You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: There was no election, so there will be no returns to judge [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. There was no election, so there will be no returns to judge
The only other thing to judge will be his qualifications. As long as he is 30 years old, a citizen for at least nine years, and a resident of the state he represents he is qualified.

In 1969 The US Supreme Court ruled in Powell v. McCormack that someone who meets the constitutional requirements cannot be excluded. The only option the Senate has is to try to expel him, which would require a 2/3 vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC