FourScore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-27-07 09:32 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. He's gotta' pay. He outta' pay. |
|
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 09:33 PM by whereismyparty
The settlement does not become null and void because of a medical procedure, even if that procedure was elective. Too often, society still views a divorce agreement as a handout to the spouse who is on the financial recieving end (usually a woman). That's just not the case.
I hope the former wife wins this one!
|
| -Man agreed to pay alimony to his ex -- but not to the man she became. Now what? |
LiberalHeart |
Mar-27-07 09:27 PM |
#0 |
-
Gender of the ex-spouse is irrelavent. |
LeftyMom |
Mar-27-07 09:30 PM |
#1 |
 -
But, if you can't legally be married to somebody of the same sex, |
BuyingThyme |
Mar-27-07 09:34 PM |
#4 |
  -
The divorce happened prior to the sex change. n/t |
whereismyparty |
Mar-27-07 09:39 PM |
#6 |
  -
Sure. They were married legally and then they legally divorced. |
LeftyMom |
Mar-27-07 09:40 PM |
#7 |
   -
Well, the question is to what the contractual obligations are. |
BuyingThyme |
Mar-27-07 09:53 PM |
#14 |
    -
If, as the article states, he's on the hook until his ex remarries or dies, |
LeftyMom |
Mar-27-07 10:00 PM |
#17 |
   -
What if the stipulation had to do with marrying or cohabiting |
BuyingThyme |
Mar-27-07 10:07 PM |
#19 |
   -
Well, here's my suspicion. |
LeftyMom |
Mar-27-07 10:15 PM |
#21 |
    -
I was assuming that sex changes were widely recognized, |
BuyingThyme |
Mar-27-07 10:33 PM |
#27 |
    -
It's in Florida |
johnnie |
Mar-28-07 11:42 AM |
#65 |
   -
Some states have rules/laws that recognize cohabitation in lieu of marriage as grounds for the |
Solo_in_MD |
Mar-27-07 11:03 PM |
#31 |
   -
He is still the same person she was |
treestar |
Mar-27-07 11:02 PM |
#29 |
  -
Palimony recognizes alimony like obligations outside of a formal marriage |
Solo_in_MD |
Mar-27-07 11:00 PM |
#28 |
 -
Yes, sometimes. |
BuyingThyme |
Mar-27-07 11:04 PM |
#32 |
 -
Not completely irrelvant |
slackmaster |
Mar-28-07 03:05 PM |
#71 |
-
Right. As a transgendered man. Sure. |
Zhade |
Mar-28-07 10:57 PM |
#79 |
-
My point is that the gender change does change factors used to compute alimony |
slackmaster |
Mar-29-07 09:01 AM |
#90 |
-
He's gotta' pay. He outta' pay. |
whereismyparty |
Mar-27-07 09:32 PM |
#2 |
 -
I'm with you on this. |
LiberalHeart |
Mar-27-07 09:34 PM |
#3 |
 -
It's arguable that it's hardly elective. |
Zhade |
Mar-28-07 10:58 PM |
#80 |
-
He continues to pay. |
Hepburn |
Mar-27-07 09:35 PM |
#5 |
-
The alimony agreement was made with a person, not a gender |
BattyDem |
Mar-27-07 09:41 PM |
#8 |
-
Alimony, smalimony... |
1monster |
Mar-27-07 09:41 PM |
#9 |
 -
You know, if two people enter an agreement |
kineta |
Mar-27-07 09:55 PM |
#15 |
-
Okay, there is merit to that argument, however, that should be part of the |
1monster |
Mar-27-07 10:18 PM |
#24 |
-
agree with you about the terminology |
kineta |
Mar-27-07 11:26 PM |
#35 |
-
I can solve this.... |
hlthe2b |
Mar-27-07 09:50 PM |
#10 |
-
I tend to dislike alimony in all cases. |
Warren Stupidity |
Mar-27-07 09:50 PM |
#11 |
-
the alimony should stop - he/she has changed her side of the deal so the guy gets to change his |
msongs |
Mar-27-07 09:50 PM |
#12 |
 -
what deal was that? nt. |
Warren Stupidity |
Mar-27-07 09:53 PM |
#13 |
 -
your implying that they had a divorce DEAL that mentioned her/his gender? |
kineta |
Mar-27-07 09:56 PM |
#16 |
 -
What deal? Still the same person. |
uppityperson |
Mar-27-07 10:07 PM |
#18 |
  -
If a person goes through a sex change |
Katzenkavalier |
Mar-28-07 12:59 AM |
#42 |
 -
dicksteele says it well in post #41 |
uppityperson |
Mar-28-07 10:50 AM |
#50 |
 -
When a person goes through a sex change do they still carry their debt |
mondo joe |
Mar-28-07 11:17 AM |
#57 |
 -
He's still the ex-wife. |
LeftyMom |
Mar-27-07 10:08 PM |
#20 |
 -
And if my landlord gets a sex change I can stop paying my rent, too! |
dicksteele |
Mar-27-07 10:24 PM |
#25 |
  -
LOL |
kineta |
Mar-27-07 11:27 PM |
#36 |
  -
Your landlord/tenant relationship was not dependent upon your |
Laurier |
Mar-28-07 12:19 AM |
#40 |
 -
Kinda my point. That alimony agreement is not dependent on gender, either. |
dicksteele |
Mar-28-07 12:51 AM |
#41 |
  -
I have to disagree with your assertion that the terms of the marriage are irrelevant . |
Laurier |
Mar-28-07 01:17 AM |
#45 |
   -
once the marriage is ended why the hell should gender matter? |
kineta |
Mar-28-07 11:07 AM |
#51 |
    -
I disagree. |
Laurier |
Mar-28-07 10:52 PM |
#78 |
   -
no, the decision about alimony is based on the deal the couple makes - |
mondo joe |
Mar-28-07 11:26 AM |
#61 |
  -
Duplicate - deleted |
Laurier |
Mar-28-07 01:19 AM |
#46 |
 -
And we all know that nothing rhymes with "orage". |
dicksteele |
Mar-28-07 01:41 AM |
#47 |
 -
Because the obligation to one's spouse is not the same as one's |
Laurier |
Mar-28-07 10:32 PM |
#77 |
 -
Again you show some peculiar difficulties with reading comprehension. |
dicksteele |
Mar-28-07 11:54 PM |
#88 |
 -
Neither is the divorce relationship. |
mondo joe |
Mar-28-07 11:10 AM |
#52 |
 -
Neither was the alimony order. |
Zhade |
Mar-28-07 11:05 PM |
#82 |
 -
it's the same person |
shatter |
Mar-27-07 11:02 PM |
#30 |
 -
Are you sure you are liberal? |
jesus_of_suburbia |
Mar-27-07 11:30 PM |
#37 |
 -
Were there terms in the deal referring to genitalia? |
mondo joe |
Mar-28-07 11:16 AM |
#56 |
 -
You're wrong. |
Zhade |
Mar-28-07 11:00 PM |
#81 |
-
Does he now call him a "bloodsucking prick" rather than a... |
mitchum |
Mar-27-07 10:16 PM |
#22 |
-
Interesting semantic awkwardness: SHE no longer exists to pay alimony to. LOL! |
BlooInBloo |
Mar-27-07 10:17 PM |
#23 |
-
Pay it and like it. |
Forkboy |
Mar-27-07 10:29 PM |
#26 |
-
Would a self-respecting man take that alimony? Heh. |
WinkyDink |
Mar-27-07 11:09 PM |
#33 |
 -
Ouch! |
BuyingThyme |
Mar-27-07 11:16 PM |
#34 |
 -
What bullshit. *I know you were kidding though* |
jesus_of_suburbia |
Mar-27-07 11:33 PM |
#38 |
-
OMG. Like this Democratic flaming Liberal WOMAN doesn't know or think that. |
WinkyDink |
Mar-28-07 01:11 AM |
#44 |
-
Interesting. |
Laurier |
Mar-28-07 12:15 AM |
#39 |
-
Another reminder why I will probably never get married |
RagingInMiami |
Mar-28-07 01:09 AM |
#43 |
-
Is alimony at all based on |
spoony |
Mar-28-07 03:36 AM |
#48 |
 -
If you think transgendered persons are treated better than women... |
Zhade |
Mar-28-07 11:09 PM |
#83 |
-
Lol, LoZoccolo was so dead on about you. |
spoony |
Mar-29-07 03:41 AM |
#89 |
-
Why is ANYONE still being awarded "Alimony?" until death or remarriage |
alphafemale |
Mar-28-07 03:48 AM |
#49 |
 -
I think it depends on what you think marriage is. |
mondo joe |
Mar-28-07 11:14 AM |
#54 |
-
here's my question: Why does someone who can afford such an elective surgery |
ComerPerro |
Mar-28-07 11:13 AM |
#53 |
 -
Alimony isn't welfare. NT |
mondo joe |
Mar-28-07 11:15 AM |
#55 |
-
true, but what reason could there be for the husband to have to keep paying |
ComerPerro |
Mar-28-07 11:21 AM |
#59 |
-
Because it doesn't have to do with "hurting for finances". |
mondo joe |
Mar-28-07 11:23 AM |
#60 |
-
well, whatever. IMO, alimony and child support is all bullshit anyway |
ComerPerro |
Mar-28-07 11:33 AM |
#63 |
-
Child support is bullshit? What do you mean? |
uppityperson |
Mar-28-07 03:03 PM |
#70 |
-
Child support is bullshit? |
Zhade |
Mar-28-07 11:13 PM |
#84 |
-
By this reasoning, if you get a sex change you can abandon all your debt. |
mondo joe |
Mar-28-07 11:19 AM |
#58 |
-
What a fat (and ignorant) pig. |
BlueIris |
Mar-28-07 11:29 AM |
#62 |
 -
Do we know he's fat? Should fat be an insult? |
Zhade |
Mar-28-07 11:14 PM |
#85 |
-
I think if she can afford to become a he, ... |
CRH |
Mar-28-07 11:37 AM |
#64 |
 -
Alimony is not generally a needs based arrangement. |
mondo joe |
Mar-28-07 01:25 PM |
#66 |
 -
Alimony is an acknowledgment of a spouses contribution to the marriage |
Rosemary2205 |
Mar-28-07 01:34 PM |
#67 |
 -
I don't think people here understand what alimony is |
gollygee |
Mar-28-07 01:41 PM |
#68 |
 -
He is a he. Deal with it. |
Zhade |
Mar-28-07 11:15 PM |
#86 |
-
I don't understand why anyone would think it would make any difference at all |
gollygee |
Mar-28-07 01:50 PM |
#69 |
-
Men still earn more money than women |
slackmaster |
Mar-28-07 03:08 PM |
#72 |
-
Yeah because transgendered people have a really easy time |
gollygee |
Mar-28-07 03:11 PM |
#73 |
-
Only if they disclose that they are transgendered |
slackmaster |
Mar-28-07 03:23 PM |
#74 |
 -
Do you think it's that easy to keep a secret? |
gollygee |
Mar-28-07 03:29 PM |
#75 |
-
I'm not assuming anything about this individual |
slackmaster |
Mar-28-07 03:41 PM |
#76 |
-
THANK you. It's like some people are blind to the discrimination Ts get EVERY DAY. |
Zhade |
Mar-28-07 11:16 PM |
#87 |