue and I was wrong  uppityperson   Apr-24-09 01:48 PM   #379 
              - Thank you. I really appreciate this post.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 01:58 PM   #387 
                 - I didn't realize some of the implications, either, until now. You always  DevonRex   Apr-24-09 02:37 PM   #438 
                    - Thank you again! It's been awful for gay DUers around here for more than a year.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 02:48 PM   #445 
  - I wish this would have been posted before leftchick was banned.  Political Heretic   Apr-24-09 09:31 AM   #66 
  - +1  shadowknows69   Apr-24-09 11:02 AM   #175 
  - not leftchick!  Fireweed247   Apr-24-09 12:23 PM   #289 
  - I don't believe she wants to return.  Marrah_G   Apr-25-09 08:13 AM   #728 
  - I agree  leftstreet   Apr-24-09 01:08 PM   #332 
  - "I guess you just don't want to see what's happening."  intheflow   Apr-24-09 01:55 PM   #386 
     - I've been a mod so I know how it works. I've alerted and written to the mods many times.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 02:04 PM   #393 
        - If you were a mod,  intheflow   Apr-24-09 04:31 PM   #556 
           - Consensus Is a Funny Thing  NashVegas   Apr-24-09 05:57 PM   #611 
           - This is true.  intheflow   Apr-26-09 12:40 PM   #882 
           - I've seen it, both  pecwae   Apr-25-09 06:20 AM   #711 
  - I respectfully disagree -- certain issues are "poutrage" hot buttons  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 09:17 AM   #43 
  - I was called a teabagger the other day.  tekisui   Apr-24-09 09:21 AM   #49 
     - I saw that  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 09:23 AM   #51 
     - I stood up for you and objected on your behalf.  Phoebe Loosinhouse   Apr-24-09 09:28 AM   #61 
        - It's pervasive, all over DU. It leads to anger.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 09:29 AM   #62 
        - Yeah  Vanje   Apr-24-09 09:45 AM   #93 
        - Well, thank you.  tekisui   Apr-24-09 09:47 AM   #95 
           - My pleasure. I had a couple speak up for me when I had an insulting poster  Phoebe Loosinhouse   Apr-24-09 10:10 AM   #115 
  - Note that there is an example of what I'm talking about right here in this thread.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 09:19 AM   #46 
  - I was appalled when I read that a few minutes ago -- what a "fuck you" to Skinner and us  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 09:24 AM   #54 
  - That isn't my experience  Orwellian_Ghost   Apr-24-09 09:32 AM   #68 
  - About Iraq  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 09:45 AM   #90 
  - That's it--exactly. nt  MADem   Apr-24-09 10:30 AM   # 
  - Ding!  RoyGBiv   Apr-24-09 11:40 AM   #222 
  - why?  Two Americas   Apr-25-09 01:31 PM   #759 
  - What Hamden said, and also  Qutzupalotl   Apr-24-09 10:55 AM   #162 
  - Unfortunately that doesn't happen lately.  Marrah_G   Apr-24-09 10:58 AM   #171 
  - Established De/liberal posters shouldn't have to do that  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 11:05 AM   #180 
  - Nobody has to do that.  Qutzupalotl   Apr-24-09 11:29 AM   #211 
  - No, established shouldn't have to do that for "respectful discussion"  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 11:35 AM   #218 
  - Nevertheless, here we are.  Qutzupalotl   Apr-24-09 12:03 PM   #259 
  - Why should being 'established' give you the chance to be destructive?  muriel_volestrangler   Apr-24-09 12:16 PM   #279 
  - It shouldn't. Even a long-time DUer shouldn't be allowed to call people "a disease."  yardwork   Apr-24-09 01:12 PM   #340 
  - That's my question as well  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 01:20 PM   #354 
  - I've noticed that problem, too.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 01:43 PM   #375 
  - that cat is chasing its own tail  Two Americas   Apr-24-09 03:44 PM   #522 
  - Let's recap what was said in this sub-thread:  muriel_volestrangler   Apr-24-09 04:33 PM   #560 
     - misrepresentation  Two Americas   Apr-25-09 12:13 PM   #752 
     - What a crock. In this case, MV, actions speak louder than words  omega minimo   Apr-25-09 11:03 PM   #830 
  - Some Democrats Are Destructive When It Comes to Progressive Values  NashVegas   Apr-25-09 04:44 PM   #800 
  - Established posters have more privileges WRT civility?  HughMoran   Apr-24-09 06:54 PM   #627 
  - no  Two Americas   Apr-25-09 03:19 PM   #788 
  - Newer posters often  Grateful for Hope   Apr-26-09 12:00 AM   #836 
  - There's a Search Function  NashVegas   Apr-25-09 04:34 PM   #798 
  - I think this response shows part of the problem at DU  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 01:18 PM   #351 
  - Except I didn't say that at all, which you know  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 01:58 PM   #388 
  - I doubled checked and that suggestion of saying you are a "dem/liberal" was never made  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 02:16 PM   #407 
  - And the poster/s need to understand it begins with themselves and doesn't have to be earned.  omega minimo   Apr-25-09 11:40 PM   #834 
  - the post you replied to, for those reading this very long, constructive discussion:  omega minimo   Apr-25-09 11:37 PM   #833 
  - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Apr-24-09 02:11 PM   #401 
  - Do what? Be respectful? Be constructive? Use complete sentences? Refrain from X forum mob attacks?  omega minimo   Apr-25-09 11:28 PM   #831 
  - it makes no difference  Two Americas   Apr-25-09 02:47 PM   #776 
  - total agreement with the Ghost.  Donnachaidh   Apr-24-09 11:19 AM   #197 
  - here's the problem with your assessment:  cali   Apr-24-09 01:08 PM   #334 
  - Could you define "you people"? I need to know. I might be one of them. Then again, maybe not.  Phoebe Loosinhouse   Apr-24-09 02:38 PM   #439 
  - I'm Definitely One of "You People"  NashVegas   Apr-24-09 06:02 PM   #613 
  - "you people?"  Two Americas   Apr-25-09 04:50 PM   #802 
  - What the Ghost said/nt  readmoreoften   Apr-24-09 02:24 PM   #422 
  - I think it's quite telling that the example you provide is entirely from one side of the fence  Maven   Apr-24-09 10:52 AM   #155 
  - Well, the reason I used that particular example...  Skinner   Apr-24-09 12:00 PM   #255 
     - While you're discussing me in the third person, may I comment?  yardwork   Apr-24-09 12:50 PM   #313 
        - For the record, my reference to "side of the fence" was not a reference to your sexual orientation.  Skinner   Apr-24-09 12:55 PM   #317 
           - I think that there is no such divide - it's a myth.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 01:03 PM   #328 
              - You're okay by me. :)  DevonRex   Apr-24-09 01:09 PM   #336 
              - Thank you!  yardwork   Apr-24-09 01:14 PM   #342 
                 - And I think you're right. :)  DevonRex   Apr-24-09 01:16 PM   #346 
              - Look, when I said "Obama Critics/Obama Defenders divide" I was using rhetorical shorthand.  Skinner   Apr-24-09 01:28 PM   #363 
                 - I have never classified anybody as mindless.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 01:49 PM   #380 
                 - Just call it a hunch...  Wednesdays   Apr-24-09 02:48 PM   #446 
                 - This is the problem.  Skinner   Apr-24-09 02:58 PM   #470 
                 - Aren't personal attacks against DU rules?  yardwork   Apr-24-09 03:13 PM   #484 
                 - I think you know the answer to that.  Skinner   Apr-24-09 03:26 PM   #500 
                    - You started this thread because you perceive a problem with incivility on DU.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 03:34 PM   #508 
                       - I think you misunderstand.  Skinner   Apr-24-09 03:38 PM   #514 
                          - Thank you for that clarification. I will take you at your word.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 03:39 PM   #516 
                 - So poutrage and Pony AREN'T against the rules  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 03:22 PM   #488 
                 - That is not what I said.  Skinner   Apr-24-09 03:33 PM   #507 
                    - Thank you for that clarification. I will resume alerting on them and hope that they will be deleted  yardwork   Apr-24-09 03:37 PM   #512 
                    - That is how I read what you said -- if I'm mistaken, I honestly apologize  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 03:43 PM   #521 
                 - Rachel Maddow, a gay American, used the "poutrage" word on tee vee.  MADem   Apr-24-09 04:58 PM   #574 
                 - Uses of "poutrage" in search results for the term using google.  HiFructosePronSyrup   Apr-24-09 03:26 PM   #499 
                 - I wish people would give the benefit of the doubt to those who post  pacalo   Apr-24-09 04:20 PM   #545 
                    - Very good post. I agree.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 05:18 PM   #586 
                    - Well,  pacalo   Apr-24-09 08:06 PM   #644 
                    - Well put. Some are used to a black & white world. And some are afraid to think about the big picture  omega minimo   Apr-24-09 07:39 PM   #640 
                       - Yes, I'd love to see constructive, respectful discussions & some humility shown  pacalo   Apr-24-09 08:03 PM   #643 
  - I agree, if we keep our language neutral and stay on topic it should not degenerate  bluedawg12   Apr-24-09 02:41 PM   #442 
  - BEST Damn Response in this Thread.  Number23   Apr-25-09 01:18 AM   #686 
     - Except People Who Defend Obama Aren't the Issue  NashVegas   Apr-26-09 08:34 AM   #859 
  - Still didn't get that pony?  No More Bushbots   Apr-24-09 09:16 AM   #41 
     - " Still didn't get that pony?" -- thanks for proving Yardwork's point  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 09:20 AM   #47 
     - They post with impunity because there are no consequences.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 09:20 AM   #48 
        - Enjoy  NashVegas   Apr-25-09 07:11 AM   #715 
     - That's helpful.  tekisui   Apr-24-09 09:22 AM   #50 
     - If that post is moderated, it will be the very first time.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 09:25 AM   #57 
        - ergo my "certain hot-button issues"  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 09:26 AM   # 
        - Not true...poutrage is used against anyone with phony outrage  Uzybone   Apr-24-09 10:23 AM   #128 
        - Wrong -- it is mainly used against liberal/Dem DUers  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 10:30 AM   #137 
        - +1  Midlodemocrat   Apr-24-09 11:49 AM   #238 
        - I agree, but I'm also troubled that Obama supporters are called variations of the Hallelujah Chorus  CreekDog   Apr-24-09 12:15 PM   #278 
        - Exactly. It has a meaning other than what some are trying to ascribe to it  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 10:36 AM   #142 
        - Why do you believe gay rights to be a source of "phony outrage"?  ZombieHorde   Apr-24-09 02:57 PM   #465 
        - Strawman. No one ever said that. Try again. nt  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 04:22 PM   #548 
           - Poutrage came to DU in the wake of a certian bigot being given a prestigious stage.  ZombieHorde   Apr-24-09 04:57 PM   #573 
        - ...yes, indeed  Vanje   Apr-24-09 04:15 PM   #541 
        - It is a gay bashing term, used against gay DUers. There are no Republican DUers  Lilith Velkor   Apr-24-09 10:40 AM   #145 
        - Thnak you  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 10:58 AM   #168 
        - Rachel Maddow used "Poutrage" on her show last night  WonderGrunion   Apr-24-09 01:02 PM   #326 
        - Did she? Very interesting  Uzybone   Apr-24-09 01:19 PM   #352 
        - context  Two Americas   Apr-25-09 02:36 PM   #772 
        - On DU, it's usually a gay-bashing term.  Lilith Velkor   Apr-24-09 01:36 PM   #369 
        - It is also used on DU as Feminist bashing! GBLT and Feminist bashing  saracat   Apr-24-09 02:13 PM   #404 
        - That is correct. A poster in this very thread continues to accuse us of "phony outrage."  yardwork   Apr-24-09 02:19 PM   #413 
        - Because certain issues have ceased to be important and or  saracat   Apr-24-09 02:25 PM   #423 
        - so true, saracat. I'm male (gay), but I've seen feminist and GLBT bashing go hand in hand  jesus_of_suburbia   Apr-24-09 04:56 PM   #571 
        - Usually? Do you have statistics that demonstrate that?  Common Sense Party   Apr-26-09 12:17 AM   #838 
        - Why? Because you say so?  NorthernSpy   Apr-26-09 02:37 PM   #907 
        - The context at DU has been to silence LGBT members.  Duncan Grant   Apr-24-09 01:47 PM   #378 
        - The term is used on DU in a very specific way to bully gay DUers.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 01:53 PM   #384 
        - I've also seen (and experienced) it used to shout down people complaining about racism  fishwax   Apr-24-09 07:31 PM   #638 
           - Exactly. n/t  QC   Apr-24-09 08:47 PM   #651 
        - Well, look at that. Two perfect examples have arrived.  Maven   Apr-24-09 11:12 AM   #189 
        - Your reply shows why changing the tone here will be hard  Uzybone   Apr-24-09 11:36 AM   #219 
           - On the contrary, your post in defense of the term "poutrage" as a weapon  Maven   Apr-24-09 11:41 AM   #228 
           - Two DU members who don't meet some undefined standard, perhaps?  MADem   Apr-24-09 11:47 AM   #235 
              - No, two examples who consistently use anti-social tactics to silence those with whom they disagree.  Maven   Apr-24-09 11:51 AM   #243 
                 - How does disagreeing with someone amount to silencing them  Uzybone   Apr-24-09 11:55 AM   #248 
                 - Do you continue to believe it is acceptable to belittle those with criticisms  Maven   Apr-24-09 11:56 AM   #252 
                    - I do not think people who use Poutrage are doing it to attack homosexuality  Uzybone   Apr-24-09 12:07 PM   #266 
                    - Of course, it's  Cha   Apr-24-09 12:55 PM   #316 
                    - The term originated, and was popularized here, by a group (yourself included)  Maven   Apr-24-09 01:25 PM   #361 
                    - As a gay person, I recognize when I'm being insulted for being gay.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 02:01 PM   #391 
                    - Speaking as objectively as I can, I think you're seeing things that aren't there  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 02:15 PM   #406 
                       - Yes, your behavior in that thread is a fine example of civility.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 02:24 PM   #421 
                       - And what were the topics. I notice you didn't address that at all. nt  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 02:26 PM   #425 
                          - What were the topics? You linked to a locked thread full of incivility  yardwork   Apr-24-09 02:27 PM   #426 
                             - It was a poutrage thread. The topics were: CIA prisons, economics, slashing military spending  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 02:30 PM   #429 
                                - Nobody disagrees that words have different meanings in different contexts.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 02:31 PM   #430 
                                - So you now agree, poutrage was not a term ...  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 02:34 PM   #434 
                                - that was not the claim  Two Americas   Apr-25-09 03:39 PM   #791 
                       - While you may be speaking as objectively "as you can" your constant disdain for LGBT issues  readmoreoften   Apr-24-09 02:54 PM   #460 
                    - Adjective parade  Bluenorthwest   Apr-24-09 02:04 PM   #394 
                    - Someone had better alert Rachel Maddow NOW!!!!  MADem   Apr-24-09 02:10 PM   #400 
                    - A sincere thanks for posting this -- you've proved our point!  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 02:28 PM   #428 
                    - First I've ever heard of this accusation  HughMoran   Apr-24-09 06:07 PM   #617 
                       - One Must Look At the Usage  NashVegas   Apr-25-09 07:37 AM   #721 
                    - The only context that I've seen the word has to do with people who  MADem   Apr-24-09 12:22 PM   #286 
                 - I find it best to come right out and say what I mean.  MADem   Apr-24-09 12:13 PM   #274 
        - The vast majority of times I have seen the word "poutrage" used was to belittle  ZombieHorde   Apr-24-09 02:54 PM   #461 
           - That's certainly how the term was first used on DU. It appears to be crossing over now  yardwork   Apr-24-09 03:48 PM   #525 
           - Originally It Was Used to Belittle Clinton Supporters  NashVegas   Apr-25-09 07:40 AM   #723 
        - The pizza was delivered and the soil fertilized.  TahitiNut   Apr-24-09 10:33 AM   #140 
        - Nothing gets "moderated" until someone hits alert, for the most part.  MADem   Apr-24-09 10:39 AM   #144 
        - I was a mod for two terms, so I know how it works.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 10:45 AM   #150 
           - Can you see how you might be misinterpreting events?  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 10:51 AM   #154 
           - Thank You, Sir  The Magistrate   Apr-24-09 01:55 PM   #385 
              - Then perhaps the phrase should be reserved for those who are truly right-wing.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 02:06 PM   #396 
                 - That Is Certainly My Practice, Ma'am  The Magistrate   Apr-24-09 02:09 PM   #398 
                    - I don't think that you've ever used the term to bully DUers, but others do.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 02:17 PM   #411 
                    - I guess it is an eye of the beholder thing  foo_bar   Apr-24-09 05:08 PM   #580 
                       - Yes, context is very important. I don't think that you spend a lot of time in the GLBT forum.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 05:21 PM   #589 
                          - I've seen a good mix of baiting and schadenfreude  foo_bar   Apr-24-09 06:09 PM   #618 
                    - You Sir, have not repeatedly used it to belittle the GBLT community here  Marrah_G   Apr-25-09 08:12 AM   #727 
                    - Links?  HamdenRice   Apr-25-09 09:02 AM   #738 
                       - Nice try- but no.  Marrah_G   Apr-25-09 09:16 AM   #742 
                          - If you look upthread, that post was about CIA prisons, economics, impeachment  HamdenRice   Apr-25-09 09:32 AM   #743 
                    - Notes on 'poutrage' given here due to tone of respect  Bluenorthwest   Apr-25-09 09:07 AM   #740 
           - Now, see, there ya go.  MADem   Apr-24-09 10:54 AM   #161 
              - You didn't see something because there was nothing to see  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 10:57 AM   #165 
              - Hmmm.  MADem   Apr-24-09 11:04 AM   #179 
              - You sound excited and confrontational.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 10:57 AM   #166 
              - Because I pointed out that you didn't even bother to read what I wrote? nt  MADem   Apr-24-09 11:15 AM   #192 
                 - No, it was your use of the words fuck, ass, all-caps, and !!!!!  yardwork   Apr-24-09 12:35 PM   #298 
                    - Well, that's inaccurate, too.  MADem   Apr-24-09 01:00 PM   #321 
                       - You sound accusatory and defensive. Also, you claim to know what I read and didn't read.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 01:05 PM   #331 
                       - Well, they're not. But you have a nice day anyway. nt  MADem   Apr-24-09 01:17 PM   #349 
                       - "you're going out of your way to be deliberately hypersensitive"  HughMoran   Apr-24-09 07:04 PM   #631 
              - I know you've never seen it, but perhaps you will notice it now  Marrah_G   Apr-24-09 10:58 AM   #167 
                 - I'll be on the lookout now, certainly. If you'd like,  MADem   Apr-24-09 11:17 AM   #195 
        - I think that's because mocking and abrasiveness is still allowed  CreekDog   Apr-24-09 12:10 PM   #271 
        - Not to mention the fact that LGBT DUers have been targeted as racists.  Duncan Grant   Apr-24-09 12:21 PM   #285 
        - Yes, and it is often used against anyone who has a criticism  tnlefty   Apr-24-09 07:07 PM   #632 
        - " "poutrage"... is used almost entirely against gay DUers and their supporters."...  BlooInBloo   Apr-25-09 02:21 PM   #770 
        - Wrong. Dead wrong. I've seen it used countless times on DU  Common Sense Party   Apr-26-09 12:14 AM   #837 
     - This person has been banned. (nt)  Skinner   Apr-24-09 09:34 AM   #70 
     - Good, he has been insulting people on here left and right all week  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 09:39 AM   #78 
     - Shoot, I always miss the good stuff.  Pacifist Patriot   Apr-24-09 02:20 PM   #414 
        - He said Unitarians who live in Florida are Freepers  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 02:32 PM   #432 
           - Pphhhfffttt!!!! Cute, very cute.  Pacifist Patriot   Apr-24-09 02:34 PM   #433 
              - God made me do it  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 02:37 PM   #437 
                 - Got back Sunday night....make that Monday morning.  Pacifist Patriot   Apr-24-09 04:32 PM   #558 
     - That person was mild in comparison to some others.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 09:39 AM   #80 
     - Thank You, Skinner!!!  tekisui   Apr-24-09 09:49 AM   #96 
     - Now that was a Walt-worthy tombstoning!  TK421   Apr-24-09 09:54 AM   #100 
     - Thank you. It has been a long week from that one. nt  uppityperson   Apr-24-09 11:51 AM   #242 
     - Good!  TorchTheWitch   Apr-24-09 07:08 PM   #633 
     - Heres a perfect example  Vanje   Apr-24-09 09:41 AM   #85 
     - If I were a mod, I would ban you for this post.  closeupready   Apr-24-09 09:52 AM   #99 
     - Here's your hat, what's your hurry?...nt  SidDithers   Apr-24-09 10:58 AM   #170 
     - Hire whoever delivered that pizza, will ya? n/t  Donnachaidh   Apr-24-09 11:20 AM   #199 
     - Exhibit A n/t  Raineyb   Apr-24-09 11:39 AM   #221 
  - K&R  drm604   Apr-24-09 08:50 AM   #17 
  - Thank You. Great post.  mikelgb   Apr-24-09 08:51 AM   #19 
  - Obviously timely. Bookmarked for use during emergencies.  dixiegrrrrl   Apr-24-09 08:53 AM   #20 
  - How will replies of "poutrage" or "you didn't get your pony!" be met by Mods and Admins?  HarukaTheTrophyWife   Apr-24-09 08:56 AM   #21 
  - This is Lostinva posting above  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 09:01 AM   #28 
  - Very good point.  Redbear   Apr-24-09 09:02 AM   #29 
  - I know several who no longer post, or very little because of this  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 09:10 AM   #38 
  - It's A Personal Attack, Which Clearly Violates The Rules.  MannyGoldstein   Apr-24-09 09:07 AM   #33 
  - I agree with you, but it currently appears to be hit or miss  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 09:08 AM   #36 
  - I would use it as a signal to hit the "ignore" button  CreekDog   Apr-24-09 12:27 PM   #292 
     - No, that's not fair to people who DO follow the rules  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 02:01 PM   #390 
        - hey  CreekDog   Apr-24-09 02:18 PM   #412 
  - I think it's just intellectually lazy. Sometimes it also acts like a dog whistle  Phoebe Loosinhouse   Apr-24-09 09:39 AM   #79 
     - The "pony" and "poutrage" accusations are designed to dehumanize.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 09:44 AM   #89 
        - Perhaps We Should All Be Careful To Flag All Of Those "Pony" Posts  MannyGoldstein   Apr-24-09 12:06 PM   #265 
           - I'm in  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 12:18 PM   #280 
           - I thought the "ponies" meme was designed to (gently) mock Obama supporters  foo_bar   Apr-24-09 11:59 PM   #672 
  - I consider those to be personal attacks.  Skinner   Apr-24-09 09:43 AM   #87 
     - Thank you very much for asking the moderators to delete personal attacks.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 09:45 AM   #92 
     - Thank you!  Marrah_G   Apr-24-09 10:06 AM   #108 
        - "Poutrage" is a term I will not miss  CreekDog   Apr-24-09 12:30 PM   #294 
           - But we can still use it  polmaven   Apr-24-09 01:31 PM   #364 
  - thank you! great "disambiguation"  nashville_brook   Apr-24-09 08:57 AM   #22 
  - Excellent post  malaise   Apr-24-09 08:58 AM   #23 
  - Thank you Skinner for your clarity. I have seen attacks on both sides and the worst when one  OmmmSweetOmmm   Apr-24-09 08:59 AM   #25 
  - Skinner, can you please keep this pinned?  OmmmSweetOmmm   Apr-24-09 09:01 AM   #27 
  - +1 nt  ZombieHorde   Apr-24-09 03:05 PM   #479 
  - k&r. thanks. n/t  orleans   Apr-24-09 09:03 AM   #30 
  - Thanks, Skinner! n/t  Spazito   Apr-24-09 09:06 AM   #31 
  - It has to be asked--the definition of "supporters"  MADem   Apr-24-09 09:07 AM   #34 
  - Hopefully she will resign soon. there is a fantastic progressive candidate ready to run  robinlynne   Apr-24-09 10:12 AM   #116 
  - Well, I'd like to see evidence of a crime before she's convicted.  MADem   Apr-24-09 10:19 AM   #121 
     - The tapes will not be made public until after the trial which is sheduled to start in June or July.  robinlynne   Apr-24-09 10:28 AM   #133 
     - I agree.  LooseWilly   Apr-25-09 02:45 AM   #698 
  - P.S. As per Harman, public opinion was against her a long time before  robinlynne   Apr-24-09 10:36 AM   #143 
  - I still find it unseemly to convict her before her case has been heard.  MADem   Apr-24-09 10:47 AM   #152 
     - ok.  robinlynne   Apr-24-09 10:58 AM   #169 
  - I agree with you. We're better than them. Let's not convinct before  DevonRex   Apr-24-09 11:31 AM   #215 
  - How about those of us that wish him well in his Presidency, but  Creideiki   Apr-25-09 02:52 PM   #778 
     - How do you know that he is "caving in to rightwing extremists?" See, you don't know that.  MADem   Apr-25-09 08:40 PM   #821 
        - You're right. He may not be caving  Creideiki   Apr-25-09 08:58 PM   #826 
           - No, not better. Not at all. You are assuming his view without any evidence.  MADem   Apr-25-09 09:06 PM   #828 
              - Give me another option  Creideiki   Apr-26-09 01:40 AM   #840 
                 - Why do you think your Holy Trinity of choices is at all valid? There are other options.  MADem   Apr-26-09 06:45 AM   #842 
                    - Since you're talking a history lesson  Creideiki   Apr-26-09 08:16 AM   #854 
                       - No. That was KENNEDY who was pushed. And that was KENNEDY who pushed back.  MADem   Apr-26-09 08:32 AM   #858 
  - I think one very important issue is not addressed in this explanation  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 09:13 AM   #39 
  - Skinner, Hamden has a good question  Vanje   Apr-24-09 09:55 AM   #101 
  - Many have noticed that some DUers use the tactics of Glenn Beck  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 09:58 AM   #103 
  - Show me where I called Obama either of those things, to earn your  tekisui   Apr-24-09 10:15 AM   #118 
  - We're not here to drag up old particular arguments, but ...  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 10:20 AM   #123 
     - I'll let the argument sleep, as well.  tekisui   Apr-24-09 10:22 AM   #126 
     - Well, per Skinner, you can no longer call people names even in round about ways. n/t  Marrah_G   Apr-24-09 10:23 AM   #127 
  - Many on DU use the tactics of David Horowitz as well--red-baiting and so forth.  readmoreoften   Apr-24-09 03:05 PM   #478 
     - ...  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 04:01 PM   #532 
  - Excellent question  Marrah_G   Apr-24-09 10:07 AM   #109 
  - There are ways to address those factually false or non-verifiable claims...  blueraven95   Apr-24-09 10:16 AM   #120 
  - I think that's a very idealistic goal  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 10:29 AM   #135 
     - of course it's idealistic  blueraven95   Apr-24-09 10:58 AM   #172 
     - I think we also have a responsibility to the public blogosphere  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 11:24 AM   #205 
     - I disagree that we have to stoop to a lower level of standards  blueraven95   Apr-24-09 11:31 AM   #214 
        - Kurt Vonnegut has good advice that I should try to take.  Political Heretic   Apr-24-09 12:00 PM   #257 
     - I totally agree with all three of your posts.  hippywife   Apr-24-09 08:08 PM   #645 
     - Do everyone a favor  Vanje   Apr-24-09 04:32 PM   #559 
        - +5  NashVegas   Apr-25-09 07:07 AM   #714 
  - They've been shopping at the "I'll bet" club, too  MADem   Apr-24-09 10:22 AM   #125 
  - How many predictions of future Obama administration behavior turned out to be bust?  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 10:31 AM   #139 
     - I think its time you drop the name calling. Whether you think its "fair" or not.  Political Heretic   Apr-24-09 12:04 PM   #260 
        - He cant help himself  Vanje   Apr-24-09 04:36 PM   #562 
  - Good questions. Do you think it's acceptable to start "rally-the-troops" threads  Maven   Apr-24-09 11:22 AM   #202 
  - Are you saying African Americans should not cooperate to defend against attacks?  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 11:41 AM   #226 
     - I'm saying your track record doesn't entitle you to complain  Maven   Apr-24-09 11:48 AM   #237 
        - Well there you go. Difference of frame, difference of opinion  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 11:55 AM   #249 
        - You don't speak for "blacks."  Political Heretic   Apr-24-09 12:05 PM   #261 
        - Did I say I speak for "Blacks"?  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 12:10 PM   #270 
           - Did you say "we" in your post?  Political Heretic   Apr-24-09 12:15 PM   #276 
              - Oh, so I can't judge the sentiment of my community?  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 12:19 PM   #282 
              - No, you can't. Not credibly. Neither can "members" of other "groups."  Political Heretic   Apr-24-09 12:21 PM   #284 
                 - Then, as I stated above, it's incumbent upon you to make those same observations ...  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 12:24 PM   #290 
                    - It's not "incumbent" on me to do anything.  Political Heretic   Apr-24-09 12:30 PM   #296 
                       - OK. So you're admitting you treat members of different groups differently  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 12:33 PM   #297 
                          - I'm admitting that I post responses to posts I stumble across.  Political Heretic   Apr-24-09 12:41 PM   #305 
              - Oh, come on now... we all "we" to some extent.  MADem   Apr-24-09 01:16 PM   #347 
                 - You didn't get the memo. Only Blacks cannot use "we"  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 02:36 PM   #435 
                 - Or not.  Political Heretic   Apr-24-09 03:36 PM   #510 
                 - Which makes "us" all open to someone correctly pointing out overgeneralizations.  Political Heretic   Apr-24-09 03:35 PM   #509 
                    - Sure, but that's quite different from saying someone can't "we" every so often. NT  MADem   Apr-24-09 05:12 PM   #581 
        - The difference between you and me, Hamden  Maven   Apr-24-09 01:21 PM   #356 
        - Maven puts it all so well  Bluenorthwest   Apr-24-09 02:17 PM   #410 
        - We're not supposed to re-hash this but frankly your characterization is Rovian  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 02:23 PM   #417 
           - I have never seen any member of GLBT use the "N" word  Maven   Apr-24-09 02:43 PM   #443 
           - You want a link?  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 02:53 PM   #457 
              - Then one could easily describe you as Rovian.  Maven   Apr-24-09 03:22 PM   #491 
                 - Actually you can't  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 03:32 PM   #505 
                    - "You cannot point to or cite one single post by an African American DUer that is homophobic  Maven   Apr-24-09 03:37 PM   #513 
                       - Links? I've given you links. Now give us yours  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 03:46 PM   #524 
                       - While "viper pit" was dripping with contempt it's not equivalent to "nig*er".  Duncan Grant   Apr-24-09 04:31 PM   #557 
                          - "Looks like your hands are clean. You're not disruptive in the least, are you?"  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 04:49 PM   #568 
                             - "You can fool some of the people all of the time,  Duncan Grant   Apr-24-09 05:03 PM   #577 
                             - I think they have...  Vanje   Apr-24-09 10:50 PM   #663 
                             - Good God. If "viper pit" is the best that this poster can do  Number23   Apr-25-09 02:42 AM   #696 
                                - Correction: It was a label used to describe the GLBT forum and its members.  Duncan Grant   Apr-25-09 11:27 AM   #749 
                                   - Yes, it was used to describe the vehement anti-Obama rhetoric  Number23   Apr-25-09 01:02 PM   #757 
                                      - Vehement anti-Obama rhetoric? LGBT members are vipers? How very progressive.  Duncan Grant   Apr-26-09 04:44 PM   #920 
                                      - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-26-09 05:53 PM   #927 
                       - wow  ecstatic   Apr-25-09 08:43 AM   #732 
           - Just hit alert.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 02:54 PM   #459 
           - We did. Nothing happened  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 02:55 PM   #464 
              - If the post was deleted, then something happened.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 02:58 PM   #468 
                 - You're confusing two different threads  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 03:00 PM   #471 
                    - If it was locked, then "something happened."  yardwork   Apr-24-09 03:02 PM   #474 
           - Ah yes the "rovian" insult- so typical from you  Marrah_G   Apr-25-09 08:19 AM   #729 
        - The irony is you just criticized LGBT posters for being "touchy" over  readmoreoften   Apr-24-09 03:23 PM   #494 
        - .  readmoreoften   Apr-24-09 03:23 PM   #495 
        - Btw ...  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 12:40 PM   #304 
  - So very, very true. There are also links to sources that are simply opinion pieces  blondeatlast   Apr-24-09 11:38 AM   #220 
     - There's no rule against opinion pieces. And the definition of "extreme" is subjective.  Political Heretic   Apr-24-09 12:06 PM   #264 
        - True--just don't cry foul when they are called out as such. nt  blondeatlast   Apr-25-09 08:29 PM   #818 
  - K & R  Scurrilous   Apr-24-09 09:19 AM   #45 
  - Thanks for posting  Echo In Light   Apr-24-09 09:23 AM   #52 
  - Thank you  Solly Mack   Apr-24-09 09:23 AM   #53 
  - Excellent. Thank you Skinner.  chill_wind   Apr-24-09 09:24 AM   #55 
  - How about a moratorium on calling Obama 'Bush-Lite'?  tekisui   Apr-24-09 09:24 AM   #56 
  - I don't understand that...did people not live through the last 8 years?  SemiCharmedQuark   Apr-24-09 09:27 AM   #59 
  - Amen!  DFW   Apr-24-09 10:01 AM   #107 
     - Implicit (if not explicit) in many posts is the expectation that one election ...  TahitiNut   Apr-24-09 11:00 AM   #173 
        - Now that was just....GOOD!!! Round of applause! Well said! Standing ovation! nt  MADem   Apr-24-09 11:21 AM   #201 
        - Thank you.  TahitiNut   Apr-24-09 11:28 AM   #209 
        - Concur completely. nt  MADem   Apr-24-09 11:50 AM   #241 
        - 2nd that. n/t  yowzayowzayowza   Apr-24-09 03:56 PM   #529 
        - Very well said  Adelante   Apr-24-09 11:34 AM   #217 
        - So very true. I remember a time, way pre-internet, when I was that way.  blondeatlast   Apr-24-09 11:43 AM   #229 
        - +1  Sunnyshine   Apr-24-09 02:57 PM   #467 
  - Seconded! Neither of these terms can be considered constructive criticism.  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 09:30 AM   # 
  - Seconded! Neither of these terms can be considered constructive criticism.  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 09:30 AM   #65 
  - I agree that "contentless" and unverifiable claims echo the tone of  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 09:36 AM   #74 
  - I'd support that, and in return call for a moratorium on anything with "Pony" in it.  Political Heretic   Apr-24-09 09:38 AM   #77 
  - That would be sweet.  SemiCharmedQuark   Apr-24-09 09:39 AM   #82 
  - The list of seven words you can't say on DU.  lumberjack_jeff   Apr-24-09 12:02 PM   #258 
     - You know what would effectively demonstrate people's unrealistic expectations?  Political Heretic   Apr-24-09 12:09 PM   #268 
  - Thank you!  NorthernSpy   Apr-24-09 09:46 AM   #94 
  - Look, I don't want to just give people a list of things they can't say.  Skinner   Apr-24-09 09:50 AM   #97 
  - Point taken.  tekisui   Apr-24-09 09:52 AM   #98 
  - What if the problem isn't with the administration, but with us?  lumberjack_jeff   Apr-24-09 03:27 PM   #501 
  - I prefer to roll my eyes, snicker, and scroll past those! nt  blondeatlast   Apr-24-09 11:40 AM   #223 
  - Some people just like throwing rocks.  WilliamPitt   Apr-24-09 09:26 AM   #58 
  - People also attend to problems more than to positive events  EFerrari   Apr-24-09 09:32 AM   #67 
  - Thank you Skinner. I just want to say that the last week or so  NJmaverick   Apr-24-09 09:27 AM   #60 
  - Thanks, your post cleared up a lot of questions.  Dr.Phool   Apr-24-09 09:30 AM   #64 
  - Thanks, Skinner.  tandot   Apr-24-09 09:33 AM   #69 
  - I'm deeply appreciative of this statement, though its going to be a bittle pill for many to swalllow  Political Heretic   Apr-24-09 09:34 AM   #71 
  - I'd just like to see some civility enforced  Marrah_G   Apr-24-09 09:35 AM   #72 
  - +1  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 09:39 AM   #81 
  - they're notably, but not surprisingly, absent.  KG   Apr-24-09 10:07 AM   #111 
  - What is the picture in your sig line?  Marrah_G   Apr-24-09 10:20 AM   #122 
  - the fictional party featured in Pink Floyds 'The Wall'  KG   Apr-24-09 10:29 AM   #136 
     - AHhhhhhh okay  Marrah_G   Apr-24-09 10:40 AM   #147 
  - If This Thread Had Been Instead Posted In GD :P  NashVegas   Apr-26-09 02:46 PM   #909 
  - +2  paulk   Apr-24-09 10:43 AM   #148 
  - One is even spewing all over this thread today  Marrah_G   Apr-24-09 10:54 AM   #158 
     - It's getting old.  Political Heretic   Apr-24-09 12:10 PM   #269 
  - I still can't get over that. Both candidates were good. There was so much to be positive about. nt  Captain Hilts   Apr-24-09 02:16 PM   #408 
  - Amen to that  TorchTheWitch   Apr-24-09 08:12 PM   #647 
  - Okay. I'm all caught up now. Totally misunderstood your meaning before.  NoSheep   Apr-25-09 01:51 AM   #692 
     - Good !  Marrah_G   Apr-25-09 07:36 AM   #720 
  - So DU Supports Democratic *Values*, And Not Necessarily Democrats.  MannyGoldstein   Apr-24-09 09:44 AM   #88 
  - Thank you Manny. I like your interpretation!  robinlynne   Apr-24-09 10:15 AM   #119 
  - I'd like to see  Bluenorthwest   Apr-24-09 09:56 AM   #102 
  - Yes. There is a DU rule against personal attacks. It hasn't been enforced lately.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 10:00 AM   #106 
  - I think these discussions/disagreements about can be productive and helpful  Fireweed247   Apr-24-09 09:59 AM   #104 
  - Thanks  Adelante   Apr-24-09 10:07 AM   #110 
  - +1  Cha   Apr-24-09 01:08 PM   #333 
  - here, here!  tomm2thumbs   Apr-24-09 10:09 AM   #113 
  - Thanks  mmonk   Apr-24-09 10:09 AM   #114 
  - Thanks  Uzybone   Apr-24-09 10:15 AM   #117 
  - Thank you for the clarification. I did not see this posted over in GD: P.  Bunny   Apr-24-09 10:21 AM   #124 
  - "our political opponents"  Freddie Stubbs   Apr-24-09 10:23 AM   #129 
  - This isn't really on-topic for this thread.  Skinner   Apr-24-09 10:27 AM   #132 
  - What about the far right so-called Democrats such as  Kingofalldems   Apr-24-09 12:58 PM   #319 
     - Lieberman isn't a Democrat anymore. He's an Independent. nt  MADem   Apr-24-09 01:28 PM   #362 
  - Those are not our opponents. They too support Democratic values.  robinlynne   Apr-24-09 10:33 AM   #141 
  - There's not enough difference between the parties. Both are massively influenced by big money  Political Heretic   Apr-24-09 12:11 PM   #272 
     - All things are massively influenced by money  muryan   Apr-24-09 12:25 PM   #291 
        - I didn't say it was or would be.  Political Heretic   Apr-25-09 01:17 AM   #685 
  - K&R  pleah   Apr-24-09 10:23 AM   #130 
  - Thank you Skinner for not trying to put out fires with restrictive rules.  zeemike   Apr-24-09 10:28 AM   #134 
  - The president lives in a bubble  nichomachus   Apr-24-09 10:30 AM   #138 
  - It's fascinating to see the frequent posters who have no participated in this thread. You know who  Captain Hilts   Apr-24-09 10:40 AM   #146 
  - Yeah theres a whole list of regulars who were saying that I was not weclome here who have gone quiet  Political Heretic   Apr-24-09 12:12 PM   #273 
  - Thanks Skinner  BlueJac   Apr-24-09 10:44 AM   #149 
  - Well said. Thank you. n/t  FourScore   Apr-24-09 10:50 AM   #153 
  - Skinner. This may be a stupid question but I need  Fire1   Apr-24-09 10:52 AM   #156 
  - We can't post about chicken.  rug   Apr-24-09 10:53 AM   #157 
  - I think I clearly stated, NAME CALLING AND INSULTS.  Fire1   Apr-24-09 10:54 AM   #160 
  - You should have heard what they caled the cornflake partisans.  rug   Apr-24-09 10:55 AM   #163 
  - Chicken is okay. Cornflakes are not. nt  blondeatlast   Apr-24-09 11:47 AM   #234 
     - Ok, blondey, it's on!  rug   Apr-24-09 12:06 PM   #262 
  - I can't speak for the admins but...  Renew Deal   Apr-24-09 11:08 AM   #184 
     - Ok. Thanks.  Fire1   Apr-24-09 11:11 AM   #188 
  - I think this comic illustrates what is going on here at DU  Fireweed247   Apr-24-09 10:54 AM   #159 
  - Wow, late to the party. Pass the popcorn.  shadowknows69   Apr-24-09 10:55 AM   #164 
  - I still get followed around by ankle-biters from the primaries  Lilith Velkor   Apr-24-09 11:00 AM   #174 
  - Strongly agree  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 11:09 AM   #185 
  - And you know those are Dems doing that because you are on an anonymous chat site  NNN0LHI   Apr-24-09 11:16 AM   #193 
  - Well they are more popular kids on the forums.  Marrah_G   Apr-24-09 11:25 AM   #206 
  - I prefer to take people at their word, rather than give in to paranoia  Lilith Velkor   Apr-24-09 11:41 AM   #225 
     - If someone claims to be Julius Caesar you are going to believe them so you don't appear paranoid?  NNN0LHI   Apr-24-09 11:56 AM   #251 
        - Good move of the goalposts there, hon  Lilith Velkor   Apr-24-09 12:23 PM   #288 
  - Ditto  Marrah_G   Apr-24-09 11:22 AM   #203 
  - Thanks for helping to promote civility and reconciliation.  lumberjack_jeff   Apr-24-09 11:43 AM   #230 
  - You're welcome.  Lilith Velkor   Apr-24-09 01:19 PM   #353 
  - You were one of the first ones to move on after the primaries.  Forkboy   Apr-24-09 01:08 PM   #335 
  - Heh heh  Lilith Velkor   Apr-24-09 01:45 PM   #377 
  - Ankle biters! That's a good description, actually.  yardwork   Apr-25-09 12:13 AM   #673 
  - I think the name calling rule needs to be enforced better.  Renew Deal   Apr-24-09 11:02 AM   #176 
  - see the post above yours  jsamuel   Apr-24-09 11:07 AM   #183 
  - Kick for The Old Boss Man. n/t  Dr Fate   Apr-24-09 11:04 AM   #178 
  - I may have missed it if it was asked already What is your position on Dem Primary candidates in '12?  shadowknows69   Apr-24-09 11:06 AM   #182 
  - My position is this:  Skinner   Apr-24-09 11:20 AM   #200 
     - With due respect Skinner that answer sucks.  shadowknows69   Apr-24-09 12:38 PM   #300 
        - Why?  TZ   Apr-24-09 12:40 PM   #303 
        - When did I say anything about campaigning against President Obama?  shadowknows69   Apr-24-09 12:43 PM   #309 
        - I wonder if this is an age thing. Some of us remember Kennedy's 1980 primary as a disaster.  HamdenRice   Apr-24-09 01:04 PM   #330 
        - It's gotta be an age thing--or a memory thing!  MADem   Apr-24-09 01:38 PM   #371 
        - Is fawning obeisance required to hold on to office?  lumberjack_jeff   Apr-24-09 03:52 PM   #528 
        - And with all due respect, I think saying that my response "sucks" is uncalled for.  Skinner   Apr-24-09 12:47 PM   #310 
           - I patiently await your ruling on such matters.  shadowknows69   Apr-24-09 01:35 PM   #368 
  - I wish this was posted on EVERY thread --  Donnachaidh   Apr-24-09 11:09 AM   #186 
  - Thanks, Skinner!  leftofthedial   Apr-24-09 11:10 AM   #187 
  - I know I've ruffled feathers on DU...  derby378   Apr-24-09 11:13 AM   #190 
  - Oh happy day.  redqueen   Apr-24-09 11:30 AM   #213 
  - Sounds good to me.  TexasObserver   Apr-24-09 11:33 AM   #216 
  - I appreciate the attempt at clarification  Still Sensible   Apr-24-09 11:41 AM   #224 
  - thank you  merh   Apr-24-09 11:41 AM   #227 
  - K&N  NMDemDist2   Apr-24-09 11:44 AM   #231 
  - Great analogy. lol!  Fire1   Apr-24-09 12:37 PM   #299 
  - Create a Hate Postbag  Gamey   Apr-24-09 11:51 AM   #244 
  - Like a Struggle Meeting, eh?  LostinVA   Apr-24-09 11:59 AM   #254 
  - I have been worried lately and laid low for a couple weeks.  FredStembottom   Apr-24-09 11:56 AM   #250 
  - I'm in Michigan. You know I've got your back!!  Fire1   Apr-24-09 12:20 PM   #283 
  - I had a gratifying personal email exchange with the mayor of Lansing  FredStembottom   Apr-24-09 12:38 PM   #301 
     - Quite a few who post regularly. Keep an eye out.  Fire1   Apr-24-09 01:11 PM   #338 
  - I am so with you!  Phoebe Loosinhouse   Apr-24-09 12:42 PM   #307 
  - It's a wood-block print..........  FredStembottom   Apr-24-09 01:00 PM   #322 
  - I'm 'here' for you.  Captain Hilts   Apr-24-09 02:21 PM   #415 
  - And I loved that pic!  FredStembottom   Apr-25-09 12:19 AM   #674 
  - I'm with you Fred, factory kid here.  TBF   Apr-24-09 10:20 PM   #659 
  - Thank you, TBF  FredStembottom   Apr-25-09 12:24 AM   #675 
     - I know, painting strike signs was more than 30 years ago for me...  TBF   Apr-25-09 12:40 AM   #677 
  - President of the FredStembottom Fan Club  omega minimo   Apr-25-09 03:11 PM   #784 
  - That's fair enough, but can we still be assholes in the Sports Forum?  Forkboy   Apr-24-09 11:57 AM   #253 
  - I was so hopeful when I read your OP. Then I made the mistake of  DevonRex   Apr-24-09 12:08 PM   #267 
  - Yeah, I made that same mistake  HarukaTheTrophyWife   Apr-24-09 01:02 PM   #327 
  - Hey you, you wanna go? Drop the gloves?  DevonRex   Apr-24-09 01:15 PM   #344 
  - Same here...  Born_A_Truman   Apr-24-09 01:51 PM   #382 
  - Yes. This shows what happens when the rules are enforced more on one "side" than the other.  Pale Blue Dot   Apr-24-09 04:14 PM   #540 
     - I believe the answer is obvious  Still Sensible   Apr-26-09 12:47 PM   #888 
  - Thanks  unapatriciated   Apr-24-09 12:14 PM   #275 
  - Thank you for the clarification, Skinner.  Duval   Apr-24-09 12:15 PM   #277 
  - Thank you for the thoughtful, insightful, and excellent guidance, Skinner.  bertman   Apr-24-09 12:42 PM   #306 
  - K and yet another R  leftyclimber   Apr-24-09 12:54 PM   #315 
  - again, being the voice of reason in a sea of voices.  Soylent Brice   Apr-24-09 01:01 PM   #324 
  - I never expected to agree with Obama on every issue  PatSeg   Apr-24-09 01:02 PM   #325 
  - You make a very good point.  Jamastiene   Apr-24-09 04:30 PM   #554 
     - I figure  PatSeg   Apr-24-09 05:05 PM   #579 
  - Thank you Skinner.As one who no longer posts much due to attacks  saracat   Apr-24-09 01:11 PM   #337 
  - "substantive criticism" Yes and Thanks Skinner  SlingBlade   Apr-24-09 01:24 PM   #359 
  - Thank you  varelse   Apr-24-09 01:41 PM   #372 
  - Thank Goddess, and thanks, Skinner!  JuniperLea   Apr-24-09 01:42 PM   #374 
  - Just a thought..."do unto others"  Peacetrain   Apr-24-09 01:44 PM   #376 
  - Sticks and stones.......  obxhead   Apr-24-09 02:10 PM   #399 
  - Thanx, pal.  DinahMoeHum   Apr-24-09 02:11 PM   #402 
  - k n r. Glad to have your input Skinner.  Sunnyshine   Apr-24-09 02:48 PM   #447 
  - Is Or Is It Not Permissable To Criticize Israel, It's Leaders,Lobbyists, Policies Or Its Actions  DaLittle Kitty   Apr-24-09 02:51 PM   #453 
  - I can live quite comfortably with DU rules  peace frog   Apr-24-09 02:52 PM   #455 
  - Skinner, you and the guys are the best  Hekate   Apr-24-09 02:53 PM   #456 
  - I must have been out of the DU Loop  Catherine Vincent   Apr-24-09 02:55 PM   #462 
  - The one thing I think we can all agree on is that, holistically speaking, junior's policies,  indepat   Apr-24-09 03:00 PM   #472 
  - nt  onehandle   Apr-24-09 03:18 PM   #487 
  - .  QC   Apr-24-09 03:28 PM   #502 
  - nominated!  spanone   Apr-24-09 03:22 PM   #489 
  - "There is a part of me...  Iggo   Apr-24-09 03:22 PM   #490 
  - I Can Support This Policy  lostnotforgotten   Apr-24-09 03:23 PM   #492 
  - Jesus Christ! I'm astounded at the extreme number of recriminations your OP has led to.  JVS   Apr-24-09 03:24 PM   #496 
  - It just goes to show how deep the rifts are  HughMoran   Apr-24-09 04:23 PM   #549 
  - Does this mean that all personal attacks on Obama are not permitted, just like..  mvd   Apr-24-09 03:33 PM   #506 
  - I'm hoping that the "fuck you Obama" posts are no longer allowed.  totodeinhere   Apr-24-09 04:19 PM   #544 
     - hold on there  Two Americas   Apr-26-09 06:52 PM   #933 
  - you know I'm not a yes man, but yes. Hear hear.  sui generis   Apr-24-09 03:42 PM   #519 
  - This thread is amazing  sniffa   Apr-24-09 03:43 PM   #520 
  - Spell it out, sniffa!  JVS   Apr-24-09 03:44 PM   #523 
  - I think you're "this" is dislocated.  EFerrari   Apr-25-09 02:15 AM   #694 
  - Thanks, Skinner.  Ikonoklast   Apr-24-09 03:49 PM   #526 
  - Far left of the Democratic Party is a BIG voting block behind President Obama. College people,  Sunnyshine   Apr-25-09 01:21 AM   #689 
  - Those are great words  Orwellian_Ghost   Apr-25-09 08:20 PM   #816 
  - Thanks OG  Sunnyshine   Apr-26-09 10:36 AM   #869 
  - great post  Two Americas   Apr-26-09 06:05 PM   #928 
  - Funny how you demostrated exactly what people were talking about  Raineyb   Apr-25-09 05:47 PM   #806 
  - It's obvious from reading through this thread  azmouse   Apr-24-09 04:02 PM   #533 
  - Nope--many responses have been pretty hostile.  WI_DEM   Apr-24-09 04:06 PM   #537 
  - Absolutely nothing  HughMoran   Apr-24-09 04:25 PM   #551 
  - I'm going to post this again here to make sure it's seen.  Pale Blue Dot   Apr-24-09 04:17 PM   #542 
  - Nailed it. Thank you.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 05:30 PM   #597 
  - very well said  Two Americas   Apr-26-09 12:30 PM   #880 
  - K&R  caseycoon   Apr-24-09 04:17 PM   #543 
  - I have seen a lot of posters who contributed a lot to this  cornermouse   Apr-24-09 04:26 PM   #553 
  - Thanks for spelling things out Skinner.  JimWis   Apr-24-09 04:30 PM   #555 
  - Rules mean nothing unless they're applied to everyone  Individualist   Apr-24-09 04:37 PM   #563 
  - Kick and rec for "without being attacked or having their motives questioned" n/t  ColbertWatcher   Apr-24-09 04:43 PM   #564 
  - Bullying is the problem, not Obama  omega minimo   Apr-24-09 04:58 PM   #575 
  - Very good points.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 05:26 PM   #593 
  - thanks for everything yardwork.  omega minimo   Apr-24-09 05:44 PM   #603 
     - Thank you!  yardwork   Apr-24-09 05:51 PM   #607 
  - I have to say: really good post OM  Marrah_G   Apr-25-09 08:41 AM   #731 
  - Perfect. Beautiful. You made my day.  omega minimo   Apr-25-09 01:39 PM   #761 
  - Well said  Bluenorthwest   Apr-25-09 09:50 AM   #746 
  - Cheers then  omega minimo   Apr-25-09 01:40 PM   #763 
  - "gangs"; "Personal Echo Chambers", "attract trolls", "That is Dittohead "Feminazi" excrement."  HughMoran   Apr-25-09 01:38 PM   #760 
     - Here's a good examples of how those projections and assumptions and perceptions work.  omega minimo   Apr-25-09 02:49 PM   #777 
     - OK, then my perceptions were correct  HughMoran   Apr-25-09 03:12 PM   #785 
        - Masterful example of the mind games, reversals, false innuendo/accusations, not-so-veiled insults  omega minimo   Apr-25-09 03:23 PM   #789 
           - Reversals Have Been the Hallmark All Along  NashVegas   Apr-26-09 12:34 PM   #881 
     - Let's see...how to say this...civilly.  urgk   Apr-26-09 07:19 AM   #844 
        - "bobbing, weaving, jabbing" with your own shadow, rather than finding common (solid) ground  omega minimo   Apr-26-09 11:30 AM   #871 
        - I think it was Gene Wilder as WIlly Wonka who once said...  urgk   Apr-26-09 06:49 PM   #932 
        - Yes, I realized the futility of the situation  HughMoran   Apr-26-09 12:42 PM   #884 
           - Hoist on your own petard  omega minimo   Apr-26-09 01:08 PM   #891 
           - Et tu?  HughMoran   Apr-26-09 02:06 PM   #903 
              - Ah, the reversal. I will be open minded to the new Hugh Moran when I see him next time.  omega minimo   Apr-26-09 06:47 PM   #931 
           - Have you ever read "A Confederacy of Dunces"?  urgk   Apr-26-09 04:22 PM   #914 
  - Well, my .02  Starry Messenger   Apr-24-09 05:03 PM   #576 
  - Beautifully written. Thank you.  yardwork   Apr-24-09 05:27 PM   #595 
  - Thank you Yardwork.  Starry Messenger   Apr-24-09 05:35 PM   #600 
     - You're on the right, er, left coast!  yardwork   Apr-24-09 05:50 PM   #606 
  - Excellent. Places the emphasis in the proper place, assume everyone is in good faith  bluedawg12   Apr-24-09 05:41 PM   #602 
  - What an excellent post  leftstreet   Apr-24-09 07:36 PM   #639 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-24-09 05:13 PM   #583 
  - Be careful. You might get a pony dropped on you for that rhetoric.  JVS   Apr-24-09 05:20 PM   #588 
  - And I am totally lost about the "pony" references.  Rabrrrrrr   Apr-24-09 05:23 PM   #591 
     - Oh here. Let me explain how it works.  JVS   Apr-24-09 05:26 PM   #594 
     - Ah - that's kind of what I figured.  Rabrrrrrr   Apr-24-09 05:29 PM   #596 
        - Change complaint of Person A to slow progress of gay marriage or DADT, and then it is.  JVS   Apr-24-09 05:31 PM   #598 
        - It started as antu-gay mocking re: Prop8/Warren  HarukaTheTrophyWife   Apr-25-09 01:40 PM   #762 
           - insofar as anything 'starts' on DU...  foo_bar   Apr-26-09 08:19 AM   #856 
              - Not the same thing -- not directed at DUers  LostinVA   Apr-26-09 04:27 PM   #916 
     - yes, that is it  Marrah_G   Apr-25-09 08:43 AM   #733 
  - Which are you?  stray cat   Apr-24-09 05:58 PM   #612 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-24-09 06:36 PM   #624 
        - What is this word "whinge" that I keep reading at DU?  JVS   Apr-24-09 07:40 PM   #641 
           - British for whining.  Forkboy   Apr-24-09 10:31 PM   #660 
  - As Always, You Have My Deepest Respect  NashVegas   Apr-24-09 05:19 PM   #587 
  - Great post  spiritual_gunfighter   Apr-24-09 05:25 PM   #592 
  - I used to moderate at Beliefnet, along with at least one other DU'er  Lyric   Apr-24-09 05:33 PM   #599 
  - Great comments . . .!!!  defendandprotect   Apr-24-09 08:48 PM   #652 
  - I totally agree  TorchTheWitch   Apr-24-09 10:41 PM   #662 
  - Locking - flamebait  HughMoran   Apr-24-09 05:48 PM   #605 
  - A good formulation for wide-ranging discussion with mutual respect.  burning rain   Apr-24-09 06:02 PM   #614 
  - I understand this clearly, but the subtext of the way this post is written worries me  Mike 03   Apr-24-09 06:56 PM   #629 
  - Holy shit!!  omega minimo   Apr-24-09 07:29 PM   #637 
  - I don't know why you are sensing that subtext.  Skinner   Apr-24-09 07:50 PM   #642 
  - Well, this is proof that...  Renew Deal   Apr-24-09 10:33 PM   #661 
     - LOL  Skinner   Apr-25-09 05:43 AM   #707 
        - LOL  Forkboy   Apr-25-09 09:09 AM   #741 
        - hahahahaha, I think you guys should have admitted your bias during the primaries...  bridgit   Apr-25-09 11:17 AM   #748 
           - Be careful what you wish for.  Skinner   Apr-25-09 12:04 PM   #750 
              - Understood...  bridgit   Apr-25-09 12:12 PM   #751 
  - Double holy shit.  valerief   Apr-24-09 08:36 PM   #649 
  - I have no idea where you could come up with that  Marrah_G   Apr-25-09 08:46 AM   #734 
  - Thanks, and no sweat! Have a great weekend! nt  Ilsa   Apr-24-09 07:10 PM   #634 
  - I can not wait for the CHANCE  BooBluePotion   Apr-24-09 07:22 PM   #636 
  - Hi Skinner . . .  defendandprotect   Apr-24-09 08:41 PM   #650 
  - Nice try  Stinky The Clown   Apr-24-09 08:51 PM   #653 
  - What is your criteria for your OPs?  omega minimo   Apr-24-09 11:19 PM   #666 
  - Not sure what you're asking me?  Stinky The Clown   Apr-25-09 08:50 AM   #735 
  - no kidding!  TorchTheWitch   Apr-26-09 08:14 AM   #852 
  - The rule is self-explanatory  bridgit   Apr-24-09 09:51 PM   #655 
  - ROFLMFAO.. .This is too funny...  walldude   Apr-24-09 10:03 PM   #657 
  - Please also address now the linking/posting from one thread/forum to another for abusive purposes  omega minimo   Apr-24-09 10:04 PM   #658 
  - I think it is one of the major contributors to making people feel victimized on DU.  Skinner   Apr-25-09 05:51 AM   #708 
     - It feels like victimization because it's against the rules!  Why Syzygy   Apr-25-09 02:11 PM   #768 
     - should be zero tolerance for all rule breaking  TorchTheWitch   Apr-26-09 10:00 AM   #864 
        - well put -- also discourages good DUers from O/Posting -- "degrades quality of discussion for all.."  omega minimo   Apr-26-09 11:52 AM   #874 
     - At least that might slow it down.  EFerrari   Apr-25-09 03:44 PM   #792 
     - Some get all hopped up ahead of time on what they think is going on, then arrive to kill a thread  omega minimo   Apr-25-09 04:02 PM   #796 
     - It's a violation of DU Rules and violation of trust within individual threads  omega minimo   Apr-25-09 03:51 PM   #795 
     - Maybe the actions of "the most determined offenders" could get them banned  omega minimo   Apr-25-09 05:25 PM   #805 
        - OMG! Are you trying to suggest that there might be consequences for misbehavior! Heavens to betsy!  QC   Apr-26-09 01:28 PM   #894 
           - And why is that?  omega minimo   Apr-26-09 07:01 PM   #938 
  - You should post more often. You seem to have some good ideas.  Robeson   Apr-24-09 11:04 PM   #664 
  - DAMMIT !!1!!11  dweller   Apr-24-09 11:31 PM   #669 
  - Magistrate is busy separating the Sirs from the Ma'ams  omega minimo   Apr-25-09 01:16 AM   #684 
  - some thought  G_j   Apr-24-09 11:48 PM   #671 
  - You da man  Botany   Apr-25-09 12:37 AM   #676 
  - I'm just glad I have a place where I can still call George Bush a  Vickers   Apr-25-09 01:20 AM   #687 
  - And so ,as it is, !  Wash. state Desk Jet   Apr-25-09 02:44 AM   #697 
  - Thanks for posting this Skinner!  AllenVanAllen   Apr-25-09 03:00 AM   #699 
  - We are Democrats and liberal  liberal N proud   Apr-25-09 04:45 AM   #703 
  - and PROUD of it!  lonestarnot   Apr-25-09 09:43 AM   #745 
  - My thoughts:  LWolf   Apr-25-09 01:11 PM   #758 
  - You stated my feelings exactly! Thank you.  Phoebe Loosinhouse   Apr-25-09 01:41 PM   #764 
  - You're welcome.  LWolf   Apr-25-09 01:59 PM   #765 
  - very good  Two Americas   Apr-25-09 05:18 PM   #804 
  - Thanks.  LWolf   Apr-25-09 05:50 PM   #807 
  - Fuckin' brilliant  Orwellian_Ghost   Apr-25-09 08:25 PM   #817 
  - I'm all for the pin.  LWolf   Apr-25-09 08:34 PM   #820 
  - Thanks for this LWolf  suffragette   Apr-26-09 12:44 PM   #886 
     - You're welcome, of course. nt  LWolf   Apr-26-09 03:30 PM   #912 
  - A few thoughts  dsc   Apr-25-09 02:04 PM   #766 
  - desc, thank you. I hope that Skinner will read and consider your thoughts.  yardwork   Apr-25-09 02:37 PM   #773 
  - and thank you for your posts  dsc   Apr-25-09 02:44 PM   #775 
  - Best post in the whole thread. n/t  QC   Apr-25-09 03:36 PM   #790 
  - well said  Two Americas   Apr-25-09 03:44 PM   #793 
  - I must say , between you dsc, and Yardie  mitchtv   Apr-25-09 03:50 PM   #794 
  - And me too.  Chovexani   Apr-25-09 10:25 PM   #829 
  - Well said and needed to be said. n/t  bluedawg12   Apr-25-09 06:44 PM   #808 
  - +1  Stinky The Clown   Apr-25-09 08:08 PM   #812 
  - As GLBT is a Forum rather than a Group,  yowzayowzayowza   Apr-25-09 08:47 PM   #823 
  - seriously  dsc   Apr-26-09 07:04 AM   #843 
  - LBGT Forum Posters  NashVegas   Apr-26-09 09:20 AM   #861 
  - That is total bullshit  dsc   Apr-26-09 09:24 AM   #862 
     - I Was Speaking  NashVegas   Apr-26-09 10:02 AM   #866 
        - Some believed in him  dsc   Apr-26-09 10:06 AM   #867 
           - In All Honesty, My Jury Is Still Out  NashVegas   Apr-26-09 10:19 AM   #868 
  - Maybe so.  yowzayowzayowza   Apr-26-09 11:39 AM   #872 
     - But I have it on great authority  dsc   Apr-26-09 11:44 AM   #873 
        - Ok, I'll bite. What authority?  yowzayowzayowza   Apr-26-09 12:16 PM   #877 
           - It is in this thread  dsc   Apr-26-09 12:45 PM   #887 
  - I'm not asking for special rights. I'm only asking that the rules be applied equally.  yardwork   Apr-26-09 08:55 AM   #860 
     - Where else have I heard about gays wanting "special rights"?  LostinVA   Apr-26-09 04:30 PM   #918 
  - You've nailed this one:  LWolf   Apr-25-09 08:52 PM   #824 
  - Since we're all speaking frankly here, there are two sides to that story...  NorthernSpy   Apr-26-09 07:47 AM   #845 
  - I agree -- those gays have gotten a bit... uppity lately  HarukaTheTrophyWife   Apr-26-09 07:52 AM   #846 
  - Absolutely not. I spoke about a few *individuals*, but then you already knew that...  NorthernSpy   Apr-26-09 07:58 AM   #849 
     - Well, unlike some people who start shit in the GLBT forum, I don't start shit in the AA Forum  HarukaTheTrophyWife   Apr-26-09 08:15 AM   #853 
  - Oh please  dsc   Apr-26-09 07:56 AM   #848 
  - You want civility? How about showing some?  NorthernSpy   Apr-26-09 08:05 AM   #850 
     - Slander?  HarukaTheTrophyWife   Apr-26-09 08:17 AM   #855 
     - But gay baiting is just fine  dsc   Apr-26-09 08:25 AM   #857 
  - Very, very well said - thank you so much for this post  Adelante   Apr-26-09 08:09 AM   #851 
  - You're welcome!  NorthernSpy   Apr-26-09 12:42 PM   #883 
  - Stop It Stop It Stop It Stop It  NashVegas   Apr-26-09 09:38 AM   #863 
  - Nope  Vanje   Apr-26-09 10:02 AM   #865 
     - Ah, another personal attack from the civility brigade...  NorthernSpy   Apr-26-09 12:29 PM   #879 
        - Seriously, I have no effing clue why you have survived on DU for as long as you have...  Solon   Apr-26-09 01:25 PM   #893 
           - When it comes to my posts, you read into them things that just aren't there.  NorthernSpy   Apr-26-09 02:17 PM   #904 
  - You lost me here  HamdenRice   Apr-26-09 01:12 PM   #892 
     - and of course the last time we had this discussion you lied through your teeth  dsc   Apr-26-09 01:36 PM   #895 
        - Whatever dude. But I suppose this is progress--->  HamdenRice   Apr-26-09 01:41 PM   #897 
        - you need to back that up  dsc   Apr-26-09 02:06 PM   #902 
        - No, the clear implication is that participants in a certain forum  HamdenRice   Apr-26-09 02:39 PM   #908 
           - This is not true.  Vanje   Apr-26-09 07:30 PM   #948 
        - Is it really necessary for you to use racial slurs?  Jamastiene   Apr-26-09 05:03 PM   #921 
        - Nobody told any "nig*er jokes"  Vanje   Apr-26-09 07:27 PM   #945 
        - I should add that your accusations of lying ring untrue  HamdenRice   Apr-26-09 01:48 PM   #898 
           - Gee what a shock that you dishonestly left out the part where you stated I posted in that thread  dsc   Apr-26-09 01:50 PM   #899 
              - Go back to the video tape. I did not accuse you of that nt  HamdenRice   Apr-26-09 01:52 PM   #900 
                 - ah but yes, you did  dsc   Apr-26-09 02:04 PM   #901 
                    - Thanks for busting yourself  HamdenRice   Apr-26-09 02:34 PM   #906 
                       - What do the words Don't Play Dumb mean?  dsc   Apr-26-09 02:59 PM   #910 
                       - Whatever the meaning of your post is, I'll look on the bright side  HamdenRice   Apr-26-09 03:09 PM   #911 
                          - Gee what a shock  dsc   Apr-26-09 04:15 PM   #913 
                          - So you decided I was wrong before you even went to the cited thread?  HamdenRice   Apr-26-09 04:36 PM   #919 
                             - I have gone through a huge amount of her thread number 2  dsc   Apr-26-09 05:08 PM   #922 
                                - Again, you seem to be so upset that you're not writing anything I can parse  HamdenRice   Apr-26-09 05:26 PM   #923 
                                   - You claimed your forum had no anti gay slurs in it  dsc   Apr-26-09 05:29 PM   #924 
                                      - I'm still totally not following you  HamdenRice   Apr-26-09 05:38 PM   #925 
                                         - It was linked as an example of a racist thread  dsc   Apr-26-09 05:44 PM   #926 
                          - No body  Vanje   Apr-26-09 07:33 PM   #949 
                       - That is a lie  Vanje   Apr-26-09 06:12 PM   #929 
                       - What??? If you ever see a joke with that word in it, alert on it.  yardwork   Apr-26-09 07:40 PM   #952 
  - The...the burning on this thread....is incredible.  Danger Mouse   Apr-25-09 11:44 PM   #835 
  - Be the Change, Danger Mouse  omega minimo   Apr-26-09 01:33 AM   #839 
  - There are bad actors in any subset of DU members, in all of them  Adelante   Apr-26-09 07:55 AM   #847 
  - Some of those wearing haloes in this thread  omega minimo   Apr-26-09 12:42 PM   #885 
     - Yeah, I love how so many of the worst offenders are playing the affronted virgin now,  QC   Apr-26-09 12:53 PM   #889 
        - It seems some are genuinely oblivious to how their own misperceptions "excuse" their behavior  omega minimo   Apr-26-09 12:55 PM   #890 
           - Indeed it does.  urgk   Apr-26-09 06:54 PM   #935 
              - The real problem is those who start with the crap and pretend it is "deserved"  omega minimo   Apr-26-09 06:59 PM   #936 
                 - "The real problem is those who start with the crap..."  urgk   Apr-26-09 07:01 PM   #937 
                    - We'll see if you agree with that concept outside this thread, won't we?  omega minimo   Apr-26-09 07:03 PM   #939 
                    - I'll agree with it all over the place.  urgk   Apr-26-09 07:10 PM   #940 
                       - Your "sly "current attempts to make trouble, falsify, discredit, blame, defame show you don't get it  omega minimo   Apr-26-09 07:20 PM   #943 
                          - I like your lists.  urgk   Apr-26-09 07:27 PM   #944 
                             - One item  omega minimo   Apr-26-09 07:28 PM   #947 
                    - Is there a mosquito in here?  omega minimo   Apr-26-09 07:10 PM   #941 
                       - Good one!  urgk   Apr-26-09 07:15 PM   #942 
                          - Cleared my Ignore list in the spirit of Skinner's OP. You can prove your claims HERE or go back on.  omega minimo   Apr-26-09 07:27 PM   #946 
                             - Ah...a feint!  urgk   Apr-26-09 07:40 PM   #950 
                                - Your behavior is truly sick  omega minimo   Apr-26-09 07:41 PM   #953 
                                   - Yet...  urgk   Apr-26-09 07:50 PM   #954 
                                      - Good example of how it's impossible to tell obsessive compulsive slime from actual troll behavior  omega minimo   Apr-26-09 07:52 PM   #956 
                                         - Those are the two options?  urgk   Apr-26-09 07:55 PM   #957 
  - Kicked and bookmarked  Haole Girl   Apr-26-09 11:53 AM   #875 
  - Good post, Skinner  mogster   Apr-26-09 04:24 PM   #915 
  - Very well put, Skinner!  ayeshahaqqiqa   Apr-26-09 06:27 PM   #930 
  - Thank you for that, Skinner.  Aristus   Apr-26-09 07:51 PM   #955 
  - I think it is well past time to lock this down.  Skinner   Apr-26-09 09:24 PM   #958 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC