You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #31: You're joking, right? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Eryemil Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #22
31. You're joking, right?
I don't necessarily mean to sound condescending but bloody dead-Jew-on-a-stick mate.
Firstly, look at the etymology of the word itself.

Virgin:
c.1200, "unmarried or chaste woman noted for religious piety and having a position of reverence in the Church," from O.Fr. virgine, from L. virginem (nom. virgo) "maiden, unwedded girl or woman," also an adj., "fresh, unused," probably related to virga "young shoot." For sense evolution, cf. Gk. talis "a marriageable girl," cognate with L. talea "rod, stick, bar." Meaning "young woman in a state of inviolate chastity" is recorded from c.1310. Also applied since c.1330 to a chaste man. Meaning "naive or inexperienced person" is attested from 1953. The adj. is recorded from 1560 in the lit. sense; fig. sense of "pure, untainted" is attested from c.1300. Virginity is attested from c.1303, from O.Fr. virginite, from L. virginitatem (nom. virginitas), from virgo.

The -word- virgin is of Roman origin and has many Christian connotations but the concept is far, far older.
It is only in modern times that the concept of 'male virginity' has even developed. The word itself hints to this. Do you think that in ancient times these desert savages cared at all whether the males they were practically selling their unspoiled daughters to had had sex?

Have you thought about WHY we have such a hard time settling on an actual definition of virginity today? It's because of all the added variables. Egalitarianism, the rise of visible sexual orientation and the broadening of our sexual horizons in general.
Once upon a time a virgin was a woman with an unperforated hymen. As I said, just like the concept of adultery it was more or less designed with the simple aim of making sure that a husband's wife actually gave birth to his sons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC