You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #16: Commander's Veto Sank Threatening Gulf Buildup [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Commander's Veto Sank Threatening Gulf Buildup
Obama's got backbone.

And he's got company.



Commander's Veto Sank Threatening Gulf Buildup

by Gareth Porter
AntiWar.com May 16, 2007

Adm. William Fallon, then President George W. Bush's nominee to head the Central Command (CENTCOM), expressed strong opposition in February to an administration plan to increase the number of carrier strike groups in the Persian Gulf from two to three and vowed privately there would be no war against Iran as long as he was chief of CENTCOM, according to sources with access to his thinking.

Fallon's resistance to the proposed deployment of a third aircraft carrier was followed by a shift in the Bush administration's Iran policy in February and March away from increased military threats and toward diplomatic engagement with Iran. That shift, for which no credible explanation has been offered by administration officials, suggests that Fallon's resistance to a crucial deployment was a major factor in the intra-administration struggle over policy toward Iran.

The plan to add a third carrier strike group in the Gulf had been a key element in a broader strategy discussed at high levels to intimidate Iran by a series of military moves suggesting preparations for a military strike.

Fallon's resistance to a further buildup of naval striking power in the Gulf apparently took the Bush administration by surprise. Fallon, then commander of the U.S. Pacific Command, had been associated with naval aviation throughout his career, and last January, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates publicly encouraged the idea that the appointment presaged greater emphasis on the military option in regard to the U.S. conflict with Iran.

Explaining why he recommended Fallon, Gates said, "As you look at the range of options available to the United States, the use of naval and air power, potentially, it made sense to me for all those reasons for Fallon to have the job."

CONTINUED...

http://www.antiwar.com/porter/?articleid=10976



Now it's time for Obama to find the good generals and admirals and promote them.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -JFK, FDR and 'Seven Days in May' Octafish  Feb-24-09 07:26 PM   #0 
  - Thank you!  H2O Man   Feb-24-09 07:28 PM   #1 
  - Wall Street's Fascist Conspiracy  Octafish   Feb-24-09 07:52 PM   #4 
     - Very good. Thanks.  H2O Man   Feb-24-09 08:18 PM   #12 
  - Rec'd. And I'm happy to know that  babylonsister   Feb-24-09 07:37 PM   #2 
  - We need a COAT - the Coalition to Oppose the Arms Trade  Octafish   Feb-24-09 07:56 PM   #7 
     - Interesting Pick  Me.   Feb-24-09 08:04 PM   #10 
  - Washington being what it is..  annabanana   Feb-24-09 07:40 PM   #3 
  - Lisa Pease has performed a heroic role.  Octafish   Feb-24-09 08:10 PM   #11 
  - Tee hee! Thanks Octafish.  lonestarnot   Feb-24-09 07:53 PM   #5 
  - Remember how, in the debates, McCain referred to Dallas as an ''intervention''?  Octafish   Feb-24-09 08:24 PM   #13 
     - Yes.  lonestarnot   Feb-24-09 09:25 PM   #14 
     - Octafish, did you read this quote from Michael Ledeen?  robertpaulsen   Feb-25-09 12:55 PM   #28 
     - Thank you, robertpaulsen. That Ledeen fellow has a way of getting his 2-cents out there.  Octafish   Feb-26-09 02:28 PM   #36 
     - I have arrived.  hootinholler   Feb-25-09 03:38 PM   #32 
  - "That subterfuge was formulated by the United States last November "  wroberts189   Feb-24-09 07:54 PM   #6 
  - further ...subterfuge = Lie to Americans  wroberts189   Feb-24-09 07:58 PM   #8 
  - Commander's Veto Sank Threatening Gulf Buildup  Octafish   Feb-24-09 09:32 PM   #16 
     - Hear, hear!  HCE SuiGeneris   Feb-24-09 11:18 PM   #22 
     - The US military industrial complex scares the crap out of me  Ichingcarpenter   Feb-24-09 11:19 PM   #23 
  - You May Find This Thread Interesting  Me.   Feb-24-09 07:59 PM   #9 
  - Thank you. That is an outstanding thread.  Octafish   Feb-24-09 09:47 PM   #18 
     - Yes, You Are  Me.   Feb-24-09 11:14 PM   #21 
  - I'm worried about this. I'm not sure Obama's evincing the appropriate degree of paranoia.  snot   Feb-24-09 09:30 PM   #15 
  - Wow! Obama certainly is facing some strong pressures  Time for change   Feb-24-09 09:44 PM   #17 
  - The Marines NEVER wanted to go to Iraq and still want 'out'. Even the Army...  Captain Hilts   Feb-24-09 10:27 PM   #19 
  - Actually, what the Marines want is  Thothmes   Feb-25-09 05:35 AM   #26 
     - True. But they never wanted Iraq to be one of the choices. What the hell...  Captain Hilts   Feb-25-09 12:55 PM   #29 
  - k*r Now they don't even bother to hide it.  autorank   Feb-24-09 10:40 PM   #20 
  - As a result of the CIA-FBI-Military-Industrial Complex . . .  Klimmer777   Feb-24-09 11:50 PM   #24 
  - Kicked & Rec'd...  MinM   Feb-25-09 12:02 AM   #25 
  - I hope you watched Rachel Maddow tonite ...  GeorgeGist   Feb-25-09 06:43 AM   #27 
  - That troubles me to no end.  Octafish   Feb-26-09 02:32 PM   #37 
  - K&R  bigtree   Feb-25-09 02:10 PM   #30 
  - JFK-related movie coming out this weekend... (Mary Pinchot Meyer)  MinM   Feb-25-09 02:37 PM   #31 
  - I'm more afraid of the Wall Street fascists than the military dictators.  anonymous171   Feb-25-09 03:41 PM   #33 
  - Two sides of the same coin.  JJ   Feb-25-09 07:51 PM   #34 
  - Morning kick for a great thread.  robertpaulsen   Feb-26-09 12:17 PM   #35 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC