H2O Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-09-09 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
| 33. There are related theories |
|
that include the Sami and pre-Celtic Irish. This is due, in large part, to the differences in language. Each of these three groups spoke/speaks a language that is different from the large, related languages of all the others in that part of the world.
|
| -Neanderthal genome to be unveiled |
Adsos Letter |
Feb-06-09 11:47 PM |
#0 |
-
interbreeding between Neanderthals and humans... |
lapfog_1 |
Feb-06-09 11:56 PM |
#1 |
 -
Why the shit-talking of Neanderthals? |
Chulanowa |
Feb-07-09 12:00 AM |
#3 |
  -
But but but... these guys come to all my parties! |
lapfog_1 |
Feb-07-09 12:30 AM |
#5 |
 -
Getting eaten by Hyenas...so easy, even a caveman could do it... |
Adsos Letter |
Feb-07-09 12:32 AM |
#6 |
 -
But having your hair preserved in Hyena poop fossils for hundreds of |
lapfog_1 |
Feb-07-09 12:38 AM |
#7 |
 -
! |
Adsos Letter |
Feb-07-09 12:42 AM |
#9 |
 -
Neanderthals were human. |
greyl |
Feb-07-09 12:41 AM |
#8 |
-
No they weren't human. They were a separate species or sub species. |
HamdenRice |
Feb-07-09 06:09 AM |
#14 |
-
Homo = Human. |
greyl |
Feb-08-09 03:40 AM |
#15 |
 -
Homo = genus for hominan. Sapien = human. Junior High School biology. I'll make it even simpler. |
HamdenRice |
Feb-08-09 06:34 AM |
#17 |
-
Homo is Latin for human. |
greyl |
Feb-08-09 02:17 PM |
#24 |
 -
Actually, the entomology of the Latin word, "Homo" comes from the word "soil" |
HamdenRice |
Feb-08-09 04:07 PM |
#25 |
-
Entomology? Oh, brother. I think you mean "etymology". |
greyl |
Feb-09-09 12:30 AM |
#28 |
-
If you're going to cite Wiki, maybe you should, like, read the article? |
HamdenRice |
Feb-09-09 05:29 AM |
#30 |
-
I didn't cite a particular wiki article, but I did cite about 6 other sources. |
greyl |
Feb-10-09 01:07 AM |
#47 |
-
uhhh... |
HamdenRice |
Feb-10-09 06:08 AM |
#49 |
-
Right. "A particular" = "single". |
greyl |
Feb-12-09 01:10 AM |
#50 |
-
Our Neandertal brothers and sisters actually had a higher EQ than Modern humans. |
Maru Kitteh |
Feb-12-09 02:01 AM |
#54 |
-
Yes, they were human. |
frogmarch |
Feb-08-09 04:37 PM |
#27 |
 -
Correct. |
H2O Man |
Feb-09-09 06:15 AM |
#32 |
  -
Whether Neanderthals were human is arguable. Whether Homo erectus was isn't |
HamdenRice |
Feb-09-09 07:45 AM |
#35 |
 -
There are no |
H2O Man |
Feb-09-09 08:20 AM |
#37 |
 -
The homo genus has existed for, at the VERY least, 1.5 million years. |
greyl |
Feb-09-09 04:12 PM |
#42 |
 -
"handy man" |
H2O Man |
Feb-09-09 06:22 PM |
#45 |
 -
Handy man", homo habilus, has been around between app. 1.5 - 2.5 million years. |
greyl |
Feb-10-09 12:22 AM |
#46 |
 -
"only the most stubborn and confused would continue to argue the point." |
HamdenRice |
Feb-10-09 06:00 AM |
#48 |
 -
Your idea of "human" is sadly narrow. Your loss. nt |
greyl |
Feb-12-09 01:12 AM |
#51 |
 -
These are ususally the same kind of persons who feel free to justify animal abuse. |
Maru Kitteh |
Feb-12-09 02:10 AM |
#55 |
  -
What makes you think that "different" means "superior"? |
HamdenRice |
Feb-12-09 12:55 PM |
#57 |
 -
Your idea of factual is sadly narrow. Your loss. |
HamdenRice |
Feb-12-09 12:47 PM |
#56 |
 -
I don't think you're being sincere. |
greyl |
Feb-14-09 12:07 AM |
#58 |
 -
"as were other early forms in the genus Homo, including ... Homo habilis. " |
HamdenRice |
Feb-09-09 08:14 AM |
#36 |
-
"Human" can refer to BOTH our particular speces and to the whole genus. |
Odin2005 |
Feb-09-09 08:26 AM |
#38 |
-
Iow, it does apply to all members of the genus. |
greyl |
Feb-09-09 04:34 PM |
#43 |
-
Wow there's a 38,000-year-old Freeper |
Stevenmarc |
Feb-06-09 11:58 PM |
#2 |
 -
hee hee n/t |
Liberal_in_LA |
Feb-08-09 09:09 AM |
#20 |
 -
I thought there couldn't be freepers older than 10,000 years11 hugh1 |
Amonester |
Feb-08-09 09:14 AM |
#23 |
-
So cool. |
aquart |
Feb-07-09 12:17 AM |
#4 |
-
I figured they started their research using joe 'the tax evading' plumber and then worked back |
rpannier |
Feb-07-09 01:48 AM |
#10 |
 -
That would be easy |
izquierdista |
Feb-07-09 02:34 AM |
#11 |
-
This was one of the hottest, most interesting debates the last time |
EFerrari |
Feb-07-09 02:44 AM |
#12 |
 -
So have we always looked like this? |
RiverStone |
Feb-09-09 04:45 PM |
#44 |
-
Here's an comparative illustration but I don't know how up to date: |
EFerrari |
Feb-12-09 01:21 AM |
#52 |
-
Fascinating! |
sfpcjock |
Feb-07-09 03:27 AM |
#13 |
-
While I find the work terribly fascinating |
Zodiak |
Feb-08-09 04:04 AM |
#16 |
 -
Just a handful of cases of interbreeding could have introduces useful trats into modern population. |
Odin2005 |
Feb-09-09 08:35 AM |
#41 |
-
quick .... get a comparison sample from the bush family |
TWiley |
Feb-08-09 08:03 AM |
#18 |
-
There is a school of thought placing Basques as the descendants of Neanderthals |
IDemo |
Feb-08-09 09:06 AM |
#19 |
 -
My money is on the Basques are aliens theory |
shadowknows69 |
Feb-08-09 09:11 AM |
#22 |
 -
There are related theories |
H2O Man |
Feb-09-09 06:23 AM |
#33 |
-
And what a convenient location: Crawford, Texas! |
jazzjunkysue |
Feb-08-09 09:10 AM |
#21 |
-
What, somebody get a blood sample from Lindsay Graham???? |
cliffordu |
Feb-08-09 04:12 PM |
#26 |
-
I wonder if some Bushie with a club will leap out and smash the petrie dishes to smithereens |
tom_paine |
Feb-09-09 12:38 AM |
#29 |
 -
Exerpted from Xenon's Intergallactic Guide to Everything |
jazzjunkysue |
Feb-09-09 08:27 AM |
#39 |
-
Later this week, |
H2O Man |
Feb-09-09 06:13 AM |
#31 |
-
This is all rubbish |
malaise |
Feb-09-09 06:45 AM |
#34 |
 -
I saw it in a museum. So it has to be true. |
jazzjunkysue |
Feb-09-09 08:28 AM |
#40 |
-
Ja! Into the valley Neander we go ~ |
bridgit |
Feb-12-09 01:35 AM |
#53 |