You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #48: So. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #37
48. So.
Your actual knowlege of Phelps and Co is all what the media reports. And I disagree that most religious folk share policy with Phelps. You think Phelps is just 'opposed to gay marriage'? Tip of the iceberg, what the media shows you at home, safe at home.
And so you opposed disrupting hearings in any way, but you offer no alternatives at all. That is now said and done.
And back to characterizing others instead of reporting honestly. You claim Code Pink's mission has noting to do with finances. Here is the opening line of Code Pink's mission statement, in the words of Code Pink:
"Mission Statement:
CODEPINK is a women-initiated grassroots peace and social justice movement working to end the war in Iraq, stop new wars, and redirect our resources into healthcare, education and other life-affirming activities."

Redirect our resorces. That means finacial resources among others. Stop new wars. Nations in huge debt historically have often gone to war to get out of that hole. It is common for such things to happen. Financial irresponsibility can lead us into war, and away from healthcare and education. That is their mission, according to them. Seems to include more than your characterization of their mission as 'ending the war'.
So their mission as they see it is not as you claim it is. An honest broker does not need to speak for others, as you do in rewriting Code Pink's mission.
So. No real world experience, no ideas for alternatives, a dishonest reporting of Code Pink's Mission worded to support your argument. So your 'opinion' of Code Pink is not based on the facts of Code Pink. Makes it moot at best. They say such hearings are well within their mission, and I agree.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC