You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: There are technical issues that prevent the F22 from being used in the battlespaces we are fighting [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. There are technical issues that prevent the F22 from being used in the battlespaces we are fighting
Edited on Fri Feb-27-09 01:33 PM by Bread and Circus
In other words, it's a machine that doesn't work as intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -F-22 Cuts? Beavker  Feb-27-09 01:24 PM   #0 
  - I think Obama has consulted with the military.  tabatha   Feb-27-09 01:25 PM   #1 
  - That would be my take  Beavker   Feb-27-09 01:27 PM   #4 
  - By the way, I see that some of the over-priced weapons are made by General Dynamics.  tabatha   Feb-27-09 01:29 PM   #5 
  - Secretary Gates cut those crap-flies down to about 170, from an initial plan of 700  Kolesar   Feb-27-09 01:32 PM   #11 
  - A contrarian view:  n2doc   Feb-27-09 01:26 PM   #2 
  - It's a cold war boondoggle.  HiFructosePronSyrup   Feb-27-09 01:26 PM   #3 
  - I don't know about boondoggle, but it's certainly a Cold War relic.  Xithras   Feb-27-09 02:15 PM   #34 
     - Yep, we should be going with the F-35.  backscatter712   Feb-27-09 02:29 PM   #45 
  - Because we also have the 2nd and 3rd best, they cost a fraction of what the F-22 does,  Greyhound   Feb-27-09 01:30 PM   #6 
  - Especially when our "enemies" are successful with cell-phones, baling wire & C-4, and  SoCalDem   Feb-27-09 01:33 PM   #13 
  - Excellent point, SoCalDem.  Enthusiast   Feb-27-09 04:39 PM   #136 
  - You are wrong...  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 02:02 PM   #24 
  - Really? Which? n/t  Greyhound   Feb-27-09 02:30 PM   #48 
  - Here are a few that are on par with the F-15...  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 04:35 PM   #134 
  - What would be the price to forge new titanium structural members?  Tesha   Feb-27-09 04:29 PM   #132 
  - Not quite.  Angleae   Feb-27-09 03:25 PM   #79 
  - And I thought the Littoral Combat Ship was history, but, evidently not. Can someonen 'splain?  Captain Hilts   Feb-27-09 01:30 PM   #7 
  - Newer planes usually have a better flight hours to maintenance ratio. So, ...  Captain Hilts   Feb-27-09 01:31 PM   #8 
  - That would be sad if they cut the 22....that is an amazing jet  cboy4   Feb-27-09 01:31 PM   #9 
  - There are technical issues that prevent the F22 from being used in the battlespaces we are fighting  Bread and Circus   Feb-27-09 01:32 PM   #10 
  - USAF senior leaders including Secretary want more F-22 but Gates opposes. Why should Gates  jody   Feb-27-09 01:33 PM   #12 
  - USAF leaders follow their faith based initiatives w/ prayer.  ChairmanAgnostic   Feb-27-09 01:44 PM   #16 
  - You don't know what you're talking about, do you?  cboy4   Feb-27-09 01:53 PM   #19 
  - Looks like he does.  HiFructosePronSyrup   Feb-27-09 02:02 PM   #23 
     - let's not forget their minor nav-glitch.  ChairmanAgnostic   Feb-27-09 02:03 PM   #25 
     - Those 80286s were always a problem.  HiFructosePronSyrup   Feb-27-09 02:05 PM   #26 
        - sigh. Glitz vs. reality? glitz always wins.  ChairmanAgnostic   Feb-27-09 03:50 PM   #100 
     - That's an article dating all the way back to 1997 for crissakes.  cboy4   Feb-27-09 02:06 PM   #27 
        - And the F-22 dates back to 1981.  HiFructosePronSyrup   Feb-27-09 02:07 PM   #28 
           - It's a fantastic machine,  cboy4   Feb-27-09 02:10 PM   #30 
           - It's a fantastic waste of money.  HiFructosePronSyrup   Feb-27-09 02:14 PM   #32 
              - Read the article below about the F-15's falling apart  cboy4   Feb-27-09 02:18 PM   #37 
                 - Read what I wrote about fantastic stretches of the imagination.  HiFructosePronSyrup   Feb-27-09 02:24 PM   #39 
                    - The fighter pilots that know better don't seem to agree with you...read my post below  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 02:26 PM   #42 
                    - The F-15's falling apart are fantastic stretches of imagination?  cboy4   Feb-27-09 02:27 PM   #43 
                       - One colossal waste of money to justify another...  HiFructosePronSyrup   Feb-27-09 02:28 PM   #44 
                          - Why do you refuse to acknowledge the cracking and aging  cboy4   Feb-27-09 02:31 PM   #49 
                             - Oh, I acknowledge it.  HiFructosePronSyrup   Feb-27-09 02:32 PM   #50 
                                - Yea, no shit.  cboy4   Feb-27-09 02:36 PM   #55 
                                   - Fortunately, Barack Obama does.  HiFructosePronSyrup   Feb-27-09 02:37 PM   #57 
                                      - His decision to halt production would not be based on any  cboy4   Feb-27-09 02:50 PM   #61 
                                      - He's always said he'll cut programs that don't work.  HiFructosePronSyrup   Feb-27-09 02:52 PM   #63 
                                         - That's ridiculous.  cboy4   Feb-27-09 03:01 PM   #67 
                                      - What makes the F-22 a boondoggle...  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 03:22 PM   #76 
                                      - The F-22 is far from a "boondoggle" by any objective measure.  Raskolnik   Feb-27-09 03:25 PM   #78 
                                         - Unit costs would go down if more were made  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 03:29 PM   #81 
                                            - Point taken, but I don't think we have the money or the need to produce that many.  Raskolnik   Feb-27-09 03:33 PM   #85 
                                            - Somehow we had the money to produce over 700 F-15A/B/C/D models and over 300 F-15Es....  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 03:35 PM   #88 
                                            - And I believe that number does not reflect a realistic need.  Raskolnik   Feb-27-09 03:40 PM   #90 
                                            - I didn't say it was...  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 03:42 PM   #92 
           - not as bad as the B-2.  ChairmanAgnostic   Feb-27-09 03:20 PM   #75 
              - 1B per copy because they only made 20  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 03:26 PM   #80 
                 - very good point. but  ChairmanAgnostic   Feb-27-09 03:33 PM   #84 
                    - The B-2 was already bought when the USSR fell...  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 03:37 PM   #89 
                       - JDAM? and how many have been used in combat?  ChairmanAgnostic   Feb-27-09 03:49 PM   #99 
                          - They are doing things with bombers that no one envisioned years ago  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 03:53 PM   #103 
                             - RIGHT. MY POINT EXACTLY!  ChairmanAgnostic   Feb-27-09 03:59 PM   #106 
                                - One thing you're not talking about, though...  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 04:01 PM   #112 
  - Your ignorance re the F-22 is awesome. n/t  jody   Feb-27-09 01:59 PM   #22 
  - You really have no idea what you're talking about...  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 02:18 PM   #36 
     - A fighter pilot message board?  HiFructosePronSyrup   Feb-27-09 02:34 PM   #53 
     - Actually it's a military pilot message board...  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 03:14 PM   #69 
     - the F-18 has rarely used gunsights.  ChairmanAgnostic   Feb-27-09 03:23 PM   #77 
        - You're not getting my point...  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 03:33 PM   #86 
           - I don't fly, never have. No wait, there was that  ChairmanAgnostic   Feb-27-09 03:45 PM   #95 
              - Ugh....  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 03:58 PM   #105 
                 - just as armored?  ChairmanAgnostic   Feb-27-09 04:00 PM   #109 
                    - Dude, I just got a peek at a USMC V-22 that was out here not long ago...  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 04:03 PM   #113 
                       - OKay. I do not doubt your experience and knowledge.  ChairmanAgnostic   Feb-27-09 04:05 PM   #116 
                          - In that case, neither are the C-130s I fly "armored"  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 04:06 PM   #119 
  - I think that is an unfair assessment. A cost/benefit analysis is part of any military procurement  Raskolnik   Feb-27-09 03:19 PM   #73 
     - and doesn't each F-35 have more moving parts than  ChairmanAgnostic   Feb-27-09 03:31 PM   #82 
     - The F-22 and F-35 are designed for different missions. Given the current mission the President has  jody   Feb-27-09 03:44 PM   #94 
        - I disagree that 381 represents a "bare minimum."  Raskolnik   Feb-27-09 03:51 PM   #101 
        - Given the mission Congress has assigned the F-22, I'll take USAF leader's estimate over Gates et al.  jody   Feb-27-09 04:01 PM   #111 
           - I don't mean to be snarky, but that is a naive outlook. We don't just give each branch a blank check  Raskolnik   Feb-27-09 04:11 PM   #123 
              - Perhaps the "naive outlook" is from the anti-F-22 group. Have a great day. n/t  jody   Feb-27-09 04:35 PM   #135 
                 - Oh, I'm not anti-F-22 at all. I think it the closest thing to an X-Wing that we'll have  Raskolnik   Feb-27-09 04:43 PM   #137 
        - yeah, the f-22 is 20 yrs old design base. The F-35 is but a decade old  ChairmanAgnostic   Feb-27-09 03:52 PM   #102 
           - Have you talked with F-22 pilots or commanders of F-22 units? Are you familiar with the mission  jody   Feb-27-09 03:59 PM   #107 
           - there is no longer a mission available for the F-22's original design.  ChairmanAgnostic   Feb-27-09 04:03 PM   #114 
              - Your statements are void of knowledge and understanding of the USAF mission. Have a good day. n/t  jody   Feb-27-09 04:06 PM   #118 
                 - to make money for contractors? to brainwash cadets in Colorado?  ChairmanAgnostic   Feb-27-09 04:09 PM   #121 
           - Both aircraft can operate in any weather...  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 03:59 PM   #108 
              - any weather, except BAD weather. That's true.  ChairmanAgnostic   Feb-27-09 04:00 PM   #110 
                 - In that case, most airplanes don't operate in BAD weather...  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 04:04 PM   #115 
                    - ahhh. THE ORIGINAL SPECS called for an all weather stealth fighter.  ChairmanAgnostic   Feb-27-09 04:06 PM   #120 
                       - "All weather" doesn't mean "any weather"  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 04:19 PM   #127 
  - There's little call for them in the foreseeable future.  Occam Bandage   Feb-27-09 01:35 PM   #14 
  - It seems there is a consensus.  Greyhound   Feb-27-09 01:38 PM   #15 
  - Also  Beavker   Feb-27-09 01:44 PM   #17 
  - You have to look at the big picture.....including the maintenance  cboy4   Feb-27-09 01:50 PM   #18 
  - Have you read up on the F-22?  Greyhound   Feb-27-09 02:29 PM   #46 
     - Why no Greyhound, I know nothing about the F-22  cboy4   Feb-27-09 02:45 PM   #60 
        - Even using your "unbiased" sources, and assuming all you say is factual,  Greyhound   Feb-27-09 03:34 PM   #87 
  - Sure, a consensus here among non-pilots that don't know what they are talking about  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 02:25 PM   #41 
     - How many F-15/F-16 have ever been defeated in combat? n/t  Greyhound   Feb-27-09 02:34 PM   #51 
        - We lost several in Iraq during Gulf War I...at least one over Yugo, etc  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 03:16 PM   #71 
           - According to this cited article,  Greyhound   Feb-27-09 03:43 PM   #93 
           - That's nice, except you originally stated BOTH the F-15 and F-16...  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 04:05 PM   #117 
           - OK, but according to Lockheed that isn't true either.  Greyhound   Feb-27-09 04:27 PM   #131 
  - Boondoggle  alcibiades_mystery   Feb-27-09 01:54 PM   #20 
  - Best at what? Shooting down non-existent Soviet MiGs?  tinrobot   Feb-27-09 01:58 PM   #21 
  - Non existent?  depakid   Feb-27-09 02:14 PM   #31 
  - Not MiGs, but Sukhois, and Chinese Shenyang J-10s, among others.  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 02:23 PM   #38 
  - we have enough to fight any air force that would attack the united states  madrchsod   Feb-27-09 02:07 PM   #29 
  - Our aging fighter fleet can still defeat the combined air forces of the rest  Greyhound   Feb-27-09 03:46 PM   #97 
     - Maybe it can today...  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 04:22 PM   #128 
        - Oh come on, you and I both know that the future is going to be unmanned  Greyhound   Feb-27-09 05:08 PM   #138 
  - F-15 grounding strains U.S. air defenses  cboy4   Feb-27-09 02:15 PM   #33 
  - Unneccessary  NeedleCast   Feb-27-09 02:17 PM   #35 
  - Yea, why don't we have to engage in dog fights?  cboy4   Feb-27-09 02:24 PM   #40 
  - I don't deny that some of the old aircraft are old  NeedleCast   Feb-27-09 02:35 PM   #54 
     - Well, there are aliens.  HiFructosePronSyrup   Feb-27-09 02:37 PM   #56 
        - And there are also clowns.  cboy4   Feb-27-09 02:51 PM   #62 
        - Right, right. We need to protect America from the clowns.  HiFructosePronSyrup   Feb-27-09 02:53 PM   #64 
           - You, of course, are the clowns I'm referring to, since you  cboy4   Feb-27-09 02:58 PM   #66 
              - Because without the F-22  NeedleCast   Feb-27-09 03:02 PM   #68 
              - Yeah, I got it.  HiFructosePronSyrup   Feb-27-09 03:45 PM   #96 
        - We've got Wil Smith for that shit anyway  NeedleCast   Feb-27-09 02:56 PM   #65 
  - We haven't engaged in an aerial battle since 2003. However...  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 02:30 PM   #47 
     - That's an excellent point bdab1973  cboy4   Feb-27-09 02:34 PM   #52 
     - I can't speak for the British parliment, sorry  NeedleCast   Feb-27-09 02:44 PM   #59 
        - Who said it's gotta be China or Russia?  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 03:19 PM   #72 
           - And the only possible deterrent then is the F-22?  NeedleCast   Feb-27-09 03:56 PM   #104 
              - I would like to address everything in your post, but I'm tired and about to go to sleep...  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 04:16 PM   #126 
                 - So build the far less expensive F-35  NeedleCast   Feb-27-09 04:30 PM   #133 
  - If America fights large wars  Jeneral   Feb-27-09 02:37 PM   #58 
  - There was a pretty good article in Slate this week about this.  Raskolnik   Feb-27-09 03:15 PM   #70 
  - The F-15 fleet has fatigue issues  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 03:20 PM   #74 
     - Correct me if I am wrong, but it is my understanding that maintenance can be performed  Raskolnik   Feb-27-09 03:31 PM   #83 
        - Sure it can...  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 03:41 PM   #91 
           - I think you are low-balling the F-22's costs and exaggerating the costs to upgrade existing fighters  Raskolnik   Feb-27-09 03:47 PM   #98 
              - I fly C-130s and we have similar problems  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 04:25 PM   #129 
  - It certainly is the best fighter, but there is no one to use it against.  old mark   Feb-27-09 04:10 PM   #122 
  - F-22 is overly complicated, and impossible to fly without computer assistance.  trthnd4jstc   Feb-27-09 04:12 PM   #124 
  - The F-16 is nearly impossible to fly without computers...  bdab1973   Feb-27-09 04:27 PM   #130 
  - Increasing the military budget?  margotb822   Feb-27-09 04:14 PM   #125 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC