Reply #47: He interviewed an FBI psychologist

[Are_grits_groceries]

who was in charge of the domestic terroroism unit for the area. The FBI man's son went to Columbine, and he got tied into the investigation.The GMan reviewed thousands of pages and watched videos. A lot of the videos and writings were by Erivc and Dylan. He headed up a meeting on school shootings months later. Many leading psychologists attended. He presented his findings about Eric with some trepidation. He thought the psycopath label would lead to disputes among the group. It didn't. They agreed with his assessment.

You can call the writer a hack, but names won't change the caliber of work he has done. This wasn't a book done in one week to please the insatiable hunger the public has for info when things like this happen. He didn't issue a diagnosis. He listened to people who had been trained to. He began his story at the attack because he was a reporter there. He also believed a lot of what got sifted around and through. Cullen was as surprised as anyone after he talked to hundreds of people and looked at hundreds of pages. He used multiple sources where he could.

I may believe too much, but I looked at his history, his methodology and his sources. I think he is a lot closer to the truth 10 years later than people were at the time. There is more info of the overall picture that is available. In addition, he had the time to talk to a lot of people and examine the ideas that had been floating around.