You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: No, [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. No,
no plants should be regulated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Should tobacco be regulated under the FDA Winterblues  Jan-13-09 03:12 PM   #0 
  - I don't know. I hope it does. It kills.  roguevalley   Jan-13-09 03:16 PM   #1 
  - So does breathing...  Ghost in the Machine   Jan-13-09 04:25 PM   #14 
     - sigh  roguevalley   Jan-13-09 04:28 PM   #17 
        - OMG!!! Sighing can kill too!!!  Ghost in the Machine   Jan-13-09 04:40 PM   #21 
  - No.  NaturalHigh   Jan-13-09 03:20 PM   #2 
  - yes: but only if marijuana is put in a less restricted class.  endarkenment   Jan-13-09 03:21 PM   #3 
  - Only interstate commerce in tobacco should be regulated  slackmaster   Jan-13-09 03:27 PM   #4 
  - They'll have to amend the constitution  Warpy   Jan-13-09 03:40 PM   #5 
  - Nicotine itself has long been manipulated by tobacco companies.  damntexdem   Jan-13-09 04:26 PM   #15 
  - No,  Mojorabbit   Jan-13-09 03:41 PM   #6 
  - Damn straight!  gratuitous   Jan-13-09 03:45 PM   #8 
  - I was thinking more of bans  Mojorabbit   Jan-13-09 11:04 PM   #24 
  - Yes, products, including food, should be and generally are regulated.  damntexdem   Jan-13-09 04:27 PM   #16 
  - With the End Result Being What?  NeedleCast   Jan-13-09 03:44 PM   #7 
  - Yes, actually. Tobacco Additives.  NYC_SKP   Jan-13-09 04:15 PM   #10 
     - Honestly I don't have much of a problem with that  NeedleCast   Jan-13-09 04:21 PM   #12 
        - I fear you're right about it being a first step.  NYC_SKP   Jan-13-09 04:34 PM   #19 
  - It's already regulated.  backscatter712   Jan-13-09 04:14 PM   #9 
  - It's sale and distribution is regulated (taxes vary by state) but not the chemicals.  NYC_SKP   Jan-13-09 04:15 PM   #11 
  - Yes, it should. Nicotine has for decades been manipulated by cigarette producers.  damntexdem   Jan-13-09 04:23 PM   #13 
  - No  RGBolen   Jan-13-09 04:33 PM   #18 
  - YES nt  JerseygirlCT   Jan-13-09 04:36 PM   #20 
  - Yes  wuushew   Jan-13-09 04:41 PM   #22 
  - That would be another step toward tobacco prohibition, so no.  High Plains   Jan-13-09 04:59 PM   #23 
  - Anything that leads to smokers being upset is something I will happily embrace. nt  Occam Bandage   Jan-13-09 11:08 PM   #25 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC