You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #72: I couldn't find it, but apparently someone else did. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #47
72. I couldn't find it, but apparently someone else did.
"Senators, on a voice vote, approved an amendment requiring the Buy American provisions be "applied in a manner consistent with U.S. obligations under international agreements ."

"The United States has made commitments under the North American Free Trade Agreement and the World Trade Organization to provide trading partners such as Canada , Mexico, Japan and the EU with access to its government procurement market and has received similar commitments in exchange."

"The change gives Canada , Mexico, the European Union and certain other major trading partners some comfort they would be exempted from a strict requirement in the bill that all public works projects funded by the stimulus package use only U.S. -made iron, steel and manufactured goods."

http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE5135MN20090...

Certainly NAFTA does not require that "US stimulus dollars go to Canada". It only requires that Americans and Canadians be treated equally in the bidding of government procurement contracts (yes, even the stimulus) except in the case of iron and steel used in transportation infrastructure projects which is exempted under the 1982 Buy America Act. It sounds now like even that exemption, based on the quote above, may be removed so that Canada can bid on the iron and steel used in stimulus projects, as well.

I am a lousy treaty reader (so don't ask me to look through it again :) ), but there must be some good ones working in DC, Ottawa and elsewhere, because they found what I couldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC