You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #76: interesting but unconvincing [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
sloane Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-28-09 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
76. interesting but unconvincing
I have yet to read something that really convinces me that negative rumors about Caroline were started in Patterson's office, rather than by any of (lots) of people/reporters who didn't support her bid for the Senate, for what could be a whole variety of (legitimate) reasons.

I appreciate that this piece reports actual facts regarding the Gilibrand-related contributions to Patterson's campaign, but I still don't find this line of reasoning convincing. For one thing--strategically, it makes some sense for Patterson to want to balance the borough-centric (exclusive) representation with someone from upstate (which is less blue). And I'm not sure how much $ is involved in gubernatorial campaigns, and 50k is by no means insignificant--but even without Kennedy giving any money directly to his campaign--had she been chosen Senator and been supportive of him, this very fact could easily have gained him far more and possibly larger contributions to his campaign, from people who were supportive of her and, by extension, came to support his bid for election. Furthermore...money aside, the Kennedy "brand" would be an asset to him and have a PR value that would be hard to quantify or place a monetary value on--but by any estimate, it would be worth far more than 50K. , David Alexrod is quoted as having said (the night before Super Tuesday): "As for Caroline’s endorsement, someone said to me she’s the purest brand in American public life.”

I don't know enough about Patterson to have strong feelings about him one way or the other, and I'm willing to accept that he may (or may not) have been set against Kennedy toward the end, at least--but if so, I think his motivations must have been much different than what's outlined here.

On his marketing blog, John Tantillo analyzed Caroline's candidacy from a branding position just before the new year--predicting that she would not only be Senator but also the first female President.

I wonder if she's out for good or will throw her hat in the ring again later...perhaps after a lot of work with a speech coach?

http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2008/12/31/caroline-kennedy--a-brand-that-will-be-president-2.aspx:">Tantillo's full post on the Caroline Kennedy brand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC