Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-05-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
| 14. Isn't that the truth. |
| -Dean will not be HHS secretary. |
ulysses |
Feb-05-09 06:28 PM |
#0 |
 -
was HRC post-partisan? |
mike_c |
Feb-05-09 06:29 PM |
#1 |
 -
Good point. n/t |
ColbertWatcher |
Feb-05-09 06:31 PM |
#3 |
 -
far as I can tell, |
ulysses |
Feb-05-09 06:34 PM |
#7 |
| -
"comforting Republicans" ...LOL good one. |
madfloridian |
Feb-05-09 06:38 PM |
#13 |
| -
Aid and comfort to the enemy, then |
FiveGoodMen |
Feb-05-09 06:39 PM |
#15 |
| -
not sure how you mean this. |
ulysses |
Feb-05-09 06:41 PM |
#18 |
| -
No. I'm saying that "comforting republicans" is giving aid and comfort to the enemy |
FiveGoodMen |
Feb-05-09 06:43 PM |
#20 |
| -
my bad. |
ulysses |
Feb-05-09 06:45 PM |
#22 |
| -
not at all |
FiveGoodMen |
Feb-05-09 06:48 PM |
#23 |
| -
indeed.... |
mike_c |
Feb-05-09 06:40 PM |
#16 |
| -
Of course it wouldn't happen |
Hydra |
Feb-05-09 06:30 PM |
#2 |
| -
You know what is "post-partisan?" Professionalism. |
ColbertWatcher |
Feb-05-09 06:32 PM |
#4 |
| -
so, again, |
ulysses |
Feb-05-09 06:36 PM |
#10 |
| -
Professionalism doesn't just define behavior ... |
ColbertWatcher |
Feb-05-09 06:51 PM |
#25 |
| -
imagine this: you're in a really interesting book club |
ulysses |
Feb-05-09 07:00 PM |
#26 |
| -
It's a standard that disqualifies your disrupter from membership. |
ColbertWatcher |
Feb-05-09 07:03 PM |
#27 |
| -
so, when we're confronted with a party |
ulysses |
Feb-05-09 07:05 PM |
#28 |
| -
You don't really expect me to solve that in one post do you? |
ColbertWatcher |
Feb-05-09 07:16 PM |
#29 |
| -
I think the answer is easier than you seem to think it is. |
ulysses |
Feb-05-09 07:21 PM |
#30 |
| -
I don't see how being professional is "disarming." |
ColbertWatcher |
Feb-05-09 07:42 PM |
#35 |
| -
I don't think you understand what we're up against. |
ulysses |
Feb-05-09 07:48 PM |
#36 |
| -
You assume I don't because I'm not agreeing with you. I'm done here. n/t |
ColbertWatcher |
Feb-05-09 07:57 PM |
#37 |
| -
no. |
ulysses |
Feb-05-09 08:14 PM |
#38 |
| -
Correct me if I'm wrong . |
Why Syzygy |
Feb-05-09 06:33 PM |
#5 |
| -
Everything has to be "post-partisan" since the Republics are not in the majority. |
Bluebear |
Feb-05-09 06:33 PM |
#6 |
| -
after all, they're nice fellows who'd treat us the same were the tables turned. |
ulysses |
Feb-05-09 06:38 PM |
#12 |
| -
Isn't that the truth. |
Bluebear |
Feb-05-09 06:38 PM |
#14 |
| -
I agree although |
nevergiveup |
Feb-05-09 06:35 PM |
#8 |
| -
I think our new President is learning... |
ohtransplant |
Feb-05-09 06:36 PM |
#9 |
| -
it's funny, but I seem to remember a time, not so long ago, |
ulysses |
Feb-05-09 06:45 PM |
#21 |
| -
It seems he's getting the express version of the same lesson. |
ohtransplant |
Feb-05-09 06:50 PM |
#24 |
| -
Are the rethuglicans "post partisan"?? |
madinmaryland |
Feb-05-09 06:37 PM |
#11 |
| -
none of his picks have been post partisan |
JFN1 |
Feb-05-09 06:41 PM |
#17 |
| -
*cough* Judd Gregg *cough* deal to replace with Repuke *cough* |
ulysses |
Feb-05-09 06:42 PM |
#19 |
| -
Is that like being post-modern? nt |
valerief |
Feb-05-09 07:32 PM |
#31 |
| -
post-modernism is a barrel of shit too. |
ulysses |
Feb-05-09 07:33 PM |
#32 |
| -
Hey, I gave it to you on platter! nt |
valerief |
Feb-05-09 07:34 PM |
#33 |
| -
and I appreciate it! |
ulysses |
Feb-05-09 07:36 PM |
#34 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread