Reply #22: 1. Larisa's account is a response to your reporting so how do you figure "Larisa must have assumed

[Garbo 2004]

Heather would not talk to another reporter..." when your article cites Heather and predates Larisa's response to your published article?

2. Who is "Brett Kimberland" cited in your article? Perhaps you meant "Brett Kimberlin:" http://www.newprogressivecoalition.com/node/4355
You and your editor are not issuing a correction on that?

3. Since when is it sound, ethical journalistic practice to not bother to try to get the "other side of the story" because you decided in advance the person's account could not be "trusted for accuracy?" Based on what? Your own judgment? Your own bias? Is this the Judy Miller school of journalism?

4. Your condescension would be amusing considering your youth...but the quality of your reporting doesn't warrant such evident smug self-satisfaction.