You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #74: "Do the research" is often shorthand for "I have no fucking clue." nt [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #71
74. "Do the research" is often shorthand for "I have no fucking clue." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Man Detained and Threatened by TSA for Flying with $4,700 Cash snot  Apr-07-09 08:55 AM   #0 
  - TSA looks for weapons...  Deep13   Apr-07-09 08:59 AM   #1 
  - got data to support your claim that people carrying cash are criminals? nt  msongs   Apr-07-09 09:02 AM   #3 
  - Trial testimony of numerous cops talking about their experience.  Deep13   Apr-07-09 09:14 AM   #11 
     - Cops testimony isn't proof that carrying large amounts of cash is suspicious.  Gormy Cuss   Apr-07-09 10:49 AM   #79 
     - That's claim is just stupid  nichomachus   Apr-07-09 02:17 PM   #162 
     - As if that means anything.  TexasObserver   Apr-07-09 02:25 PM   #164 
     - The fact SOME criminals carry cash isn't probable cause for arrest.  mainer   Apr-07-09 04:45 PM   #180 
  - Or maybe you found a car on Craigslist in another city..  Fumesucker   Apr-07-09 09:04 AM   #6 
  - Yes, it may be perfectly innocent. nt  Deep13   Apr-07-09 09:13 AM   #10 
     - It IS perfectly innocent  WolverineDG   Apr-07-09 11:26 AM   #111 
  - cash is not "evidence of other crimes" and he does not get to be treated as criminal  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 09:07 AM   #8 
  - It's not conclusive or beyond reasonable doubt...  Deep13   Apr-07-09 09:12 AM   #9 
  - It is evidence of nothing.  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 09:31 AM   #21 
  - Oh really?  Deep13   Apr-07-09 09:54 AM   #27 
     - Sure it is  Coyote_Bandit   Apr-07-09 09:57 AM   #32 
     - Funny... you cite a "probable cause" example (drugs)  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 10:20 AM   # 
     - in a police state  datasuspect   Apr-07-09 11:14 AM   #97 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-07-09 09:33 AM   #22 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-07-09 09:57 AM   #31 
     - i say all are cowards that are so fuckin fearful they are willing to give up rights  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 10:00 AM   #35 
        - She said from 1500 miles away.  Deep13   Apr-07-09 10:05 AM   #38 
           - Privacy for starters  WolverineDG   Apr-07-09 11:30 AM   #116 
           - Oooh! I'll play!  14thColony   Apr-07-09 12:28 PM   #146 
  - Acutally it is  WolverineDG   Apr-07-09 11:27 AM   #113 
  - You're insane  Hawkowl   Apr-07-09 01:46 PM   #159 
  - I agree.. what a disgusting assumption to make  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 09:30 AM   #19 
     - i am so sick and tired of the cowards of this nation that must allow SOMEONE to CONTROL  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 09:40 AM   #24 
     - This is an airport.  Deep13   Apr-07-09 10:00 AM   #34 
        - OM FRIGGIN G> cause it is all just so out of control gonna wet my pants i am so afraid  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 10:02 AM   #36 
        - Frankly, your language makes you sound like a little kid.  Deep13   Apr-07-09 10:09 AM   #42 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-07-09 10:10 AM   #43 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-07-09 10:30 AM   #52 
           - . n/t  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 10:54 AM   #82 
        - So....  14thColony   Apr-07-09 12:35 PM   #149 
           - so right on, couldnt agree more and you are funny..... lol lol. n/t  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 12:39 PM   #151 
     - It is not an assumption, it is suspicion.  Deep13   Apr-07-09 09:58 AM   #33 
        - "If he had an INNOCENT explanation".....  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 10:08 AM   #40 
           - Innocent until proven guilty is a procedural rule for trial.  Deep13   Apr-07-09 10:11 AM   #44 
              - The pre-trial equivalent is "probable cause"  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 10:17 AM   #45 
              - And he wasn't indicted, so you can throw that out the window, too.  Occam Bandage   Apr-07-09 10:20 AM   #47 
              - It is NOT reason to detain. which they did  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 10:21 AM   #48 
              - His refusal to answer questions was.  Occam Bandage   Apr-07-09 10:25 AM   #49 
              - You are not obligated to answer questions that they are not  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 10:32 AM   #55 
              - You are not ***OBLIGATED***  Coyote_Bandit   Apr-07-09 10:35 AM   #60 
              - Of course you have the right to remain silent,  Occam Bandage   Apr-07-09 10:38 AM   #64 
                 - that is the wrong of it. your looks.... detain. they have the right. what you wear,.... detain  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 10:42 AM   #70 
                 - Police may only detain you based on reasonable suspicion.  Statistical   Apr-07-09 11:34 AM   #125 
              - I don't see any evidence they aren't authorized to ask those questions.  Occam Bandage   Apr-07-09 10:37 AM   #62 
              - Since when is $4700 = $10K?  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 10:38 AM   #63 
              - Let's try this again, this time with you reading my post.  Occam Bandage   Apr-07-09 10:39 AM   #65 
                 - So, what WAS he "under suspicion of (sic)?"  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 10:41 AM   #67 
                    - Probably drug trafficking, given how they were talking about the DEA.  Occam Bandage   Apr-07-09 10:45 AM   #72 
                       - If you think so...  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 10:46 AM   #75 
                          - As do I.  Occam Bandage   Apr-07-09 10:52 AM   #81 
                             - and Merriam Webster now cites "NUCULAR" as an acceptable  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 10:59 AM   #85 
                             - The "no-prepositions" rule is something of a recent innovation as well,  Occam Bandage   Apr-07-09 11:13 AM   #95 
              - he didn't have to answer  CreekDog   Apr-07-09 12:34 PM   #148 
              - Agree 100 percent with you  14thColony   Apr-07-09 12:40 PM   #152 
              - He only demanded his rights. Now THAT'S illegal????  mainer   Apr-07-09 04:47 PM   #181 
              - Have you got case law for that?  Deep13   Apr-07-09 10:31 AM   #54 
                 - If your read the entire thread, at least 6 people have pointed out  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 10:32 AM   #56 
                    - I don't have time for that.  Deep13   Apr-07-09 10:34 AM   #58 
                       - You've got to be kidding. Is your reading comprehension that  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 10:36 AM   #61 
                       - Blame public education.  Deep13   Apr-07-09 01:16 PM   #156 
                          - I don't suffer fools lightly...  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 02:28 PM   #166 
                             - ...  Individualist   Apr-07-09 06:35 PM   #191 
                       - Oh, please  Coyote_Bandit   Apr-07-09 10:48 AM   #78 
                       - I've done it. I passed the bar exam.  Deep13   Apr-07-09 01:18 PM   #157 
                          - Right... And I have marsh land in the the Gulf of Mexico for sale  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 02:28 PM   #165 
                             - .  Deep13   Apr-08-09 07:46 AM   #193 
                       - Yes, the citation is on CBP Declaration Form 6059B  14thColony   Apr-07-09 04:44 PM   #179 
              - You have a right not to answer their questions.  Dr.Phool   Apr-07-09 11:31 AM   #118 
              - He has no obligation to provide evidence against himself.  Statistical   Apr-07-09 11:41 AM   #130 
              - By coincidence, there was no arrest or indictment either.  Deep13   Apr-07-09 10:30 AM   #53 
                 - Cowardice in those who will not stand up for their own rights...  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 10:33 AM   #57 
                    - leads to more abuse of authority and erosion of our rights.... preach it brother/sister....  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 10:40 AM   #66 
                    - What the hell are you talking about?  Deep13   Apr-07-09 01:40 PM   #158 
              - It's not a procedural rule, it's in the constitution  CreekDog   Apr-07-09 12:31 PM   #147 
                 - I see you aren't buying his claim either....  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 02:29 PM   #167 
                    - actually i do (in part)  CreekDog   Apr-07-09 03:22 PM   #172 
                    - Actually the grammarian is another poster...  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 03:58 PM   #174 
                       - aw shoot  CreekDog   Apr-07-09 04:32 PM   #175 
                    - I've been a paralegal for fifteen years and I'm sure as  liberalhistorian   Apr-07-09 06:11 PM   #189 
  - 1. Most times checks are not accepted in  shraby   Apr-07-09 09:18 AM   #15 
  - "Cash is privacy."  MADem   Apr-07-09 09:19 AM   #16 
  - Plus we're talking about PEANUTS.  JackRiddler   Apr-07-09 10:42 AM   #69 
     - ....he acted as though he had rights!!! Why the NOIVE of that guy!  MADem   Apr-07-09 11:22 AM   #105 
        - he acted as though he had rights!!! .... YES. EXACTLY. the audacity  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 11:23 AM   #108 
  - I routinely carry large sums of cash in the operation of my business.  Ikonoklast   Apr-07-09 09:22 AM   #18 
  - is it illegal to carry $4700 in cash?  dysfunctional press   Apr-07-09 10:08 AM   #41 
  - WTF?  Statistical   Apr-07-09 10:59 AM   #86 
  - two earrings, detain. tattoo, detain. shaved head... d etained.  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 11:07 AM   #89 
     - It only takes a dozen or so lawsuits.  Statistical   Apr-07-09 11:25 AM   #110 
  - What kind of insulated little world do you live in?  tuckessee   Apr-07-09 11:11 AM   #93 
  - You got anything to back that up that assertion  MadHound   Apr-07-09 11:33 AM   #122 
  - Sheer codswollop.  Richard Steele   Apr-07-09 11:40 AM   #128 
  - You watch way too much TV  Lorien   Apr-07-09 12:01 PM   #141 
  - bwahahaha....cash = crime? usually drugs? bwahahahahaa  spanone   Apr-07-09 03:01 PM   #171 
  - LMAO... $4700 bucks, must have been some shitty drugs  walldude   Apr-07-09 05:19 PM   #186 
  - It is not a crime to carry cash..or to refuse to use the banks.  winyanstaz   Apr-08-09 08:18 AM   #195 
  - My husband was a tour manager for  a la izquierda   Apr-08-09 08:29 AM   #196 
  - Yet another reason we need to disband the TSA  derby378   Apr-07-09 09:02 AM   #2 
  - TSA, DHS... all these fascist agencies need to be disbanded...  ixion   Apr-07-09 09:03 AM   #4 
  - The TSA is a monster that grows larger daily.....  lib2DaBone   Apr-07-09 09:04 AM   #5 
  - Wow, FOX NEWS, too. Talk about "Left is right, up is down!"  MADem   Apr-07-09 09:05 AM   #7 
  - Fox only gets in a tizzy when one of 'their people' get hassled  Blue_Tires   Apr-07-09 11:32 AM   #120 
     - I think this guy would have, despite his RP affiliation, gotten the "Sit down and SHUT UP" treatment  MADem   Apr-07-09 02:42 PM   #168 
  - the cutoff is 10K, and if he wasn't required to declare it  sui generis   Apr-07-09 09:15 AM   #12 
  - I think that cut-off only applies to international flights  mainer   Apr-07-09 04:36 PM   #176 
     - Yes, it's only for international travel  14thColony   Apr-07-09 05:03 PM   #184 
     - good thing we live in America, land of the free  sui generis   Apr-08-09 07:59 AM   #194 
  - TSA Inspector Damages 9 American Eagle Aircraft....tax dollars at work..  lib2DaBone   Apr-07-09 09:16 AM   #13 
  - $4,700 is not a lot money  Wickerman   Apr-07-09 09:17 AM   #14 
  - And carrying it with you is probably safer than investing it these days.  Pacifist Patriot   Apr-07-09 10:57 AM   #84 
  - Its not an unreasonable question why he's got thousands of dollars in cash on him.  baldguy   Apr-07-09 09:22 AM   #17 
  - cause i want to carry 4700 is as much a reasonable answer. question asked, question answered  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 09:39 AM   #23 
  - see #98  baldguy   Apr-07-09 11:19 AM   #100 
     - only the coward, the fearful, the weak would support ths. n/t  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 11:21 AM   #104 
  - Not suspicious at all.  Mother Of Four   Apr-07-09 09:49 AM   #25 
  - There is a history - people who commit crimes usually behave in a particular way.  baldguy   Apr-07-09 10:26 AM   #50 
     - How awful of him to insist on his (alleged) rights!  Tesha   Apr-07-09 10:46 AM   #73 
     - He has the right to carry any amount of cash he wants.  baldguy   Apr-07-09 11:16 AM   #98 
        - i am soooo afraid of the big bad terrorist..... lock down the airports.  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 11:20 AM   #102 
        - Please quote me the section of *ANY* law that gives the TSA the right to question him. (NT)  Tesha   Apr-07-09 05:10 PM   #185 
     - Uhm-  Mother Of Four   Apr-07-09 10:50 AM   #80 
     - Did you even watch the video?  baldguy   Apr-07-09 11:08 AM   #90 
        - First of all-  Mother Of Four   Apr-07-09 11:53 AM   #138 
        - There is no legal def of "flaky".  Statistical   Apr-07-09 12:35 PM   #150 
     - So when I got agitated a few years ago when they almost  liberalhistorian   Apr-07-09 06:28 PM   #190 
  - Hey, baldguy  BeFree   Apr-07-09 09:56 AM   #29 
  - I'm sure you can supply documentation from Skinner, EarlG & Elad granting that authority?  baldguy   Apr-07-09 11:12 AM   #94 
     - constitutional rights.... anyone. cause it is government doesnt mean a free for all on their part  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 11:17 AM   #99 
     - How you behave depends on what you want.  baldguy   Apr-07-09 11:23 AM   #107 
        - don't expect to get on the plane in time. .... cause of people like you and the others that support  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 11:24 AM   #109 
           - They don't let cows on commercial flights.  baldguy   Apr-07-09 11:29 AM   #115 
              - but cowards. now cowards are ushered thru. little sheep... quietly walking along the line  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 11:32 AM   #121 
     - Question the feds?  BeFree   Apr-07-09 11:30 AM   #117 
        - The feds are my friends.... ya  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 11:34 AM   #124 
           - Exactly  BeFree   Apr-07-09 11:40 AM   #129 
              - and a whole bunch of really cowardly people willing to give up all THeir rights  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 11:43 AM   #131 
  - What suspicious behavior?  Statistical   Apr-07-09 11:28 AM   #114 
  - Limit is $10,000 and that's for leaving the country. This was a domestic flight. It none of their  OregonBlue   Apr-07-09 09:31 AM   #20 
  - $10,000 is also the limit  Coyote_Bandit   Apr-07-09 09:55 AM   #28 
     - I also travel for business frequently out of the country. Last trip a TSA official was stationed  OregonBlue   Apr-07-09 11:44 AM   #132 
        - this is what pisses me off. you do it, to get on the plane and do what you gotta do. and they KNOW  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 11:48 AM   #133 
           - TSA is too damn inconsistent in enforcing the rules  Coyote_Bandit   Apr-07-09 12:51 PM   #155 
  - my brother worked for the TSA  Mari333   Apr-07-09 09:53 AM   #26 
  - i dont. i wouldnt, couldnt be so foolish to believe they make us safe.  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 09:56 AM   #30 
  - but I do believe it.  rucky   Apr-07-09 02:20 PM   #163 
  - I'll carry as much cash as I chose fuck you very much...  truebrit71   Apr-07-09 10:03 AM   #37 
  - $4,700 buys a lot of lap dances and those TSA agents sounded like they needed it.  Stevenmarc   Apr-07-09 10:06 AM   #39 
  - There's no security threat. They had reason to suspect he might be a drug dealer,  Occam Bandage   Apr-07-09 10:19 AM   #46 
  - which is beyond the scope of their authority and duties...  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 10:35 AM   #59 
  - I don't believe it is.  Occam Bandage   Apr-07-09 10:42 AM   #68 
     - If you read the congressional record that lays out the authorities  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 10:44 AM   #71 
        - "Do the research" is often shorthand for "I have no fucking clue." nt  Occam Bandage   Apr-07-09 10:46 AM   #74 
           - No, it is putting the oneness for taking one's time in YOUR lap  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 10:47 AM   #76 
              - And it isn't my responsibility to educate you, either. I think the TSA  Occam Bandage   Apr-07-09 10:56 AM   #83 
                 - TSA are not authorized as subsitute for law enforcement.  hlthe2b   Apr-07-09 11:00 AM   #87 
                 - merely having cash cannot make you a suspect any more than having a third eye. n/t  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 11:08 AM   #92 
  - No citizen is required to answer unlawful questions and accept "routine" detainment.  Statistical   Apr-07-09 11:04 AM   #88 
  - He didn't refuse to answer any questions. He asked if he was legally required to answer them  Gormy Cuss   Apr-07-09 11:08 AM   #91 
  - Hmmm, the guy was a Ron Paul campaign worker, and worked for the campaign  MiniMe   Apr-07-09 10:28 AM   #51 
  - Flying with cash is a crime?????  Vinca   Apr-07-09 10:48 AM   #77 
  - He wasn't charged with any crime.  baldguy   Apr-07-09 11:27 AM   #112 
     - We was DETAINED despite meeting NO requirement for reasonable suspicion.  Statistical   Apr-07-09 11:31 AM   #119 
  - Actually the guy was a Campaign for Liberty Staffer. A Paul-bot.  galileoreloaded   Apr-07-09 11:13 AM   #96 
  - Why would it?  rcrush   Apr-07-09 01:55 PM   #160 
  - He could inflict nasty paper cuts on the flight crew!  leftofthedial   Apr-07-09 11:20 AM   #101 
  - I wouldn't carry that much cash, but I mean this is getting out of control.  sarcasmo   Apr-07-09 11:21 AM   #103 
  - Just wait until the economic chickens come home to roost.  MilesColtrane   Apr-07-09 11:22 AM   #106 
  - Much Ado About Nothing. In Fact, The TSA Did Its Job Appropriately.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Apr-07-09 11:33 AM   #123 
  - and the coward will always "spew their falsely righteous outrage" defending the oppressor.  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 11:37 AM   #126 
  - If Only You Realized How Silly You Look.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Apr-07-09 11:53 AM   #140 
     - it is the difference between the people willing to keep the authority honest.... cause we arent  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 12:08 PM   #143 
  - Bingo.  baldguy   Apr-07-09 11:51 AM   #135 
  - This thread is an example why authoritarians and anti-authoritarians will never get along  Zodiak   Apr-07-09 11:39 AM   #127 
  - No, the paulites aren't anti-authoritarians - they're whiners.  baldguy   Apr-07-09 11:50 AM   #134 
  - instead you prefer to blindly follow without question. rollin eyes.... n/t  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 11:52 AM   #137 
  - Gawd  BeFree   Apr-07-09 11:53 AM   #139 
  - So are you ok w/ civil rights being trampled.... OR  Statistical   Apr-07-09 12:44 PM   #153 
     - Tell you what.  baldguy   Apr-07-09 03:50 PM   #173 
        - STRAWMAN ALERT.... STRAWMAN ALERT.....  Statistical   Apr-07-09 04:48 PM   #182 
           - Legally, the whole airport is a checkpoint.  baldguy   Apr-07-09 05:50 PM   #187 
              - TSA authority isn't unlimited.  Statistical   Apr-07-09 06:04 PM   #188 
                 - Ok, when was he being detained?  baldguy   Apr-07-09 06:35 PM   #192 
  - not all of us can or know how to be sheep. we have got to be allowed our rights.... where  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 11:51 AM   #136 
     - damn right, seabeyond  noiretextatique   Apr-07-09 12:07 PM   #142 
        - the fucking COWARDS didn't bother to show up,.... cowards i tell you.  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 12:15 PM   #144 
  - WTF. The man took all the monetary donations from Ron Paul's campaign  npk   Apr-07-09 12:20 PM   #145 
  - Seems a bit early to decide that is the only reason he was detained.  DevonRex   Apr-07-09 12:47 PM   #154 
  - Just another victim from the insanity created by the War Against Some Drugs, now cash is illegal.  Uncle Joe   Apr-07-09 02:02 PM   #161 
  - When cash is outlawed, only outlaws will have cash  KamaAina   Apr-07-09 02:45 PM   #169 
  - maybe he was gonna bribe the pilot to fly into tall buildings????  spanone   Apr-07-09 03:00 PM   #170 
  - So TSA is FORCING Americans to have credit cards?  mainer   Apr-07-09 04:39 PM   #177 
  - It is not against the law to demand your rights. ACLU should be on this.  mainer   Apr-07-09 04:42 PM   #178 
     - me too. not against the law to demand your right.... say it loud  seabeyond   Apr-07-09 04:51 PM   #183 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC