You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #83: did any of the repubs even read the letter, if we accept there will be no more inteviews [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-22-07 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #73
83. did any of the repubs even read the letter, if we accept there will be no more inteviews
Such interviews may cover, and would be limited to, the subject of (a) communications between the White House and persons outside the White House concerning the request for resignations of the U.S. attorneys in question; and (b) communications between the White House and members of Congress concerning those requests. Those interviews should be conducted by both committees jointly. Questioning of White House officials would be conducted by a member or limited number of members, who would be accompanied by committee staff. Such interviews would be private and conducted without the need for an oath, transcript, subsequent testimony, or the subsequent issuance of subpoenas. A representative of the Office of the Counsel to the President would attend these interviews and personal counsel to the invited officials may be present at their election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Anyone watching the Senate regarding the vote on subpoenas? Solly Mack  Mar-22-07 09:21 AM   #0 
  - Judd Gregg (R) is talking about healthcare on cspan2  skooooo   Mar-22-07 09:27 AM   #1 
  - C-Span radio  blogslut   Mar-22-07 09:29 AM   #2 
  - Thank you!!!!!  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 09:31 AM   #4 
  - thank you  maddezmom   Mar-22-07 09:32 AM   #7 
  - Sessions - gag me (sorry, wrong place)  LizW   Mar-22-07 10:22 AM   #92 
  - The Judiciary Comm. website doesn't have a link to see this hearing.  cspanlovr   Mar-22-07 09:30 AM   #3 
  - See blogslut 's post above. C-SPAN Radio is carrying the audio  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 09:32 AM   #5 
  - Webcast link not working. nt  zanne   Mar-22-07 09:32 AM   #6 
  - "Placing someone under oath connotes subservience"  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 09:36 AM   #8 
  - Where are you getting this?  zanne   Mar-22-07 09:38 AM   #9 
  - I can't either. n/t  cali   Mar-22-07 09:39 AM   #10 
  - I'm using C-SPAN radio from the link in blogsluts' post (above)  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 09:40 AM   #12 
     - Thank you!  WinkyDink   Mar-22-07 09:45 AM   #17 
        - See below post with link  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 09:47 AM   #19 
  - OK. It was John Kyl saying that crap  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 09:39 AM   #11 
  - Kyl said that crap? WTF? Someone send him to Civics 101.  Roland99   Mar-22-07 09:48 AM   #21 
  - What a dumbass. n/t  redqueen   Mar-22-07 09:55 AM   #36 
  - Damn straight. Subservience to the Constitution of the U.S. and our legal system.  Straight Shooter   Mar-22-07 10:02 AM   #48 
  - Kyle taking issue with the suggestion USA were removed to prevent  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 09:42 AM   #13 
  - Every US Attorney in the country is investigating some political corruption?  Sydnie   Mar-22-07 09:43 AM   #14 
  - Yes he did  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 09:44 AM   #16 
  - eom  OmmmSweetOmmm   Mar-22-07 09:44 AM   #15 
  - Thank you bunches!!!!!  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 09:45 AM   #18 
     - Your welcome! I have found that will often have a video  OmmmSweetOmmm   Mar-22-07 09:49 AM   #23 
        - I'll hafta remember that...and will. Thanks again!!!!  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 09:54 AM   #34 
  - Oh THANK YOU!  Norquist Nemesis   Mar-22-07 09:47 AM   #20 
  - This needs a few K/Rs  Norquist Nemesis   Mar-22-07 09:48 AM   #22 
  - I wish I had known about it MUCH earlier.  WinkyDink   Mar-22-07 09:50 AM   #26 
     - Me too! I caught it after it had already started :(  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 09:51 AM   #27 
  - Radio connection sucks, keep getting booted off  48percenter   Mar-22-07 09:50 AM   #24 
  - Try the link - live video at the top of the page  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 09:53 AM   #31 
     - I got it!! Thanks!  48percenter   Mar-22-07 09:56 AM   #38 
  - Specter trying to do a deal ... we need to flood his office  Sydnie   Mar-22-07 09:50 AM   #25 
  - I agree!  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 09:52 AM   #28 
  - I wouldn't take any offer that Specter has worked on  maddezmom   Mar-22-07 09:54 AM   #35 
  - I'll get my mom to call, he's her Senator. n/t  48percenter   Mar-22-07 10:01 AM   #44 
  - Arlen Spectre is being a dick...  annabanana   Mar-22-07 09:52 AM   #29 
  - You mean the President would purposely mislead us?  Sydnie   Mar-22-07 09:53 AM   #30 
  - I'm still chuckling over it  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 09:53 AM   #33 
  - ROFL! Leahy to Spector: You mean that the President would purposefully  Norquist Nemesis   Mar-22-07 09:53 AM   #32 
  - Ah--FINALLY I got the CBS site to work! Thank you!!  WinkyDink   Mar-22-07 09:55 AM   #37 
  - Thanks for the links everyone. You are the best! eom.  Purveyor   Mar-22-07 09:57 AM   #39 
  - Orrin "Uriah Heep" Hatch whining on and on and on.  TahitiNut   Mar-22-07 09:57 AM   #40 
  - Hatch blah blahing- saying Justice has agreed to produce their people  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 09:58 AM   #41 
  - Thanks for letting us know  cali   Mar-22-07 10:01 AM   #46 
     - You're welcome, cali!!!  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 10:03 AM   #49 
  - Orrin Hatch is a woosie. Now the cons have no backbone.  48percenter   Mar-22-07 09:58 AM   #42 
  - We need to go back and see how each of these repugs handled  Sydnie   Mar-22-07 10:00 AM   #43 
  - Leahy speaking on how after a closed door briefing, he reads something in the press  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 10:01 AM   #45 
  - Hatch desperately trying to rollover and have the WH rub his tummy  Norquist Nemesis   Mar-22-07 10:02 AM   #47 
  - LOL! Well put!!  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 10:04 AM   #50 
  - Feinstein pointing out 18-day gap!  keithjx   Mar-22-07 10:05 AM   #51 
  - Yep!  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 10:06 AM   #52 
  - Video Link !!!! In case anyone needs the direct link  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 10:06 AM   #53 
  - super, thanks  maddezmom   Mar-22-07 10:08 AM   #54 
  - Di-Fi is saying we can't get at the truth without getting on record  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 10:09 AM   #55 
  - R - Coburn  keithjx   Mar-22-07 10:11 AM   #56 
  - All the "important" work that they need to do related DIRECTLY to  annabanana   Mar-22-07 10:13 AM   #64 
  - What is the ratio of D's to R's on this subcommittee--and is this vote  wienerdoggie   Mar-22-07 10:12 AM   #57 
  - It should be 2 more D's than R's  Norquist Nemesis   Mar-22-07 10:13 AM   #63 
     - Good --thanks!  wienerdoggie   Mar-22-07 10:14 AM   # 
  - tom coburn is an ass like our other senator, inhofe  madokie   Mar-22-07 10:12 AM   #58 
  - Reminds me of "Ruprecht" :"Oklahoma! Oklahoma! Oklahoma!"  WinkyDink   Mar-22-07 10:14 AM   #67 
  - remember the good old days when clintons BJ was on every channel?  leftchick   Mar-22-07 10:12 AM   #59 
  - Funny, Coburn brings up the case of Ark saying 'it was to give  Norquist Nemesis   Mar-22-07 10:12 AM   #60 
  - What's with this Republic yapping now about how people don't want Congress to  WinkyDink   Mar-22-07 10:12 AM   #61 
  - Why are none of these Democrats countering with WH trying to skirt the Senate approval process?  48percenter   Mar-22-07 10:13 AM   #62 
  - Clinton's BJ all the time definitely was NOT high school...  keithjx   Mar-22-07 10:14 AM   #65 
  - ....missed the name but they said....  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 10:14 AM   #66 
  - Leahy wants to vote now, Coburn hypocrite, CONS did this to Clinton  48percenter   Mar-22-07 10:15 AM   # 
  - Did Coburn just conflate this issue with Anna Nicole?  annabanana   Mar-22-07 10:15 AM   #68 
  - yes  leftchick   Mar-22-07 10:16 AM   #71 
  - Thank God for Tom Coburn!!! Without him, I'd never be able to figure  Norquist Nemesis   Mar-22-07 10:15 AM   #69 
  - Teddy is cutting to the criminal chase. HAHAHAHA!!! About calling off  WinkyDink   Mar-22-07 10:17 AM   #74 
  - OMG. Comparing this issue with the media fixation on ANS. What a MORON.  WinkyDink   Mar-22-07 10:15 AM   #70 
  - FINALLY , . . Kennedy!  annabanana   Mar-22-07 10:16 AM   #72 
  - The interfering with the Justice Dept career people...n/t  annabanana   Mar-22-07 10:17 AM   #76 
  - Coburn says we should try out Fielding's offer.  keithjx   Mar-22-07 10:17 AM   #73 
  - Political playbook: Get Dems to accept Fielding's offer, then call them wussies  Norquist Nemesis   Mar-22-07 10:19 AM   #81 
  - did any of the repubs even read the letter, if we accept there will be no more inteviews  maddezmom   Mar-22-07 10:19 AM   #83 
  - Teddy bringing up the tobacco case interference  leftchick   Mar-22-07 10:17 AM   #75 
  - Fucking FINALLY, Kennedy says 'they made this guy a US attorney without senate approval'  48percenter   Mar-22-07 10:18 AM   #77 
  - Yes. To me, that is the most relevant issue. So glad for this string!!!  sicksicksick_N_tired   Mar-22-07 10:23 AM   #93 
  - Thanks so much for starting this thread.  seasonedblue   Mar-22-07 10:19 AM   #78 
  - Thank you and everyone else for tuning in and posting!!!!!  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 10:20 AM   #84 
  - The GALL of that Bushie just now, to say politics shouldn't over-ride policy!! Tell your CULT-LEADER  WinkyDink   Mar-22-07 10:19 AM   #79 
  - Exactly! It shouldn't, but it does when it comes to the WH and  Norquist Nemesis   Mar-22-07 10:24 AM   #100 
  - Kennedy speaking and talking about how political appointees  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 10:19 AM   #80 
  - They are waking Teddy up.  keithjx   Mar-22-07 10:19 AM   #82 
  - Sessions is speaking now... then the vote...n/t  annabanana   Mar-22-07 10:21 AM   #85 
  - Sounds like the vote will split on party line  cali   Mar-22-07 10:23 AM   #95 
  - The vote!!! Oh, wait...another Con has something to say.  Norquist Nemesis   Mar-22-07 10:21 AM   #86 
  - LOL  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 10:22 AM   #88 
  - Yay! They are finally goingto vote!  youthere   Mar-22-07 10:21 AM   #87 
  - Specter wants to vote, Leahy moves to vote, Sessions whines...  48percenter   Mar-22-07 10:22 AM   #89 
  - Sessions is coming....  keithjx   Mar-22-07 10:22 AM   #90 
  - ewwww! n/t  Norquist Nemesis   Mar-22-07 10:23 AM   #94 
  - The vote will be called before the Senators return to the floor...  annabanana   Mar-22-07 10:22 AM   #91 
  - What feed are you on??  keithjx   Mar-22-07 10:23 AM   #97 
     - CSpan radio. . n/t  annabanana   Mar-22-07 10:25 AM   #102 
        - thx. n/t  keithjx   Mar-22-07 10:26 AM   #109 
  - LOL "That's why we need transcripts"  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 10:23 AM   #96 
  - Oh shut the hell up Sessions.  youthere   Mar-22-07 10:24 AM   #98 
  - You just read my mind. Blah blah blah nauseum  OmmmSweetOmmm   Mar-22-07 10:26 AM   #107 
  - (appplause for transcript requirements - alluding to a little  annabanana   Mar-22-07 10:24 AM   #99 
  - Ha! Schumer just interjected, "That's why we need transcripts." Making these Republics look like  WinkyDink   Mar-22-07 10:25 AM   #101 
  - Someone should ask Sessions what happened to his  Norquist Nemesis   Mar-22-07 10:25 AM   #103 
  - Sessions "let's avoid conflict"  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 10:25 AM   #104 
  - But, but, aren't THEY the strong and brave men??  WinkyDink   Mar-22-07 10:26 AM   #106 
  - Fine! He can skip the hearing then! n/t  Norquist Nemesis   Mar-22-07 10:26 AM   #108 
  - Sessions wants to avoid confrontation  48percenter   Mar-22-07 10:26 AM   #105 
  - Confrontation.... or investigation?  Skidmore   Mar-22-07 10:27 AM   #111 
  - WHAT ARE THEY HIDING!  helderheid   Mar-22-07 10:27 AM   #112 
  - Oh, here it comes: The Democrats are just ANGRY, looking for REVENGE.  WinkyDink   Mar-22-07 10:27 AM   #113 
  - See Political Playbook manual in Post #81 n/t  Norquist Nemesis   Mar-22-07 10:28 AM   #115 
  - Sessions??? Emotions????  OmmmSweetOmmm   Mar-22-07 10:27 AM   #114 
  - How the hell do they know if it's a criminal case  seasonedblue   Mar-22-07 10:26 AM   #110 
  - "Curiosity isn't over-ride E .Privilege."  WinkyDink   Mar-22-07 10:28 AM   #118 
  - Yo, Sessions!  helderheid   Mar-22-07 10:28 AM   #116 
  - Session is interminable. . . "curiosity is not enough". .blech  annabanana   Mar-22-07 10:28 AM   #117 
  - Sessions "Curiosity isn't enough"  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 10:28 AM   #119 
  - Schumer: "Why no transcripts?" Sessions: "I don't know."  WinkyDink   Mar-22-07 10:30 AM   #123 
  - Hey Solly, thread #2 please, official?  48percenter   Mar-22-07 10:29 AM   #120 
  - OPPS!!! My bad...I did. Thanks!!!!  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 10:32 AM   #129 
  - What is the justification for "no transcript?" - Schumer  annabanana   Mar-22-07 10:29 AM   #121 
  - "What is the justification for no transcript?" (Schumer)  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 10:30 AM   #122 
  - oh god, please do not tell me these guys are setting these crimes  alyce douglas   Mar-22-07 10:31 AM   #124 
  - They KNOW no transcript isn't satisfactory! What bullshit!  youthere   Mar-22-07 10:31 AM   #125 
  - *What* subpoenas?  BlooInBloo   Mar-22-07 10:32 AM   #126 
  - New thread started!!!!!! Thread 2 link below  Solly Mack   Mar-22-07 10:32 AM   #127 
  - Brownback: let's just hold up for a couple of weeks  LizW   Mar-22-07 10:32 AM   #128 
  - "The passions of the moment"FUCK YOU TOO Brownbeck.  youthere   Mar-22-07 10:33 AM   #130 
  - I just can't believe that all of the Repukes are such whores. Where is their sense of Justice?  OmmmSweetOmmm   Mar-22-07 10:33 AM   #131 
  - The Vote! - the ayes have it!  annabanana   Mar-22-07 10:33 AM   #132 
  - Subpoenas are Authorized!!!!! eom  OmmmSweetOmmm   Mar-22-07 10:34 AM   #133 
  - LOL! Grassley wants record to reflect he voted "Aye"  Norquist Nemesis   Mar-22-07 10:34 AM   #134 
  - Brownback -  seasonedblue   Mar-22-07 10:34 AM   #135 
  - Locking.  Fenris   Mar-22-07 11:47 AM   #136 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC