You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #57: I think that there need to be laws, and that everyone needs to obey them [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-29-07 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
57. I think that there need to be laws, and that everyone needs to obey them
So no, I don't think that the rich should be able to 'do as they like' by buying themselves out of obeying the law.

I also think that the rich should pay proportionately more taxes than less well-off people.

When it's a question of consumption, within the law, and within the income left after taxes, then I think that people should be able to do roughly what they like. "Within the law", however, covers quite a bit: e.g. you should not be able to build a big palace or private amusement park without getting planning permission, and you should not be able to get that automatically, without regard to the needs of other people in your locality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Should rich people be able to do whatever they want? XemaSab  Jan-26-07 08:30 PM   #0 
  - As long as they're paying their share of taxes...  deadmessengers   Jan-26-07 08:34 PM   #1 
  - Well, maybe you should....  MattSh   Jan-29-07 04:28 AM   #53 
  - sure but they should not expect poor peoples' sons and daughters  Mend   Jan-26-07 08:35 PM   #2 
  - I voted no  Codeblue   Jan-26-07 08:38 PM   #3 
  - They should be allowed  ProudDad   Jan-26-07 08:40 PM   #4 
  - So long as you don't significantly impact other people, or the commons  EstimatedProphet   Jan-26-07 08:41 PM   #5 
  - Who decides what an impact is?  XemaSab   Jan-27-07 12:43 AM   #8 
     - Well, that's one definition  EstimatedProphet   Jan-27-07 12:44 PM   #9 
        - The definition of a significant impact  XemaSab   Jan-28-07 10:01 PM   #10 
  - I think EVERYONE should be alllowed to do what they like with what's theirs,  mondo joe   Jan-26-07 08:46 PM   #6 
  - But where is that line?  XemaSab   Jan-26-07 11:49 PM   #7 
     - No, it's not socially responsible.  mondo joe   Jan-28-07 10:06 PM   #11 
  - Should they be able to .....just because they are able to?  KoKo01   Jan-28-07 10:07 PM   #12 
  - not without criticism  JVS   Jan-28-07 10:14 PM   #13 
  - They Should Pay A LIVING WAGE Even If They Don't Want To  Wiley50   Jan-28-07 10:17 PM   #14 
  - Not if they want me to vote for them. nt  Quixote1818   Jan-28-07 10:26 PM   #15 
  - We regulate corporations  lwfern   Jan-28-07 10:30 PM   #16 
  - As long as they aren't infringing anyone else's rights, everyone should be able...  porphyrian   Jan-28-07 10:30 PM   #17 
  - Under the law: Yes Moraly: No  Quixote1818   Jan-28-07 10:32 PM   #18 
  - I think all people should live responsibly  jpgray   Jan-28-07 10:33 PM   #19 
  - In an era of declining resources, No.  camero   Jan-28-07 10:38 PM   #20 
  - should poor people be able to do whatever they want with their money.  seabeyond   Jan-28-07 10:42 PM   #21 
  - Poor people getting everything they need would be a good place to start  jpgray   Jan-28-07 10:43 PM   #22 
  - i guess there would have to be a defintion of poor and need n/t  seabeyond   Jan-28-07 10:47 PM   #23 
     - Well, people who can't afford homes, food, education, or time to raise their kids are poor  jpgray   Jan-28-07 10:50 PM   #24 
  - Because resources are finite  sandnsea   Jan-29-07 12:35 AM   #32 
  - no. there should be no rich people.  leftofthedial   Jan-28-07 10:51 PM   #25 
  - Never in a million years will that fly, but unfortunatly it's the truth! nt  Quixote1818   Jan-28-07 11:56 PM   #28 
  - I have to agree  marions ghost   Jan-29-07 04:41 AM   #54 
  - I'm not religious  Jim Warren   Jan-28-07 10:51 PM   #26 
  - Yes, but maybe we need to start levying exorbitant environmental  Zorra   Jan-28-07 11:53 PM   #27 
  - This is what I love about DU  Quixote1818   Jan-29-07 12:03 AM   #29 
  - I admire your outlook.  Vidar   Jan-29-07 04:14 AM   #52 
  - It's true  marions ghost   Jan-29-07 04:45 AM   #55 
  - Weird, divisive, polarizing, vaguely offensive poll question.  wiggs   Jan-29-07 12:31 AM   #30 
  - What wiggs said.  Laurier   Jan-29-07 01:24 AM   #39 
  - They should be criticized for it  sandnsea   Jan-29-07 12:31 AM   #31 
  - Amen! nt  Quixote1818   Jan-29-07 12:37 AM   #33 
  - Yes  JVS   Jan-29-07 03:22 AM   #49 
  - Yes, but if they do these things before compensating those they stole their riches from  ConsAreLiars   Jan-29-07 12:38 AM   #34 
  - You can't Legislate Morality  Raydawg1234   Jan-29-07 01:04 AM   #35 
  - But is morality "None of anyone's business"?  JVS   Jan-29-07 01:05 AM   #36 
  - Morality cannot be forced on another. It is up to us as individuals to attain it.  Raydawg1234   Jan-29-07 01:20 AM   #37 
     - But is morality an individual or social concept.  JVS   Jan-29-07 01:22 AM   #38 
        - short of breaking the law.........no.  Raydawg1234   Jan-29-07 01:33 AM   #41 
           - So we shouldn't criticize people unless they are breaking the law?  JVS   Jan-29-07 01:35 AM   #42 
              - what point does it serve, all you can do is live your own life.  Raydawg1234   Jan-29-07 02:30 AM   #45 
                 - You are exactly right! I never understood guys like MLK Jr.  Quixote1818   Jan-29-07 02:35 AM   #46 
                    - I'm talking more about legislation, you can't force people to change.  Raydawg1234   Jan-29-07 02:39 AM   #47 
                       - Not force but teach  Quixote1818   Jan-29-07 02:48 AM   #48 
  - Well, thats not exactly right  Quixote1818   Jan-29-07 01:37 AM   #43 
  - It never bothered Marie Antoinette or Czar Nicholas II.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Jan-29-07 01:33 AM   #40 
  - hell no  koopie57   Jan-29-07 02:04 AM   #44 
  - I have seen that too  marions ghost   Jan-29-07 04:56 AM   #58 
  - Uh, yeah??  Katherine Brengle   Jan-29-07 03:52 AM   #50 
  - The majority of the rich are thieves & should be treated accordingly.  Vidar   Jan-29-07 04:12 AM   #51 
  - Yes... IF they obey laws THEY HAVEN'T WRITTEN!  annabanana   Jan-29-07 04:47 AM   #56 
  - I think that there need to be laws, and that everyone needs to obey them  LeftishBrit   Jan-29-07 04:49 AM   #57 
  - I think if it is your money...  Fountain79   Jan-29-07 06:19 PM   #59 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC