You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #286: The only context that I've seen the word has to do with people who [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #252
286. The only context that I've seen the word has to do with people who
thought that Obama was "faking it" during the election, just to get elected, and once he got in the White House, he was going to put on his Che tee shirt, grow his hair and get a blowout kit, take to the microphone and scream "Fight the POWAH, you muthafuckas!!!" while legalizing pot (planting some on the WH lawn, of course), appointing Kucinich as Gates' replacement, providing free housing and a no-work stipend for everyone, mandating books made of hemp in the public schools, dragging every registered Republican to the courts to be tried for war crimes....etc., etc. and so forth.

Yes, that's garishly hyperbolic, but when I've seen the word "poutrage," I've seen it in that context--that Obama has been "insufficiently attentive" to a wide variety of issues of import to his former supporters, and now they're angry because he apparently wasn't saying that stuff to get elected....he actually meant it.

Now, that's NOT to say that the term hasn't been used in other contexts, I've just not seen it used as a blanket slur with a purpose to SPECIFICALLY TARGET gays. I'd need a link to lay my eyes on such a thing. In my reading, I have noticed that it specifically targets someone who "thought" Obama was going to do something beneficial to the far left end of the tent, even though his campaign speeches said otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC