Reply #50: Your response says a lot

[Truth Teller]

I'm not anyone's sock puppet. This is my only account here. I've posted about many issues, including the Connell bullshit. I've challenged many posters on it, not just you.

But you assume I'm part of a larger conspiracy to discredit you. That tells me you're prone to assuming hidden conspiracies where there are no facts to support it.

My point was, you refer to preliminary NTSB information and don't question it. When they make their final report, will you respect it? If they rule it an accident, will you then suggest they are part of a broader conspiracy, rather than admit you were wrong?

And can we at least be intellectually honest enough to agree your motivation in pursuing the story is to raise doubt, not simply report the facts down the middle?